Page 870 of 2957

      More trouble for Michael Vick?

      June 25, 2010 /

      The Philadelphia Inquirer is reporting that Michael Vick is not a suspect in an incident that occurred early this morning that resulted in a man named Quanis Phillips being shot outside a nightclub in Virginia. Vick had been celebrating his 30th birthday at the restaurant/club sometime before the shooting occurred.

      The police have stated that they have no interest in Vick, but that doesn’t mean he won’t face punishment from the NFL. When commissioner Roger Goodell reinstated Vick last July, part of the deal was that Vick wasn’t supposed to associate with anyone from his days as a dog fighter. And Phillips was just one of the people that Vick had a close “business relationship” with when he owned Bad Newz Kennels. Goodell also announced upon Vick’s reinstatement that the quarterback’s margin for error was “extremely limited.”

      Falcons’ receiver Roddy White, who was apparently with Vick earlier in the night, said that the two of them had left the party before the shooting took place. Said White: “I don’t know what’s going to go on with that or whatever, but we didn’t have anything to do with it.”

      Not many details are available right now, so we can only speculate about what transpired leading up to the shooting. Maybe Phillips was there without Vick’s knowledge or arrived to the restaurant after the quarterback had left. Who knows?

      But the mere fact that Vick’s name is being brought up in relation to another off-field incident is troubling to say the least. It sounds as if he did nothing wrong and wasn’t involved in the shooting. It also isn’t a crime to celebrate your birthday with your friends, although if one of those friends is an old acquaintance that helped you set up an illegal dog-fighting ring, then that’s a problem. And if Phillips was invited to the party, then Vick’s decision-making is yet again up for criticism.

      Check back for more details on this developing story.


      Photo from fOTOGLIF

      External Sports, NFL

      USC appeals NCAA ruling, asks for 1-year bowl ban instead of two

      June 25, 2010 /

      USC has appealed the NCAA’s sanctions that prohibits them from playing in any postseason games over the next to years and has asked that the ban be reduced to only one year.

      From ESPN.com:

      USC appealed only certain aspects of this month’s ruling. Among the penalties were a two-year bowl ban, four years of probation, scholarship losses and removal of several victories. The school will accept a bowl ban for the upcoming season and certain scholarship penalties in football, but believes the full sanctions were unduly harsh.

      USC asked for the two-year postseason ban to be reduced to one year. The school also wants the NCAA’s scholarship reductions in football from 2011 to 2013 to be reduced to five lost scholarships in each season, rather than 10.

      “We disagree with many of the findings in the report from the NCAA Committee on Infractions and assert that the penalties imposed are too severe for the violations identified and are inconsistent with precedent in similar cases,” said Todd Dickey, USC’s senior vice president for administration.

      USC already announced it would appeal immediately after the sanctions were handed down June 10. The NCAA’s appeal process typically takes at least several months, and Dickey said the Trojans might get an answer by spring only in a best-case scenario.

      If the NCAA wants to make an example out of USC, then there’s little hope that the ban will be reduced. This situation could serve warning to all programs that if they’re caught breaking rules, that they could be punished as severely as the Trojans were.

      That said, considering those that were at fault (ahem, Reggie Bush, Pete Carroll, etc.) for the ban aren’t involved with the program anymore, one can make the argument (and many certainly have) that the NCAA was too harsh in its ruling.

      We’ll see what they rule…in a year.

      College Football, External Sports

      Giants’ rookie Chad Jones suffers career-threatening injuries in car wreck

      June 25, 2010 /

      In what can only be described as a horrific car wreck, New York Giants’ rookie Chad Jones suffered career-threatening injuries when he slammed his SUV into a streetcar pole in New Orleans early Friday morning.

      WDSU 6 in New Orleans has the details:

      The crash happened around 5 a.m. on Carrollton Avenue in New Orleans, in front of the Home Depot.

      WDSU has learned that Jones’ most serious injuries are to his left ankle and leg. A source close to the situation describes the injury as “dire,” noting that amputation of the leg is a possibility.

      The same source said Jones did not sustain any serious injuries to his upper body and that the situation was not life-threatening.

      New Orleans police spokeswoman Shereese Harper said Jones was driving his 2010 Range Rover on North Carrollton, headed toward Canal Street, when he lost control and hit a streetcar pole.

      Emergency crews had to cut him out of the vehicle, Harper said. Two other people in the car were not badly injured.

      Jones was taken to a local hospital, where he was in critical condition and was in surgery Friday morning, Harper said.

      Here’s hoping Jones makes a full recovery and he can walk again. Reports earlier in the day stated that doctors had saved his left leg, but amputation still hasn’t been ruled out. From the looks of the photos, it’s fortunate that everyone made it out without any life-threatening injuries.

      Nobody currently knows how the accident happened or if Jones was being a reckless driver. It’s also unclear at this point whether or not he had been drinking before the accident, so it’s not fair to speculate if he was driving while inebriated. I’ll update this post as more information is released.

      External Sports, NFL

      Did ESPN do a good job covering the draft?

      June 25, 2010 /

      The Big Lead says ESPN’s coverage was unimpressive.

      We’ll get into some detail below, but here are our main gripes with ESPN’s 2010 NBA draft coverage: 1) College players are being drafted, so why are NBA analysts the ones doing most of the talking?; 2) Far too much LeBron/free agency talk (a smattering was inevitable, but it was relentless; food for thought – Does the NBA need to consider pushing up free agency or pushing back the draft?); 3) there was zero energy from the ESPN talking heads. Maybe it was just a dull, predictable draft, or perhaps the flurry of trades killed whatever flow the draft could have had. But in a word, last night was dull. Was there even one distinguishable moment?

      There are two separate issues here: 1) the predictability of the draft, especially the early picks, and 2) the quality of the coverage.

      The first part of the draft was a snoozer, and that pretty much made the whole night a snoozer. Chad Ford nailed the top 8 picks, and there were no trades, so there were no surprises. After the marquee names are off the board, the draft became a grind, and that’s not really ESPN’s fault.

      I thought Van Gundy was funny when given the opportunity and did a decent job adding levity to a night that needed it. Like TBL goes on to say, Jay Bilas needs a foil, someone to argue picks with, so ESPN should bring in another college scout type to play McShay to his Kiper. One NBA guy (JVG) is enough. He can put the pick into perspective and discuss the free agency rumors that are bouncing around.

      External Sports, Fantasy Basketball, NBA, NBA Draft, Television

      « Older posts Newer posts »

      © 2026 The Scores Report – The National Sports Blog

      Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