Month: January 2009 (Page 44 of 61)

Six Pack of Observations: BCS National Championship Game

Here are six quick-hit observations on Florida’s 24-14 victory over Oklahoma in the BCS National Championship Game.

1. These were the best two teams in college football?
One game shouldn’t make or break how teams are perceived for an entire season (Florida and Oklahoma had tremendous years). But if college football refuses to implement a playoff to determine what teams are the best in the country, than the BCS needed a better showing than that. That was one hell of a sloppy football game, complete with stupid penalties, ugly turnovers and bad decisions by both players and coaches. To say that that wasn’t a cleanly played game would be a gross understatement and anyone from the BCS that can unequivocally state that Florida and Oklahoma were the two best teams in college football after that mess should be embarrassed. This game did nothing to support the notion that college football doesn’t need a playoff system.

2. Utah could play with both of these teams.
There’s no question that Utah’s performance over Alabama was more impressive than Florida’s win over Oklahoma. Again, without a playoff system, how can anyone from the BCS say without question that Utah isn’t the best team in the nation? They were the only team to go undefeated, beat two teams that did/will rank in the top 10 (Alabama and TCU), and they won their BCS game in convincing fashion. The Gators, who absolutely bulldozed everyone in their path after losing by one to Ole’ Miss earlier in the season, lost a game and didn’t look particularly sharp in their BCS victory. Who knows, maybe Florida would shit-stomp Utah on a neutral field next week. Maybe the Utes would run the Gators over like they did ‘Bama. We’ll never know and that’s the problem with the current college football system – it leaves too much to debate.

3. What happened to the shootout?
One word: pressure. Both of these teams did a great job of pressuring the quarterback and disrupting the rhythm of the opposing offense. Oklahoma didn’t see a defense as good as Florida’s all season. But you know what? Florida didn’t see a defense as good as the one Oklahoma trotted onto the field tonight, either. While the offenses played awfully sloppy, you have to give it to the defensive minds on both sides for coming up with great game plans. Tebow and Bradford could hardly set their feet and that’s the main reason why the final was 24-14 instead of 44-38 like most people expected. (Of course, Oklahoma’s struggles inside the red zone played into the low score, too.)

4. Percy Harvin was more valuable to Florida tonight than Tim Tebow.
Harvin (9 carries, 122 yards, 1 TD) was the best athlete on the field tonight – period. And the funny thing was, he played on a bum ankle. With all due respect to Tebow, without Harvin the Gators don’t win tonight. He provided a spark to an offense that seemed to be off all night, he provided Florida with its biggest plays and he opened the door for Tebow in the running game in the second half. Oklahoma’s defense was pretty damn good tonight, but Harvin was even better. I shutter to think how well he would have played if he was completely healthy.

4A. Chris Brown is lighting in a bottle.
Percy Harvin’s play out shadowed him, but Brown was absolutely phenomenal tonight. He was the backbone of Oklahoma’s offense and he picked up some much-needed first downs in the second half. Too bad Bob Stoops and the OU coaching staff decided to run what looked like the same damn play on the goal line when he was stuffed on consecutive 3rd and 4th down plays, because I would have loved to see if he could have scored on a screen pass. He’s so quick.

5. Sam Bradford is the real deal.
Bradford’s final numbers (26 of 41 for 256 yards, 2 TDs, 2 INTs) certainly weren’t as dazzling as they have been all season. But it doesn’t take a pro scout to see that this kid is loaded with talent and doesn’t get rattled. Florida drummed up some decent pressure at times and Bradford often starred down the heat and delivered the ball in a timely manner. And the two interceptions he threw were hardly his fault considering they both hit his receivers in the hands. I think he should stay at least one more year at school to hone his skills and try for a national title again next year. But it’s pretty clear that he has the intangibles to play at the next level. (I’ll let the people in the know determine whether or not he’s got everything else.)

