Tag: New York Knicks (Page 6 of 36)

Knicks have “more of a sense of urgency” with regard to Carmelo trade

New York Knicks Amar’e Stoudemire, Timofey Mozgov, Raymond Felton, Danilo Gallinari and Wilson Chandler (L) wait during a fourth quarter timeout against the Los Angeles Lakers at Madison Square Garden in New York City on February 11, 2011. The Lakers defeated the Knicks 113-96. UPI/John Angelillo

Alan Hahn of Newsday has the details:

As we reported on Monday, a source with knowledge of the situation said there is “more of a sense of urgency” from the Knicks to get a deal done before the deadline rather than to wait until free agency. But that doesn’t mean the Knicks would be willing to pay top dollar if they know they’re the only bidder.

The Knicks know landing Carmelo would pave the way to attracting Chris Paul in 2012. But if Denver comes in at the 11th hour and demands the Knicks to add, say, Al Harrington (2012-13 salary of $6.68 million) or Chris Andersen’s ($5.2 million in 12-13), that would compromise their ability to sign Paul, or Deron Williams, in 2012, plus build a championship-caliber roster.

This looks like it could go one of three ways, assuming the Nets (or some other team) doesn’t step up with a new offer:

1. The Knicks and Nuggets come to terms. Trade is executed before the trade deadline.
The Knicks would like to acquire Carmelo now, but they don’t want to sell the farm to get him. The Newsday piece states that the Knicks are willing to give up Danilo Gallinari OR Wilson Chandler, and are willing to give up Raymond Felton for Chauncey Billups as well. Rookies Landry Fields and Timofey Mosgov, as well as Anthony Randolph, are also up for discussion.

I don’t think it would be wise to give up more than two of the following four players: Gallinari, Chandler, Fields or Mosgov. Fields is especially valuable since Anthony’s arrival woudn’t cut into his playing time, and he is arguably the Knicks’ best perimeter defender. Mosgov has also shown some flashes and is a 24-year-old legit seven-footer, so he has quite a bit of value as a prospect. It will be interesting to see whether or not the Knicks and Nuggets can come to terms. The article also states that the Nets thought they had a done deal before the Nuggets came back asking for more. The same thing might be happening here.

2. No trade is made. Anthony signs with the Knicks in the summer.
We don’t know if Carmelo wants to play in New York so badly that he’s willing to pass up $65 million in guaranteed money. This would be the ideal option for the Knicks, because they’d be able to sign him outright without having to give up many assets. But with the uncertainty of a new collective bargaining agreement looming large…

3. Carmelo panics when no trade is made and signs extension with Denver.
He could very well decide that playing in New York is not worth passing up the guaranteed money. Ideally, he’d get traded to the Knicks and sign the three-year extension with New York, but if the trade doesn’t go down, the money might be too good to pass up. He’s already admitted that he would take a long look at signing the extension if he isn’t moved before the trade deadline.

The thing to look for as the next week progresses is whether or not the key names in this trade are suiting up for games. If a deal is imminent, teams will usually rest players so that they don’t suffer a deal-breaking injury before the trade is finalized, so if Carmelo suddenly misses a start, we know something is likely to happen soon.

Did the Knicks turn down Nuggets’ latest trade offer?

New York Knicks Timofey Mozgov and Danilo Gallinari react in the final seconds the fourth quarter against the Detroit Pistons at Madison Square Garden in New York City on January 30, 2011. The Knicks defeated the Pistons 124-106. UPI/John Angelillo

According to Frank Isola of the New York Daily News, Donnie Walsh did indeed turn down the Nuggets’ latest trade offer involving Carmelo Anthony. Isola has a “team source close to the negotiations” that is probably with the Knicks given Isola’s job covering the team.

The Nuggets, according to a source, are asking for three starters – including Danilo Gallinari and Raymond Felton – plus Eddy Curry’s expiring contract and at least one first-round pick. In that proposed deal, Anthony and veteran point guard Chauncey Billups would be coming to the Knicks.

