Tag: sports documentaries (Page 3 of 3)

8 Questions for the Producers of “Muhammad Ali: Made in Miami”

Who needs another Muhammad Ali documentary? Creators of the new PBS documentary Muhammad Ali: Made in Miami succeeded by taking on a fresh approach – how did he become Muhammad Ali? And why is he and forever “the greatest”? We had a chance to chat with the producers, Gaspar Gonzalez and Alan Tomlinson.

Scores Report: Hello.

Gaspar Gonzalez: Yep, it’s Gaspar.

SR: Really enjoyed the documentary by the way.

GG: Thank you very much.

SR: So, is it okay if I just start the questions?

GG: Anytime you like.

SR: What is one thing that you guys learned about Ali that stood out when making the film?

GG: We had researched the film and subject matter extensively before we ever started. I think the thing that surprised us, not that we didn’t know about it, but how kind of compelling the material turned out to be with his relationship with Malcolm X – and how that relationship kind of evolved and devolved. We came across that snippet of film where he is being interviewed obviously after the assassination and he says something to the effect of “anybody who speaks out against Elijah Muhammad will die” which is a very stark thing to hear. I think that aspect of the story turned out to be more compelling than we thought initially.

SR: What inspired you to make this film? Why did you want to make it?

GG: It was sort of my idea and I was not a filmmaker so I took the idea to Alan Tomlinson, so you know without Alan it wouldn’t have been made a film – let’s get that straight. But I grew up in Miami, and I’m forty years old, so I’m just old enough, obviously Ali was long gone by the time I was a young kid, but there were still plenty of people around who remembered Ali when he used to hang around Miami. They remembered running into him in Cuban restaurants and seeing him on South Beach and running to and from the gym – and so I always remembered that from the time I was a little boy. Then I ended up in grad school and did a PhD in American Studies and became a cultural historian. So I was able to appreciate as a cultural historian the significance of that story – the significance of this young kid named Cassius Clay coming to Miami and evolving into Muhammad Ali here, and in some ways these memories I had as a child, you know of people who still remembered and talked about Ali, kind of came together with my professional training as a historian. I thought it was a story that really had never gotten the attention it deserved – so I took the idea to Alan Tomlinson and he thought is was a great idea and so we made the film.

SR: How long did it take to make this film by the way?

GG: Well, that all depends on how you count it. From the time we pitched it to WLRN, which is the Miami PBS affiliate. They gave us the go ahead probably February of 2006 and we went into pre-production — we conducted the interviews beginning of the summer of 2006 and through early of 2007 and we premiered the film locally in November of 2007. So, if you want to count it from the very, very beginning – probably a year and a half. If you want to count from the time we actually started shooting it was probably a little more than a year.

SR: I think one of the greatest aspects of this film is probably some of the interviewees that you guys had and incorporated in the film. I was just curious how did you find some of these people that knew Ali so personally? Was it a difficult process in locating them?

GG: No, not really. Obviously people like Ferdie Pecheco and Angelo Dundee they’re famous in their own right. A few others like Nelson Adams who was the neighbor, as a young boy he was Ali’s neighbor who is actually a prominent doctor in Miami now – and Sonny Armbrister who is the barber, who was wonderful in the film. People like that, while they are not famous per se, they are very well known in the black community in Miami and are very well know in terms of their association with Ali. Everybody knows that Sonny Armbrister was Muhammad’s barber for a long time and that Nelson was his neighbor and so I don’t know that we necessarily uncovered anybody who…I don’t think that was one of the hard things in making this film. You know Flip Shulke is a reknown civil rights photographer and he had actually put out a book in the 1990’s of his Ali pictures in Miami so, that was just a matter of tracking Flip down. So you know again, I don’t think this story was unknown, I think the story was under-appreciated and had been given sort of short shrift in other films and books and what have you – and so I think that’s what we did. We just went back and told the story the way it deserved to be told and we went to the people who can best tell that story.

SR: Was there anything in particular that struck you about your interviewees?

GG: Yes. They were all great story tellers. It’s very unusual to turn the camera on people and have them be as smart and funny and insightful as our subjects were. Almost without exception that is very unusual. A lot of times you can go to somebody who is very knowledgeable and is the perfect interview subject for the film you’re making and you turn the camera on them, and it’s deadly – you know they are just not very good at it – they are not very good at talking on camera and not everybody is. We were really blessed, I guess would be the right word, that all of our subjects were just terrific that way – which incidentally is I think which made it very easy for us not to have a narrator.

