Tag: Mike McCarthy (Page 6 of 6)

Is Mike McCarthy the right coach for the Packers?

Over on FanHouse, Packer fan Bruce Ciskie discusses “The Case Against Mike McCarthy.”

In the end, however, the biggest issue with McCarthy — and one that could cost him his job come January if he’s not careful — is discipline.

The Packers have become a penalty-plagued team during his time. In 2005, the final year under Mike Sherman, Green Bay was in the middle of the pack in penalties assessed. McCarthy’s first year actually saw them improve, as they were near the upper third of the league in fewest penalties. However, the 2007 team — one that finished 13-3 — was fourth in the NFL in penalties, finishing second in penalty yards. The Packers were second in penalties and first in yards marked off in 2008. 2009 isn’t looking too much better. So far, they’re second in total penalties and third in yards.

Virtually every Monday when he addresses the media, McCarthy talks about how they’re going to fix the penalty problem, and the special teams problem. Then, almost on cue, the same issues plague this team every Sunday.

Penalties can be so frustrating. The Packers have all (or at least most) of the pieces necessary for a great offense, yet time and time again they find themselves backed up due to a holding penalty or some other mind-numbing infraction. In McCarthy’s defense, his team is young, but at some point the light has to go on and the number of penalties has to go down.

It should be noted that the offense has the second-most penalties in the league, but the defense is actually 26th in that category. Why the disparity? It probably has to do with the Packer offensive line and how it has been in a state of flux since Ted Thompson arrived.

One of the first things that Thompson did when he took over in Green Bay was to let guards Mike Wahle and Marco Rivera walk in free agency. Financially, this was probably a good decision, but from a continuity standpoint, it’s tough to overcome the loss of two experienced vets. The Packer O-line was a strength before Thompson arrived and now it’s probably the team’s biggest weakness.

But back to McCarthy. My problem with the Packers is how they oftentimes come out flat and/or sloppy. The first half of Sunday’s game is a great example. Suddenly, in the second half, the offense is on fire. Some might say that McCarthy deserves credit for giving an inspiring halftime speech or orchestrating the necessary adjustments, but where was that passion and preparation at the start the game?

There’s no doubt that this team has enough talent to make the playoffs, and with a 4-3 record and a relatively weak schedule, they are in good position to do so. As long as they keep winning the games they should win (TB, DET and SEA) and split the remaining six games (DAL, SF, BAL, CHI, PIT and ARI), they’ll finish with 10 wins and a probable wild card berth.

But with the team’s discipline, O-line and special teams problems, it’s entirely possible that they miss the postseason. If that happens, the franchise should consider finding someone else to lead the way.

Brett Favre extended interview with Ed Werder

The clip runs over 20 minutes, and it provides some insight into Favre’s thinking last summer when he was trying to rejoin the Packers.

I do wish that Werder had asked Favre about the report that he was all set to return in the March of 2008, but as Mike McCarthy and Ted Thompson were set to fly to Mississippi to finalize things, he called it off at the last minute. I think that was the reason that the Packers moved on, but unfortunately it wasn’t addressed in this interview. He never really talks about how his wishy-washiness on the subject of retirement puts the franchise in a tough position summer after summer, though he seems pretty level-headed about Green Bay’s decision to move on.

Packers fire six coaches, including DC

Let the retooling begin

The Green Bay Packers have fired defensive coordinator Bob Sanders and five assistant coaches, four on defense.

In addition to Sanders, defensive tackles coach Robert Nunn, defensive ends coach Carl Hairston, secondary coach Kurt Schottenheimer, cornerbacks coach Lionel Washington.

The only defensive coaches who were retained was assistant head coach / linebackers Winston Moss and quality control assistant Joe Whitt Jr.

McCarthy also fired strength and conditioning coach Rock Gullickson.

The move suggests that coach Mike McCarthy will hire a defensive coordinator who will have a say in which assistants he brings with him. The leading candidate would be former San Francisco 49ers coach Mike Nolan, who hired McCarthy as his offensive coordinator in 2005 and is close to the current Packers coach.

The defense really struggled this season. The Packers were 20th in total yards allowed, 22nd in points allowed and 26th against the run. Last season, they were 11th, 6th and 14th in those categories, respectively. Consistent pass rush was always a problem and the Packers just could not stop the run when they needed to. They were second (to Houston) in points allowed in the fourth quarter, which explains why they went 0-7 in games decided by four points or less.

He looked like a genius in 2007, but if not for that, there would be a strong possibility that McCarthy should be shown the door as well. One more season like this and he’ll be gone too.

