Author: John Paulsen (Page 228 of 937)

Chris Bosh wants to be ‘the man’

Last week, Bosh informed us that he wasn’t about to wait for LeBron James to make up his mind, and now he’s reiterating his wish to be ‘the man’ for whatever team he plays for next season.

Chris Bosh isn’t waiting for some summit to determine his landing spot next season. The soon-to-be Toronto Raptors free agent is determined to chart his own course and forge his own identity apart from the star-studded field of peers also entering the open market.

“I don’t want to be mentioned as an addition to a team,” Bosh said prior to the season . “I want to be mentioned as the guy that people want to center their team around.”

“I’m not an addition. I’m a centerpiece,” he said. “I have to have that confidence in myself, and I want people to know that, because I’m not somebody that helps out. I’m the guy you get like, ‘Yo, we’re going to win a championship, you’re gonna take us there.’

“I want to hold onto that because I think every kid when they dream about playing basketball, they don’t dream about being a role player. They dream about being the man. I have that position in Toronto and to give that up and go somewhere else to be an addition would kinda defeat the purpose of my dreams.”

That’s still pretty nebulous, but we can read the tea leaves a little bit.

The fact that he doesn’t want to be mentioned as an addition to a team leads me to believe that he won’t join Dwyane Wade in Miami or LeBron in Cleveland. If he does end up playing with one of those two, it would probably be in New York or New Jersey, where the franchises are basically starting over and can build around him (and LeBron/Wade).

It would also seem to eliminate the Thunder and Lakers from contention, since he’d be seen as an “addition” to teams that already had established stars (Kevin Durant, Kobe). We could also potentially cross off the Bulls, since they already have a budding star in Derrick Rose (though Bosh would be an ideal fit there).

Perhaps the Knicks or Nets could persuade both Joe Johnson and Bosh to sign, since Bosh wants to be ‘the man,’ while Johnson doesn’t seem to crave that title.

Is it July 1 yet?


Photo from fOTOGLIF

2010 NBA Consensus Mock Draft (6/21)

With the draft just a few days away, it’s a good time to zip through another consensus mock draft. I’ve pulled in the first 14 picks from ESPN, DraftExpres, NBADraft.net, SI, Yahoo and FanHouse to see if we could come to some sort of consensus as to how the first half of the draft might go. If a player was taken by a certain team in three-plus mock drafts, he is listed in bold with the number of drafts in parenthesis. If there was no consensus, or if he was drafted by a team in two mocks, then he is listed in italics.

(I know the font is a little small, but you can click on the table for a larger version.)

A few random thoughts:

– The top four appear to be set, with Wall, Turner, Favors and Wesley Johnson going to the Wizards, Sixers, Nets and T-Wolves, respectively. These picks intuitively make a lot of sense, which probably means they won’t go this way on Thursday night.

– I listed Cousins at #6 because I don’t think there’s any chance that he falls further than that. But with his “character issues,” who knows. He had a great workout in Sacramento, so I’d bet that he goes #5 at the latest. Besides, Monroe seems like a great fit in Golden State with his basketball IQ and willingness to pass the ball.

– After the #6 pick, this draft seems like a free for all. There are a number of forwards — Aminu, Hayward, Babbitt, Davis and Patterson — all jockeying for position.

– Even though he wasn’t the consensus — there was no conensus — Babbitt seems destined to land in Utah. Aldrich is a possibility there as well.


Photo from fOTOGLIF

Three things I’d change about the World Cup

I realize that soccer/football is the most popular sport in the world, but watching the USA/Slovenia game yesterday morning, there are a few glaring problems that I have with the sport. (Note: I played soccer through the 9th grade, so I am familiar with its rules.)

1. The ref has too much control.
Referee Koman Coulibaly stripped the U.S. of its go-ahead goal by calling a foul, yet he doesn’t have to explain what the foul was. Replays showed that no one was offsides, and the only physical fouls that could be seen on the replays were on the Slovenian players. Moreover, the ref keeps the official time. Why is this? Why can he arbitrarily say there’s three minutes or four minutes of injury time? Why not have an official clock that stops and starts when the official blows the whistle?

2. Offsides takes the excitement out of the sport.
It seems like anytime a player makes a nice run, there’s the sideline official raising his flag and stopping the play. Why is there offsides in the first place? Look at American football and basketball, two of the most exciting sports in the world — no one is penalized for beating the opposing team down the field/court. If a player can make a break for the goal and his teammate can hit him with a nice pass, why are we penalizing them? The defender needs to stay with his guy; that’s the whole point of defense. Under the current format, the defender is encouraged to sandbag it (pull up when he’s beat) in order to get the offsides call. With no offsides, scoring would go up and it would be a far more free-flowing and exciting sport.

3. The vuvuzelas.
WTF? What are these and why do fans feel the need to blow them for the entire game?

What about you — what would you change about the World Cup?


Photo from fOTOGLIF

« Older posts Newer posts »