Author: John Paulsen (Page 157 of 937)

Hate for LeBron tied to race?

Vincent Thomas argues that there’s some black protectionism going on with LeBron.

You’ve probably heard about his plummeting Q rating (the industry standard for measuring an athlete’s familiarity and appeal). According to The Q Scores Co., for non-blacks, LeBron’s positive Q rating went from 18 percent in January to 10 percent in September and, more telling, his negative Q rating went from 24 percent to 44. Nearly half of the non-blacks in this country don’t like the dude. Meanwhile, LeBron’s positive Q rating among blacks went from 52 percent in January to 39 — a noticeable drop — but his negative Q rating barely budged, going from 14 percent to 15. Among African-Americans, says The Q Scores Co. executive vice president Henry Schafer, the shift in opinion was mostly to neutral.

The general, expressed sentiment of African-Americans has been, “I may not have agreed with how LeBron carried the whole free-agency thing, but I’m not gonna hate the man.” The more America shuns LeBron, the more Black America retreats to his corner. In fact, as America hates LeBron more and more, Black America’s collective hug embraces LeBron tighter and tighter. It’s called black protectionism.

Athletes have always been inspirational figures within the black community and — as far back as Jack Johnson, Jesse Owens and Jackie Robinson — often have taken the public racial hit for the team. So, naturally, through the years, they’ve engendered an almost automatic protectionism response whenever America — whether justifiably or not — decides it wants to hate them.You saw it with Hank Aaron. You saw it with Barry Bonds. You saw it with Allen Iverson. You saw it with Michael Vick. You’re seeing it now with LeBron James. There are plenty of black folks who want LeBron to drop 60 on the Cavs when he visits Cleveland and wouldn’t mind the maligned Heat winning a championship.

As a white man who has never particularly liked LeBron the person or the player, I can honestly say that I don’t dislike him any more now that he’s decided to ‘take his talents to South Beach.’ He had every right to choose to play with a different team and, unlike most NBA fans, I don’t hold it against him that he decided to join forces with Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh in Miami. Was he disloyal to the fans in Cleveland? Sure, but that wasn’t any surprise after hearing about how much of a front-running fan he was as a kid — rooting for the Cowboys, Bulls and Yankees — and how he’d hobnob on the Cowboy sidelines when they played the Browns or how he’d wear his Yankee hat to an Indians game.

First and foremost, LeBron is a fan of himself, and that was what “The Decision” was all about. It was a horrible lapse in judgment and the majority of the jump in his negative Q rating can be attributed to how he chose his new team in early July, not that he chose a new team.

As for the Miami Heat, I don’t know if I’ll be rooting for or against them, or if the truth will lie somewhere in between. I can tell you this — I’d rather see the Heat win a title in 2011 than see Kobe get his sixth ring, so to me, the Lakers are still far more annoying. If nothing else, it will be fascinating to watch LeBron, Wade and Bosh navigate the season and each other, and I’m looking forward to potential playoff battles with the Celtics, Magic and Bulls.

But back to LeBron — I don’t like the guy because he’s an egomaniac, he doesn’t do enough in the offseason to improve his game, he hasn’t developed a go-to post move because he thinks it’s “boring” to play on the block, he settles for jumpers far too often and he complains too much to the officials. Generally speaking, I don’t think he’s done enough with the innate talent that he’s been given, and that’s saying something considering the guy has back-to-back MVPs, six All-Star nods and six All-NBA appearances under his belt.

He has the physical ability to be the greatest basketball player ever to play the game, but he’ll never reach that level because he refuses to work on those areas of his game that give him trouble. That’s why I have a problem with the guy — and it has nothing to do with the color of his skin or his decision to take his talents to South Beach.

Fantasy Fallout, Week 2: Where you lose the game you think you’ll win and win the game you think you’ll lose

SAN FRANCISCO - SEPTEMBER 20: Frank Gore  of the San Francisco 49ers scores a touchdown against the New Orleans Saints during an NFL game at Candlestick Park on September 20, 2010 in San Francisco, California. (Photo by Jed Jacobsohn/Getty Images)

Funny story (at least to me): I had two games up for grabs last night. In one PPR league, I was up 13 points facing Marques Colston and wasn’t particularly optimistic about my chances given the way the Seahawks shredded the 49er pass defense in Week 1. But Colston was held to 5-67, so my team held on. In my other league, I was trailing by 12 with Drew Brees (254 yards, 2 TDs), Pierre Thomas (103 total yards, 8 catches) and Michael Crabtree (1-32) going, while my opponent only had Frank Gore. Seven catches, 168 yards and two TDs later, I lost by two. Ugh. To make matters worse, I had Jahvid Best sitting on my bench, which serves as the ol’ double kick in the nuts. UGH.

What’s the lesson? Anything can happen in fantasy football. Just when you think you’ve locked a game up, you’ll find a way to lose, and when you’re holding on for dear life, the lead will be just enough.

Oh, and don’t bench Jahvid Best.

But back to the SF/NO game…Alex Smith (275 yards, TD, 2 INTs) looked pretty good at times, but both interceptions were his fault. He threw a few very nice passes to Vernon Davis (4-78, seven targets) and Josh Morgan (6-70, eight targets), but Crabtree only saw three passes come his way. I’d keep him on the bench until he’s starts producing.

For the Saints, Reggie Bush looked great (34 total yards, TD, four catches) before leaving the game with a leg injury, and now ESPN is saying that he’s going to miss at least 6 weeks. Bump up Thomas and put DeShawn Wynn on your radar. Heath Evans might get some extra work as well, but it’s more likely that Sean Payton will elect to feature Devery Henderson (3-28) or Robert Meachem (0-0) more in the passing game to account for Bush’s production there.

