Category: NBA Draft (Page 45 of 55)

McDyess & Stuckey: The Pistons’ X factors

Detroit won in Boston last night due in no small part to the play of Antonio McDyess. His line – 7-12 shooting, eight rebounds and three steals – isn’t eye-popping, but considering he’s the fifth option in the Pistons’ starting lineup, those are very nice numbers.

The 33 year-old McDyess landed in Detroit in 2004 after changing teams five times, so he’s a bit of a journeyman. People forget just how good he was before several knee injuries derailed his career during 2001 and 2002. In his first six seasons, he averaged 17.7 points and 8.8 boards per game, and was named to the All-NBA 3rd Team in 1999 and to the All-Star Game in 2001, so he was on his way to a very good career before suffering a dislocated knee cap, a torn patellar tendon and a fractured kneecap in the next two years.

He arrived after the Pistons’ championship in 2004, so he still has that insatiable hunger to win a title. And he’ll play a key role in the Eastern Conference Finals because the Celtics do a pretty good job of limiting the opportunities of the other Detroit starters, but it’s very difficult to shut down five guys at once. McDyess scored 10 points in the first half of Game 2, knocking down jumper after jumper. If he can keep that up, the Pistons are going to be very difficult to beat.

Another player who had a very nice game was rookie Rodney Stuckey. He went 5-8 from the field and scored 13 points. More importantly, he allowed Flip Saunders to rest Chauncey Billups, who is coming back from a hamstring injury. Stuckey is strong and has a good feel for the game. In fact, he reminds me a lot of the guy he plays behind… Billups.

The rich get richer

The Chicago Bulls overcame long odds (1.7%) to win the NBA lottery. They’ll get their choice of Chicago native Derrick Rose and Kansas State’s Michael Beasley. Both Ben Gordon and Luol Deng are restricted free agents, so the Bulls could go a number of ways with this pick. Chicago is likely to retain Deng, and Rose is looking like a very solid #1 pick, so I’m betting that Gordon (and Kirk Hinrich) are sweating a little right now.

Miami gets the second pick and Minnesota will pick third. The Heat will be able to add Rose or Beasley to a lineup that already includes Dwyane Wade and Shawn Marion. If Wade can stay healthy, the Heat will make a big jump in the standings next season.

The Cavs have failed LeBron James

There’s no other way to say it: the Cleveland front office has failed LeBron James.

Just look at their current rotation: LeBron, Delonte West, Wally Szczerbiak, Ben Wallace, Zydrunas Ilgauskas, Sasha Pavlovic, Anderson Varejao, Daniel Gibson and Joe Smith. Other than LeBron, is there a player on that list that is in the top 20 at his position? Delonte West was probably the best thing to come out of those two deadline deals the team made in February, but he’s injury-prone and is a restricted free agent this offseason. Ilgauskas is probably still a top 20 center, but I can name 15 guys off the top of my head that I’d rather have on my team. (Okay, want me to list them? Amare Stoudemire, Dwight Howard, Yao Ming, Tim Duncan, Marcus Camby, Chris Kaman, Andrew Bynum, Brad Miller, Tyson Chandler, Andrew Bogut, Andris Biedrins, Samuel Dalembert, Mehmet Okur, Al Horford, Rasheed Wallace, Shaquille O’Neal and Jermaine O’Neal. There, that’s 17 for you.)

The point is that the 2008 Cavs feature LeBron James with four below-average starters and a few mediocre rotation guys. I do like West, Varejao and Gibson, but that’s about it. What’s worse, the Cavs had the fourth highest payroll this season ($81.1 million) and they’re on the hook for another $74.8 million next season.

It takes work to have a roster this expensive be this bad. But don’t blame it all on GM Danny Ferry. He took over in 2005 a full year after the Cavs’ bonehead move to let Carlos Boozer become a free agent because of a “verbal agreement” that he would re-sign for the mid-level exception. At that point, Boozer was a 22 year-old 15.5-point, 11.4-rebound power forward that had All-Star written all over him. Why in the world would you risk the advantage and consistency of pairing he and LeBron for the next decade just to save a few million on his contract? I know the fans in Cleveland hate Boozer for this, but it was probably his agent at the time, Rob Pelinka, who was at fault for Boozer’s part in things. I don’t know what kind of a promise Boozer made to the organization, but once he became a free agent, the Jazz offered him $4.6 million more per season than what the Cavs said they would pay him. For his part, Boozer has insisted all along that there was no handshake and no promise. Still, that kind of deal would be illegal under the collective bargaining agreement, so the blame falls entirely on the Cavs for pursuing (or claiming to pursue) such an arrangement.

