Page 2251 of 2957

      Jay Mariotti quits Chicago Sun-Times

      August 27, 2008 /

      Columnist and resident I-love-to-hear-myself-talk sports personality Jay Mariotti has abruptly decided to quit the Chicago Sun-Times.

      Mariotti told the Chicago Tribune he decided to quit after covering the Olympics in Beijing because newspapers are in serious trouble, and he did not want to go down with the ship.

      “I’m a competitor and I get the sense this marketplace doesn’t compete,” he said in the Tribune story. “Everyone is hanging on for dear life at both papers.

      “To see what has happened in this business. … I don’t want to go down with it.”

      His comments sparked a pointed response from his former employer.

      Sun-Times Editor Michael Cooke said in an e-mail to CBS 2: “That’s Jay’s opinion. He has plenty of them. But the facts, of course, say something different. I’m going with the facts. Well, it’s turning nasty … and that’s typical of Jay to throw a bomb on the way out of a place that cared for him, nurtured him, paid him well for 17 years.

      “The reason Mariotti showed up the Sun-Times 17 years ago was because the paper had the best sports pages in town. That was true then, and it’s true now.

      “And as in all sports, when the star leaves, some other young star-to-be skates on to the ice. The Sun-Times has a deep bench of talent, and we’ll be using that depth.

      “I am not hearing from grief-stricken fans,” Cooke said.

      Cooke pointed to e-mails that he received from readers, including this one: “I wish to inform you that due to recent developments on the Jay Mariotti front, I will now read your newspaper. In fact, I picked one up on the way to work this morning. Not a half-bad rag, I must say. Bully on you.”

      Mariotti said he plans to pursue opportunities on the Web, and continue his regular appearances as a panelist on ESPN’s “Around the Horn.”

      You have to love this comment by Cooke: “That’s Jay’s opinion. He has plenty of them.” The Sun-Times is going to do just fine without him. People read his stuff because they liked to disagree with him and anyone who watches “Around the Horn” knows that he just likes to stoke the fire.

      I will say this about Mariotti, however – the guy doesn’t back down from players, coaches or GMs. (In his columns at least. Apparently he never goes into the White Sox clubhouse because he fears for his safety.) Sometimes he hits the nail on the head when he’s criticizing (i.e. Bears’ GM Jerry Angelo).

      College Football, General Sports, MLB, NBA, NFL, NHL

      No hiding their identity – Jaguars to run football in ‘08

      August 27, 2008 /

      In the weeks leading up to the kickoff the 2008 NFL Season, I’ll take a look at position groups that could potentially lift teams to new heights, or bury them and their postseason hopes. Today I take a look at how the Jacksonville Jaguars will once again rely on their running backs to carry them in 2008.

      It’s no secret how the Jacksonville Jaguars plan on winning games this season: Running the football. Thanks to one of the best 1-2 punches in the league at running back in Fred Taylor and Maurice Jones-Drew, the Jags are legitimate Super Bowl contenders this season.

      It’s amazing how a running back can compile 10,715 rushing yards and a 4.7-yard per carry average and yet only make one Pro Bowl. Fresh off his first (and only) Pro Bowl appearance, Taylor is set to once again carry the rock 200-plus times in Jacksonville’s offense.

      When most running backs reach the dreaded age of 30, they usually start to break down. But Taylor hasn’t lost much over the years and has gained at least 1,000 yards in five of his last six seasons. Last year, Taylor rushed for 1,202 yards in 15 games (a 5.4 YPC average) and added five touchdowns.

      Once again complementing Taylor in the backfield will be the third-year back Jones-Drew. In terms of production, Jones-Drew took a step back in his second year, rushing for 768 yards and nine touchdowns compared to the 941 yards and 13 scores he amassed his rookie year in 2006. But that doesn’t mean he was any less effective and once again gave the Jags a great change-of-pace back to go along with Taylor’s grinding style.

      Taylor will once again carry the load in 2008, a role he’s relished since 2000. Appreciate him now, because the underrated and often under appreciated Taylor is expected to retire at the end of the season. Jones-Drew will once again serve as Jacksonville’s change-of-pace back and home run threat, as well as an effective weapon in the passing game.

      There’s no doubt both of these backs benefit greatly from an offense that relies on the run, as well as a solid line and a quarterback that rarely makes mistakes. Expect the Jags to once again be one of the top-ranked rushing teams in ‘08.

      Fantasy Football, NFL

      College Football: Toughest Places to Play

      August 27, 2008 /

      FOX Sports.com ranks the top 10 toughest places to play in college football.

      8. Michigan Stadium – University of Michigan
      100,000-plus screaming fans on game day are loud. The fans are passionate enough to make it a tough place to play for a visiting team.

      3. Beaver Stadium – Penn State University
      There is no doubt that the tradition and passion of PSU football gives it a spot near the top of this list. Whether it be JoePa or a whiteout, there’s some serious passion among fans here.

      2. Neyland Stadium – University of Tennessee
      Tennessee has a great program and 100,000-plus fans doesn’t hurt. They seem to always be into the game no matter the score and the design of the stadium can be very intimidating for opposing teams.

      1. Tiger Stadium – Louisiana State University
      The Tigers have some of the craziest fans in all of college football and trying to play in Tiger Stadium at night with 92,000-plus fans around you must be one of the most intimidating things a college athlete can do.

      I’ve been to several games at the Big House in Ann Arbor and while it is cool to look out and see so many fans throughout the stadium, I wouldn’t necessarily say it gets loud. Obviously 100,000-plus fans are going to make some noise, but with the way the bowl was constructed, a lot of the sound just goes up and out. Most football stadiums you feel like you’re on top of the players, but not Michigan Stadium.

      College Football, General Sports

      The NBA should take a cue from FIBA…

      August 26, 2008 /

      …not the other way around.

      FIBA (the governing body of international basketball) plans to extend its three-point line from 20’ 6” to 22’ 2” effective 2010. They’re also getting rid of the trapezoidal lane in an effort to standardize the game worldwide. The NCAA is extending its three point line from 19′ 9″ to 20′ 9″ starting this season. The NBA’s three-point line is 23’ 9” from the hoop.

      I like the international line where it is. Doug Collins said during the Olympic broadcast that “too many players are able to shoot that shot” as a reason that it should be moved back. I say… who cares? I think most basketball purists agree that the international game (and the college game) is more fun to watch than the NBA game. I’m not talking about the talent of the players – I’m talking about how the game is played. Part of that has to do with the pressure that the three-point line puts on the defense. If a good portion of players can hit that shot, it forces more defenders to get out and guard those players. This, in turn, creates more spacing inside the arc and allows for more free-flowing, dynamic offense, which is good for the game.

      Plus, the three-pointer makes the game more exciting. Underdogs have a better chance of pulling an upset, comebacks are easier, big scoring runs are more frequent and scores are higher. Aren’t these good things?

      Then there’s the NBA’s shot from the side. It’s a different distance (22’) from the rest of the arc, which in and of itself is just silly. But at least once a game, a player will step out of bounds because he is trying to spot up behind the three-point line when he’s catching the ball. This is just a drag that slows the game down, and it would be virtually eliminated if the league moved the line in.

      I’d rather see the NBA adopt the international 20’ 6” length than see FIBA extend its arc.

      I know, it will never happen. People conform to David Stern and the NBA, not the other way around.

      Fantasy Basketball, NBA, The Olympics

      « Older posts Newer posts »

      © 2026 The Scores Report – The National Sports Blog

      Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