The third starter could be Landry Fields, Wilson Chandler or even Timofey Mozgov, though it should be noted that the trade only works as it stands with Mozgov included. More salary (Al Harrington?) would be needed from Denver’s end to balance things out if Chandler or Fields were included. One would think that the Nuggets would want to include Harrington in any deal, but I can’t imagine the Knicks are eager to take him back.

I suspect the Knicks would be most willing to give up Chandler and/or Gallinari, since Carmelo would be replacing a lot of their minutes on the wing. At this point, it would be tougher to part ways with Fields given his excellent all-around play this season as a rookie and cult status amongst the Knicks faithful. Felton is an interesting inclusion seeing that the Nuggets already have a point guard in Ty Lawson that is capable of becoming a good starter, but Felton probably has more long-term value than Billups at this point, so why not?

The saga continues.

Your obligitory Carmelo trade talk update

Denver Nuggets forward Carmelo Anthony warms up at the Pepsi Center in Denver on November 16, 2010. UPI/Gary C. Caskey

And the beat goes on…

Fred Kerber of the New York Post writes that the Nets could soon reenter the fray.

But around the NBA, there is a strong undercurrent that the Nets, while idle now and certainly not viewed as favorites in the hunt, are anything but done if there indeed is a trade in the Carmelo Anthony saga.

Though multiple sources said there is nothing going on at present, there exists a growing feeling the Nuggets will contact the Nets again while playing the drama out until the Feb. 24 trading deadline.

I don’t know about this one. Mikhail Prokhorov had a meeting set up with Carmelo when he elected to instruct management to stop pursuing a trade with the Nuggets. Why would he start the saga again? What’s changed?

Meanwhile, the Denver Post is reporting that Carmelo may be willing to sign an extension with the Nuggets if he isn’t traded by the trade deadline.

Anthony said he would “take a real hard look” at signing a three-year, $65 million contract extension that has been on the table since June if he is not dealt by the Feb. 24 trading deadline.

The team’s all-star said he hasn’t heard any updates from management about a possible trade, though team officials are talking to potential suitors throughout the league. Though Anthony has always said he was keeping his options open, he hadn’t talked publicly about possibly signing until Wednesday.

“As the days go on, that’s something that I think about, that nothing might happen, that I’ll be here, whether I have to deal with the free-agency market or re-sign the extension here with the Nuggets,” he said.

Asked specifically to clarify whether he might sign the extension if not traded, Anthony said, “Yeah.”

What? The Nuggets’ extension has been on the table for months and Carmelo has refused to sign it. Now that we’re just over two weeks away from the trade deadline, he’s suddenly willing to think about re-upping with Denver?

I don’t buy it. This has to be a ploy to get the Knicks (or Lakers) to step up and make a good trade offer. The Knicks may be sitting back thinking that they can get Carmelo as a free agent in the summer, but if he floats the idea that he may stay in Denver, it would encourage the Knicks to get something done now.

As for the rumored Carmelo/Bynum swap with the Lakers, Bynum isn’t thinking about it, per ESPN:

Bynum said that he has not been in contact with anyone within the Lakers organization about the possibility of being traded.

“I think they would [contact me] if it was more than a rumor,” Bynum said. “No one’s really said anything.”

Bynum has never been traded, so I’m not sure if his “they’d tell me” line of thinking is entirely accurate. Like anything else, management will wait as long as they can before informing a player/employee about something of this magnitude. They wouldn’t want to disrupt his morale until a move was definite.

But again, the Laker rumor was probably just a ploy by Anthony’s camp to encourage the Knicks to get something done. Of course, if I were Laker GM Mitch Kupchak, I’d trade Bynum for Anthony in a New York minute.

Rumors and innuendo are fun to discuss, but at this point, I just want something to happen so we can put Carmelo Anthony’s future to bed, at least for a while. I’ve said all along that the Nuggets should have traded him last summer instead of waiting until midseason when all the trade talk would become a distraction for the team. The Nuggets are just 30-23 and are in the #7 spot in the West. They’re on pace for 46 wins, and considering the franchise has been a 50-win team over the past three seasons, the rumor mill is clearly having a negative impact on the franchise.

