…at least that’s what Greg Easterbrook of ESPN.com is suggesting.
Four games into his fifth season, Eli is 44-30 as a starter and has a Super Bowl ring. At the same point in his career, Peyton was 35-35 and had not won a postseason game. In terms of passing stats, the two players are approximately the same. In terms of leadership, Eli won the Super Bowl in his fourth season with a team whose personnel was so undistinguished, not one of the 16 sets of expert predictions ESPN.com ran before the 2007 season even had the Giants making the playoffs, let alone winning the Super Bowl. On Sunday, both Manning brothers recorded monster wins, and both played well. Eli achieved close to perfection — he was 19-of-25 for 267 yards, with two touchdowns and no interceptions. His perfect passing made who-dat backup receiver Domenik Hixon (see below) look like a star, and his leadership skills inspired the who-dat Giants offensive line — quick, how many of them can you name without peeking? — to play like the New England offensive line of 2007. Stretching back to last season, the Giants have won eight straight games, and this season’s 127-49 scoring margin over their opponents is spectacular. If football stays popular for a thousand years, Eli’s escape from four tacklers on that last-minute Super Bowl scoring drive will always be one of the sport’s signature plays. Peyton is great, and a near-lock for Canton. Eli may be bound for the same place, with his bust in a slightly nicer corner.
See this is what happens. A quarterback wins a Super Bowl and all of a sudden he’s on par with every other Super Bowl quarterback that has ever lived. I’m not saying that’s what Easterbrook is saying, but he’s at least suggesting it, which at this point seems like a reach.
Eli Manning is turning into a great player. And the stats that Easterbrook mentions are solid. But if we want to bring up numbers, Peyton dwarfs Eli in nearly every major passing category including total yardage (42,657 to 11,861), TD to INT ratio (311-158 to 80-65) and QB rating (94.3 to 74.0).
Yes, Peyton has more years on Eli and has had an advantage playing in the same system his entire career. But the reason he’s been able to do the latter is because he wins and keeps everybody employed. He’s led the Colts to the playoffs every year except his rookie season and everybody has seem to forgotten how lost Eli looked in his first three seasons (even though he did lead the Giants to the postseason with a dazzling 8-8 record in 2006). Peyton struggled in his rookie campaign and then led Indy to a division title the next year, and the year after that, and the year after that, and the year after that…
Maybe Eli will be better than Peyton when it’s all said and done, but not right now. Not when Peyton is sitting on a mountain of personal milestones and accomplishments. Just because the two have switched roles (to some degree) this year doesn’t mean we should go overboard and say Eli might be better than his big bro some day.
