Author: Christopher Glotfelty (Page 65 of 67)

Athlete Profile: Chris “Beanie” Wells

Chris For someone who stands 6’1” and 235 lbs., Chris “Beanie” Wells rushes with the speed of a 100-meter sprinter and the finesse of a rhythm gymnast. He’s able to see the tiniest of pockets in a defensive line, or seems to have a sixth sense for where they’ll open up. After using this intuition to map his route, he exploits his opposition’s vulnerability like no other. He spins out of tackles using his craftiness, burrows through them with his strength, and gathers extra yardage with his exceptional speed.

Wells once told his father that he wanted to be the first freshman to win the Heisman Trophy. Though this did not come true, Wells was a true freshman in his first year at Ohio State, playing in all 13 games. Even though he was just one player on a talented offense, Wells still finished second on the team in rushing with 576 yards on 104 carries.

By his second year, the spotlight was officially on Wells, and he was voted Most Valuable Player by his teammates. Wells rushed for 1,609 yards and 15 touchdowns, which ranked him fourth among all-time OSU single-season running backs and first among sophomore rushers.

But a memorable 38-24 loss to LSU in the 2008 BCS title game still haunts Wells and the Ohio State campus. In his third (and likely final) college season, Wells is projected by many to win the Heisman. Along with quarterback Todd Boeckman and an outstanding defense, Wells is expected to lead the Buckeyes to yet another BCS national championship.

An Ohio boy through and through, Wells was raised by his parents in Akron, Ohio along with his ten siblings. Ohio State was always the first choice for Wells, who was scouted by many prestigious schools after his time at Akron Garfield High School. It’s only been two years at OSU, but former Buckeye and two-time Heisman Trophy Winner Archie Griffin is already comparing “Beanie” to Jim Brown.

Obviously, this young man has boundless potential. If he can get over his nagging ankle and wrist injuries, he’ll likely fulfill it.

Wells on the Web

Ohio State Buckeyes: Official player page for Wells
Find career stats, highlights and a bio on Wells at OSU’s official player page.

ESPN.com player profile page for Wells
Find game by game stats, scores and a small bio on Wells at ESPN.com.

Rotoworld player page for Wells
Check out all the latest player news on Wells at Rotoworld.com.

The best Chris Wells fansite
A fansite dedicated to Chris “Beanie” Wells.

Latest on Wells

Wells will return for his junior year at Ohio State. Based off his phenomenal sophomore year— rushing for 1,609 yards and 15 touchdowns—he is a likely candidate to win this year’s Heisman Trophy.

News and Commentary


Sports Illustrated.com: 2008 Heisman candidate breakdown

SI.com expects Wells to be among one of the leading vote-getters for the Heisman in 2008.

Is Wells the next Jim Brown?
The Cleveland Plain-Dealer discusses whether or not Wells is the next Jim Brown, a legendary runner for the Browns.

Beanie says ankle injury nothing to worry about

Even though Wells is expected to compete for the Heisman Trophy in 2008, he does have a history of injuries.

Wells Says

On his nickname

“I got the nickname because when I was a baby, I came out and my big brother said I had a bean head.”

On Americans being fed up with Ohio State

“We don’t have to prove ourselves to anyone. We just go out there, play our game, and move on.”

On Archie Griffin comparing him to Jim Brown

“It’s just incredible to even be mentioned in the same sentence as Jim Brown, let alone have Archie Griffin, a two-time Heisman Trophy winner, say it.”

On how often he thinks about winning the Heisman

“All the time.”

U.S. Open Men’s Final Preview: Roger Federer vs. Andy Murray

Andy MurrayAs much as it pains tennis enthusiasts to miss out on another Federer/Nadal showdown, this match with Andy Murray will still contain the passion and close competition of that rivalry. Murray has a reputation of being one of the most disliked players on the tour. People say he’s petulant, argumentative, and that he likes to talk a little trash before a match. Nobody expected him to come this far—his lanky physique and penchant to helplessly huff and puff late into matches have caused critics to write him off as one who lacks what it takes to win a Grand Slam. To say that Great Britain has high hopes for Murray is an understatement. Fred Perry was the last Brit to win a Grand Slam, way back in 1936. It’s true that Murray has beaten Federer two out of their three meetings, but it has never been under the pressure of a Grand Slam final, which Federer has won 12 times to Murray’s zero. Despite Nadal’s absence, there’s still plenty at stake here. Andy Murray has a chance to get his first taste of dominance, and this is Federer’s opportunity to reclaim it.

