Page 393 of 2956

Adrian Peterson compares NFL to modern-day slavery

Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Peterson runs for a 4-yard gain during the first quarter against the Chicago Bears at Soldier Field in Chicago on November 14, 2010. UPI/Brian Kersey

You knew somebody was eventually going to say something stupid when it came to the current state of the NFL.

Meet Adrian Peterson, that “somebody.”

Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Peterson made some controversial comments about the NFL labor situation in an interview with Doug Farrar of Yahoo’s Shutdown Corner. The interview was conducted just before the NFLPA decertified.

It’s modern-day slavery, you know? People kind of laugh at that, but there are people working at regular jobs who get treated the same way, too. With all the money,” Peterson continued. “The owners are trying to get a different percentage, and bring in more money.”

Farrar took out the quote shortly after publishing. He tweeted that he wanted to give Peterson an opportunity to explain. Farrar described the comment as “a real misstep.”

As expected, AP is being ridiculed about the remarks. A person set to make $10.72 million in a down economy can’t refer to his job as “modern-day slavery” and not expect to receive backlash for it. In fact, at least one player has already taken to Twitter to disagree with what Peterson said. Below is a series of tweets from Packers’ running back Ryan Grant.

I have to totally disagree with adrian Peterson’s comparison to this situation being Modern day slavery..false..

Their is unfortunately actually still slavery existing in our world.. Literal modern day slavery.. That was a very misinformed statement

But I understand what point he was trying to make.. I just feel like he should have been advised a little differently

Actually, it’s hard to understand the point Peterson was trying to make. Is he saying he’s been forced to play football against his will the past couple of years? Is he viewed as property of the NFL or the Minnesota Vikings or can he come and go as he pleases? Is he treated poorly or met with violence if he doesn’t serve his employer?

As Grant noted, slavery still remains today so Peterson’s comment was pretty insensitive and, to use Grant’s words, misinformed. It was a dumb comment and he should take every opportunity to clarify what he meant (or better yet, tell everyone that it was stupid to even suggest such a thing).

If I’m AP’s publicist, I just fired myself.

NFLPA trying to get one representative from every team to show up at faux draft party

Peter King writes in his latest edition of MMQB that the NFLPA is trying to get veterans from every team to show up at an undetermined location in New York so that when the college players are drafted next month, they’ll have a future teammate, not commissioner Roger Goodell, greet them. This news comes a day after reports surfaced that the NFLPA has instructed prospects that were invited to Radio City Music Hall to boycott the draft. (A claim they’re now denying.)

Will it work? One agent with several prospective first-round picks thinks it will, telling me this morning: “What is the first round of the draft for the NFL? It’s a TV show, a show that makes the league a lot of money. They’re going to be asking young men to shake the hand of a commissioner [Roger Goodell] who is trying to lock them out. They’re going to be asking young men to help the league put on this big TV production. And I can tell you this: There’re a few quarterbacks who could get picked high in this draft and the NFL will invite to New York. All those quarterbacks would do by attending the draft for the NFL is giving DeMarcus Ware more incentive to knock their blocks off the first time they line up across the line of scrimmage from him.”

Forget DeMarcus Ware or any other opposing player: what would a veteran teammate do to a rookie that defied the NFLPA’s instructions not to attend the draft? Could you imagine being a first-year player who attended the draft and then had to answer to Ray Lewis once the football season resumed?

I feel bad for these college players. Don’t forget that these are just kids and they deserve the opportunity to shake Goodell’s hand and stand up on stage at Radio City Music Hall. They’re now pawns in something that hasn’t concerned them until this moment and they have to go along with it because the labor dispute is much bigger than them. It’s much bigger than shaking Goodell’s hand, standing up on stage with family and snapping that picture holding up that No. 1 jersey. It’s much bigger than the draft.

But even if they got the opportunity to take part in the normal draft festivities, the moment they shook Goodell’s hand they would enter the land of lawsuits, lockouts and labor disputes. It’s just the misfortune of being the class of 2011.

Need a March Madness schedule for your time zone? Look no further.

Those of us who don’t live in the Eastern Time Zone get a little sick of having to subtract one to three hours whenever we want to figure out when a game is on. March Madness is especially tough since there are a flurry of games and the math can get tougher when the adult beverages are flowing.

So here are the Thursday and Friday schedules with all four time zones present and accounted for. Just print them out and highlight the column of the time zone you’re in. No more subtraction.

You’re welcome.

THURSDAY

ETCTMTPTMATCHUPCHANNEL
12:1511:1510:159:15UAB/Clemson at (5) West VirginiaCBS
12:4011:4010:409:40(9) Old Dominion vs. (8) ButlertruTV
1:4012:4011:4010:40(13) Morehead St. vs. (4) LouisvilleTBS
2:101:1012:1011:10(10) Penn State vs. (7) TempleTNT
2:451:4512:4511:45(13) Princeton vs. (4) KentuckyCBS
3:102:101:1012:10TBA at (1) PittsburghtruTV
4:103:102:101:10(12) Richmond vs. (5) VanderbiltTBS
4:403:402:401:40(15) Northern Colorado vs. (2) SDSUTNT
6:505:504:503:50(15) UC Santa Barbara vs. (2) FloridaTBS
7:156:155:154:15(14) Wofford vs. (3) Brigham YoungCBS
7:206:205:204:20(14) Bucknell vs. (3) ConnecticutTNT
7:276:275:274:27(13) Belmont vs. (4) WisconsintruTV
9:208:207:206:20(10) Michigan State vs. (7) UCLATBS
9:458:457:456:45(11) Gonzaga vs. (6) St. John’sCBS
9:508:507:506:50(11) Missouri vs. (6) CincinnatiTNT
9:578:577:576:57(12) Utah State vs. (5) Kansas StatetruTV