It is that historical misstep that has sent the Cavs franchise into its current tailspin. LeBron alone is good enough to win 40 games, and the Cavs supporting cast stepped up enough in the 2007 postseason for Cleveland to get past the dilapidated competition in the East to make a Finals appearance, but as the ensuing sweep (at the hands of the Spurs) would indicate, the Cavs were a long way from a title then and they are even further away now.

And the clock is ticking. LeBron signed an abbreviated deal that allows him to opt-out in the summer of 2010. Barring any additional signings, the team projects to have some salary cap flexibility in the summer of 2009, when Szczerbiak, Joe Smith, and Eric Snow come off the books, but new contracts for Delonte West and Daniel Gibson threaten that flexibility. The team will have to improve through the draft and through trades – two areas where the Cavs have struggled over the past few years.

Here’s a list of all the bad moves that the franchise has made since drafting LeBron:

1. In 2004, the Cavs could have held onto Jason Kapono, one of the league’s best three-point shooters. But they elected not to re-sign him after he shot nearly 48% from long range. Sure, why would you want a guy that could make teams pay for doubling LeBron?

2. Instead of drafting Luke Jackson (#10 overall), the team could have drafted Al Jefferson, Josh Smith, Jameer Nelson or Andris Biedrins, whom were all drafted in the next 10 picks of the 2004 Draft.

3. In 2004, they failed to pick up the option on Carlos Boozer, trying to do an illegal deal to get Boozer on the cheap. The so-called “verbal agreement” falls through when Boozer signs with Utah for six years and $68 million.

4. Instead of trading for Sasha Pavlovic (giving up a first round pick that turned into the #13 pick overall), the team could have instead used that selection on Danny Granger, Rashad McCants, Hakim Warrick or Francisco Garcia, whom were all taken in the next 10 picks of the 2005 Draft.

5. In the summer of 2005, instead of signing Larry Hughes to a five-year, $67 million deal, signing Donyell Marshall to a four-year, $22 millon contract, and re-signing Zydrunas Ilgauskas to a five-year, $51 million deal, the team could have made a stronger run at Michael Redd or Ray Allen (whom were both unrestricted free agents that summer) and Tyson Chandler or Samuel Dalembert (whom were both restricted free agents). If that failed, they could have saved all of that cap space for the future.

6. In the 2006 Draft, the Cavs could have selected Jordan Farmar, one of the league’s best young point guards, instead of Shannon Brown. The Lakers took Farmar with the pick immediately following the Cavs’ pick. (Kudos to Ferry for drafting Gibson in the second round.)

Simply stated, had the Cavs exercised the option on Boozer and made a better pick in the summer of 2004, the team could have had a core of LeBron and Boozer, along with Al Jefferson or Josh Smith. Now that sounds like a group with championship contender written all over it.

Kevin Love in training

ESPN caught up with Kevin Love in Los Angeles as he prepares for the NBA Draft.

Draft stock is a fickle thing. Last year, Love was projected to go in the top 5, but over the course of the season, people started to question his fitness and athleticism. He is no doubt a very skilled player, but while he was at UCLA, he was clearly on the doughy side. It also seemed like he got by more on strength than jumping ability in the post.

But, from the video, it looks like he has indeed lost some fat and that seems to have helped his vertical leap. He was dunking in the post with ease, so if can improve on that (or just keep it up), his draft stock will rise. He’s going to play power forward in the NBA, and he has all the tools to be a good one. He is very skilled with the ball – there’s no questioning his shooting, passing or even his ball handling skills – but scouts will need to see good athleticism in his personal workouts for his stock to rise to earlier levels.

Lots of players are motivated to get into better shape before the draft (because of the money involved), but some don’t keep those good habits up once the money starts rolling in. My beloved Milwaukee Bucks were once duped by one Robert “Tractor” Traylor, who trimmed down enough before the draft to convince the Bucks to burn a lottery pick on him. I don’t think Kevin Love is the next Robert Traylor – in fact, I think he’s going to be a star – but there is some risk.

Where do the Suns, Mavs and Nuggets go from here?

Watching the once-proud Suns and Mavs (and the not-so-proud Nuggets) lose their first round series with a combined 2-12 record, the opening lyrics from “Games People Play” (the ol’ Alan Parsons Project song) popped into my head. I realize I’m dating myself, but here they are:

Where do we go from here / now that all other children are growing up
And how do we spend our lives / if there’s no one to lend us a hand

I don’t wanna live here no more / I don’t wanna stay
Ain’t gonna spend the rest of my life / quietly fading away

So where do these three teams go from here?