6. Every team would be fortunate to have a Tim Tebow.
He might have annoyed a lot of Sooner fans tonight with his sideline antics, but Tebow is the kind of emotional leader I’m sure every football coach wish he had. He’s got so much fight and determination that he’s easy to root for and I’m sure he has no problem rallying his team, too. I also love how he’ll lower his shoulder and head to fight for just one more inch – there’s no way he’s running out of bounds. I don’t know if he can be a pro quarterback or not, but there’s no question that he’s quite the football player and has a future playing on Sundays (at whatever position).

Did Jason Whitlock just compare Matt Millen to O.J. Simpson?

Newspaper columnist Jason Whitlock is a bit miffed about NBC’s recent hire of former Detroit Lions general manager Matt Millen as their lead studio analyst for the NFL playoffs. And he wondered if O.J. Simpson was available from his Las Vegas jail cell.

Seriously, O.J. on “Football Night in America” is the only thing that could top Millen’s inclusion. And NBC is promising to foist Millen on its Super Bowl audience. If this happens, I will confront Millen and NBC executives at the Super Bowl and go Rob Parker-Rod Marinelli on the responsible parties.

Look, the Lions haven’t won a NFL championship in over 50 years, and Millen was in charge for only eight seasons. Though under his leadership, the Lions did own the NFL’s worst winning percentage (31-81, .277) and became the first team in league history not to win a road game in three consecutive seasons (2001-2003). And, of course, there was the whole 0-16 thing. At the core of this failure are some pretty bad drafts that included guys like quarterback Joey Harrington, and wide receivers Charles Rogers and Mike Williams.

Lion fans surely grew tired of Millen’s time as the team’s CEO, but I can’t imagine them longing for the Eric Hipple years.

A statistical analyst calls for a boycott of the BCS

Regular readers know that numbers are near and dear to my heart. Maybe it comes from my background — my degree is in industrial engineering — or maybe I just like the cold, objective finality of statistics.

So when a quantitative analyst like Bill James stands up and says that all quantitative analysts should boycott the BCS, I take notice.

The entire article is a good read — and don’t worry, James doesn’t delve too deeply into the numbers. He outlines the problem with the BCS this way:

1. That there is a profound lack of conceptual clarity about the goals of the method;

2. That there is no genuine interest here in using statistical analysis to figure out how the teams compare with one another. The real purpose is to create some gobbledygook math to endorse the coaches’ and sportswriters’ vote;

3. That the ground rules of the calculations are irrational and prevent the statisticians from making any meaningful contribution; and

4. That the existence of this system has the purpose of justifying a few rich conferences in hijacking the search for a national title, avoiding a postseason tournament that would be preferred by the overwhelming majority of fans.

James then goes into each topic with more detail, but this section stands out:

In the 1990s there was a strong movement, within the NCAA, to organize a national postseason football tournament. The problem was, had the NCAA in fact organized such a championship, two other events would almost certainly have followed:

1. The smaller schools, which outnumber the big football powerhouses about 5-to-1, would have voted to send a lot of the money to the smaller schools that in fact had not participated in the national championship contest in any meaningful way.

2. The big football schools would have bolted and revolted. They’d have walked out of the NCAA and formed their own organization. The two-tiered system of NCAA and NAIA schools would have been replaced by a three-tiered system with the NCAA occupying the middle tier.

The creation of the BCS system was simply a less dramatic revolt. And, as I said, the BCS schools were right: There is no reason why schools that don’t fund programs to participate in the battle for the national championship should share in the proceeds of the contest.

There are two ways to get around this problem. First, the NCAA could pass a unanimous or nearly unanimous resolution, promising not to try to steal the proceeds of a national title contest and give the money to small schools, deserving nephews, or the church poor box. The BCS could then dissolve and be replaced by an NCAA Football Tournament involving eight to 16 teams, and the big football schools would wind up with just as much money or a little more.

