Tag: Thomas Dimitroff (Page 2 of 3)

Roddy White should show more humility

Roddy White deserves to be paid like a No. 1 receiver – he just doesn’t deserve to be paid like Larry Fitzgerald.

White, the Falcons best receiver and top playmaker, is currently in holdout mode in hopes of getting a new contract. He’s in the final year of his rookie deal that will pay him $2.28 million this season and if he can’t reach a contract agreement with the Falcons, he’ll be a restricted free agent next year since the owners are opting out of the collective bargaining agreement. (2010 is heading for an uncapped year.)

Last season, White hauled in 88 passes for 1,382 yards and seven touchdowns while helping to lead Atlanta to a miraculous playoff appearance. But when the Falcons opened their doors for training camp last Friday, White was nowhere to be found and is reportedly working out on his own in Alabama. Making matters worse for the Falcons, they just lost slot receiver Harry Douglas (who has been subbing for White during the holdout) for the season after he tore his ACL on Wednesday.

According to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, contract talks between White and the Falcons have soured, with GM Thomas Dimitroff indicating that the holdout could go deep into camp. With White seeking a deal similar to what Fitz got (four years, $40 million), the Falcons may soon pull their offer off the table and make Roddy play out the final year of his contract.

This situation could have been avoided had White and his agent showed a little more trust and humility from the start. While White certainly has put up fantastic numbers these past two seasons (171 receptions, 2,584 yards, 13 TDs), he also shorted the Falcons during the first two years of his contract when he only caught 59 passes for a messily 952 yards and three touchdowns.

Continue reading »

Are the Falcons interested in Tony Gonzalez?

According to the National Football Post, the Falcons are interested in trading for Chiefs’ tight end Tony Gonzalez.

Lombardi reports that the Falcons may be willing to give up their second round draft pick (#55 overall) in order to obtain the services of Gonzalez.

The move makes sense as Justin Peelle, the Falcons top tight end target from 2008, caught only 15 passes for 159 yards and 2 touchdowns in 16 games last season.

Meanwhile, Gonzalez is coming off another Pro Bowl season in which he hauled in 96 receptions for 1,058 yards and 10 touchdowns.

More on this story as it develops.

If you’re looking for a connection, Atlanta’s GM is Thomas Dimitroff, who used to be the Director of College Scouting for the Patriots under former New England general manager and now current Kansas City GM Scott Pioli.

But even with that connection, this rumor is still a little far-fetched. None of the major media outlets have had anything to say about a possible trade and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports that so far, there’s ‘nothing concrete about the rumor.’

Yes, the Falcons do want to give a pass-catching tight end to quarterback Matt Ryan. But to give up a second round pick for Gonzo is a steep price when you consider how many holes Atlanta has on the defensive side of the ball. The Falcons haven’t been major players in free agency this offseason, instead choosing to wait for the draft to fill their needs. It’s unlikely that Dimitroff would give up his second round pick when there are pressing holes at linebacker, defensive tackle, safety and defensive end. I’m not saying it wouldn’t be a good trade, it’s just seems a little unrealistic at this point.

Did the Falcons snub Keith Brooking?

So I’m watching ESPN News the other day and this scrolls at the bottom of the screen: Falcons sign LB Mike Peterson.

Not a bad move.

Considering they lost Keith Brooking and Michael Boley to other teams in free agency, the Falcons were in desperate need of linebackers and Peterson is familiar with head coach Mike Smith and defensive coordinator Brian VanGorder from their days in Jacksonville. Plus, Peterson surely came cheaper than Brooking, which was part of the reason Atlanta GM Thomas Dimitroff allowed him to walk when he became a free agent last week. (Brooking wanted to re-sign with Atlanta, but eventually signed a three-year, $6 million contract with the Cowboys when it was clear the Falcons wanted to go in another direction.)

Then I read the details of Peterson’s contract: Two years, $6.5 million.

