Category: External Sports (Page 270 of 821)

Knicks’ front office fractured over Carmelo talks?

Adrian Wojnarowski of Yahoo! Sports writes that Knicks management may be at odds over what is a worthwhile deal to make for Carmelo Anthony.

The Nuggets are selling the idea they’ll be content to keep Anthony through the Feb. 24 trade deadline if no one meets their demands. The Nuggets want to package Anthony and Chauncey Billups for a deal that includes Danilo Gallinari, Raymond Felton, the expiring contract of Eddy Curry and a draft pick, the New York Daily News reported. Another source said Denver is still pushing for more Knicks players, including rookies Landry Fields and Timofey Mozgov, in the package.

“This is like the Nets talks all over again: Denver keeps moving the goal posts,” one league source said. “They don’t know what they want there.”

As the Daily News reported, the wild card is Knicks owner James Dolan and the looming possibility he could overrule his president and cut a deal with Denver himself. There are fears that Dolan is listening too much to former president and coach Isiah Thomas and possibly agents and representatives for Anthony who have agendas to undermine Walsh.

“Donnie isn’t going to make a one-sided deal and gut his team to get this done now,” said one league source who regularly speaks to Walsh. “He’ll end up with two unhappy stars because they have no supporting cast. But if Dolan gets more involved in this, he could really makes a mess of this.”

The reason a deal isn’t already done is because Donnie Walsh is exercising great patience. He knows that the Nuggets’ bargaining position isn’t as strong as they’d like people to believe. He thinks he can get Anthony and Billups for Gallinari, Felton and a first round pick (or Anthony Randolph), but it sounds like the Nuggets are continuing to ask for more.

But time’s a wastin’. The Nuggets aren’t likely to let the trade deadline pass without getting something for Carmelo. The team isn’t playing well and they aren’t a threat to make a strong playoff push with a fractured locker room. If Denver balks at a trade with the Knicks, then the Nuggets risk going the way of the Cavs or Raptors…and look at those teams now.

Why is it again that Pujols and the Cards can’t work out an extension during the season?

St. Louis Cardinals Albert Pujols has fun with Yadier Molina (L) and Pedro Feliz (R) in the dugout in the fifth inning against the Pittsburgh Pirates at Busch Stadium in St. Louis on September 27, 2010. UPI/Bill Greenblatt

It’s kind of ironic that Albert Pujols’ camp didn’t want the superstar’s contract situation to become a distraction because that’s exactly what it’s become.

Wednesday’s Noon deadline came and went without Pujols and the Cardinals agreeing to a new contract. As it stands now, the slugger will head into the 2012 offseason as a free agent and the Cards will just have to hope another team doesn’t whisk him away before they have another chance to re-sign him. (If they even want to re-sign him, that is. It sounds like the club has no plans of meeting Pujols’ 10-year, $275 million-plus demands.)

But what’s unclear to me is why the discussions have to cease. I think it’s admirable that Pujols doesn’t want his personal situation to become a distraction to his teammates, but that’s out of his hands. Does anyone think that the media in St. Louis isn’t going to ask him about his future plans just because his deadline passed? Does he think the media in New York, Chicago or L.A. won’t poke and prod him every night when the Cardinals play the Mets, Cubs and Dodgers on the road?

Sorry Albert, but your situation will be a distraction whether you like it or not. So you might as well let your camp continue discussing dollar amounts with the team over these next couple of months. At least then you can say, “Hey, my agent is working on it. I’m staying out of it.” That sounds a heck of a lot better than, “I’m going to body slam the next sum bitch that says the word contract.” (What, that doesn’t sound like Pujols?)

I think everyone needs to use common sense here. Albert has stated that he wants to stay in St. Louis and you know the Cardinals don’t want to lose him. So if the main objective is to keep him in the Lou, then the two sides might as well keep the lines of communication open throughout the season. Again, it’s not realistic to think that everyone will fall hush over these next couple of months just because Pujols’ deadline passed on Wednesday. He’s baseball’s best player and this story is the biggest in baseball. Who knows, maybe if the two sides keep talking, they’ll eventually settle on something and everyone can put this mess behind them.

Bailey puts his Colorado home up for sale

Denver Broncos cornerback Champ Bailey glances down at the Seattle Seahawks as they warm up at Invesco Field at Mile High on September 19, 2010 in Denver. . UPI/Gary C. Caskey

Ready for a good news/bad news scenario, Bronco fans?

The good news is that Champ Bailey and your team are talking contract again.

The bad news is that according to Inside the NFL’s Josina Anderson, the 10-time Pro Bowler just put his Colorado home up for sale. If Bailey thought the Broncos were willing to offer him more than a one-year deal, then it seems unlikely that he’d stick a for sale sign in his front yard.

One option for Denver is to assign Bailey the franchise tag and lock him in for one year. But the Broncos don’t want to pay a 32-year-old corner $15 million for one season, even if he is Champ Bailey.

The other problem is that the Broncos shouldn’t be playing for 2011. I understand that in today’s NFL, turnarounds can happen quickly but this team needs an upgrade at every level defensively. Even if they were to re-sign Bailey, nothing says that the Broncos won’t take someone like LSU’s Patrick Peterson with the No. 2 pick in this year’s draft. They need to build for the future.

As hard as it would be, maybe the Broncos would be better off allowing Bailey to go to a contender that will shell out big money for 2-3 years. No team wants to let talent walk out the door and Bailey is the consummate professional. But teams aren’t created equal. Some need one or two pieces to make a Super Bowl run, while others are starting over. The Broncos are in rebuilding mode and unless they seriously believe they can build a winner in the next two years, why pay Bailey to hang around?

