Page 894 of 2957

With a little (mis)fortune, United States and England draw

I’ve been reading a bunch of recaps on this game, and everyone is describing the U.S. team as a “force” or some other obligatory hyperbole.

Are you kidding me? Look through your afternoon buzz and realize that, aside from goalie Tim Howard, we looked capable at best.

I watched the game at a crowded pub in Agoura Hills, Calif., surrounded by seasoned English soccer enthusiasts and fledgling converts of the U.S. squad. Any budding energy on the U.S. side was instantly deflated in the fourth minute when England captain Steven Gerrard netted a goal inside the box. Things did not look good, but at least a goal early on is much easier to mitigate than one late into the game.

As the game drudged toward the half, I didn’t see anything that resembled a promising U.S. effort. England must of had control of the ball at least 80 percent of the time, continuing to make short passes and well-structured runs that kept the U.S. defense scrambling and Howard on his toes. When the U.S. finally snagged the ball it was all about sending it downfield for an ill-advised breakaway or improbable cross.

Our team looked directionless. Where was that touted counterattack that was supposedly our ace in the hole? If I were an England fan I would have felt fairly comfortable heading into halftime. The British squad had a stranglehold on the game, what with the dismal U.S. offense and its patchy defense.

But. But! Aha! Despite boasting an organized offense, England fans were already worried about the most important factor of a team’s defense: its goalie. Robert Green plays in the English Premier League but is known for having some of the most unfortunate hands; U.S. goalie Howard also plays in the EPL, but thankfully he’s with the Yanks and exudes leadership qualities that Green might never hold. In the 40th minute Green’s weaknesses shined as U.S. midfielder Clint Dempsey lined a shot toward the opposing goalkeeper. Green knelt down for the manageable save, but fumbled the ball. As the sphere stumbled into the goal, Green collapsed mournfully along with Three Lions fans everywhere. Pikey’s Pub in Agoura Hills, however, came alive, and it was clear more U.S. fans had showed up to rally their team on their own soil.

By the second half, the idea of an “underdog” had left my mind. The U.S. goal was a gift from above (or a curse from below, depending on who you’re rooting for), but now we had two evenly-matched teams on the pitch. Both England and the U.S. created runs and pounded the net. Neither controlled the tempo, but fought for it. It was the finest half so far in the World Cup, and fans of both teams should be proud.

Yet, England will come out the curmudgeon as they were heavily favored. As for the U.S., this team at times played like 11 bashful opportunists, and that won’t fly at this level. If they expect to go deep into this tournament they need to replicate the play-making they exhibited in the second half.


Photo from fOTOGLIF

Lou Piniella needs a reality check

It’s hard to blame Lou Piniella for being frustrated these days. His Cubs are currently 7.5 games back in the NL Central behind the Reds (the Reds!), his No. 3 and No. 4 hitters couldn’t hit a beach ball if one were lobbed in their direction and he probably gets the sense that his time is almost up in Chicago.

But if you’re Lou, why pick on little ol’ Steve Stone?

For those of you who aren’t familiar with Stone’s work, he’s a former broadcaster for the Cubs and now a current broadcaster for the White Sox. Earlier this week, he criticized Piniella on Comcast SportsNet for not playing rookie outfielder Tyler Colvin more.

This is exactly what Stone said (via ESPN Chicago):

“I think that means that Lou doesn’t have a great grasp on what to do with young players,” Stone said in the interview. “Because with Tyler Colvin, if you take a look at what he has accomplished in a short period of time, with limited play, you realize that he very well could be the one thing the Cubs have been looking for for six years. That’s a left-handed run producer. Colvin could be that one guy. But he can’t do it on the bench, so you make a decision that you play the guy.”

What Stone said was hardly venomous and the guy does have a right to share his opinion. (He is a broadcaster after all.) But apparently Piniella took exception to the criticism and before the Cubs got their ass kicked by the Sox yesterday, Lou went off.

 

Continue reading »

Fact-checking Tim Donaghy

Tim Donaghy is still around, mostly because he’s in financial trouble and is trying to find a way to parlay his history of gambling on (or fixing?) NBA games into some semblance of a post-officiating career. Henry Abbott put together a nice post about Donaghy that seems to debunk much of what he has said.