SR: Those interviews were really great.

GG: Yeah. The entire film is narrated by our subjects.

SR: What was your favorite moment while making this film?

GG: There were lots. We had such a great time in making it. Making the film was a great excuse to talk to some really interesting people. One of my favorite moments is that when we actually interviewed Angelo Dundee, who is a great guy and a legendary boxing trainer, we thought on our way out the door, we thought of this idea, we said we should take this little T.V. set with a tape player, and play the tape of the Clay/Liston fight for Angelo. You know because we are gonna be asking about the fight. And so, we interviewed him at the gym, and we set up this little thirteen inch television set with a tape deck and we popped in the VHS tape, super low tech, and we set him up on a stool and he watched the fight. Then we had him comment on the fight as it played in front of him – and it was wonderful because he actually said he did not watch that fight all the way through since maybe the night of the actual fight. He’d seen little clips of it.

(Alan Tomlinson joins the call.)

Alan Tomlinson: I’m on board now. This is Alan Tomlinson. I was waiting for the opportunity to let you know I was here.

GG: I was just telling the story of when we took the T.V. over to Angie.

AT: Yes, absolutely.

GG: And it was a great moment. He immediately fell almost into this trance and he started referring Ali as “my kid.” As “My fighter my kid” and it was like he was right back in that moment – and that made it into a terrific interview. So that was one of the things that really stands out for me and I assume that for Alan as well, but I don’t know.

AT: Well, I think it kind of really set the tone for the way we went about telling the story. Angelo Dundee is a guy who, whatever he talks about, he’s right back there in the moment – he’s just that sort of guy who lives and breathes this boxing world and with the twinkle in his eye, he is right back in the moment. He seems to have an incredible memory; although, no doubt watching the fight was a good aid to his memory – but the sort of immediacy of it was so powerful, the rest of the interviews kind of took their cue from that and the whole way we built the film.

SR: Was there a main point you wanted to make by the end of this film?

AT: This is sort of a round-about way in answering your question. But, who needs another Muhammad Ali documentary? Google or Amazon, you will find there are plenty out there. We thought this was one little story, one little window, that his Miami is, which goes a long way in explaining how this guy from Louisville, Cassius Clay, this “Louisville Lip” with predicting rounds and the gibberish and the rhyming became this enormous figure who totally transcends sport – and who resonates with people all over the world: white, black, green, orange – I mean he captures everybody’s imagination; most people positively. But how did he become Muhammad Ali? The fact of the matter is, he became Muhammad Ali during his Miami years. Most times when you make films they kind of take on a life of their own and this rapidly went beyond evoking the time and the place of Miami Beach and the boxing world, which were very important to us in the outset of the film. The heart of what the film is about is how this guy became Muhammad Ali — its one of those things when you start out by doing one thing and you wind up achieving something else. Your way of looking at Muhammad Ali is a little different – it takes you into a world and a time. You know I’m sixty, so I remember the Liston fight, Cassius Clay, and all that stuff – but my kids who are in their early twenties, love Muhammad Ali, and they never knew he was ever called Cassius Clay or that he spent any time in Miami Beach – and they have absolutely no idea how he became Muhammad Ali, his involvement with Malcolm X, and the background of the Civil Rights Movement of the time. So, why do we need another Muhammad Ali film? I mean this was an aspect of it that it just reminds you – Muhammad Ali has now become something almost mythical, he’s almost been sanctified by this point. But he’s just this kid that wanted to be this fighter for Christ sake. I’m always reminded of John Lennon who said, “I wanted to be Tom Jones and look what happened.” This guy wanted to be heavyweight champion of the world and look what happened – and that’s our story.

SR: This is sort of a rhetorical question, but in your opinion, will Muhammad Ali always be known as “the greatest?”

GG: I think that Ali as a figure of his moment and as a figure of the 1960’s – I mean the 1960’s are this era that is remembered as an age of revolt and revolution and transformation – and I think Ali will always be identified with that historical moment.

SR: So, it had a lot to do with the time period in which he came?