2011 NFL Draft Needs: AFC East

New York Jets head coach Rex Ryan reacts on the sidelines in the fourth quarter against the Buffalo Bills in week 17 of the NFL season at New Meadowlands Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey on January 2, 2011. The Jets defeated the Bills 38-7 and advance to the playoffs. UPI /John Angelillo

2011 NFL Draft Needs: AFC East | AFC North | NFC East | NFC North

No. 3 Buffalo Bills
Top Needs: DE, OLB, QB, OT
When a team holds the No. 3 selection in the draft they usually don’t have just one need: they have multiple needs. That fits the Bills, who could stand upgrades at linebacker, offensive tackle, quarterback and defensive end. Linebacker is arguably their biggest positional need seeing as how Akin Ayodele is a free agent and Andra Davis (who was replaced in the starting lineup by Ayodele during the season) has just one year remaining on his current deal. Finding someone to play alongside Paul Posluszny in the middle is important but locating a solid pass-rusher is vital, whether that comes at defensive end or outside linebacker. If Buffalo thinks Shawne Merriman can resurrect his career, they can either invest their top pick in a D-end or a quarterback.
Possibilities in the First Round: Da’Quan Bowers (Clemson); Cam Newton (Auburn), Blaine Gabbert (Missouri).

No. 15 Miami Dolphins
Top Needs: RB, QB, S
Two years ago when the Dolphins were running the updated version of the single wing (or as the kids call it these days, “the Wildcat formation”), they had two capable runners in Ronnie Brown and Ricky Williams. But there’s a good chance that both have played their final downs in Miami. Brown can’t stay healthy through a full 16-game season and Williams is a free agent (who has also taken to criticizing his head coach and teammates). South Beach has been mentioned as a possible landing spot for DeAngelo Williams, which makes sense. But with the uncertainty of the CBA deal, I wouldn’t be shocked if the Dolphins took someone like Alabama’s Mark Ingram in the first round. If not, there’s no doubt that this team needs more consistency at the quarterback position, which is where a signal caller like Ryan Mallett of Arkansas makes sense. (Or Cam Newton if he falls.)
Possibilities in the First Round: Mark Ingram (Alabama), Ryan Mallett (Arkansas), Cam Newton (Auburn).

Continue reading »

Knicks have “more of a sense of urgency” with regard to Carmelo trade

New York Knicks Amar’e Stoudemire, Timofey Mozgov, Raymond Felton, Danilo Gallinari and Wilson Chandler (L) wait during a fourth quarter timeout against the Los Angeles Lakers at Madison Square Garden in New York City on February 11, 2011. The Lakers defeated the Knicks 113-96. UPI/John Angelillo

Alan Hahn of Newsday has the details:

As we reported on Monday, a source with knowledge of the situation said there is “more of a sense of urgency” from the Knicks to get a deal done before the deadline rather than to wait until free agency. But that doesn’t mean the Knicks would be willing to pay top dollar if they know they’re the only bidder.

The Knicks know landing Carmelo would pave the way to attracting Chris Paul in 2012. But if Denver comes in at the 11th hour and demands the Knicks to add, say, Al Harrington (2012-13 salary of $6.68 million) or Chris Andersen’s ($5.2 million in 12-13), that would compromise their ability to sign Paul, or Deron Williams, in 2012, plus build a championship-caliber roster.

This looks like it could go one of three ways, assuming the Nets (or some other team) doesn’t step up with a new offer:

1. The Knicks and Nuggets come to terms. Trade is executed before the trade deadline.
The Knicks would like to acquire Carmelo now, but they don’t want to sell the farm to get him. The Newsday piece states that the Knicks are willing to give up Danilo Gallinari OR Wilson Chandler, and are willing to give up Raymond Felton for Chauncey Billups as well. Rookies Landry Fields and Timofey Mosgov, as well as Anthony Randolph, are also up for discussion.

I don’t think it would be wise to give up more than two of the following four players: Gallinari, Chandler, Fields or Mosgov. Fields is especially valuable since Anthony’s arrival woudn’t cut into his playing time, and he is arguably the Knicks’ best perimeter defender. Mosgov has also shown some flashes and is a 24-year-old legit seven-footer, so he has quite a bit of value as a prospect. It will be interesting to see whether or not the Knicks and Nuggets can come to terms. The article also states that the Nets thought they had a done deal before the Nuggets came back asking for more. The same thing might be happening here.

2. No trade is made. Anthony signs with the Knicks in the summer.
We don’t know if Carmelo wants to play in New York so badly that he’s willing to pass up $65 million in guaranteed money. This would be the ideal option for the Knicks, because they’d be able to sign him outright without having to give up many assets. But with the uncertainty of a new collective bargaining agreement looming large…

3. Carmelo panics when no trade is made and signs extension with Denver.
He could very well decide that playing in New York is not worth passing up the guaranteed money. Ideally, he’d get traded to the Knicks and sign the three-year extension with New York, but if the trade doesn’t go down, the money might be too good to pass up. He’s already admitted that he would take a long look at signing the extension if he isn’t moved before the trade deadline.

The thing to look for as the next week progresses is whether or not the key names in this trade are suiting up for games. If a deal is imminent, teams will usually rest players so that they don’t suffer a deal-breaking injury before the trade is finalized, so if Carmelo suddenly misses a start, we know something is likely to happen soon.

« Older posts Newer posts »