Category: Rumors & Gossip (Page 9 of 225)

Jerry Sloan resigns due to strained relationship with Deron Williams

Utah Jazz Head Coach Jerry Sloan has words for an official during play against the Golden State Warriors in the second half at Oracle Arena in Oakland, California on January 30, 2011. The Warriors defeated the Jazz 96-81. UPI/Terry Schmitt

Per Yahoo! Sports’ Adrian Wojnarowski and Marc J. Spears…

Sloan’s relationship with point guard Deron Williams had grown progressively worse over the course of the season, league sources said, and the coach had tired of dealing with the team’s best player. The frustration escalated on Wednesday night when Sloan and Williams clashed in the locker room at halftime.

“He decided right there in halftime that he was done,” a league source told Yahoo! Sports. “He felt like ownership was listening more to Williams than they were to him anymore. He was done.”

One source said Sloan had become tired of Williams “blaming everything on everyone else.” Still, Williams, who can become a free agent in the summer of 2012, has remained the Jazz’s best and most consistent player after the departure of several key teammates. Williams has always had a reputation for wanting to win badly and being a strong leader.

This is a surprise. Sloan owns a career 1221-803 (.603) record and led the Jazz to 21 winning seasons in his 23-year tenure in Utah, including thirteen 50+ win seasons. Yes, he was fortunate to be able to coach John Stockton and Karl Malone for many of those years, but I would argue that without Sloan, that duo would not have been nearly as effective as they turned out to be. Sloan’s teams always play hard, as he has a knack for getting the most out of his roster.

It’s an absolute travesty that he never won the Coach of the Year award, though he was inducted into the Hall of Fame as a coach in 2009. It will be interesting to see if the 68-year-old decides to coach elsewhere or if he hangs ’em up for good.

Your obligitory Carmelo trade talk update

Denver Nuggets forward Carmelo Anthony warms up at the Pepsi Center in Denver on November 16, 2010. UPI/Gary C. Caskey

And the beat goes on…

Fred Kerber of the New York Post writes that the Nets could soon reenter the fray.

But around the NBA, there is a strong undercurrent that the Nets, while idle now and certainly not viewed as favorites in the hunt, are anything but done if there indeed is a trade in the Carmelo Anthony saga.

Though multiple sources said there is nothing going on at present, there exists a growing feeling the Nuggets will contact the Nets again while playing the drama out until the Feb. 24 trading deadline.

I don’t know about this one. Mikhail Prokhorov had a meeting set up with Carmelo when he elected to instruct management to stop pursuing a trade with the Nuggets. Why would he start the saga again? What’s changed?

Meanwhile, the Denver Post is reporting that Carmelo may be willing to sign an extension with the Nuggets if he isn’t traded by the trade deadline.

Anthony said he would “take a real hard look” at signing a three-year, $65 million contract extension that has been on the table since June if he is not dealt by the Feb. 24 trading deadline.

The team’s all-star said he hasn’t heard any updates from management about a possible trade, though team officials are talking to potential suitors throughout the league. Though Anthony has always said he was keeping his options open, he hadn’t talked publicly about possibly signing until Wednesday.

“As the days go on, that’s something that I think about, that nothing might happen, that I’ll be here, whether I have to deal with the free-agency market or re-sign the extension here with the Nuggets,” he said.

Asked specifically to clarify whether he might sign the extension if not traded, Anthony said, “Yeah.”

What? The Nuggets’ extension has been on the table for months and Carmelo has refused to sign it. Now that we’re just over two weeks away from the trade deadline, he’s suddenly willing to think about re-upping with Denver?

I don’t buy it. This has to be a ploy to get the Knicks (or Lakers) to step up and make a good trade offer. The Knicks may be sitting back thinking that they can get Carmelo as a free agent in the summer, but if he floats the idea that he may stay in Denver, it would encourage the Knicks to get something done now.

As for the rumored Carmelo/Bynum swap with the Lakers, Bynum isn’t thinking about it, per ESPN:

Bynum said that he has not been in contact with anyone within the Lakers organization about the possibility of being traded.

“I think they would [contact me] if it was more than a rumor,” Bynum said. “No one’s really said anything.”

Bynum has never been traded, so I’m not sure if his “they’d tell me” line of thinking is entirely accurate. Like anything else, management will wait as long as they can before informing a player/employee about something of this magnitude. They wouldn’t want to disrupt his morale until a move was definite.