The match will air today at 5 PM ET on CBS.

U.S. Open Women’s Final Preview: Serena Williams vs. Jelena Jankovic

Serena WilliamsIt’s been six years since an American-born woman has played in a U.S. Open singles final. That match featured one of the earliest showdowns between the Williams sisters. At just 21 years of age, that was Serena’s second U.S. Open championship. Now, close to her 27th birthday, she’s gunning for her third against Serbian Jelena Jankovic. Though Jankovic has advanced to three Grand Slam semifinals this year, her match tomorrow against Serena will be the first Grand Slam final of her career. The two have the most powerful serves in the game, a skill which can produce numerous unforced errors by their opponents. Both are patient and able to sustain extended volleys as well. If Serena can consistently rush the net and get ahead early, she’s the favorite. The key to Jankovic’s success will be her placement; if she can pinpoint her crosscourt volleys and keep Williams on the run, we’ll have a new U.S. Open champion. Either way, we’re guaranteed a new #1 ranked women’s player.

The match will air Saturday at 7 PM ET on CBS.

U.S. Open Singles Semifinals Breakdown

This year’s U.S. Open has already yielded many spectacular matches, and there’s still four days left of play. After 25 years of coverage on the USA Network (ESPN and the Tennis Channel will pick up the rights next year), the athletes are providing a worthy sendoff. We’ve already seen an epic showdown between the Williams sisters and a grueling five-setter from Novak Djokovic and Tommy Robredo. However, unranked or low-seeded players have given the likes of Rafael Nadal and Dinara Safina a run for their money. Below I’ve previewed both the men’s and women’s semifinal matches, which will begin tomorrow.

Women

Dinara Safina RUS (6) vs. Serena Williams USA (4)

The spotlight has always just missed Dinara Safina. Though the 22-year-old has won a Grand Slam doubles title, a singles championship has always eluded her. Also, it doesn’t help that she’s the little sister of 2000 U.S. Open men’s champion, Marat Safin. Safina lost to Ana Ivanovic in this year’s French Open final and earned the silver medal in Beijing. Unfortunately, two-time U.S. Open women’s champion Serena Williams now stands in her way. After losing to Venus at Wimbledon, the sisters put on a phenomenal show last night at Flushing Meadows, with Serena emerging the victor. Given Safina’s emotionality on the court and her focused desire to win the same championship as her brother, tomorrow’s match is a must-see.

Elena Dementieva RUS (5) vs. Jelena Jankovic SRB (3)

Elena Dementieva is another top-ranked player who’s never won a Grand Slam, a testament to how competitive the WTA Tour has been this year. However, it was Dementieva that took the gold from Safina in Beijing. She’s also beat Ana Ivanovic, Serena Williams, and Svetlana Kuznetsova in previous tournaments. Her opponent, Jelena Janokovic, continues her campaign for her first Grand Slam championship as well. Perhaps the most interesting aspect about the women’s competition is that the winner will not only receive the U.S. Open trophy, but the world No. 1 ranking (from Ivanovic) to boot.

Men

Rafael Nadal ESP (1) vs. Andy Murray GBR (6)

By now, most sports fans should be acquainted with Rafael Nadal, even if they’ve covered their ears at the mention of tennis. Some say that the rivalry he has with Roger Federer has resurrected the sport. While that may or may not be true, those two have definitely set a high standard of play and their matches are a pleasure to watch. Still, there’s no question that Nadal is this year’s dominant player, having won the French Open, Wimbledon, and the gold medal at Beijing. Murray, on the other hand, has never won a Grand Slam tournament. Both are very quick and eclectic players, so count on seeing dozens of drop shots and volleys at the net. It seems like more and more matches are being forced into the fifth set. (Nadal’s last match finished at 2:15 ET this morning!) This one shouldn’t be any different, with each player bringing out the best in the other.

