Tag: Los Angeles Lakers (Page 5 of 48)

Your obligitory Carmelo trade talk update

Denver Nuggets forward Carmelo Anthony warms up at the Pepsi Center in Denver on November 16, 2010. UPI/Gary C. Caskey

And the beat goes on…

Fred Kerber of the New York Post writes that the Nets could soon reenter the fray.

But around the NBA, there is a strong undercurrent that the Nets, while idle now and certainly not viewed as favorites in the hunt, are anything but done if there indeed is a trade in the Carmelo Anthony saga.

Though multiple sources said there is nothing going on at present, there exists a growing feeling the Nuggets will contact the Nets again while playing the drama out until the Feb. 24 trading deadline.

I don’t know about this one. Mikhail Prokhorov had a meeting set up with Carmelo when he elected to instruct management to stop pursuing a trade with the Nuggets. Why would he start the saga again? What’s changed?

Meanwhile, the Denver Post is reporting that Carmelo may be willing to sign an extension with the Nuggets if he isn’t traded by the trade deadline.

Anthony said he would “take a real hard look” at signing a three-year, $65 million contract extension that has been on the table since June if he is not dealt by the Feb. 24 trading deadline.

The team’s all-star said he hasn’t heard any updates from management about a possible trade, though team officials are talking to potential suitors throughout the league. Though Anthony has always said he was keeping his options open, he hadn’t talked publicly about possibly signing until Wednesday.

“As the days go on, that’s something that I think about, that nothing might happen, that I’ll be here, whether I have to deal with the free-agency market or re-sign the extension here with the Nuggets,” he said.

Asked specifically to clarify whether he might sign the extension if not traded, Anthony said, “Yeah.”

What? The Nuggets’ extension has been on the table for months and Carmelo has refused to sign it. Now that we’re just over two weeks away from the trade deadline, he’s suddenly willing to think about re-upping with Denver?

I don’t buy it. This has to be a ploy to get the Knicks (or Lakers) to step up and make a good trade offer. The Knicks may be sitting back thinking that they can get Carmelo as a free agent in the summer, but if he floats the idea that he may stay in Denver, it would encourage the Knicks to get something done now.

As for the rumored Carmelo/Bynum swap with the Lakers, Bynum isn’t thinking about it, per ESPN:

Bynum said that he has not been in contact with anyone within the Lakers organization about the possibility of being traded.

“I think they would [contact me] if it was more than a rumor,” Bynum said. “No one’s really said anything.”

Bynum has never been traded, so I’m not sure if his “they’d tell me” line of thinking is entirely accurate. Like anything else, management will wait as long as they can before informing a player/employee about something of this magnitude. They wouldn’t want to disrupt his morale until a move was definite.

But again, the Laker rumor was probably just a ploy by Anthony’s camp to encourage the Knicks to get something done. Of course, if I were Laker GM Mitch Kupchak, I’d trade Bynum for Anthony in a New York minute.

Rumors and innuendo are fun to discuss, but at this point, I just want something to happen so we can put Carmelo Anthony’s future to bed, at least for a while. I’ve said all along that the Nuggets should have traded him last summer instead of waiting until midseason when all the trade talk would become a distraction for the team. The Nuggets are just 30-23 and are in the #7 spot in the West. They’re on pace for 46 wins, and considering the franchise has been a 50-win team over the past three seasons, the rumor mill is clearly having a negative impact on the franchise.

Why won’t the Lakers give up Bynum to get Carmelo?

Denver Nuggets Carmelo Anthony and Los Angeles Lakers Kobe Bryant smile at each other to begin the second half at the Pepsi Center in Denver on November 11, 2010. The Nuggets ended the Lakers season opening eight game winning streak by the score of 118-112. UPI/Gary C. Caskey

Yahoo! Sports’ Adrian Wojnarowski tweeted that the Lakers aren’t planning to trade Andrew Bynum, even for Carmelo Anthony.

NY will work trade on its terms but knows it can get Melo in free agency. Anyway, Jim Buss has made it clear within org: Bynum is staying.

If I were a Laker fan (which I’m not), I’d be furious about the position that Buss is taking here. Furious.

I get it — Bynum is a good player when he’s healthy. But over the past four seasons, including the postseason, he has missed 172 of the Lakers’ 395 games (43.5%) due to issues with his knees. There are a few things I’ve learned about knee injuries over the years: 1) knee problems aren’t good for basketball players, 2) knee problems aren’t good for seven-footers and 3) knee problems don’t usually just go away.

The Lakers almost always finish games with Pau Gasol at center and Lamar Odom at small forward. So they’re unwilling to trade an injury-prone player (that they don’t even play in crunch time) for a 26-year-old, five time All-NBA performer?

Are they nuts?

The only — and I mean only — reason I can see for this inflexibility would be that the Lakers are expecting to see the Celtics again in the Finals. If healthy, Bynum would certainly help battle Shaq and Kendrick Perkins down low. But there are a few problems with this thinking: 1) the Lakers aren’t playing all that well right now and could use some new blood, 2) they will face stiff competition from the Spurs, Mavs and Thunder just to get out of the West, and 3) there’s a good chance that the Celtics don’t make the Finals, and the Lakers will instead face the Heat, the Bulls or even the Magic.