But again, the Laker rumor was probably just a ploy by Anthony’s camp to encourage the Knicks to get something done. Of course, if I were Laker GM Mitch Kupchak, I’d trade Bynum for Anthony in a New York minute.

Rumors and innuendo are fun to discuss, but at this point, I just want something to happen so we can put Carmelo Anthony’s future to bed, at least for a while. I’ve said all along that the Nuggets should have traded him last summer instead of waiting until midseason when all the trade talk would become a distraction for the team. The Nuggets are just 30-23 and are in the #7 spot in the West. They’re on pace for 46 wins, and considering the franchise has been a 50-win team over the past three seasons, the rumor mill is clearly having a negative impact on the franchise.

Why won’t the Lakers give up Bynum to get Carmelo?

Denver Nuggets Carmelo Anthony and Los Angeles Lakers Kobe Bryant smile at each other to begin the second half at the Pepsi Center in Denver on November 11, 2010. The Nuggets ended the Lakers season opening eight game winning streak by the score of 118-112. UPI/Gary C. Caskey

Yahoo! Sports’ Adrian Wojnarowski tweeted that the Lakers aren’t planning to trade Andrew Bynum, even for Carmelo Anthony.

NY will work trade on its terms but knows it can get Melo in free agency. Anyway, Jim Buss has made it clear within org: Bynum is staying.

If I were a Laker fan (which I’m not), I’d be furious about the position that Buss is taking here. Furious.

I get it — Bynum is a good player when he’s healthy. But over the past four seasons, including the postseason, he has missed 172 of the Lakers’ 395 games (43.5%) due to issues with his knees. There are a few things I’ve learned about knee injuries over the years: 1) knee problems aren’t good for basketball players, 2) knee problems aren’t good for seven-footers and 3) knee problems don’t usually just go away.

The Lakers almost always finish games with Pau Gasol at center and Lamar Odom at small forward. So they’re unwilling to trade an injury-prone player (that they don’t even play in crunch time) for a 26-year-old, five time All-NBA performer?

Are they nuts?

The only — and I mean only — reason I can see for this inflexibility would be that the Lakers are expecting to see the Celtics again in the Finals. If healthy, Bynum would certainly help battle Shaq and Kendrick Perkins down low. But there are a few problems with this thinking: 1) the Lakers aren’t playing all that well right now and could use some new blood, 2) they will face stiff competition from the Spurs, Mavs and Thunder just to get out of the West, and 3) there’s a good chance that the Celtics don’t make the Finals, and the Lakers will instead face the Heat, the Bulls or even the Magic.

If it’s the Heat or Bulls, wouldn’t the Lakers much rather have Carmelo than Bynum? What about the Spurs, Mavs and Thunder? None of those teams have a true center that only Bynum could defend (unless you count Tim Duncan, whom I think Gasol could handle in a pinch). If the Lakers need another big man, I’m sure the Nuggets would include Nene or Chris Andersen at a reasonable price.

Of course, the Nuggets may not even want Bynum at this point, though if the Wilson Chandler/Corey Brewer package is the best offer they’re getting, I would think any package including Bynum would be better. There are rumors floating around that Carmelo’s camp leaked the supposed Nuggets/Lakers talks to get the Knicks to panic a little and up their offer. Someone close to Carmelo even said that he’d definitely re-up with the Lakers if he was traded there.

Hmmm…methinks there’s some gamesmanship afoot.

Regardless, if the Lakers can get a five-time All-NBA performer at the expense of a seven-footer with bad knees who doesn’t even finish games, I think they should do it.

To quote Kobe from a few years ago, “Are you kidding me? Ship his ass out.

Nuggets/Lakers talking Carmelo trade?

Los Angeles Laker’s Andrew Bynum poses for photos during the media day at the Lakers training facility in El Segundo, Ca., on September 25, 2010 (UPI Photo/Lori Shepler)

ESPN is reporting that the Lakers are willing to give up Andrew Bynum in a deal to acquire Carmelo Anthony.

The Lakers’ package would be built around center Andrew Bynum. Denver has no interest in Ron Artest and isn’t particularly interested in Lamar Odom either, sources said. A straight-up deal of Bynum for Anthony works financially, but there could be other players involved since Denver would look to shed more salary if possible.

The Lakers are an interesting landing spot for Carmelo because there’s a chance that he could re-sign there if the team were to play well after his arrival. L.A. is not New York, but it’s a metropolitan city and Anthony’s wife, LaLa Vasquez, could pursue her entertainment career there.

