Page 339 of 2957

Mallett admitted drug use at scouting combine

Arkansas quarterback Ryan Mallett (15) is chased from the pocket by Ohio State defensive lineman Cameron Hayward (97) during first half action of the 77th Annual Allstate Sugar Bowl at the Louisiana Superdome in New Orleans, Louisiana January 4, 2011. UPI/A.J. Sisco

In his column about character assessments, Nolan Nawrocki of Pro Football Weekly writes that Arkansas quarterback Ryan Mallett confirmed to NFL teams during the scouting combine that he at least experimented with drugs during his college years.

Arkansas QB Ryan Mallett — One GM said Mallett was the first quarterback ever to admit his drug usage to him in interviews, and his willingness to be honest about his past and acknowledge issues is viewed as a positive. Concerns about his history of use could impact his draft position, though. Although Mallett did not produce an official positive test at Arkansas, he has been arrested for public intoxication and carries a reputation as a “big party guy,” per sources who have interviewed him. How much teams believe he has matured will weigh into his draft status. “I would not take him at any point,” one executive not in need of a quarterback said. He still figures to be drafted in the second round.

If I were an NFL draft evaluator I would be more concerned about his work habits than his drug use. Just because a player experimented with drugs in college doesn’t mean he’s going to be a loose cannon in the NFL. Granted, giving him millions of dollars and more free time usually only fuels young players’ appetites for partying but again, that doesn’t mean they’ll be a malcontent in the NFL. I would be more concerned if Mallett was lazy, failed to show up to meetings and practice on time, or if he generally couldn’t grasp a playbook.

That said, I don’t blame any team for wanting to stay away from him. You invest that much money in a player, he better eat, sleep and drink football until his career is finished or else why draft him? There’s a reason why a guy like Peyton Manning is viewed as the best: because he’s willing to work at the game he loves. If teams get the sense that Mallett is the second coming of Ryan Leaf, then why bother even having him on their draft board?

If Mallett does wind up falling into the second round, one team I’d keep an eye on is Oakland. The Raiders run a vertical offense with Hue Jackson at the helm and Al Davis doesn’t give a squat about whether or not a prospect has questionable character. Granted, quarterback isn’t necessarily a need for the Raiders but Davis has always been a guy who is attracted to big-time talent.

Justin Verlander’s very bizarre balk [vid]

Check out this bizarre pitch by Justin Verlander of the Tigers in a game against the A’s over the weekend. Apparently Verlander’s head said first base but his body said home plate.

Here was Verlander’s explanation of the weird play:

“I went to go pick one and I didn’t get my body turned. The way I thought — and this was all in milliseconds — if I just throw it home, they won’t call anything.”

“I saw the video of it and I couldn’t help but laugh at myself. It might be the first time it happened in general. I thought nothing could happen at the plate. It was funny talking to the umpires. They gave me a hard time about it, too.”

Apparently Justin isn’t much of a multi-tasker.

Ponder and Dalton in the Redskins’ sights?

TCU Horned Frogs quarterback Andy Dalton (14) runs with the ball between Wisconsin Badgers defensive tackle Jordan Kohout (91) and defensive tackle Beau Allen (96) during the 2nd quarter at the 97th Rose Bowl game in Pasadena , California January 1, 2011. REUTERS/Danny Moloshok (UNITED STATES – Tags: SPORT FOOTBALL)

Despite a report a week ago that stated the Redskins were trying to move up in the first round, Pete Prisco of CBSSports.com writes that Washington is actually trying to trade down.

According to a league source, the Redskins are looking to trade down in the first round with the idea they will draft either Florida State quarterback Christian Ponder or TCU quarterback Andy Dalton.

The Redskins, who pick 10th overall, would like to get a second-round pick from a team in exchange for moving back to their spot in the first round. They could then use their two second-round picks to bolster the defense.

For a team that doesn’t have a third-round pick, this scenario makes a lot more sense than trying to trade up.

The X-factor here would be if Missouri quarterback Blaine Gabbert were to fall to them at the 10th spot. The Redskins would likely take him there, rather than trading back.

I share in Prisco’s thoughts exactly. Teams can’t trade 2012 draft picks without a CBA in place, so it would be difficult for a team like the Redskins to move up in the first round without having enough 2011 selections to make a deal. Besides, why would the Redskins want to sacrifice maybe first, second and fourth round selections to move up a couple of spots when they don’t have a third rounder? I get that if a team is in love with a player, you move up and get him. But the Redskins may wind up sacrificing their entire draft for one player if they traded up, which might not be worth it in the end.

It sounds like if Gabbert is there at N0. 10, the Skins will take him. If he doesn’t fall, then they could wait to see if Ponder or Dalton is there in the second or third. (Assuming of course that they trade down and acquire a third round pick.)