* Donaghy recalls a conversation he had on the court with Phil Jackson that Jackson tells ESPN’s J.A. Adande never happened.
* He describes relationships between Allen Iverson and referees Steve Javie (who he says hated Iverson) and Joe Crawford (who was allegedly a fan) that biased their calls, and made picking Iverson games easy ways to make money. But those betting rules, in fact, would not have led to winners.
* He told a stirring tale of locker room run-in with Charles Barkley, but Barkley told ESPN’s Mark Schwarz no such thing occurred.
* The three palming violations Donaghy remembers in some detail that were really two.
* He wrote that he won bets relying on Dick Bavetta’s habit of keeping games close, but looking at scores proved betting like that would not win you money.
* He described in some detail the friendship between referee Joe Forte and then-Grizzlies coach Mike Fratello, which inspired him to pick Fratello’s team to beat the spread when Forte reffed. But in that period, Fratello’s teams beat the spread less than half the time.

Even Donaghy’s publisher has severed ties with him.

Generally speaking, I don’t think there is a lot of game-fixing going on. To err is to be human, and NBA referees make a LOT of bad calls. It doesn’t mean they’re doing it on purpose. It’s an impossible job to do perfectly.


Photo from fOTOGLIF

World Cup Reminder: United States vs. England, 2:30 PM ET on ABC

At this point, I shouldn’t need to remind any of you. In addition to the ubiquitous FIFA ads over the past couple of months (you saw them, even if they hadn’t registered), our country’s most powerful sports resource, ESPN, is judiciously handling the 2010 World Cup coverage (with the help of ABC). It’s the one time (every four years) that the Worldwide Leader has the opportunity to reach mass markets that don’t care for Yankee/Red Sox games. And although the lucrative task isn’t quite as burdensome as the heft of the Olympics, I’m glad the World Cup is out of the clumsy grasp of NBC.

Of course, their soccer-centric coverage has to do with what is on as much as what isn’t. With the Stanley Cup decided, the achingly-long NBA Finals on an off-day and baseball offering underwhelming rivalries (Cubs/White Sox, Dodgers/Angels), today is all about an American second-tier sport. Do you remember anything about the 2006 World Cup? Maybe so, but what about our national team’s showing? Who scored? Who did we beat? Right.

I love supporting our national teams. I was pumped up when the U.S. hockey team made it to the gold-medal game at the recent Olympics. And although I’m not a soccer or hockey aficionado, I look forward to getting together with groups of people around a television and sharing in the joy, sorrow, surprise and dismay. And really, the Olympics and the World Cup are the prime times we do this as Americans — it’s all so rare.

No, we aren’t going to win the World Cup. (At this point, considering soccer’s popularity in America, it would be sin.) But what our team can do is advance into the knockout stage. We’ve landed in Group C, likely the easiest overall selection of teams. As two teams advance from each group, our chances look great. From then on, it only gets hard or harder. That’s what make today’s outcome against England so important. If the U.S. defeats Wayne Rooney and company they could face Austria/Serbia en route to France. But if England comes out on top the U.S. could be at the mercy of Germany.

That last paragraph may have been more than you wanted to know about the World Cup. I can’t apologize, because the rewards far exceed the effort.

Watch the game. Watch all of them.


Photo from fOTOGLIF

Glen Davis and Nate Robinson’s funny postgame interview [video]

Want to know how it feels when you’re a reserve and you have a direct impact on the outcome of Game 4 of the NBA Finals? Watch this video of Nate Robinson and Glen Davis. They don’t hold anything back…

There is definitely a different mindset as a starter versus a reserve. As a starter, you expect to be in the game at crunch time and are prepared to play with the game on the line. There will be games where you decide the outcome.

As a reserve, you go in and do your thing, but you’re usually pulled with five or six minutes remaining (or earlier) because the coach wants to get his starters back in. Doc Rivers made the decision to let a unit that featured four bench players continue to play deep into the fourth quarter because they were performing so well. Both Davis and Robinson admitted that they kept looking at the clock wondering when they were going to get pulled.

« Older posts Newer posts »