Or, if that doesn’t work, we can pass a law creating a new National Collegiate Sports Collaborative and requiring all schools receiving federal funding to join and participate. And if we have to do that, we’ll decide how to split the money.

I didn’t realize that fear over the small schools milking too much money from a playoff system was the reason that we don’t have a playoff system. If that’s the case, and as James outlines, it’s not a difficult fix.

I can only hope that we can make some progress towards a legitimate playoff in the next four years, even though the ESPN VP of Programming is completely happy with the current format.

Interview with Rich Zvosec — author, former coach, ESPN analyst

Rich Zvosec, former college basketball coach (and friend of The Scores Report), has written a book, Birds, Dogs & Kangaroos: Life on the Back Roads of College Basketball. In Zvosec’s humorous way, the book outlines what life is really like at the low Division I level.

I played ball at what would be considered the high Division III level and it sounds like we had more resources, support and continuity than a few of Zvosec’s teams. Coach Z is an engaging writer and has a plethora of funny/outrageous/touching anecdotes to relate as he goes through his entire coaching career.

The Scores Report had the opportunity to talk to Zvosec about why he wrote the book, what it’s like coaching in New York City, and the hurdles he had to overcome to develop into a successful color commentator for ESPN.

The Scores Report: Hi, this is John Paulsen from The Scores Report. How are you doing?

RZ: Hey, John. How are you doing?

TSR: Pretty good. I just finished reading your book over the weekend. I enjoyed it. It brought back some memories of when I played Division III ball – sounded like some of the same crazy stories. Can you tell me a little bit about why you decided to write the book?

RZ: When I first got the job at St. Francis in New York, some of the different things happened. My mother always told me, “You should save all these stories and write a book someday.” I guess I kind of wrote it for a number of different reasons. It’s kind of a cathartic look back at 25 years of kind of chasing a dream – college coaching. And the other part of it is, I wanted to give the reader a different perspective on college basketball. So often the media only covers the highest of levels and consequently everything is portrayed as just a business transaction, so to speak. Whether it comes to recruiting or wins and losses. I wanted people to get an inside look at what a coach actually goes through. And certainly it’s a little different at a St. Francis than it is at North Carolina or Kansas.

TSR: You said in the book that you coached at ten different schools. Could you give our readers a brief rundown of where you coached?

RZ: I spent 25 years, 16 as a head coach. I was the head coach at the University of North Florida, where I started the program. I coached at St. Francis college in New York. There was Millersville, Pennsylvania. And my last stop, as a college coach was at the University of Missouri at Kansas City, where I was at for the last seven years.

TSR: You mentioned St. Francis; what’s it like being a small fish in such a huge pond, basketball-wise?

RZ: It was a great experience. I was 27 when I got the job and was the youngest Division I head coach in the country. St. Francis is a commuter school. Basically, the campus is one city block. It’s one building, seven stories high, with a gym on the third floor. It was a great opportunity to cut my teeth, and also to rub shoulders with some of the premier coaches at the time in the New York metropolitan area. I had an opportunity to become friends with P.J. Carlisemo, who was at Seton Hall at the time and also Lou Carnesecca, the legendary coach at St. John’s.

TSR: You told a story in the book about taking the subway to one of your games. Only in New York, right?

RZ: Our archrival was Long Island University, which ironically enough, is not in Long Island. It’s in Brooklyn, which to this day I’m not sure why it’s called Long Island University when it’s in Brooklyn. They were actually two subway stops away from us. And because of the parking and transportation, it was much easier for us to jump on the train over to their campus as opposed to getting on a bus, or in a van, or some other mode of transportation. And what made the game even more interesting was that it was played in the old Paramount Theatre, which is an old movie theater where they had plays and obviously films. And it gave a lot of character because you’re playing on a stage. So that was interesting.

TSR: And there you had – I believe it was an athletic director – who didn’t want to pay for your team to play in the semifinal of your conference tournament.

RZ: Actually it wasn’t the athletic director it was the Vice President of Student Affairs.

