Page 449 of 2956

Cardinals have yet to make a contract offer to Albert Pujols

St. Louis Cardinals Albert Pujols swings for a solo home run against the Chicago Cubs in the first inning at Busch Stadium in St. Louis on August 13, 2010. UPI/Bill Greenblatt

Tim Brown of Yahoo! Sports writes that the Cardinals have not made an offer to Albert Pujols yet.

All indications suggest that Pujols and the team that drafted him a dozen years ago are not close to an agreement, and that eight days won’t be time enough to negotiate and consummate not only the richest contract in club history, but possibly the richest in the history of the game. As of the weekend, the Cardinals hadn’t made a concrete offer.

In calculations using metrics of player comparison, estimated production and age curves, hardballtimes.com valued Pujols as high as $275 million over 10 years (almost exactly A-Rod money), fangraphs.com put his value at $267 million over 10 years, and sabernomics.com – factoring in the normal increases in player salaries and league revenues – came in at $350 million over eight years.

Businessinsider.com, which determined Pujols – given his production – was underpaid by as much as $130 million over the life of his current contract, said Pujols’ next eight seasons would be worth as much as $240 million.

To me, there’s no debate over whether or not Pujols deserves the money. As the best player in baseball, he should be paid in the A-Rod range.

But it’s not hard to see where the Cardinals are coming from here. What if Pujols’ production declines sooner rather than later? What if they aren’t able to build a competitive roster around him? Their team payroll often doesn’t exceed $100 million and now they’re going to pay one player nearly $300 million? They’re in a tough spot.

That said, it’s nearing that time where St. Louis either has to sh*t or get off the pot. They’re hoping that Pujols (who wants to stay in St. Louis) will eventually accept a discount, but his camp seems unwilling to budge on their demands.

Ward frustrated over lack of opportunities on final drive of Super Bowl

Pittsburgh Steelers Gary Russell (L), Hines Ward (C) and Mike Wallace enter the field before the start of Super Bowl XLV at Cowboys Stadium in Arlington, Texas on February 6, 2011. UPI/David Silpa

Hines Ward expressed his frustrations to the Pittsburgh Post Gazette about not having more opportunities to make plays on the Steelers’ final drive against the Packers in Super Bowl XLV. But as usual, he was professional about it.

Ward thought they’d do it right until the end, when they had a first-down on their 13 and two minutes to go. However, without criticizing anyone, he was not happy he did not get much of an opportunity on that drive. Heath Miller caught the first pass for 15 yards. Ward caught the next for 5 yards — which wasted about 30 seconds because Antwaan Randle El acknowledged he lined up on the wrong side. The next three passes all were aimed at Mike Wallace but never connected.

“I’m thinking deja vu, here we go again,” said Ward, who caught seven passes for 78 yards and one touchdown in the game. “Two minutes, let’s go down there. I really felt like I was in a zone, that anything that came my way it was going to get caught no matter what. I didn’t get an opportunity. I would like to have gotten opportunities [on the final series] but it didn’t happen.”

Spoken like a true competitor. Ward has been around long enough to know that criticizing coaches or teammates gets you nowhere fast. If you’re a winner, you want the ball in your hands in crunch time and there’s no doubt Ward is a winner. I’m sure Mike Tomlin appreciates that his veteran receiver wanted more chances to make plays in the clutch and expressed his frustrations without throwing anyone under the bus.

On a related topic, Ward will have two surgeries this week, one on his left knee and the other on his left thumb. As of right now, the Steelers expect him to be back in uniform next year if there’s a season.

Why won’t the Lakers give up Bynum to get Carmelo?

Denver Nuggets Carmelo Anthony and Los Angeles Lakers Kobe Bryant smile at each other to begin the second half at the Pepsi Center in Denver on November 11, 2010. The Nuggets ended the Lakers season opening eight game winning streak by the score of 118-112. UPI/Gary C. Caskey

Yahoo! Sports’ Adrian Wojnarowski tweeted that the Lakers aren’t planning to trade Andrew Bynum, even for Carmelo Anthony.

NY will work trade on its terms but knows it can get Melo in free agency. Anyway, Jim Buss has made it clear within org: Bynum is staying.

If I were a Laker fan (which I’m not), I’d be furious about the position that Buss is taking here. Furious.

I get it — Bynum is a good player when he’s healthy. But over the past four seasons, including the postseason, he has missed 172 of the Lakers’ 395 games (43.5%) due to issues with his knees. There are a few things I’ve learned about knee injuries over the years: 1) knee problems aren’t good for basketball players, 2) knee problems aren’t good for seven-footers and 3) knee problems don’t usually just go away.

The Lakers almost always finish games with Pau Gasol at center and Lamar Odom at small forward. So they’re unwilling to trade an injury-prone player (that they don’t even play in crunch time) for a 26-year-old, five time All-NBA performer?

Are they nuts?

The only — and I mean only — reason I can see for this inflexibility would be that the Lakers are expecting to see the Celtics again in the Finals. If healthy, Bynum would certainly help battle Shaq and Kendrick Perkins down low. But there are a few problems with this thinking: 1) the Lakers aren’t playing all that well right now and could use some new blood, 2) they will face stiff competition from the Spurs, Mavs and Thunder just to get out of the West, and 3) there’s a good chance that the Celtics don’t make the Finals, and the Lakers will instead face the Heat, the Bulls or even the Magic.