So the Falcons didn’t want Brooking back because he’s a 33-year old linebacker with deteriorating skills and is weak in coverage. Yet they signed Peterson (for more money mind you), who is a 32-year old linebacker with deteriorating skills, is weak in coverage and was suspended one game for pissing off his head coach (Jack Del Rio) last season?

Ooooookay.

I’m not criticizing the Falcons for allowing Brooking to walk. His best days are clearly in the rear view mirror (see the Falcons’ playoff game against the Cardinals last year as proof) and he wasn’t going to be part of the long-term picture in Atlanta even if the team did re-sign him. But he would have given his left testicle to the Falcons at the drop of a hat and throughout his entire career he never complained once despite being asked to play multiple linebacker positions in multiple schemes.

Nothing against Peterson, but he’s probably only a small upgrade over Brooking at this stage of his career, yet the Falcons were willing to hand him more money (not a lot more money, but more money nevertheless). I get that Peterson has ties to Smith and maybe he’ll be rejuvenated after reuniting with a familiar face, but were those ties greater than the ones that Brooking had with the Falcons? (Brooking played 11 seasons in Atlanta, led the team in tackles for most of those years and was the last member of the 1998 Super Bowl team.)

In the end, this won’t be an issue. Brooking would never say the Falcons snubbed him (they did hold a fair-well presser for him after all) and truth be told, both linebackers will probably be backups in 2010 anyway. But I just found it a little interesting that Atlanta wanted to revamp the defense (and maybe they still will by adding young linebackers via the draft), so they let Brooking walk and give more money to a similar player to take his spot.

GM Carl Peterson done in Kansas City

Chiefs fans got an early Christmas present Monday night when it was reported that general manager Carl Peterson will resign at the end of the season.

Kansas City Chiefs Chairman Clark Hunt today announced that Carl Peterson will step down as President, General Manager and Chief Executive Officer at the end of the 2008 season.

“On behalf of my family and the entire Kansas City Chiefs organization, I want to thank Carl for his two decades of service to the Chiefs,” Hunt said. “Both Carl and I agreed that immediately initiating the search for the next Chiefs General Manager would be the best thing for the future of the organization, and he will be resigning following the 2008 season.”

Peterson joined the Chiefs in 1989, and guided the club through one of the most successful eras in its history. During his 20 years at the helm, the Chiefs amassed a 176-141-1 record, won the AFC West four times and reached the AFC Championship Game in 1993.

Hunt said the search for a new General Manager will begin immediately. Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Denny Thum will serve as the Chiefs interim President and General Manager.

Chiefs fans have to appreciate what Peterson did in the 90s, because he did construct some solid teams. That said, his moves of late have been disastrous and his unwillingness to fix the offensive line over the years has doomed this team’s chances of survival. The Dolphins and Falcons turned their fortunes around in just one season and they did so by first hiring quality football men in the front office (Bill Parcells and Thomas Dimitroff, respectively). The Chiefs can do the same thing, but it all starts with Clark Hunt finding the right GM to rebuild through the draft.

Four ways to turn an NFL team around in one offseason

John HarbaughEach year the NFL provides examples of how teams can rise from the basement to the penthouse in just one offseason. 2008 is no different, as the Ravens, Falcons, Dolphins and Jets have all won as many games this year as they did all of last season.

Here are four ways NFL teams can turn around their misfortune in just one offseason along examples from the 2008 season.

1. Get a strong, football-minded front office person to construct the team.
2008 Example: Miami Dolphins
It’s safe to say at this point that Bill Parcells knows what he’s doing. He’s won everywhere he’s gone and it would have been naïve to think he wouldn’t turn around the Dolphins at some point. But the fact that he’s done it this quickly is remarkable and speaks volumes for how necessary it is for teams to have good front office people in place to run the day-to-day operations. Parcells is a football-minded guy and he can judge talent. He parted ways with long-time veterans Zach Thomas and Jason Taylor because he knew they weren’t going to play key roles in Miami’s future. Sure the Dolphins lost veteran talent, but they also were focused on moving forward. Parcells also went out and found a competent quarterback in Chad Pennington and drafted a franchise left tackle in Jake Long. Now the Fish can compete on a weekly basis, unlike last season when they were dead in the water (no pun intended) before games even started. Teams can’t win if their front office makes huge draft mistakes and can’t fit individual pieces into one big puzzle. Credit the Dolphins for spending big on a proven winner in Parcells. They might not make the playoffs this year, but they’re competing again and soon enough, the postseason will become a reality.