GG: Absolutely, to the degree that it was a significant era with the Civil Rights, anti-war movement, and all of that which I think what makes Ali’s place secure. But, you know as Alan sort of points out, that time sort of moves on and there are twenty year old kids who aren’t quite sure why he’s famous. They don’t have a memory of him as a fighter – he was a great fighter. Was he the greatest heavyweight fighter ever? He’s certainly the top three or four. You can argue that he was.

AT: There was another film out there that was made years ago. In fact it was filmed live at the time of the Liston fight, I saw a bit of it on the Independent Film Channel the other night, and someone asks Ali a provocative question and he says, “Listen, you’re the greatest if you think you are, let somebody prove you wrong.” I think there are a lot of boxing experts and analyst who would argue that Muhammad Ali isn’t their number one or two – I think it is Jack Dempsey or Joe Louis. But, there will never be another one like him. I don’t think there will never be a heavyweight as fast as he was and we’ve yet to see in any division a showman like him. In fact, a showman in boxing that we see these days is pretty much taking a leaf from Muhammad Ali’s book. A bit like Tiger Woods today, he certainly increased the size of the purses because people started watching boxing who never watched it before. Of course, that’s all gone now – nobody watches heavyweight boxing. I don’t watch heavyweight boxing. Who is the heavyweight champion of the world?

GG: Who, all six of them?

AT: Yeah, who cares? But back then everybody knew who the heavyweight champion of the world was. If you asked anybody in Ali’s time who was the heavyweight champion of the world, everybody would know. With that point, I don’t think there was anybody as greatly recognized – I mean what other boxer in any division, what other sportsman in any other sport could argue that he became the most famous face on the planet.

SR: Well, thank you guys once again for this opportunity.

GG: Sure, no problem, thank you.

(Be sure to check out Jeff’s review of the documentary.)

Muhammad Ali: Made in Miami (Documentary Review)

Muhammad Ali: Made in Miami documents how and why most of the world knows Ali as the greatest boxer of all time. Going back to a time of severe racial tension, filmmakers Gaspar Gonzalez and Alan Tomlinson explore the beginning and rise of Ali – and the town where only a man like Ali could be believed in.

The film incorporates interviews from some of the most fascinating people that knew Ali personally. Unique characters themselves, anecdotes from ringside doctor Pacheco, trainer Angelo Dundee, and others provide vivid recollections of Ali’s lifestyle and fights. In addition, narrations from biographers provide context and a sense of the African-American experience during the 1960’s, a time when even young Ali returning home with the gold medal from the 1960 Olympics is refused from “whites only” restaurants.

In the words of Pacheco, Miami’s Fifth Street Gym was the island of democracy. With this gym Ali found his identity. Fifth Street gym becomes the backdrop where Ali’s trainer, Dundee encouraged his unorthodox boxing style, which has influenced not just boxers, but all kinds of athletes to this day. Throughout the film, original footage of Ali’s dramatic stage presence shows how he captivated both sports writers and audiences, forcing them to either love him or hate him.

This film also includes Ali’s relationship with Malcom X, membership to the Nation of Islam, and refusal to join the United States Army to fight in the Vietnam War. Also, his first championship fight against Sonny Liston is revisited, and it still carries its sense of suspense. Watching the fight again, it is evident why Ali proved his self-proclaimed title of “the greatest.” For the time, his inventive style was unorthodox and appeared clumsy; however, his motions blended beautifully with fierce counter jabs that knocked unsuspecting fighters to the floor.

Muhammad Ali: Made in Miami shows how Ali is truly more than a boxer. He has done what few athletes have been able to do; he transcended the sport and became a symbol for inspiration. Seamlessly, this film extends its exploration of Ali with the culture and perspective of the time period in which he lived. Audiences can now understand the forces that shaped the great American icon.

Also, be sure to check out our interview with the creators of the documentary.

Interview with Chris Bell, Director of “Bigger, Stronger, Faster*”

The following is an interview I conducted with Chris Bell, director of the film, “Bigger, Stronger, Faster*.” For the synopsis of the film, as well as a review and discussion, click here.

Among other topics, I asked Bell what drove him to make the film, what he wanted viewers to take from it, and how his family (who are prominently shown throughout the film) reacted when they saw it on the big screen. For more information about “Bigger, Stronger, Faster*,” visit the film’s official website.

Scores Report: Hey Chris, how are you?

Chris Bell: Good, thank you.