Carmelo will only sign with the Knicks

Denver Nuggets Carmelo Anthony (R) and Chauncey Billups watch the scoreboard during the fourth quarter against the Los Angeles Lakers at the Pepsi Center in Denver on January 21, 2011. The Lakers beat the Nuggets 107-97. UPI/Gary C. Caskey

The Carmelo Anthony trade saga took another turn recently as Yahoo! Sports is reporting that he’ll only sign an extension with the Knicks.

Several sources told Yahoo! Sports that Carmelo Anthony’s agent, Leon Rose, has recently begun informing teams that the All-Star forward is interested in signing a contract extension with only the New York Knicks. The stance has weakened the Denver Nuggets’ leverage in trying to deal Anthony, not only to other teams, but also the Knicks.

The sources said the Knicks don’t feel pressed to present a substantial trade offer to the Nuggets because they think they can also sign Anthony after the season if he opts out of his contract, as expected.

“If you’re New York, you just sit and wait until the offseason,” one general manager said. “That’s where it’s likely to go. Why give up assets to get him now when you can wait and get him next season?”

The unnamed GM asks an interesting question, but a lot can happen in a few months. If the Knicks elect to wait until the summer they run the risk of Carmelo changing his mind about where he’ll re-sign. Maybe he gets irked about the fact that the Knicks wouldn’t trade for him, forcing him to sign a deal for less money. Maybe he gets traded to the Mavericks as a rental and the team gels and makes a run to the Finals, forcing him to rethink his priorities. Who knows.

If the Knicks wait, they’ll also pass on having Carmelo for a possible playoff run this season, and they’ll be pushing off the inevitable chemistry development into next season.

Ideally, the Knicks would acquire Carmelo by the trade deadline for next to nothing, but signing him outright this summer would save the Knicks assets and money, since an extension would cost more than a new free agent contract. It’s just a risky proposition to wait, because the summer is a long way away.

Three sensible trade offers for Steve Nash

Phoenix Suns guard Steve Nash drives down the court chased by New York Knicks center Amar’e Stoudemire (1) in the fourth quarter of their NBA basketball game at Madison Square Garden in New York January 17, 2011. REUTERS/Ray Stubblebine (UNITED STATES – Tags: SPORT BASKETBALL)

ESPN’s Chad Ford lists the 10 impact players most likely to be moved before the Feb. 24 NBA trade deadline and believe it or not, #10 on his list is Steve Nash.

The Suns have said all along that Nash is still the core of the franchise, but at 22-24, the Suns are a long way from contending for a championship. Heck, they may not even make the playoffs this season. The soon-to-be 37-year-old is still playing at a high level, so he could help a team in need of a good point guard.

So here are a few reasonable offers that might get the Suns to bite.

1. Los Angeles Lakers
The chances that the Suns would trade Nash to the Lakers are pretty slim. No one in the West really wants to help Kobe try to three-peat, but the Lakers aren’t playing very well and they have a big piece that the Suns might be interested in.

There’s a saying — don’t trade big for small — but the Lakers aren’t getting great play out of their point guard position and Nash’s shooting would be a great fit next to Kobe in the Laker backcourt. However, Nash’s propensity to dribble around until he finds the open man would take the ball out of Kobe’s hands, and that may not go over very well (or fit within the Lakers’ triangle offense). The trade would leave the Lakers very thin on the front line, and with the way that the Celtics are playing, it’s doubtful that they’re going to want to part ways with Bynum. But they’re not playing very good baskeball right now and the roster could use a shakeup. Perhaps Robin Lopez could be included to maintain the Lakers’ frontcourt depth.

For the Suns, Bynum could be a franchise cornerstone if he can just stay healthy. I have my doubts about his knees, but if the Phoenix doctors take a look at him and think that the worst is behind him, he may be worth the risk.

Continue reading »

« Older posts Newer posts »