FRIDAY

ETCTMTPTMATCHUPCHANNEL
12:1511:1510:159:15(13) Oakland vs. (4) TexasCBS
12:4011:4010:409:40(9) Tennessee vs. (8) MichigantruTV
1:4012:4011:4010:40(15) Akron vs. (2) Notre DameTBS
2:101:1012:1011:10(9) Villanova vs. (8) George MasonTNT
2:451:4512:4511:45(12) Memphis vs. (5) ArizonaCBS
3:102:101:1012:10(16) Hampton vs. (1) DuketruTV
4:103:102:101:10(10) Florida State vs. (7) Texas A&MTBS
4:403:402:401:40TBA at (1) Ohio StateTNT
6:505:504:503:50(16) Boston University vs. (1) KansasTBS
7:156:155:154:15(15) Long Island vs. (2) UNCCBS
7:206:205:204:20(14) St. Peter’s vs. (3) PurdueTNT
7:276:275:274:27(11) Marquette vs. (6) XaviertruTV
9:208:207:206:20(9) Illinois vs. (8) UNLVTBS
9:458:457:456:45(10) Georgia vs. (7) WashingtonCBS
9:508:507:506:50USC/VCU at (6) GeorgetownTNT
9:578:577:576:57(14) Indiana State vs. (3) SyracusetruTV

Do the Panthers have eyes for Ryan Mallett?

Arkansas quarterback Ryan Mallett (15) is chased from the pocket by Ohio State defensive lineman Cameron Hayward (97) during first half action of the 77th Annual Allstate Sugar Bowl at the Louisiana Superdome in New Orleans, Louisiana January 4, 2011. UPI/A.J. Sisco

You have to hand it to Ron Rivera. He’s only been a head coach for about two months but he’s already managed to keep everyone guessing when it comes to the No. 1 pick. (I guess some credit goes to GM Marty Hurney for that, too.)

After the Super Bowl was played, the majority of draft pundits had the Panthers taking Missouri quarterback Blaine Gabbert with the first overall pick. Then it was Auburn defensive tackle Nick Fairley. Now it’s Auburn quarterback Cam Newton. Give it another week and it’ll be LSU’s Patrick Peterson, Clemson’s Da’Quan Bowers and MTV’s Lady Gaga.

Or how about this for a curveball: Arkansas’ Ryan Mallet.

There are reports that Mallett is scheduled to work out for the Panthers on Tuesday in Fayetteville. While he isn’t viewed as a potential No. 1 overall pick, that doesn’t mean Carolina wouldn’t trade out of the top spot in order to acquire more picks and nab him later in the first round. They currently don’t have a second round pick after the aforementioned Hurney traded it away last year so that he could reach on Armanti Edwards. So it would stand to reason that the Panthers wouldn’t mind trading back in order to gain more picks this year, and the No. 1 pick would fetch quite a haul.

Of course, trading out of the top 5 isn’t an easy task – especially when teams don’t know what’s going to happen with the CBA. The one thing the NFL and NFLPA reportedly agreed upon was restructuring the ridiculous rookie pay scale. If teams don’t have to invest $67 billion in the No. 1 pick, then the Panthers might have an easier time trading down. But if the rookie pay scale is still an issue, then they might be stuck.

If that’s the case, then it still seems likely that the Panthers would select Newton or Gabbert at No. 1. Granted, they could always take a defensive player like Peterson and then trade back into the first round to nab Mallett, but how would they do that? They don’t have a second rounder and they have a ton of needs to address, so trading the rest of their draft doesn’t seem smart. Thus, moving out of the No. 1 slot could prove extremely difficult.

Either way, the Panthers have everyone in a state of mass confusion with their pre-draft antics. And with that in mind, I say well done, Rivera and Co.

Bill Hall calls Cole Hamles “a marked man”

Philadelphia Phillies Cole Hamels pitches to the San Francisco Giants in the 4th inning of the NLCS at AT&T Park in San Francisco Park on October 19, 2010. UPI/Terry Schmitt

Following a spring training game on Monday, Bill Hall called Cole Hamels “a marked man” after the Phillies’ starter pitched Hall inside.

From the Houston Chronicle:

I don’t know if he was mad because he gave up a homer (to Carlos Lee in the previous at-bat) or if he was mad because the umpire gave me time. But I’m not going to let him speed-pitch me. Obviously, he threw a pitch in, and I’m not going to let him disrespect me either. He kind of said something that I didn’t like too much. It’s over with.

He’s definitely a marked man for me now, so when I do some damage off him, I’m going to let him know I did some damage off him. I can guarantee that.

I don’t feel like I do a lot of things to have pitchers mad at me for doing things on the field. I feel like I play the game the right way. But if you disrespect me, I’m going to do my best to disrespect you back. Obviously not in a way to disrespect the game, but obviously I’m going to let him know when I face him.

Oh, stop it. He quick-pitched and threw you inside so now he’s a marked man? What happens when he actually hits you, the entire city of Philadelphia will burn to the ground?

Baseball players get whinier every year. He pitched me inside. He stepped on my mound. He broke one of the unwritten rules. He quick-pitched me…when does it end?

Do you think Babe Ruth, Willie Mays or Mickey Mantle ever bitched about a pitcher throwing them inside? They would have been embarrassed for even uttering the words.

« Older posts Newer posts »