If I’m the Lakers, I do this deal in a New York minute (pun intended). I am not confident that Bynum will ever fully get past his knee issues, which seem more chronic than something he’ll eventually get over. They would lose some size, but Carmelo can play power forward and it would give the Lakers a star to build around once Kobe Bryant finally retires.

For the Nuggets, Bynum is a risk, but if he can get healthy and stay healthy, he’s a potential All-Star and is better than any of the players that the Knicks are currently offering. Like I said, I think he’ll be battling knee issues all his life, but I’m not a doctor and I’m not privy to his medical file. Maybe the Nuggets’ doctors take a look and decide it’s worth the risk. I would have to assume that’s the case if this deal eventually goes through.

I suspect the Lakers are one team that have the Knicks worried. Carmelo could get out to L.A., enjoy playing in the Finals and eventually decide to re-up.

Are the Suns doing Steve Nash a disservice?

Phoenix Suns Steve Nash stands next to head coach Alvin Gentry in the second half against the New York Knicks at Madison Square Garden in New York City on January 17, 2011. The Suns defeated the Knicks 129-121. UPI/John Angelillo

The Phoenix Suns have stuck to their no-trade stance with regard to Steve Nash, Marc Stein reports.

Here’s Alvin Gentry’s take:

“The only reason you would ever even remotely consider trading Steve is if he came to you and said, ‘I think I need to move on somewhere,’ ” Gentry says. “That would be the only reason. But to us, making that decision to trade him, I don’t see why we would even think about it. You guys can keep talking about it, but we’re not going to trade him. He’s playing at such a high level. Why would we?

“How you gonna get value for him? Unless you’re gonna go get Deron Williams or Chris Paul or somebody like that, tell me how. Why do we have to bottom out to rebuild our team? I don’t see why you would want to bottom out and spend the next five years trying to get good again.”

So Gentry’s position is that you don’t trade Nash unless he gets to the point where he comes to the team and says that he wants to move on. But Nash is a throwback NBA star…

“Maybe I’m old school,” Nash said, “but I signed a contract to play here and I want to honor it. I feel like I owe it to my teammates and the city and everybody to keep battling until they tell me it’s time to go.”

…so he’s not going to ask for a trade even if deep down he’d rather play for a contender.

Gentry asks how the Suns would get value for him. A few days ago, I outlined three different trade scenarios that would help the Suns rebuild. Gentry wonders why a team has to bottom out, but what’s going to happen when Nash eventually retires? Of course you aren’t going to get a player of Nash’s caliber in return, but the point is to get a younger asset or two (and/or draft picks) that will help the team in five years, when Nash is retired.

Team president Lon Babby is of the same mind:

“I don’t see how it makes any sense for us to move him,” Babby said. “I know that people think we ought to look to the future. And we’re doing that. But if you look at the history of the teams that have sort of blown it up, as the expression goes, how successful have they been in recapturing [elite status] and how long does it take?

“I’m willing to put more faith in Grant Hill, Steve Nash and the players that we have than I am in a lottery ball,” Babby continued. “It’s easy to say blow it up, but show me the teams that have successfully done it and how long it took and how much luck was involved, because luck’s involved in everything. I don’t want to depend on fortuity. I’d rather depend on a two-time MVP.”

So because there’s luck involved in rebuilding a team shouldn’t do it? At some point, the Suns aren’t going to have any choice — Nash will retire and they’ll have to try to get good again. Isn’t that easier when you have a couple of extra good young players to build around?

To answer Babby’s question, the Magic were 21-61 when the won the lottery and drafted Dwight Howard. They were a 50-win team four seasons later. The Seattle Supersonics were 31-51 the year before they drafted Kevin Durant, and they were a 50-win team three years later. The Cavs were 17-65 the season before they landed LeBron James and they were a 50-win team three seasons later. Sure, those teams were fortunate to get those players in the draft, but it’s a lot easier to find a superstar at the top of the draft than it is at the bottom of the lottery.

The bottom line is that the Suns are going to be mediocre as long as Nash is playing, because he’s that good. But by taking this “no-trade” stance, they’re only delaying the inevitable. They’re going to bottom out eventually, and by holding onto Nash they won’t have the young assets to rebuild quickly and efficiently. By trading him now they’d give him an opportunity to play for a contender and by getting a few good young pieces they would increase the chances that the rebuilding process won’t be a long and painful one.

Trading away the face of the franchise is a tough thing to do, but Nash deserves to play for a contender, and the Suns lost that status when Amare Stoudemire signed with the Knicks last summer.

« Older posts Newer posts »