Page 632 of 2957

Which starter should the Giants throw in Game 1?

San Francisco Giants starting pitcher Tim Lincecum in the 2nd inning during the National League Championship Series at AT&T Park in San Francisco, on October 21, 2010. UPI/ Bob Larson Photo via Newscom

Tim Lincecum says he fully expects to start in Game 1 of the World Series Wednesday night against the Rangers. But after pitching in the 8th inning Saturday night against the Phillies in Game 6 of the NLCS, Giants’ manager Bruce Bochy has a tougher decision than people think.

By the time Wednesday rolls around, Matt Cain will have had a full week of rest after pitching in Game 3 of the NCLS last Tuesday. If the Giants were to throw him Game 1 of the Fall Classic, that would give Lincecum four days of rest if the Giants wanted to start him Game 2 on Thursday (and why wouldn’t they?).

But that would mean the Giants wouldn’t have their ace in Games 4 and 7 if they were facing an elimination game. If possible, clubs always want to throw their best pitcher Game 1, so that if they needed him later in the series he would be available. Lincecum only threw 16 pitches on Saturday and while he would be working on only three days rest, he should be fine to pitch the opening game.

That said, it’s not like Cain can’t get the job done. He’s proven to be one of the most underrated pitchers in baseball and after the Giants burned through their bullpen Saturday night thanks to Jonathan Sanchez’s dud performance (he lasted only two innings before being pulled), they could use a bull like Cain to throw seven or eight innings.

But it all comes back to throwing your ace in Game 1, which is why I think Bochy will inevitably tab Lincecum as his starter. If the Rangers pound him, then so be it. But the Giants need to have their ace available later in the series if need be. Guys can rest in December.

Delusional Childress blames refs for loss

Not only did Brad Childress (sort of) call out his quarterback for his poor decision-making, he complained ad nauseum about the officiating.

“That’s the worst officiated game I’ve seen,” Childress said during his postgame intervieew with KFAN. “That referee came over and apologized to me for not calling a hold on the scramble by [Packers quarterback Aaron] Rodgers. And I’ll tell you what, that’s his job. Protect the quarterback and look at the left tackle. Look at the left tackle hold his tail off.”

Childress also criticized the Loadholt penalty during his KFAN interview.

“The umpire standing on that side, they called a penalty, the guy hadn’t called a penalty all night long and then I don’t know if he got religion or what happened but Bruce whatever his name didn’t make a [expletive] call all night long,” Childress said. “Now we’re going to get a facemask. I mean c’mon now. C’mon.”

Said Loadholt: “I didn’t feel it. I couldn’t tell. I thought I had his shoulder and kept pushing him by. We just have to look at the film and see. They thought I did.”

Childress has a right to complain about the non-holding call, but the facemask was obvious. Obvious.

Below are a few screen captures of the facemask call. The first shows Loadholt’s hand in Matthews’ facemask…

The second shows Matthews’ helmet starting to turn…

Continue reading »

Childress considered removing Favre from Packer game

GREEN BAY, WI - OCTOBER 24: Brett Favre  of the Green Bay Packers reacts as Desmond Bishop  of the Green Bay Packers celebrates his interception for a touchdown at Lambeau Field on October 24, 2010 in Green Bay, Wisconsin. (Photo by Jim Prisching/Getty Images)

When you throw three interceptions that aid in the demise of your team, your head coach isn’t going to be very happy with you.

Brad Childress somewhat called out Brett Favre following the Vikings’ 28-24 loss on Sunday night to the Packers, a loss in which Lord Favre threw three interceptions and Minnesota had three touchdowns overturned by replay. Childress even admitted that he had considered removing Favre at one point.

From the Minnesota Star-Tribune:

“It still goes back to taking care of the football,” he said. “You can’t throw it to them. You’ve got to play within the confines of our system. Sometimes it’s OK to punt the football and you can’t give seven points going the other way. Not in a game like this. Not with a high-powered team.”

Childress said he considered removing Favre but he did not say if he had told Favre. “[I] was going to give him that next series and he took us and moved us down the field,” Childress said.

Childress has every right to complain about the play of his quarterback when his quarterback throws three interceptions that lead to a loss for his team. But this is vintage Brett Favre – he was throwing interceptions 10 years ago and he’s throwing interceptions now. When he’s under duress, he will force the issue, which leads to mistakes. Childress knows (or should know, anyway) exactly what he’s getting with Favre every time the QB takes the field.