SR: Just wanted to start off by saying I really enjoyed Bigger, Stronger, Faster*. And I guess the biggest thing I wanted to know, Chris, is what you want viewers to take from your film?

CB: I think just a better understanding of steroids and a better understanding of athletes in general and what they go through. And you know, the kinds of pressures that are placed on younger people growing up who want to become professional athletes. When I was a kid growing up, I basically faced a lot of pressure to look good and to feel good about myself. I felt I had to have a good body. I just thought [steroids] were an interesting facet and I started looking at my own life and going, wow, I’ve really been obsessed with this for a long time and maybe I shouldn’t be. And also, to understand that maybe steroids aren’t the monster they’re made out to be and that there are definitely other sides to this issue.

SR: That was one thing I found to be pretty unique about the film. You did a nice job of showing both sides of the coin. What did you learn from those who support steroids and those who are against them? In other words, what was the biggest takeaway from each side and what did they teach you?

CB: I would say the biggest takeaway from the pro-steroids side was that all the guys that were steroid users were basically saying, “show me the bodies – show me the evidence that steroids actually kill people.” And the fact of the matter is, there isn’t a whole lot of research to prove that. So, [steroid users] are saying, you want me to stop taking this – show me that somebody has died from it. And you really can’t because there’s no real information, or not enough good information, on these drugs. So as part of this film, I wanted it to be a call for more research so we can learn more about these drugs. The other thing that was really interesting was the fact of why steroids became illegal. We always think drugs become illegal because they’re dangerous and with steroids that’s completely not the case. I think that’s an important reason why people need to see the film. They became illegal because people cheated in sports. That was the main reason and there’s no proof otherwise. We did three years of research for this film and that was probably one of the most interesting things that came to light for me.

SR: Right.

CB: And on the anti-steroids front – the people that are against steroids – I was finding that they were against steroids more for moral reasons than medical reasons, but that they would use medical reasons to make their moral argument. And that was a really interesting conflict, because we can’t base things off antidotal evidence or emotion – we need to base them on facts. So, there were people like Donald Houghton, whose son committed suicide, which I feel terrible for and I wanted to approach that in a delicate manor, but I felt that in order to get to the bottom of either side of the coin, you had to really ask the right questions.

SR: That was a really powerful scene, by the way. To be standing in Donald Houghton’s son’s room and having to ask difficult questions about the fact that the young man wasn’t only on steroids, but also anti-depressants, too, yet his father choose to ignore or look past that fact must have been extremely hard.

CB: That’s what I meant when I say [non-steroid users were] basing [their opinions] on emotion. I basically met [Donald Houghton] and went inside the house and talked to him for a while. Then the next thing you know, I’m in the kid’s room and once you get in that room, everything changes. My own personal opinion of what happened actually started to shift because I was like, I’m going to test this guy and ask him all the right questions. I’m a good film maker, I’m going to go do this. And I went and did it, but once you get in that room and see all the kid’s baseball gear is still there. His cleats are still there with mud on them. And you’re like, oh shit, this is emotionally harder to ask the right questions. But I still knew that I had to do it if I wanted to explore the issue.

SR: Absolutely. Why do this film? What was your main drive?

CB: The main drive was in the beginning. Both of my brothers were doing steroids and we started talking about the issue and basically how people lie about it. And I was saying to my younger brother, Smelly, “what do you think about Mark McGwire and his use of andro?” And my brother laughed and said, “Andro? He’s on the juice – come on.” I was like, “really?” and he said, “well come on, you don’t start hitting home runs and get that big.” So I was like, oh my God, maybe there’s something more to this. So the genesis really was that my brothers were using steroids, I started talking to them and learning more about steroids, then realized there was definitely a film in there.

SR: There was an underlying inner battle for you, I thought, throughout the whole film, and that was whether or not you should take steroids. Did you come to a conclusion about whether or not to take steroids or was that not the main focus of the film and really, it was just a small storyline?

