Page 1202 of 2957

McGwire officially admits to using steroids

Here’s a shocker: Mark McGwire used steroids during his career.

From MLB.com:

“Now that I have become the hitting coach for the St. Louis Cardinals, I have the chance to do something that I wish I was able to do five years ago.

“I never knew when, but I always knew this day would come. It’s time for me to talk about the past and to confirm what people have suspected. I used steroids during my playing career and I apologize. I remember trying steroids very briefly in the 1989/1990 off season and then after I was injured in 1993, I used steroids again. I used them on occasion throughout the nineties, including during the 1998 season.

“I wish I had never touched steroids. It was foolish and it was a mistake. I truly apologize. Looking back, I wish I had never played during the steroid era.

“During the mid-90s, I went on the DL seven times and missed 228 games over five years. I experienced a lot of injuries, including a rib cage strain, a torn left heel muscle, a stress fracture of the left heel, and a torn right heel muscle. It was definitely a miserable bunch of years and I told myself that steroids could help me recover faster. I thought they would help me heal and prevent injuries too.

You can read McGwire’s full statement here.

Better late than never I guess, although he would have been better admitting all of this from the start instead of lying. I also find it a little humorous that he took a page out of the Andy Pettitte book of coming clean about steroids and saying he used the drugs to recover from injuries. I guess all the big muscles and home runs were just icing on the cake, huh?

Big Mac has been hiding under a rock for the better part of a decade, so before he stepped back into the public eye I suppose he had no choice but to come clean. Considering the media will surround him on a nightly basis during the season, he was bound to field questions about his involvement with steroids. So instead of denying the allegations for an entire season, he was better off admitting everything up front and starting his new career off on the right foot.

The ball is now in Barry Bonds’ court. The only hitters in the modern era to pass 61 home runs have all either admitted using steroids or are linked to performance-enhancing drugs and their masking agents. So are any of us to believe that Bonds hit 73 dingers on God-given talent? Don’t think so.

It’s good that another player came clean about his use of steroids, but I think it’ll be a cold day in hell before Bonds every admits to any wrongdoing.

Were the Packers screwed?

It was a rough finish for Green Bay in overtime. After winning the coin flip, the hopes of Packer Nation were doused rather quickly. First, Aaron Rodgers just missed Greg Jennings on a deep ball that probably would have won the game. Then, on 2nd-and-10, Darren Colledge was called for holding while a helmet-to-helmet hit on Rodgers went uncalled, setting up a 2nd-and-20.

After a 14-yard gain on second down, Rodgers was sacked (and fumbled) on the ensuing play, and Karlos Dansby recovered the ball and trotted into the endzone for the game-winning score. During the sack and fumble, beleaguered cornerback Michael Adams clearly had a hold of Rodgers’ facemask, but once again it went uncalled. (Side note: I give Arizona DC Billy Davis credit — Adams couldn’t cover anyone in the secondary, so you might as well send him on the blitz.)

Matt Snyder of FanHouse’s Zebra Report had this to say about the two blown calls:

Continue reading »

Should Vick be a starter in 2010?

It seems like decades ago that Michael Vick was supposed to change the way the quarterback position was played forever. That was before Ron Mexcio, trick Aquafina bottles and dog-fighting investigations.

Vick has one more year left on his current contract with the Eagles, but he reportedly wants to be a starter again. Scout.com’s Adam Caplan speculates that Vick could be had via trade for a conditional fourth or fifth round pick, but even at that asking price, is the former Falcon worth it?

In two plays on Saturday night, Vick showed exactly what he could bring to the field. Early in the second quarter, he did a great job selling a run fake and then throwing a bullet to Jeremy Maclin for a 76-yard touchdown pass. But during the same quarter, he also fumbled a snap and somehow couldn’t recover the ball when it was lying right in front of him.

That’s the good and bad with Vick. One moment he’s throwing a seed to a receiver for a long gain, and the next he’s costing his team with his carelessness. Nothing has changed with him since he came into the league in 2001; Falcon fans know all too well the highs and lows of watching Vick run an offense.

I don’t think Vick would be a bad option for the Bills or Raiders – two teams that have little to no direction and that could use an upgrade at quarterback. But the expectations on him should be tempered. At 29, he has lost a lot of his explosion as a runner and don’t forget that he really hasn’t played in three seasons. He only attempted 13 passes this year and most of his completions were of the short-yardage variety.

Should a team take a chance on Vick as a starter? Yeah, depending on what team it is. If a team is a quarterback away from making the playoffs then no, because I think Vick would fail to live up to expectations. But if a team wants an upgrade at QB and a stopgap for one or two years, then I think Vick would be worth a fourth or fifth round pick. (Although, they’d also have to stomach paying him over $5 million in 2010.)

Photo from fOTOGLIF

« Older posts Newer posts »