2. Find a head coach who understands the fundamentals and basics.
2008 Example: Baltimore Ravens
When John Harbaugh was hired by the Ravens this offseason, it certainly didn’t turn a lot of heads or make big headlines. He wasn’t the hottest NFL coordinator or a big name college coach, but he did come from a franchise in Philadelphia that understands that winning football games comes down to understanding fundamentals and basics. Fans and pundits get lost in big free agent signings, “Wildcat” formations and gimmicky offenses, but football games are won when teams don’t turn the ball over, limit their mistakes and play physical. Baltimore isn’t a flashy team, but they’ve gotten back to the basics under Harbaugh and now are once again contenders. They do the little things right and are now competing on weekly basis. The job Harbaugh has done with rookie quarterback Joe Flacco has been amazing as well, because overall, the young man hasn’t looked overwhelmed very much this season and appears confident. That’s a testament to Harbaugh and his coaching staff for knowing how to handle a rookie quarterback and not falling into the pitfalls that most teams do with rookie signal callers.

Matt Ryan3. Find a quarterback.
2008 Example: Atlanta Falcons
Not everything is about the quarterback. There are 53 players on a roster and all 53 of those players have a role in whether or not a team wins on Sunday. But you can’t consistently win with poor quarterback play. People like to criticize Rex Grossman the year the Bears went to the Super Bowl, but the fact of the matter is that he made plays throughout the season. The Falcons were criticized for passing on Glenn Dorsey in this year’s draft to take a gamble on Matt Ryan. Then they were criticized for naming Ryan the starter in preseason. But new GM Thomas Dimitroff and head coach Mike Smith saw something special in Ryan and knew that he had the maturity to suffer the ups and downs that rookie quarterbacks go through. And outside of some accuracy issues, Ryan has been nothing short of phenomenal. He has won the respect of his teammates and coaches, is already coming through in the clutch and perhaps most importantly, has put the Michael Vick era to rest. The Falcons did a lot of things right this offseason, but none was bigger than drafting a franchise quarterback they can hopefully lean on for years to come.

4. Find the missing piece.
2008 Example: New York Jets
Things haven’t all been good for Brett Favre in New York, but there’s no question he has lit a spark under a franchise that desperately needed one. Nothing against Chad Pennington, but even at this point in his career, Favre can do more things on a football field than most quarterbacks. He takes risks that sometimes blow up in his face, but more times than not, those risks turn into big rewards and he’s made the Jets more unpredictable this year on offense. Teammates rally around Favre and want to play for him because when it’s crunch time and the game is on the line, they know he’s done it all before. The Jets haven’t had that in a quarterback for some time and while Pennington deserves more credit for his play than he got in New York, Favre has filled a huge void for that franchise. Sometimes all a team needs is one piece. If the Jets make the playoffs this year, Favre won’t be the only reason but he would certainly have played a huge role.

I have to mention that all four of these teams have done well in the other categories, as well as the ones I specifically used them as examples in. The Dolphins and Falcons each have new head coaches that are turning out to be fantastic hires and Atlanta found a solid new GM in Dimitroff. The Ravens also look like they have found their quarterback of the future in Flacco and as previously mentioned, Parcells’ decision to sign Pennington looks like a smart one.

Granted, these aren’t the only keys for a team turning things around. I made no mention of defense or offensive line, which are two gigantic things that play into the success of a NFL franchise. But nevertheless, these four moves are critical and they have meant so much to the teams that are playing well again this season.

« Older posts Newer posts »