Waiver Wire Watch, Week 3: How is Mike Williams (TB) still available in 65% of ESPN leagues?

CHARLOTTE, NC - SEPTEMBER 19: Mike Williams  of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers breaks a tackle on his way to scoring a touchdown against the Carolina Panthers during their game at Bank of America Stadium on September 19, 2010 in Charlotte, North Carolina. (Photo by Streeter Lecka/Getty Images)

Every week, I highlight a few players that you should target in waivers. I use the ESPN league data when filtering players, so the only guys eligible for discussion here are those that are available on the waiver wire in at least 50% of ESPN’s leagues. I’ll list each player’s percentage-owned after their name so you have an idea of how available they are in leagues around the country. I’ll always try to mention a few players that are available in 90% of leagues for those of you in 12-team leagues or leagues with big rosters. I’ll rank them in the order I’d pick them up in a league with a high-performance, PPR scoring system.

Please note that these rankings are for total value through the end of the year. Players with particularly good matchups this week are in bold.

Kyle Orton (45.9)
The competition (JAX & SEA) wasn’t the greatest, but Orton absolutely shredded those defenses to the tune of 602 yards and 3 TDs, while throwing just one pick. His upcoming schedule isn’t the greatest, but he has several nice matchups in the second half.

David Garrard (36.0)
His outing against San Diego was rough, but three of his next four games are at home (where he plays well) and the only road game is in Buffalo.

Josh Freeman (5.2)
Freeman has averaged 180 yards and 2.0 TDs in his first two games. There are a few tough matchups coming up (PIT, CIN, NO), but after that, things get a lot easier, and he has two great matchups in Week 15 and Week 16 (DET & SEA).

Alex Smith (9.3)
After a dreadful Week 1, Smith bounced back with a 275 yards and a TD against (with two INTs) against the Saints.

Shaun Hill (0.4)
He threw for 335 yards and 2 TDs against a pretty good Eagles defense. With plenty of weapons to throw to coupled with the Lions’ propensity to play from behind, Hill is a good bet to post solid numbers week in and week out.

Mark Sanchez (22.7)
Which Sanchize is going to show up? The one that threw for a measly 74 yards in Week 1 or the one that tossed 3 TD against the Patriots. Only use Sanchez in good matchups.

Matt Hasselbeck (21.5)
Hass has (try saying that five times fast) always been a decent fantasy player when healthy. This week’s matchup with the Chargers isn’t favorable, but it is at home where the Seahawks seem to thrive.

Sam Bradford (15.0)
A favorable upcoming schedule (WAS, SEA, DET) makes Bradford an interesting play in two-QB leagues.

Bruce Gradkowski (0.0)
It looks like he’ll be starting as news broke last night that Jason Campbell has been demoted to QB3.

Derek Anderson (11.1)

Matt Cassel (11.0)

Jimmy Clausen (0.5)

Ryan Fitzpatrick (0.2)
Trent Edwards is out, Fitzy is in. God help us.

Continue reading »

Nets leading the Carmelo sweepstakes?

New Jersey Nets new owner Mikhail Prokhorov (L) of Russia sits with his new head coach Avery Johnson during Game 5 of the 2010 NBA Finals basketball series in Boston, Massachusetts, June 13, 2010. REUTERS/Mike Segar (UNITED STATES - Tags: SPORT BASKETBALL)

The New Jersey Nets have emerged as the frontrunner for Carmelo Anthony’s services, according to ESPN…

Several league sources on Monday told ESPN.com that they believe the Nets have emerged as the front-runner to secure Anthony. Not only is Anthony willing to sign a contract extension with the Nets, sources say the club is willing to make an intriguing offer of Derrick Favors (the No. 3 pick in this year’s draft), the expiring contracts of Troy Murphy and Kris Humphries, and at least one future first-round pick to Denver to land Anthony.

A source close to the Nets told ESPN.com that he wasn’t ready to concede that the Nets were the front-runners for Anthony’s services, nor was the source willing to confirm what the Nets would offer. However, the source did acknowledge that New Jersey was in serious consideration based on the Nuggets’ reluctance to trade Anthony to a Western Conference team and the Nets’ combination of expiring contracts, draft picks and a young player with serious upside.

Hmm. This trade looks familiar, though the Nets don’t have to include Humphries in the deal (unless I’m missing some rule about the extend-and-trade). Favors is obviously the centerpiece, and he’d give the Nuggets and intriguing building block and running mate for Ty Lawson.

The report makes me wonder if the Knicks have offered Danilo Gallinari and Anthony Randolph (along with Eddy Curry’s contract) or if they are holding to the originally reported Gallinari/Curry deal. It seemed like the Nuggets weren’t too impressed with anything on the Knicks’ roster, so this Favors deal might be enough to get the Nuggets to pull the trigger. They’d get a young prospect, a draft pick, salary cap relief, and they’d trade Carmelo out of the conference. Not bad.

For the Nets, the trade would open a hole at power forward, but the team could move forward with a core of Melo, Brook Lopez, Devin Harris and Terrence Williams. I’m still confused by the team’s decision to invest $11 million per year in Travis Outlaw and Jordan Farmar when they could have used that cap space to sign someone like David Lee. I guess they were waiting on LeBron, like everyone else, and when he finally decided to ‘take his talents to South Beach,’ they scrambled to do the best they could with what was still out there. I don’t mind the Farmar signing so much, but the Outlaw deal leaves the Nets with zero cap flexibility going forward.

« Older posts Newer posts »