TSR: Ah, okay. But there was a lack of commitment to the basketball program there?

RZ: Pretty much. The athletic director there was fantastic. He was actually the soccer coach as well. How he survived without strangling the Vice President of Student Affairs for so many years is beyond me.

TSR: That’s one of the big differences between the upper echelon Division I schools and the lower Division I, which you describe in your book – how much support the athletic program has from the school, correct?

RZ: That is correct. I think it really comes down to resources. I think the easiest way to quantify it for the reader is if you’re in a low major, you go play guarantee games. That means you go play at a Syracuse or at a St. John’s strictly for money. They’re never going to return the game to you. Nowadays, you can get as much as a hundred thousand dollars for a road game. That would be low major. Mid-majors would be teams that don’t have to go play guarantee games but don’t have the money to buy home games. And then high-majors are obviously teams like Kansas and Syracuse, North Carolina – people that can buy nine or ten home games before their conference schedule every year.

TSR: So I wanted to ask you a couple of things about the state of college basketball today. Specifically, the NBA age-limit and the effect it’s having on college hoops. Brandon Jennings is a player that was going to go to Arizona, but there was a problem with his test score, so he elected to go play overseas. So he’s going to go play for a year overseas and then come back and play in the NBA. What kind of an effect is this having on college hoops?

RZ: I think it’s having somewhat of a developmental effect, i.e. you have a situation where guys aren’t as fundamentally schooled when they come out of college to go to the NBA, because they’re only playing one year. Now, on the other hand, I’m for either having no rule at all, and just allowing the players to go right to the pros out of high school, or go to the baseball rule where you can’t leave until after your junior year. Right now, for a guy to come to school for one year, to some degree it’s doing a disservice to the institution, because the player doesn’t necessarily want to be at school, but he has to be. I think what Brandon Jennings is doing going overseas – hey, more power to him. I respect that choice because he doesn’t want to be in college. I respect that decision more than a guy who will come to school and just pay lip service. And not to say that a young man can’t get anything out of one year at college because I think they can, and ultimately the reason someone goes to college is to get a better job. The story that sticks in my mind when it comes to guys leaving school early is Bob Costas. Bob Costas never graduated from Syracuse, and by his own admission, he didn’t go back for his senior year because he was offered a broadcasting job and it was too good to turn down. So that’s why people go to college – to get a better job. If a young man can come to college for one year and sign a professional contract where he’s making two hundred thousand dollars, why should he come back and then get a job where he’s making forty thousand dollars a year? Economically, it doesn’t make sense.

TSR: It seems, from the NBA’s point of view, that they want a more mature league, but I wrote a column when this age-limit passed and found that players that came straight out of high school actually had a better chance to become a starter-, star- or superstar-level player than your average college senior or international player that was drafted. So they have the talent, it’s just about where they cultivate that talent and David Stern wants the college ranks to do that.

RZ: The NBA drafts out of two things. They draft out of potential, but more importantly, they draft out of fear — the fear of passing over the next Michael Jordan or the next Kobe Bryant. So they’re going to draft an international guy or a guy with one year of college over maybe a more seasoned college player, because they’re afraid that that guy is going to develop into the next Kobe Bryant. And they’re going to be the one that missed on that guy. It’s unfortunate that the group that’s standing in the way is the NBA Player’s Association. For the life of me, I don’t understand why. Because you would think that they would want older guys so that their veteran players aren’t replaced by younger guys. It will be interesting to see what happens. I know the Coaches Association wanted the baseball rule then it got rolled back two years and then eventually it was rolled all the way back to one year.

TSR: I’m with you. I’m okay with guys going straight to the NBA, but I think if you go to college you should stay for at least two years. At least during that freshman year, they would have to go class, because I think some of these guys know that they don’t have to go to class because they know they’re leaving.