If it’s the Heat or Bulls, wouldn’t the Lakers much rather have Carmelo than Bynum? What about the Spurs, Mavs and Thunder? None of those teams have a true center that only Bynum could defend (unless you count Tim Duncan, whom I think Gasol could handle in a pinch). If the Lakers need another big man, I’m sure the Nuggets would include Nene or Chris Andersen at a reasonable price.

Of course, the Nuggets may not even want Bynum at this point, though if the Wilson Chandler/Corey Brewer package is the best offer they’re getting, I would think any package including Bynum would be better. There are rumors floating around that Carmelo’s camp leaked the supposed Nuggets/Lakers talks to get the Knicks to panic a little and up their offer. Someone close to Carmelo even said that he’d definitely re-up with the Lakers if he was traded there.

Hmmm…methinks there’s some gamesmanship afoot.

Regardless, if the Lakers can get a five-time All-NBA performer at the expense of a seven-footer with bad knees who doesn’t even finish games, I think they should do it.

To quote Kobe from a few years ago, “Are you kidding me? Ship his ass out.

Nuggets/Lakers talking Carmelo trade?

Los Angeles Laker’s Andrew Bynum poses for photos during the media day at the Lakers training facility in El Segundo, Ca., on September 25, 2010 (UPI Photo/Lori Shepler)

ESPN is reporting that the Lakers are willing to give up Andrew Bynum in a deal to acquire Carmelo Anthony.

The Lakers’ package would be built around center Andrew Bynum. Denver has no interest in Ron Artest and isn’t particularly interested in Lamar Odom either, sources said. A straight-up deal of Bynum for Anthony works financially, but there could be other players involved since Denver would look to shed more salary if possible.

The Lakers are an interesting landing spot for Carmelo because there’s a chance that he could re-sign there if the team were to play well after his arrival. L.A. is not New York, but it’s a metropolitan city and Anthony’s wife, LaLa Vasquez, could pursue her entertainment career there.

If I’m the Lakers, I do this deal in a New York minute (pun intended). I am not confident that Bynum will ever fully get past his knee issues, which seem more chronic than something he’ll eventually get over. They would lose some size, but Carmelo can play power forward and it would give the Lakers a star to build around once Kobe Bryant finally retires.

For the Nuggets, Bynum is a risk, but if he can get healthy and stay healthy, he’s a potential All-Star and is better than any of the players that the Knicks are currently offering. Like I said, I think he’ll be battling knee issues all his life, but I’m not a doctor and I’m not privy to his medical file. Maybe the Nuggets’ doctors take a look and decide it’s worth the risk. I would have to assume that’s the case if this deal eventually goes through.

I suspect the Lakers are one team that have the Knicks worried. Carmelo could get out to L.A., enjoy playing in the Finals and eventually decide to re-up.

Was McDyess’s tip-in goaltending?

Check out Antonio McDyess’s tip-in at the buzzer to beat the Lakers last night at Staples Center.

Was it goaltending? Lakers fans think so, but a quick read of the NBA’s goaltending rules leads me to believe that it wasn’t:

Section I-A Player Shall Not:
a. Touch the ball or the basket ring when the ball is using the basket ring as its lower base.
EXCEPTION: If a player near his own basket has his hand legally in contact with the ball, it is not a violation if his contact with the ball continues after the ball enters the cylinder, or if, in such action, he touches the basket.
b. Touch the ball when it is above the basket ring and within the imaginary cylinder.
c. For goaltending to occur, the ball, in the judgment of the official, must have a chance to score.

The view from the side shows that the ball was coming off, but I think it was still in the imaginary cylinder when McDyess’s hand touched it. However, as part “c.” states, if the official did not think it had a chance to score (which it didn’t), then it cannot be goaltending. This appears to supersede the fact that the ball may have been in the cylinder.

Spurs win.

Ron Artest is a master of the third person

On the heels of Marc Stein’s report that Ron Artest would like to be traded, FanHouse posted an interview with Ron Artest where Ron Artest talks about Ron Artest quite a bit. Here’s an excerpt:

FH: Break down last season compared to this one for me. What are the main differences for you?

RA: Last year I didn’t really know the offense that much. I realized this is (Bryant’s) team, so he really dominates the game a lot and I had to adjust my way of thinking. My whole summer before my first year as a Laker, I practiced spotting up. Even if I played with regular players in the street, I’d be a spot-up player because I knew Kobe was going to dominate the ball and I wanted to perfect my role. But then during the playoffs, I’d see how these teams be playing off me … and I’d mess up. I’m like, ‘A couple years ago, y’all were double-teaming me, and triple-teaming me,’ so I had to readjust.

The whole year I was going through a transition of getting comfortable, and then the playoffs came and, bam, the old Ron Artest came, the best one — where he locks up his player, where he locks up a former Finals MVP (in) Paul Pierce, he gets five steals, a couple rebounds and scores buckets. So this summer, it was different. I didn’t prepare to play a role. I prepared to play like Ron Artest played. And that’s to help my team.

So sometimes it’s uncomfortable a little bit because I can’t play how Ron Artest plays all the time, but I don’t quit. I don’t quit on my team. I still do what it takes to win. So even if I have two points, I’m so arrogant with my defense — because I already know my defense can change a game. So when people are saying, ‘Ron Artest is playing bad,’ I’m like, ‘No, I’m playing great. Just give me a chance and I’ll show you.’ That’s the difference. The difference this year is I’m definitely playing how Ron Artest is going to play.

His numbers may not be there this season, but Ron Artest is certainly working the third person for all it’s worth.

« Older posts Newer posts »