Month: March 2010 (Page 10 of 59)

We’re down to the Elite 8

Butler, St. Mary’s and Northern Iowa entered the Sweet 16 as the only mid-majors remaining. But after St. Mary’s destruction at the hands of the Baylor Bears, and UNI’s inability to beat a Michigan State team that was missing its best player, only the Butler Bulldogs still stand.

Watching Friday night’s action it struck me how often it seems that the so-called “Cinderellas” that reach the Sweet 16 fail to perform well in the regional semifinal. Is it because these teams have had a few days to reflect on their success or is it because their opponents — usually power conference programs — have had an opportunity to study plenty of video and were able to better break down their opponent’s strengths and weaknesses? In the end, it’s probably some combination of the two.

Duke’s win in a slugfest against Purdue and Baylor’s trouncing of a well-oiled St. Mary’s team were both impressive. The Blue Devils struggled in the first half but still lead at the break due to a big edge on the boards. For the game, Duke outrebounded Purdue, 45-22. Jon Scheyer finally found his shot in the second half, and when he did, the Blue Devils cruised…or cruised as much as they could against a tough defense like the Boilermakers.

Those lamenting how “easy” of a bracket Duke drew should consider the fact that Duke has to play a very good Baylor team in Houston, which is just a few hours drive from the Bears’ campus in Waco. Baylor is both athletic and balanced, and has the tools to give Duke fits.

Tennessee’s tight win over Ohio State hurt my bracket a little bit, but right now it all comes down to Kentucky and West Virginia. Most people have Kentucky going to the Final Four, so if the Mountaineers can pull off the upset, I’ll have a real shot to win my pool. After losing my overall winner (Kansas) last weekend, I’m a little surprised to be able to say that. Kentucky is playing very well, but the Mountaineers should be able to keep it close by slowing the game down and forcing the Wildcats to attack their zone defense.

In the other game, how much gas will K-State have in the tank after its double-OT thriller against Xavier? The Wildcats are much more athletic inside, but keep an eye on how the K-State wings get through Butler’s screens in the second half. If the Wildcats start to fade, Butler should be able to capitalize.


Photo from fOTOGLIF

Why does everyone hate Duke?

The Week has a piece that outlines five theories why everyone seems to hate Duke.

1. Americans hate monopolies, and love underdogs: Think of Duke as Microsoft, says workplace psychologist Paul Damiano, as quoted in Newsweek. Duke’s basketball prowess, like Microsoft’s software near-monopoly, makes people mad. Americans love underdogs that fight for victory with few resources. Conversely, we hate dominant businesses and sports teams — the New York Yankees are a prime example — on the assumption they buy the best players, or get cushy treatment from the regulators (“aka the referees”). Case in point: Many writers have complained that Duke got easy opponents to help it go far in the tournament, because Blue Devil hatred translates into good TV ratings.

Sure…only Duke hasn’t been to the Final Four in six years. They are still a top 10 basketball program, certainly, but they aren’t the dominant program they were in years past. If that were the case, why doesn’t everyone hate North Carolina or Michigan State? And I don’t like the comparison to the New York Yankees. Duke can’t go around and buy up all the best free agents. If anything, Coach K is at a disadvantage due to Duke’s stringent admission standards.

2. The “Cameron Crazies”: No school has more infamous fans than Duke’s Cameron Crazies, says John Gasaway in Basketball Prospectus. And many Duke haters believe the rowdy — some would say obnoxious — student fans who cram into Duke’s Cameron Indoor Stadium for home games and relentlessly taunt opposing players give their team an unfair advantage. Or, as a student at nearby arch-rival University of Carolina put it: “When I see those Dookie boneheads shoe-polishing their faces navy blue on television, squandering their parents’ money with their fratty elitist bad sportsmanship antics and Saab stories, I want to puke all over Durham.”

Really, we’re going to ask a Tar Heel fan to comment about the Cameron Crazies? That’s like asking Sarah Palin to comment on Dennis Kucinich’s single-payer health care plan. I suspect even most Duke haters wish that their team had a home court advantage like Duke does. Unfair advantage? Give me a break.

Continue reading »

2010 MLB Preview: NL Central

In order to help get you ready for the MLB season, we’re doing division-by-division rankings with quick overviews on how each club could fair in 2010. Next to each team, you’ll also find a corresponding number written in parenthesis, which indicates where we believe that club falls in a league-wide power ranking. Be sure to check back throughout the next two weeks leading up to the season, as we will be updating our content daily. Enjoy.

All 2010 MLB Preview Content | AL East Preview | AL Central Preview | AL West Preview | NL East | NL Central | NL West

Next up is the NL Central.

1. St. Louis Cardinals (4)
Albert Pujols, Chris Carpenter, Adam Wainwright and Matt Holliday could help the Cardinals win this division sauced out of their minds on a nightly basis. That said, would anyone really be surprised if Carpenter’s arm falls off and the starting pitching (which is among the best in the league) suffers? It’s happened before, so if you answered “yes” to the proposed question then you sir or madam, have not been paying attention. Still, the addition of Brad Penny (who pitched well in the second half last year) will strengthen the club’s starting pitching and Kyle Lohse is a fine middle of the rotation guy. Pujols and Holliday will ignite the offense again, although Colby Rasmus might be the key to whether or not this team makes a serious World Series run. Skip Schumaker is a solid table setter, but how Rasmus fairs hitting in front of Pujols and Holliday could be the difference between the Cards winning the NL Central again and playing for a championship. David Freese better produce too or else the club will regret not acquiring a veteran third baseman in the offseason. All in all, the Cardinals are the best the NL Central has to offer and should make another postseason appearance this season. But how far they go beyond that depends on whether or not Carpenter and Wainwright can continue their magic and if Pujols and Holliday receive help from the rest of the lineup.

Continue reading »

Asomugha for McNabb deal a possibility?

It’s a Donovan McNabb Friday here at TSR.

ESPN’s Len Pasquarelli confirms that the Raiders would be willing to part with cornerback Nnamdi Asomugha in a trade for quarterback Donovan McNabb, although the Eagles are reluctant. This news comes via Adam Schefter’s Twitter page, so there aren’t any other details outside of that.

One would have to imagine that the reason the Eagles are reluctant is because of the video game-like contract Al Davis signed Asomugha for in February of 2009. The cornerback is due $16 million in 2010 with an option year in 2011 available for either $16.9 million or the franchise tag number for quarterbacks, whichever amount is greater. So while Philly might have dreams of Asomugha lining up across from Asante Samuel dancing in their heads, they know taking on a contract like that would bury them. Especially considering Kevin Kolb needs a new deal soon, too.

Schefter also reports that Kolb is fully expected to be the Eagles’ starting quarterback in 2010 and that McNabb will be on another team’s roster by the time his $6.2 million roster bonus is due on May 5. The Bills, Rams and Raiders are viewed as the teams most interested in McNabb, but I would have to believe that signing McNabb to a contract extension would be a major sticking point in any trade.


Photo from fOTOGLIF

« Older posts Newer posts »