RZ: That’s exactly right. If you keep going to school for two years you have a much better chance of coming back and getting your degree than somebody who goes to college for one year and basically that second semester they really haven’t done anything. Because here’s the caveat – the NCAA wants to talk about a school’s progress and retention rate. Well, if a kid signs a professional contract, it doesn’t matter that he’s leaving school, ineligible to come back the following year. So where’s the motivation to get that kid to at least finish complete that freshman year in good academic standing?

TSR: So, moving on to your current career. You spent last season I believe calling games for the Big Ten Network and now you’re doing a package of games for ESPN. How’s that going?

RZ: It’s going well. I’m really enjoying it. All I know is that I haven’t lost a game in two years. So that’s always a good thing. It’s a great opportunity to stay around the game. I enjoyed getting to know and watch all the guys in the Big Ten last year and this year I’m doing primarily Big 12 games, so I’m kind of getting the same opportunity in the Big 12. I enjoy going to watch practice and see how different coaches prepare their teams. When you’re running your own program as I did for so many years, you don’t really get that opportunity, so in a lot of ways, I’m like a kid in a candy store.

TSR: So when you called your first game on TV, or first couple of games, what were some of the challenges there?

RZ: Actually, the first game I did was Michigan and Radford. And fortunately I did it with Roger Twibell, a longtime broadcaster. He was very helpful in setting me up to cover certain things that I wanted to talk about during a game. But probably the biggest challenge when you’re sitting there doing a game, and you have the producer in your headphones, and they’re saying, “say this” or “this is what’s coming next.” I’ll never forget the very first game I’m doing it and I hear the producer say “Clem Haskins,” and I’m thinking “Clem Haskins, what in the heck is he talking about?” Well then they go to a shot of Jerry Dunn, who is the associate head coach at Michigan, with the graphic underneath his picture that says “Clem Haskins, former head coach at Minnesota.” Well, I was so raw and since I wasn’t looking at the monitor, so I didn’t see it. So they went to Jerry Dunn, I actually rattled off “Jerry Dunn, former head coach at Penn State University now the associate head coach at Michigan.” And the next thing I know, I hear this producer cussing in my headphones because they had the graphic wrong. Well, I had no idea, and probably, if I had been doing this a little longer, I probably wouldn’t have said that. Sometimes accidents happen in a positive way.

TSR: So when’s the next game that we can catch?

RZ: Actually I have Oklahoma and Kansas State on Saturday.

TSR: That should be a good one.

RZ: Yeah, that should be a good contest.

TSR: Well, that’s about all I have for you. Thanks for sending over the book and best of luck in your new career.

RZ: I appreciate that. Thank you.

TSR: All right, talk to you later.

RZ: Take care.

As usual, Favre to take his sweet ass time with retirement decision

Here’s a shock – Brett Favre will take his time deciding whether or not he should retire or come back for another season.

Brett FavreBrett Favre has eased comfortably into his offseason routine in Mississippi and will make no decision about whether to play another NFL season for several weeks.

“I have the ability to turn it off just like that,” he said. “I don’t feel I have anything else to prove. Do I have to redeem myself for the last five games? No. I could be trying to do that until I’m 60 years old. There is nothing left out there for me from that standpoint. I’m disappointed with the last five games, sure, but I know I did everything I could have.”

Favre said that if he does decide to announce his retirement from the NFL for a second straight offseason that he will do so differently. He plans to make a quiet decision without a public news conference, such as the one he held upon finishing his 16 years with the Green Bay Packers, in which he became choked with emotion.

“I’m an emotional guy, and I’m sure people are tired of seeing me get emotional,” he said. “People would probably say, ‘Oh, here he goes again.’ I think it would just better for me to just thank the Jets, and I sincerely mean that. It was well worth what I invested. But I’m going to just quietly step away if that’s what happens.”

He’ll make a quiet announcement this time – no press conference.

He’ll probably announce it the week of the Super Bowl, but again, no press conference.

« Older posts Newer posts »