My question is, if the guy is too hurt to play then why leave him in there? Favre has been battling an elbow injury for the past few weeks and now his surgically repaired ankle is bothering him again. Childress needs to make a decision: does he want Favre at 75% (or whatever) or Taravaris Jackson at 100%? There’s no question that Favre gives the Vikings their best chance to win when he’s healthy, but he’s not healthy. He’s never healthy actually, but he appears to be even more banged up than ever right now.

The point is to win. If Favre isn’t going to help the Vikings do that because he’s too hurt, then Childress needs to put the big boy pants on and get the 40-year-old out of there.

Fantasy Fallout, Week 7: Where Steve Johnson and Lee Evans blow up on your bench

BALTIMORE, MD - OCTOBER 24: Lee Evans  of the Buffalo Bills scores a touchdown against the Baltimore Ravens at M&T Bank Stadium on October 24, 2010 in Baltimore, Maryland. The Bills lead the Ravens at the half 24-20. (Photo by Larry French/Getty Images)

All right, I’m sure there are a few owners out there who had the cojones (or were desperate enough) to start Steve Johnson (8-158-1) and/or Lee Evans (6-108-3) in a very bad matchup against the league’s 3rd-ranked pass defense. The bottom line is that Ryan Fitzpatrick (374 yards, 4 TD, 2 INT) is a legit starter in the NFL, and he’s giving the Bills’ receivers chances to make plays. Fred Jackson (23 carries, 74 yards) out-touched C.J. Spiller (7 carries, 33 yards) yet again, and is the clear starter for the Bills.

For the Ravens, Anquan Boldin (6-92-1) had a predictably good game and was easily the Ravens’ most targeted (13) receiver. Derrick Mason (2-48) was only targeted three times, which is worrisome. Todd Heap (3-59-2) was targeted five times but scored twice. Ray Rice (16 carries, 72 yards) was a big disappointment in a terrific matchup. Willis McGahee (11 carries, 64 yards, TD) had the better fantasy line.

Is Roddy White (11-201-2) the best WR in the league? He’s certainly playing like it. Michael Turner (144 total yards, 2 TD) had his best game of the season and even caught a couple of passes. On the other side of the ball, Chad Ochocinco (10-108-1), Terrell Owens (9-88-1) and Jordan Shipley (6-131-1) all had huge games for the Bengals, which led to Carson Palmer‘s best fantasy day of the season (412 yards, 3 TD). Shipley is likely available on your waiver wire and is worth consideration, especially in PPR leagues.

Continue reading »

Belichick fortunate another fourth down gaffe doesn’t cost Patriots a win

New England Patriots head coach Bill Belichick looks on during the fourth quarter of their NFL football game against the Cincinnati Bengals in Foxborough, Massachusetts September 12, 2010. REUTERS/Adam Hunger   (UNITED STATES - Tags: SPORT FOOTBALL)

Oh come on, you knew Bill Belichick would go for it.

Up 23-20 in San Diego on Sunday, the Patriots faced a 4th-and-1 at their own 49-yard-line with two minutes remaining. They didn’t have any time outs, so if they went for it and didn’t convert they would be handing the ball back to the Chargers (who had all of their timeouts) in prime scoring position.

The situation was obviously eerily similar to when Belichick decided to go for it deep in their own field position against the Colts a few years ago and the Pats failed to convert. They went on to lose that game, but history didn’t repeat itself this time (ah, sort of).

BenJarvus Green-Ellis was stuffed on fourth down but after the Chargers moved the ball to New England’s 32-yard line, Kris Brown missed a 50-yard field goal that would have tied the game. It didn’t help that the field goal was five yards longer than it should have been following a false start by one of the Bolts’ offensive lineman, but it was a heartbreaking loss after San Diego battled back from a 23-6 fourth quarter deficit.

What also hurt was the fact that the Chargers were missing regular kicker Nate Kaeding, who was out with an injury. The field goal certainly wasn’t a gimmie, but the miss hurts nonetheless, especially for a San Diego team that is now 2-5 on the year.

As for Belichick, I assume that if he’s faced with a similar decision in the future that he’ll go for it again. He’s not going to change his style of coaching and he clearly buys into the notion that teams shouldn’t always punt when faced with a fourth down – no matter where they are on the field.

That doesn’t mean that he wasn’t fortunate today though. If the Pats would have went on to lose like they did to the Colts, that would have made them 0-2 when Belichick decided to go the less-conventional rout.

« Older posts Newer posts »