THE SUNS

Bill Simmons just wrote a good, long piece about the downfall of the Suns where he discusses all the questionable moves that the organization made to get where they are now. I agree with most of what he says, except his claim that the Spurs were the better team in last year’s series with the Suns. (You know, the one where Amare Stoudemire and Boris Diaw were suspended for the crucial Game 6 in Phoenix when the Suns were up 3-2 and had a chance to put the Spurs away on their home court.) I firmly believe that the Suns would have won that game had Stoudemire and Diaw played, so I never liked their decision to trade Shawn Marion for Shaquille O’Neal (which Simmons defends). The funny thing is that suspension may have completely altered the NBA landscape. Teams around the league were starting to mimic the Suns’ breakneck offensive attack, but the perception after that series was that it wasn’t effective in the playoffs. If the Suns’ win the title that year, the overall pace of the league would have continued to rise.

That said, the Suns have made a series of bad roster moves since 2005, when a 62-win team that featured a core of Steve Nash, Shawn Marion, Amare Stoudemire and Joe Johnson fell short in the playoffs against the Spurs. The franchise squandered the opportunity to keep that group together when negotiations with Joe Johnson soured. According to Marc Stein, this was due to a perceived slight when the Suns’ initial offer of a six-year, $60 million contract irked Johnson.

In his first extended interview about his future since free agency began Friday, Johnson said his desire to leave the Suns involves “a lot of things,” starting with contentious negotiations on a contract extension last October that broke off with sides about $5 million apart. Johnson was rankled further earlier this month when, after a breakout season for himself and the team, Phoenix offered only $60 million over six years.

Yet sources close to the situation also insist that Johnson is most unhappy with what he perceives as his standing as a “fourth wheel” behind Stoudemire, Marion and especially Nash. The native of nearby Arkansas would instantly have his own team to run in Atlanta and become a franchise face for a club teeming with inexperience.

I don’t know if Stein is too familiar with a map of our great country, but Arkansas and Atlanta aren’t particularly close to one another, but that is neither here nor there. Whatever Johnson wanted, it was the Suns’ decision to let him go when they elected to work out a sign-and-trade with the Hawks instead of just matching the contract and keeping Johnson in Phoenix. That said, it’s a tough decision to keep a player who claims he doesn’t want to stay, but it’s not like his trade value is going to plummet if the Suns were to keep him for another season just to see how things worked out.

Since then, the Suns’ roster moves have tried to balance keeping the franchise a contender while staying out of luxury tax territory. This has resulted in Phoenix giving away most of their first-round picks so that teams would take salary off their hands. This leaves Phoenix with three players of note 26 years-old or younger – Amare Stoudemire, Boris Diaw and Leandro Barbosa. Barbosa and Diaw are locked up through 2011, while Stoudemire has a player option for that season. Nash and O’Neal both have contracts that run through 2010 and the team won’t have any cap flexibility until they’re off the books.

The pressing question seems to be whether or not to keep this group together for another year or two. By most accounts, Shaq played better than expected after the trade, so if they could get another solid effort out of him, they would be a factor in next year’s playoffs. But Nash seems to have lost a step – either that, or he isn’t as effective with Shaq on the court. It was obvious in the Spurs series that the team isn’t able to run as well with O’Neal on the court, though that’s partially due to the loss of Marion’s speed and athleticism.

Unless the team can find someone who wants to take on Shaq’s monster contract (two-years, $20 million), they’re going to have a tough time reshaping the roster anytime soon. They’ll probably regroup and give this core another shot. With that in mind, they need to add some three-point shooting to the lineup. With Shaq and Grant Hill on the court, Raja Bell (or Barbosa, when he’s playing off guard) is the team’s only legitimate three-point threat when Nash and Stoudemire are running their patented pick-and-roll. So they need a good shooting small forward to replace Hill. Either that, or they need to drastically change their offense.

It would probably be a mistake to let Mike D’Antoni go, though the perception is that he’s only good at coaching a breakneck offensive attack. If they let him go, the Raptors should snatch him up as he’d be a great fit with their “Suns East” roster.

THE MAVS

Ah, Mark Cuban’s Dallas Mavericks. The team went “all in” this season when they traded Devin Harris and two first round draft picks for Jason Kidd. At the time of the trade, Harris – who is 10 years Kidd’s junior – was averaging 14.4 points and 5.3 assists while shooting 48% from the field and 36% from the three-point range. Those points, assists and three-point accuracy were all career highs for the young guard.