CB: No, that was definitely part of it. I asked people several times, do you think I should [take steroids]? And you know, some people said yes – some people said no. Louie Simmons said, “Your morals are your morals, mine are mine. Who are you to judge me and who am I to judge you?” I thought that was really interesting. It definitely is a personal decision for people to make. I didn’t necessarily come to any conclusion (as far as whether or not to take steroids). I thought my conclusion was learning more about myself, and the fact that I learned that my goal wasn’t to be a bodybuilder or to be a power lifter. You know it’s kind of funny, I went into the film trying to figure out if I should do steroids and if they were a good thing or a bad thing, and I came out of it, like, I don’t even know if I want to be a meat head anymore – I just want to be a filmmaker. (Laughs)

CB: It was an awaking for me, because I feel like I wasted a lot of my life slaving away in the gym and I think a lot of us worry too much about what we look like and not having enough fun in life.

SR: That’s a great point. I thought one of the more positive scenes was one with you and your mom when you were sitting at the kitchen table and you had to break the news to her that one of her brothers, your uncle, gave your older brother steroids. Did you show your parents the film and if so, what was their reaction?

CB: Yeah, my parents have actually been to almost every screening so far. They really love the film and their opinion was hey look, if you guys did something wrong or illegal and now you’re turning it into education for people – where people can learn from what you guys have done – then more power to you and God bless you for doing it. They think it’s a good thing. Obviously they were concerned a lot about my younger brother doing steroids, especially because he has a kid. They were also really concerned with my older brother because he has a lot of other problems that steroids only contribute to. We don’t know what steroids do for people that are bi-polar for example, and that’s what he was diagnosed with a couple of years ago. And so, what do steroids do when someone is bi-polar? We don’t know, so of course they’re concerned. But they also feel that the film showed the family in an intelligent light.

SR: And what did your brothers think of the film?

CB: Both of my brothers love it because they really wanted to tell their story. They really wanted people to know how they felt about this situation. And basically, I took a lot of what my brothers said out of the film – a lot of their real, personal opinions about steroids – because I didn’t want people to be skewed and think my two brothers were telling me what to think. And so I left that up to the experts and I just kind of got more of the opinions from my brothers on how steroids are affecting their lives.

SR: What was the hardest part about doing this film?

CB: The hardest part, overall, was patience. I’m probably the most impatient person in the world and it took three years to make this movie. That was probably the hardest thing, just trying to get it right over and over and over again. And editing for months upon months upon months was just really difficult. But I’d have to say if there was one individual scene that was difficult, it was probably that one with my mom because my mom came to me and said, “I need to talk to you because I feel like a failure as a mother – I feel like I failed you guys. And I want to know what’s wrong.” And I was like, oh man, I don’t know if I can talk about this.

SR: Right.

CB: The whole film I was the one asking questions to people and my mom’s like, “all right Chris, I’m going to sit you down and ask you some questions.” And that was kind of scary, you know? At first she didn’t want me to film it. She said, “No, I don’t want to do this on camera, I want to just talk to you about it.” And I said, look, I think what you’re going to tell me right now is going to be really powerful and I think we need to shoot it. I said, you know what, I’ll only have one other person in the room – it’ll just be the camera operator, you, and me and that’s it. And you know, that’s kind of the way we did it.

SR: And it turned out to be a great scene.

CB: Yeah it’s really emotional. And also, you know, I call the film the “side effects of being American.” And what I mean by that is that we have this idea that we have to be the best and we have to be great – if we can’t be great and if we’re not a great athlete or have the best psyche or whatever, we’re nothing. I don’t necessarily agree with that. I think that my mom’s brother John was swallowed up by the same exact problem my brother Mad Dog had. What a lot of people don’t know is that my mom’s brother John died of a drug overdose. I think he was 34 years old, so he was the same age as I was when I was making the film. He died of a drug overdose because he was a great football player and he broke his back. And after he broke his back he couldn’t play football anymore so then he basically felt like a failure. He felt there was nothing more for him to do in life. So he got into drugs and all sorts of other things.

SR: It kind of seems that your older brother followed that same mindset. You know, he even said it in the film that he didn’t just want to be average he wanted to be great.

CB: Yeah, you know what’s really interesting on both sides of coin, my brother said, “I’d rather be dead than average.” My younger brother, you know, has his own gym and his philosophy since seeing the film is that he wants T-shirts made to say that – “I’d rather be dead than average.” And I’m like – I didn’t mean that as a good thing. (Laughs)

SR: (Laughs)

CB: So my younger brother you know, this win at all cost power lifter, looks at that saying as a really positive thing, you know? I’d rather be dead than average – he’s like, “that’s amazing.”

