Sugar Bowl violates tax laws Posted by Gerardo Orlando (09/21/2011 @ 9:23 am) Ohio State University players celebrate after their team defeated the University of Arkansas during the NCAA BCS Allstate Sugar Bowl football game in New Orleans, Louisiana January, 4, 2011. REUTERS/Sean Gardner (UNITED STATES – Tags: SPORT FOOTBALL IMAGES OF THE DAY) The mess in college football keeps piling up. Real Sports on HBO has a new expose on how the “nonprofit” college bowls spend money like drunken sailors entertaining conference and school officials. We’ll have more on that later. In the meantime, one of the disclosures from Real Sports involved improper expenditures by the Sugar Bowl for campaign purposes, something that violates tax laws given their nonprofit status. An HBO “Real Sports” investigation has prompted the Allstate Sugar Bowl to self-report tax law violations it committed by purchasing three $1,000 tickets to fundraisers for then-Gov. Kathleen Blanco in 2004 and 2006. Under its non-profit charter, the bowl is not allowed to contribute to political campaigns, and such actions also are against bowl policy, according to a release from the bowl. At the time of the fundraisers, the Sugar Bowl was receiving approximately $1 million annually from the state as a “cooperative endeavor” that helped fund team payouts. The arrangement, which predated Blanco’s term, was rescinded two years ago at the Sugar Bowl’s request. The release also stated that the money has been refunded from Blanco and those funds have been donated to the National Football Foundation Scholar-Athlete fund. Chief Executive Officer Paul Hoolahan and current bowl president Lance Alfrick declined to elaborate beyond the release, but immediate past president Dave Melius called the violation “an accident.” “Obviously, nobody had any idea,” Melius said. “You have to understand we have an organization with about a $14 million budget, and we’re spending $14 million a year in about a zillion different ways on a lot of things we’re supporting. There are thousands of checks written, and one check goes out that didn’t go through the correct process.”
This is the same Sugar Bowl that lobbied to have 5 suspended Ohio State players be permitted to play in the 2011 Sugar Bowl. It’s becoming clear that the “nonprofit” status of these bowls is a complete fraud. They don’t care about college kids – they simply care about money. It will be interesting to see where that $14 million is really going as we get more scrutiny of this corrupt bowl system. Posted in: College Football Tags: BCS, BCS controversy, BCS corrupt, BCS corruption, BCS defenders, BCS flaws, BCS mockery, BCS money, BCS reforms, BCS scenarios, BCS unfair, bowl system, bowls not for profit, college bowl corruption, college bowl junkets, college bowl scandals, college bowl system, college bowls corrupt, college bowls nonprofit, College football bowls, college football scandals, HBO bowl investigation, idiotic BCS, NCAA absurdity, NCAA bowl corruption, NCAA bowls corrupt, NCAA football cash, NCAA football mess, NCAA football playoffs, NCAA football scandals, NCAA reforms, need for NCAA reform, nonprofit status of bowls, Ohio State, ohio state scandal, proposed NCAA reforms, Real Sports, Real Sports bowl investigation, Real Sports investigation, reforming the BCS, Sugar Bowl, Sugar Bowl campaign contributions, Sugar Bowl corruption, Sugar Bowl junkets, Sugar Bowl nonprofit, Sugar Bowl scandal, Sugar Bowl tax laws
Tough day for the Pac-12 Posted by Gerardo Orlando (09/04/2011 @ 3:41 pm) Louisiana State University running back Spencer Ware (L) celebrates his touchdown run against the University of Oregon with center T-Bob Hebert (C) and offensive tackle Chris Faulk in the second half of their NCAA football game at Cowboys Stadium in Arlington, Texas September 3, 2011. REUTERS/Mike Stone (UNITED STATES – Tags: SPORT FOOTBALL) College football guru Bruce Feldman is now with CBS Sports following his controversial treatment by ESPN and ultimate departure. Bruce sums up this weekend’s college football action by noting the bad day for the Pac-12, at least on the field. off the field the conference might be on the verge of adding Texas and Oklahoma, further shaking up the crazy world off college football. Chip Kelly has a dynamic offense, but it is seeming more and more like the frenetic Ducks attack that looks so, well, awesome in league play wilts when it goes up against power teams from other leagues, or at least teams with added prep time. (See: the 2009 opener at Boise; the 2010 Rose Bowl vs. Ohio State; the 2011 BCS title game against Auburn; and now Saturday night’s game against an LSU team that still had to replace an All-American DT [Drake Nevis] and the best defensive back in college football [Patrick Peterson]). Kelly’s star, running back LaMichael James, who was held to just 54 yards rushing and 3.8 yards per carry against Auburn, managed 57 yards and fewer than 3.2 yards per rush against LSU. The most telling stats for the night, though, were these: Oregon had 28 carries and none went longer than 13 yards; and on 82 plays, the Ducks didn’t have any go for more than 18. That sounds so anti-Oregon. In fairness, we should note that the Ducks did travel into SEC country last year and blow out Tennessee, but those Vols were one of the worst teams in the SEC in 2010. Kelly pointed out before the game that those teams that handled Oregon are great ones, well-coached and stocked with outstanding athlete. He echoed that point, again, after losing to LSU: “They’ve got a little bit different athlete running around out there right now,” he told Ted Miller. “Looking at their D-line, standing next to them, walking off the field, they don’t look like the kind of guys we see. That’s the common trait, the trait you saw in the Auburn game.” As blunt as that is, that’s still not the kind of talk you’d expect to hear from the coach of a powerhouse program.
There a gimmicky element to what Kelly has been able to accomplish at Oregon. Sure, they’re a great team, but everyone gets caught up in the stats they rack up and their quick scoring ability, but the harsh reality is that their system comes up short against physical defenses with tough d-lines. It will be interesting to see if they can adjust, but in today’s idiotic BCS system, the chances are now much slimmer that they will get a chance to redeem themselves. If we had a rational system, Oregon could get back to work and focus on running the table so they could be one of the final eight teams in the season-ending playoff system. Instead, we’ll have to listen to the talking heads on TV drone on endlessly about how they might squeak into the BCS title game if x, y and z occur. Posted in: College Football Tags: BCS, BCS controversy, BCS defenders, BCS flaws, BCS mockery, BCS reforms, BCS scenarios, BCS unfair, Bruce Feldman, Chip Kelly, ESPN, idiotic BCS, LaMichael James, LSU Tigers, NCAA football playoffs, Oregon Ducks, Pac-12, Pac-12 expansion, reforming the BCS
|