It was a gutsy move, but a dumb one. The Mavs decided that they weren’t going anywhere with the personnel they had (even though it was essentially the same roster that took them to the Finals two years prior), and they traded away their second-best prospect for a grizzled vet. Well, you know the rest: Kidd’s up-tempo style clashed with Avery Johnson, the Mavs were dispatched again in the first round (this time by the Hornets), and Johnson was subsequently fired.

Wow, what a difference two years makes! About this time in 2006, Dallas was on the verge of a NBA title before Dwyane Wade and the officials turned the tide of the series. The franchise has been in a hangover since then, and it only seems to be getting worse.

Dirk Nowitzki is still an All-NBA caliber player, but people are questioning his ability to be the best player on a title team. (By the way, I do think he can lead a team to a title with the right supporting cast.) And how far has Josh Howard’s stock fallen in the last month? Aside from a few nice moments, he was a no-show in the New Orleans series, shooting a woeful 29% from the field. Moreover, he became a giant distraction when he went on a radio show and admitted to using marijuana in the offseason (a definite NBA no-no). Most of us know that pot is pretty common in our society, and the NBA is no different, but what was once NBA’s dirty little secret became the focus of the series. Suddenly sideline reporters were asking about it, play-by-play guys were talking about it, and it just wouldn’t go away.

So where do the Mavs go from here? Well, Cuban is not one to easily admit a mistake, so he’s going to follow Kidd down the dusty trail and see where it takes him. He’s already tipped his hand by getting rid of his head coach, and he’ll eventually hire someone that is more Kidd-friendly. He probably plans to keep this group together, try to add a piece or two and hopefully make a run next season, which is the final year of Kidd’s contract.

If that doesn’t work, they’ll probably scrap the plan and rebuild around Nowtizki, Brandon Bass and Howard, if he’s still on the roster. It’s just too bad they don’t have a super-quick point guard to run the show…

THE NUGGETS

Denver was on a mission over the last month of the season, outlasting the Warriors for the final playoff spot in the West. Their reward? A first-round date with the surging Lakers, who unceremoniously swept the Nuggets out of the playoffs, raising all sorts of questions about the future of the franchise.

Is it time to put an end to the Carmelo Anthony/Allen Iverson experiment? AI can opt-out of his contract this summer, but he’d be leaving almost $22 million on the table, so it’s not a sure thing. The Nuggets won’t have any cap flexibility until AI’s salary is off the books, but the problem isn’t his contract, it’s the three years and $46 million remaining on Kenyon Martin’s contract.

Denver has a few nice pieces – an offensive stud (‘Melo), a great center (Marcus Camby) and two sharp-shooting youngsters (Linas Kleiza and J.R. Smith). But for some reason these pieces just don’t seem to fit with each other. Iverson could be used as trade bait, but it would be tough for the Nuggets to find a trading partner with all the right pieces. If that’s the route they choose, they should look for a deal that includes a good young player, a first round draft pick (or two), and an expiring contract (or two).

The other issue is what to do with George Karl. Other than a few exceptions – Phil Jackson, Jerry Sloan and Greg Popovich – it seems like most NBA coaches have a shelf life of three or four years at any particular job, and Karl’s effectiveness in Denver seems to be waning.

The Nuggets had an opportunity to add Ron Artest before the trading deadline but reportedly nixed the deal because they didn’t want to give up Kleiza. Artest is an oddball, but he changed the defensive dynamic in Sacramento and he could do the same thing for the Nuggets. Artest will likely be a free agent this summer, but Denver doesn’t have the cap flexibility to sign him to anything more than the mid-level exception. He is likely to want more, though Artest is nothing if not surprising.

One scenario would be for the Nuggets to trade ‘Melo and start over. This seems like a crazy idea, especially considering that he’is good enough to pretty much guarantee a winning record for the remainder of his contract, which runs through 2012. It’s a lot easier to blow up the team when you’re missing the playoffs every season, but when you’ve put up five straight 43+ win seasons, it’s a lot more appealing to try to tweak what you’ve got. But the simple fact is that the Nuggets haven’t won a playoff series in Anthony’s career, so something needs to change. It’s either ‘Melo or the pieces around him. Given AI’s contract status and Karl’s tenuous position, it should be a very interesting summer in Denver. My bet is that one of them – Karl or AI – is gone next season.

« Older posts Newer posts »