SR: It’s amazing how one person can view one thing and take a positive from it, while someone completely different can view the same thing and take it in a whole different direction.

CB: Right.

SR: I thought it was kind of cool when the movie first started and you started talking about your heroes being Hulk Hogan, Arnold (Schwarzenegger) and Rocky, and then slowly coming to the realization that these aren’t heroes at all. I had the same crushing reality when all the steroid-talk first started in baseball. Do you think kids can look up to sports heroes anymore?

CB: Well, there’s no one to really look up to that’s totally clean anymore, let’s put it that way. But I don’t know if somebody is not a hero because they use steroids. Arnold Schwarzenegger was a hero of mine. I don’t necessarily agree with him and his take on steroids, but I definitely look up to him and admire what he’s done. And I’ve come to the realization by doing this movie that steroids don’t create great athletes, they make great athletes excellent, I guess.

SR: Sure.

CB: I think for kids it’s different though. When you’re talking about an adult…when you’re talking about me…my perception of Hulk Hogan, if he did steroids, I’m like, who cares? He’s an adult and he can do what he wants. But when you’re a kid it really crushes you. It’s really devastating. I think the conflict of my little brother is one of the most amazing strengths of the film because he’s a football coach and he loves working with kids and he loves being a positive influence in these kids’ lives. And there have been kids that have told me the only reason I come to school is to train with Coach Bell. And then I say (to my brother), did you tell the kids you’re taking steroids? And he’s like, “What good would that do? It would only make it worse and it wouldn’t do them any good to know what I do because I’m an adult. And this is something that’s not for kids.” So I thought that was a really interesting conflict because is it sometimes better to not know what people did to get to where they are?

SR: That’s true. And I think it’s interesting when you bring alcohol and cigarettes into the mix, because those are two things that should be, in theory, choices you make when you’re an adult.

CB: Yeah, and you know what’s really interesting is that we did a screening last night and for the first time I realized something. Somebody asked me, “You guys were brought up in a really moral family, so why did you choose to make an immoral decision to use steroids?” And I said, wow, that’s a really strong statement. You know, first of all, my youngest brother is probably the most moral person I ever met in my life. He doesn’t drink – he never drank alcohol really. He doesn’t smoke. He has two kids. He teaches high school kids. He’s a personal trainer and he goes out of his way to help people all the time. He’s a great husband, a great father who plays with his kids all day when he’s not at the gym training people. And, I’m like, so he made one decision (to take steroids) and now all of a sudden, you know, he’s the bad guy. And he said that in the movie – “Why am I the bad guy?” And I say, “Because you’re on steroids and steroids have been demonized so much.” I’m not condoning what he does, but there’s a lot more people doing a lot more immoral things out there, so I’m thinking, wow, with all the problems we have in this country, it’s amazing how steroids have become one of the main issues.

SR: Absolutely, it’s amazing what people will overlook when the topic of steroids comes up.

CB: Definitely.

SR: So what’s next for you as a filmmaker?

CB: Well, I signed with Endeavor, which is a great agency, and they’re working on finding a couple scripts. I think everything I want to do will be something with a social impact or some kind of social relevance to it. So I’m looking at a script right now that deals with kind of the same problems my brother Mad Dog was dealing with, but in the world of ultimate fighting. It’s based on a documentary called “The Smashing Machine,” so we were looking into doing something with that as a narrative film. And I also wrote a script called “Bell’s Gym,” which basically focuses on the wacky world of Gold’s Gym, Venice (CA) and that’s more of a comedy that shows you all of the things that occur in the gym that I couldn’t show you in the movie because we didn’t have enough time. Part of the genesis in this movie is that, oh my God, there are some many crazy people in Gold’s Gym – we just have to film these people. I’m sure that any people that work out in any gym has the guy that pulls his shorts up under his nipples.

SR: (Laughs)

CB: In our gym we have “Grannie Guns.” It’s this woman who has size triple-F breasts and she’s about 65-years old and she’s always flaunting them with these really tight outfits.

SR: (Laughs)

CB: And so, it’s just this really interesting world that needs to be it’s own TV shows. It’s not really a reality show – its kind of “The Office” meets Gold’s Gym.

SR: Oh you guys have to include the guy that was living out of his van [in “Bigger, Stronger, Faster”].