Here’s what worries me about the Thunder…

Oklahoma City Thunder guard Russell Westbrook (C) shoots against against Denver Nuggets guard Raymond Felton (20) during the second half of Game 1 of the Western Conference NBA basketball playoffs in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, April 17, 2011. REUTERS/Bill Waugh (UNITED STATES – Tags: SPORT BASKETBALL)

Watching the fourth quarter of Game 1 of the Thunder/Nuggets series, I noticed that OKC didn’t utilize Kevin Durant much down the stretch, even though he had 37 points in the game with seven minutes to play. Over those final seven minutes, Durant was just 1-2 from the field.

Here’s how the Thunder’s final possessions went, before the Nuggets had to start fouling with 0:11 to play:

7:26 Kevin Durant makes two point shot (Russell Westbrook assists)
7:05 Kevin Durant makes 14-foot two point shot (Russell Westbrook assists)
6:13 Russell Westbrook makes 19-foot two point shot
5:45 Russell Westbrook lost ball (Raymond Felton steals)
5:28 Kevin Durant misses 25-foot three point jumper
5:05 Russell Westbrook misses 17-foot two point shot
4:26 Russell Westbrook misses 24-foot three point jumper
4:01 Thabo Sefolosha misses 23-foot three point jumper
3:26 Kevin Durant makes 11-foot jumper (Thabo Sefolosha assists)
2:38 Serge Ibaka misses 16-foot jumper
2:09 Russell Westbrook misses 17-foot jumper
1:40 Russell Westbrook bad pass (Nene Hilario steals)
1:06 Russell Westbrook misses 11-foot jumper
1:05 Kendrick Perkins makes tip shot
0:22 Russell Westbrook makes 15-foot two point shot

Not counting those first two possessions, someone other than Durant shot the ball (or turned it over) on eight of the next 10 possessions. During that span, Russell Westbrook shot 2-for-6 for four points, zero assists and two turnovers. (He did assist on the first two Durant makes.)

If not for the blown goaltending no-call on Kendrick Perkins’ tip-in, the Thunder would have found themselves down by one without the ball with a minute to play. Under those circumstances they easily could have lost the game and they would have those previous eight possessions to blame.

I like Russell Westbrook and he’s obviously a great player, but he doesn’t have a point guard mentality. This has been only major gripe with his game since he has come into the league and that probably won’t change anytime soon. He went 2-for-6 with two turnovers, so he was responsible for five empty possessions in the final seven minutes. It would have been six if not for Perkins’ illegal tip-in.

At some point, Westbrook needs to figure out a way to get Durant (arguably the league’s best scorer) the ball in a position where he can be successful, especially in crunch time when Durant is obviously the team’s best chance at winning. If teams are going to double-team Durant, fine. Let Durant use his size to find the open man. I didn’t see a lot of that down the stretch. Instead, I saw Westbrook dribbling around and firing up contested jumpers. The shoot-first point guard can be successful depending on team make-up (i.e. Derrick Rose, who is clearly the Bulls’ best offensive weapon), but OKC cannot afford to waste crucial possessions in a tight game.

For this reason, I don’t know that the Thunder are championship caliber, at least not yet. They’re my favorite team in the West, but without heady point guard play, it’s tough to win those nailbiters down the stretch.

Players and owners viewing second round of mediation as a ruse?

The home of the NFL’s San Diego Chargers is shown in San Diego, California at Qualcomm Stadium March 15, 2011. The antitrust suit filed by NFL players against the league will be heard on April 6 in a federal court in Minnesota, according to court documents released on Monday. The hearing is to be heard by Judge Susan Nelson with the players asking for an injunction against the lockout declared by the NFL on Saturday. REUTERS/Mike Blake(UNITED STATES – Tags: SPORT FOOTBALL)

Remember the report about how a new CBA could be in place by the time of the NFL draft? Well apparently fans can forget about that.

Just days after NFL Network’s Albert Breer reported that the CBA discusses were getting “serious,” CBSSports.com’s Mike Freeman refutes Breer’s claims and labeled the current talks a “ruse.” After speaking with sources on both sides, Freeman believes this second round of mediation is just a “song and dance, ritualistic, done to satisfy Judge Susan Nelson.”

Great. Happy Monday, NFL Fans! There’s still no hope that there will be a season next year!

One thing that I found perplexing about Breer’s report is that he said the two sides were serious about this round of mediation, yet they weren’t going to meet over the weekend. If the players and owners were taking mediation seriously, wouldn’t they want to exhaust their time together by trying to iron out their issues over the weekend? After all, there’s no season next year. It’s not like the owners and players had something more important to take care of last weekend that they couldn’t continue mediation. I get that these people also have lives but if they were taking it seriously and if they were getting somewhere in talks, why halt the discussion?

If you want to remain optimistic about the situation, then sink your hope into Breer’s report. But if you want to be realistic, then Freeman’s story makes more sense. The players are still confident that Judge Nelson will rule in their favor, while the owners believe that they can reverse her decision on appeal. Freeman is probably right in that we’re right back to where we started when the owners locked the players out in March: Nowhere.

« Older posts Newer posts »