If it’s the Heat or Bulls, wouldn’t the Lakers much rather have Carmelo than Bynum? What about the Spurs, Mavs and Thunder? None of those teams have a true center that only Bynum could defend (unless you count Tim Duncan, whom I think Gasol could handle in a pinch). If the Lakers need another big man, I’m sure the Nuggets would include Nene or Chris Andersen at a reasonable price.

Of course, the Nuggets may not even want Bynum at this point, though if the Wilson Chandler/Corey Brewer package is the best offer they’re getting, I would think any package including Bynum would be better. There are rumors floating around that Carmelo’s camp leaked the supposed Nuggets/Lakers talks to get the Knicks to panic a little and up their offer. Someone close to Carmelo even said that he’d definitely re-up with the Lakers if he was traded there.

Hmmm…methinks there’s some gamesmanship afoot.

Regardless, if the Lakers can get a five-time All-NBA performer at the expense of a seven-footer with bad knees who doesn’t even finish games, I think they should do it.

To quote Kobe from a few years ago, “Are you kidding me? Ship his ass out.

Report: Mark Sanchez hooked up with 17-year-old girl

New York Jets quarterback Mark Sanchez reacts with fans after the game against the Buffalo Bills in week 17 of the NFL season at New Meadowlands Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey on January 2, 2011. The Jets defeated the Bills 38-7 and advance to the playoffs. UPI /John Angelillo

Clearly still rattled by the loss to the Steelers in the AFC title game, Jets’ quarterback Mark Sanchez apparently decided to find comfort in the open arms of a 17-year-old girl. She’s a senior at her Connecticut high school and reportedly is the daughter of a preppy dad who is a “super-wealthy financier.”

From FOX News New York:

Sexy rich girl Eliza Kruger not only bragged on Facebook about “MARK F–ING SANCHEZ” texting her after they flirted at a hip Manhattan nightclub on New Year’s Eve — she also took photos of a mussed-up bed in his boudoir as “proof” of their huddle just days later.

“We went back to his place in Jersey after dinner. He lives on a golf course. There was a big storm,” Eliza told Deadspin.com, according to that Web site, which identified her only as E.K.

Asked if she “hooked up” with the 24-year-old Sanchez that night — after they dined together at Midtown hotspot Nobu the first week of January — the Greenwich high-school senior said, “Yeah,” albeit somewhat reluctantly, according to Deadspin.

When a Deadspin editor told her he would research the legality, Eliza reportedly replied that the age of sexual consent in New Jersey is “16. I checked.”

“He’s a really nice guy, you know,” Eliza told the site. “He’s one of the kindest people, and he’s a genuine person.”

Hey, you can find love in all kinds of different places but what in the name of Fireman Ed is Sanchez thinking? I don’t care if she is a bombshell: she’s 17 and he’s a public figure. The age difference between the two is only seven years but maturity-wise, they might as well be 40-years apart. (By the way, this may or may not be a photo of her.)

He’s the quarterback of the New York freaking Jets and she’s still in high school. I just don’t know what goes through these athletes’ heads sometimes. The guy has dated models before and he’s taking a high school senior to dinner and back to his place? How stupid.

The only saving grace for Sanchez may be that he didn’t know how old she was. Seventeen-year-olds can look 24 these days and they met at a nightclub, so maybe he thought they were the same age (or at least 21 since she was in a bar). Unless the female looks super young, I don’t know any dudes that card a girl before they attempt to pick her up at a club.

If he didn’t know how old she was, then they best thing for him to do is come clean and be honest. The fact that he didn’t know her age is certainly more tolerable than him knowingly dating a high school senior. Or hey, maybe this story isn’t even true and she’s a liar. I hope for Sanchez’s sake that that’s the case.

A-Rod not happy about popcorn shot

Per the Chicago Sun-Times

A few Fox honchos’ ears were burning Sunday night in Dallas — and it had nothing to do with the action on the Cowboys Stadium field. Turns out Yankees slugger Alex Rodriguez wanted to slug a few folks after he spotted himself and his girlfriend Cameron Diaz being shown to the 111 million people watching the game.

America saw the actress lovingly feeding popcorn into A-Rod’s mouth.

“He really went ballistic — thinking the cameraman was out to get them in a paparazzi-like shot. … That’s so crazy,” said my source. “Anyone who knows anything about producing a live sports event — especially something as huge as the Super Bowl — would know that those celebrity shots are purely random.

“A-Rod, of all people, should know that.”

After that one shot — which frankly was totally innocent and kind of sweet — Rodriguez got a guarantee that he and Diaz would not be televised any further.

Here’s an idea — if you don’t want the camera to catch your girlfriend feeding you popcorn, THEN DON’T LET HER FEED YOU POPCORN AT THE F#$%!NG SUPER BOWL!

This is it — this is where ego and idiocy converge.

Just because he complained to Fox, I’m going to post the video here, in case you missed it:

« Older posts Newer posts »