CB: (Laughs) He’s just a great character in general. You should have heard some of the other stuff he said, it was crazy.

SR: I could only imagine! Well I appreciate you sitting down with us Chris and I loved the film. I wish you the best of luck.

CB: Great, thank you very much!

SR: Take care.

CB: Talk to you soon.

DVD Review & Film Discussion: “Bigger, Stronger, Faster*”

Synopsis from official website: From the producers of Bowling For Columbine and Fahrenheit 9/11 comes a new film that unflinchingly explores our win-at-all-cost culture through the lens of a personal journey. Blending comedy and pathos, Bigger, Stronger, Faster* is a collision of pop culture, animated sequences and first-person narrative, with a diverse cast including US Congressmen, professional athletes, medical experts and everyday gym rats.

At its heart, this is the story of director Christopher Bell and his two brothers, who grew up idolizing muscular giants like Hulk Hogan, Sylvester Stallone and Arnold Schwarzenegger, and who went on to become members of the steroid-subculture in an effort to realize their American dream. When you discover that your heroes have all broken the rules, do you follow the rules, or do you follow your heroes?

Film Review & Disccusion: I didn’t know what to expect when I sat down to watch “Bigger, Stronger, Faster*” and, quite frankly, I assumed it would be about how athletes have tarnished sports due to their use of performance-enhancing substances.

But I couldn’t have been more wrong.

Sure, the film does dive into how athletes and celebrities like Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire, Hulk Hogan and Arnold Schwarzenegger got an edge in their respective sports by using steroids. But it goes much deeper than that.

The film does a tremendous job of showing both sides of the steroids issue by including opinions from both sides of the argument. Instead of shoving his opinion down the audience’s throat, director Chris Bell allowed the viewer to determine whether or not steroids are hurting sports, as well as why they’re viewed a certain way in society. (And really, it’s clear throughout the film that he doesn’t have an opinion either way – he just wants viewers to be more educated on the topic of steroids.)

The film relied on interviews with athletes including former Olympic sprinter Ben Johnson (right), steroid users, people who were somehow affected negatively by steroids, and medical experts who claim that there just isn’t enough evidence either way to suggest that steroids actually kill people. The medical information that was shared in the film was eye opening to say the least. (For example, the perception is that steroids cause ‘roid rage in everyone that takes them, but only 5% of people that take steroids develop those symptoms according to the film.)

One of the more interesting takeaways from the film is how America views steroids. The drug is mostly demonized in our society, but why? Is it because it’s played a hand in ruining sports? Is it because we as fans hate that Barry Bonds, who allegedly took steroids, cheated to break baseball’s all-time home run record? Do we hate steroids because athletes use them to get an edge on the field and therefore, tarnish the games we love? Or maybe because steroids have a trickle down effect and potentially works its way into college and even high school sports?

The film raises an interesting debate that has come up in other steroid-related discussions: If you were a professional athlete with the opportunity to make millions of dollars and provide for your family, would you take steroids? Would you cheat? Based on moral beliefs, most of us would like to say no. But then again, most of us aren’t in the position to have to make that decision either.

For the record, I don’t condone steroid use. I’ve never taken steroids, nor do I plan to. It makes me sick to think that high school kids and other young adults in this country are doping because they feel it’s the only way to become a professional athlete.

But let’s take sports out of the debate for a second. When purely talking about adults (non-professional athletes) making the concise choice whether or not to use steroids, the film makes an interesting point that it should be left to the individual to decide if it’s morally acceptable – not society. And it’s rather ironic that another illegal and potentially harmful drug, marijuana, is used almost as a comedic prop in many movies, yet steroids and those that use them are made out to be villains. (Granted, the side effects and potential dangers of the two don’t compare, but it’s funny that one illegal drug is damn near accepted and glorified by society, while the other is vehemently viewed as morally wrong.)

Overall, Bell accomplishes what he sets out to do; he enlightens people about what steroids are. He also gives viewers a different perspective about steroids than what is normally fed to us through the media and the so-called experts.

Click here for an interview I conducted with the director of the film, Chris Bell. Among other topics, I asked him what drove him to make the film, what he wanted viewers to take from it, and how his family (who are prominently shown throughout the film) reacted when they saw it on the big screen. For more information about “Bigger, Stronger, Faster*,” visit the film’s official website.

Newer posts »