Roger Federer SUI (2) vs. Novak Djokovic SRB (3)

Of all the matches in the singles semifinals, this will be the most exciting to watch, for a couple of reasons. First, Roger Federer is on a mission. He seems to like having the No. 2 ranking by his name; it’s almost as if a certain weight has been lifted that allows his to make amateur mistakes and take the same risks he did when he first joined the tour. He’s not playing like he did four years ago, but the this is his tournament, and he’s going for his fifth U.S. Open championship in a row. Novak Djokovic, was his opponent in 2007 final at Flushing Meadows. The New York crowd fell in love with the Serb, in part because of strong play against Federer, but also because of this hilarious video that has since surfaced. Unfortunately, New York’s adoration is a double-edged sword, and its cheers have since turned to boos over the past two days. Both Tommy Robredo and Andy Roddick criticized Djokovic for taking too much time during matches to nurse his injuries. Roddick was a bit more vocal, causing Djokovic to take offense. After Djokovic destroyed Roddick on his home turf, he was interviewed (in front of the 20,000+ crowd) and addressed the derogatory remarks. You can decide if the crowd’s response was justified. Either way, I find Djokovic completely entertaining. He’s also a gifted tennis player and a good bet for stopping Federer’s reign at the U.S. Open.

No No-No for Sabathia

CC SabathiaMajor League Baseball’s scoring review committee has ruled in favor of Bob Webb, not CC Sabathia.

During Sunday’s game against the Pirates, Sabathia had a no-hitter going into the bottom of the fifth inning. Andy LaRoche, with his .171 batting average, stepped to the plate, and dribbled a hit back to the mound. Sabathia tried to bare-hand the ball, and was unable to make the play as it slipped out of his grasp. Scorekeeper Bob Webb ruled the play a hit, on the basis that LaRoche was already two-thirds of the way down the first base line by the time Sabathia got to the ball. Sabathia, who is undefeated since joining the Brewers, didn’t give up another hit through the ninth inning, earning the win for his team.

Milwaukee manager Ned Yost, Sabathia’s teammates, and sports commentators across America immediately expressed frustration with the decision to not give Sabathia a no-hitter. The Brewers organization soon appealed. Yesterday, the committee ruled that Webb’s judgment was not “clearly erroneous” and did not meet the criteria for reversal. If the call had been ruled in favor of Sabathia, this would have been the second no-hitter in Brewers history. (Juan Nieves recorded the first on April 15, 1987.)

A couple things irritate me about this situation. First of all, while Sabathia doesn’t seem the least bit miffed, everyone keeps crying about how “the fans were robbed of a great performance.” No, they weren’t. It would be one thing if this LaRoche at-bat happened in the ninth inning, but it didn’t—it happened in the fifth. If Sabathia really had designs on a no-no, maybe he would’ve tried a bit harder to make the play. Nobody was robbed of anything, especially Sabathia. The fact that he didn’t pitch a no-hitter will not hurt his chances for a National League Cy Young, which is the least of Sabathia’s worries right now. His team is in the playoff hunt.

Secondly, when did organized sports start protesting calls when they don’t concern the outcome of the game? Fan interference, pitches out of the strike zone, plays at the plate, these are calls worth arguing over. When I think of calls which should be appealed, I picture Lou Piniella and Tommy Lasorda getting thrown out of the game. These managers were passionate about the issue at hand because it affected the score. The Brewers went on to the win the game 7-0. Taking an individual performance up to the board of review is ridiculous in a game the pits two teams against each other.

And another thing, retroactively ruling this a no-hitter is not giving Sabathia and the fans ease of mind—it ruins the integrity of the game. Baseball and human error go hand-in-hand. Players, coaches, umpires, and even the fans, can affect the outcome of the game. The new instant replay is great because it determines a game’s score, and thereby a win or a loss, playoff hopes, etc. Still, the game wears fallibility on its sleeve. Who’s to say what would happen if Sabathia’s call were actually reversed; would it stop there? What if a hitter had two singles, a home run, and a triple? Wait, his single in the top of third, he could have stretched that into a double if he really wanted to. Give him the cycle!

« Older posts Newer posts »