I like the idea of bringing Mike Nolan in to run the defense. The 49ers weren’t terribly good when he was there, but the defense was solid and my guess is that Nolan is hungry to rehab his reputation as a top defensive mind.

Aaron Rodgers is not to blame for the Packers’ predicament

With the New York Jets positioned for an AFC East title and Green Bay’s playoff hopes on life support, some are seriously questioning the wisdom of the Packers’ decision to trade Brett Favre instead of giving him his starting job back. The thinking is that since the Packers made the NFC Championship Game last season and Favre is the most significant subtraction from that team, then his absence is the reason the team is struggling. While this is logical line of reasoning, it doesn’t paint an accurate picture of what is going on in Green Bay.

Back in July, I urged the Packers to bring back Brett Favre. At the time, they had two choices: (1) go with the known quantity or (2) roll the dice on the young guy. Given that the Packers were an overtime interception away from making the Super Bowl, at the time it made sense that the team should go with the proven commodity.

But things have changed. Aaron Rodgers owns the league’s 8th-best QB rating (91.2), and is 9th in yards (241.4) and 6th in touchdowns (20), meeting or beating Favre in all three categories. Some football purists might say that he doesn’t have the swagger or the moxy of his counterpart, and at this point in his career, he doesn’t. But much of that confidence and leadership comes with experience, so it’s not fair to hold it against him.

The bottom line is that Rodgers is not to blame for the Packers 5-7 record. Last week against Carolina, he threw for 298 yards and three touchdowns, but the Packers were done in by poor defense (4.8 ypc allowed) and poor execution in the running game on their second-to-last drive, when they couldn’t convert on two carries at the Panthers’ goal line. They had to settle for a field goal, and on Carolina’s next possession, Jake Delhomme’s 54-yard bomb to Steve Smith set up DeAngelo Williams’ go-ahead touchdown.

Are there areas in which Rodgers can improve? Absolutely. On the Packers’ final drive, he had 1:19 to play and two timeouts. Instead of just moving the chains, Rodgers tried to force a long pass to Donald Driver. It was picked off and the game was lost. In that situation, Rodgers needs to take a page from Favre’s book and just keep moving the chains. It’s fairly easy to do that when you’re down four because the defense is guarding against the big play. Get yourself on the Panthers’ side of the field and put yourself in a position where you can take three or four shots into the endzone. But, as we learned in the NFC Championship Game, even 38 year-old veterans are not immune to ill-advised passes in crunch time.

In these situations, Rodgers will improve with experience. After all, he is only 25 and is in his first season as a starter in the NFL. Still, despite the pick against Carolina, he has shown comeback ability this year. In Week 10 at Minnesota with the Packers trailing by one and 2:15 remaining, he threw a beautiful 19-yard pass to Driver to put Green Bay in position for a game-winning field goal. Even though the Packers were still at the edge of Mason Crosby’s field goal range, they got conservative and called two Ryan Grant runs, which totaled three yards and eventually led to Crosby’s 52-yard missed field goal. Is that loss somehow Rodgers’ fault? Of course not.

Just take a look at the defense. The Packers are 17th in total yards allowed. Last year, they were 11th. They are 27th against the run. Last year, they were 14th. They are 22nd in points allowed. Last year, they were 6th. The only area in which the defense has improved is against the pass (11th in 2007 to 5th this year), and that’s because they are so bad against the run. Oakland and Indianapolis are also in the Top 8 against the pass but are 29th and 25th respectively against the run. There are teams that are good against the pass and then there are teams that seem like they are good against the pass because they are so bad against the run.

So if Favre were still in Green Bay, the team would probably be 5-7, or 6-6, or maybe even 4-8. QB play has very little to do with the defense, other than to put the unit in a tough position by throwing bad interceptions (and Favre has thrown more picks than Rodgers). We could also point a finger at the special teams, which allowed Mark Jones back-to-back 51-yard and 45-yard kick returns that set up two fourth-quarter touchdowns for the Panthers. Throw in Crosby’s missed field goal against the Vikings and there’s clearly plenty of non-QB blame to go around.

Finally, you have to think about the future. If the Packers had brought back Favre, Rodgers wouldn’t have re-signed. He would have looked for an opportunity elsewhere, especially when Favre inevitably started his whole retirement dance the following summer. So, removing the names for a second, which QB would you rather have?

QB1 – 39 years-old, 90.4 QB rating, 20 TD, 14 INT

QB2 – 25 years-old, 91.2 QB rating, 20 TD, 10 INT + a second-round pick

Assuming the Jets make the playoffs, that’s how this trade is going to work out.

Despite the team’s current predicament, the Packers made the right decision.

Newer posts »