Author: Gerardo Orlando (Page 69 of 75)

Gerardo is the founder of Bullz-Eye.com along with Black Mountain Publishing, LLC which publishes 30 blog titles across a variety of topics.

Holmgren rips the refs; NFL delivering mediocre product

I can’t really blame him. Frankly it would be better for Holmgren and Seattle players to keep their mouths shut and let the press rip the refs, but it has to be hard to keep quiet in light of the pathetic performance of the officials in the Super Bowl. This is not a knock on the Steelers – they took advantage of the great hand that was dealt to them. But the NFL has to be embarrassed by the product on the field.

The problem for the NFL is that this game was not an aberration. The product on the field has been deteriorating for years. The biggest culprit is free agancy. Many players leave just as they become comfortable with a system. In today’s complicated game, the result is that even the good teams can look mediocre at times.

The problem with the officiating is now critical with the Super Bowl being decided by a host of questionable calls favoring one team. Part of the problem lies with the league trying to hard too manage the game through penalties. Protecting players is important, but clean hits that were celebrated ten years ago now get called as 15-yard personal fouls (one of the few officiating problems that did not get exposed in the Super Bowl). It’s impossible to watch a game without seeing a kick return getting called back for a lame penalty. Holding calls seem to be random. Seattle gets called on one of the biggest plays of the game, while I don’t remember one holding call on the Steelers.

The NFL needs to get their act together. For years the NFL has been lauded as the best of the professional sports, and they’re still making tons of money. But the product is deteriorating, and television ratings have been slipping over the years. They need to re-examine the officiating process, including replay. Why is the official on the field making the call while peering into a small screen on the sidelines? Why can’t penalties in the end zone be reviewed? Why can’t 50-yard pass interference calls be reviewed? Why are the blocking rules on kick returns so stringent? Wouldn’t the game be better if fewer spectacular returns were brought back by penalties?

McNabb unloads on T.O.

We all know T.O. is an idiot, but Donovan McNabb is starting to sound like a big crybaby. The whole soap opera was finally out of the news, but McNabb decides to open it all up again by granting an interview to ESPN during Super Bowl week. McNabb reveals that he’s hyper-sensitive about the black quarterback issue:

McNabb might have, at first, laughed it off when Owens affirmed the statement, saying, “I think that’s a fair assessment, if we had Brett Favre we’d probably be undefeated.” But McNabb acknowledged Wednesday that Owens’ statement hit him hard.

“In that situation, it was kinda like, ‘That’s unreal.’ That’s just like me saying, ‘If we had Steve Largent, if we had Joe Jurevicius, we’d be undefeated. He’ll now have to answer the question for the whole week about me saying it.”

McNabb’s selection of two white receivers was not by accident. He took Owens’ choice of Favre as disrespectful to McNabb as an African-American quarterback.

“It was definitely a slap in the face to me. Because as deep as people won’t go into it, it was [a] black-on-black crime. I mean, you have a guy that has been criticized just about all his career and now the last criticism is that I’m selling out because I don’t run anymore, by an African-American [J. Whyatt Mondesire, the NAACP chapter president who ripped McNabb in a column that appeared in the Philadelphia Sun].

“And to say if we had Brett Favre, that could mean that if you had another quarterback of a different decent or ethnic background, we could be winning. That’s something I thought about and said, ‘Wow.’ It’s different to say if we had Michael Vick, Daunte Culpepper, Steve McNair, Aaron Brooks, Byron Leftwich. But to go straight to Brett Favre, that slapped me in the face, like what I’ve done and what I set out to do…”

Black-on-black crime?!? Are you kidding me? That’s pathetic. Everyone (including me) assumed that T.O. was the problem in Philly and that McNabb was the innocent victim, but maybe McNabb had something to do with the problem as well. It’s clear he has a big chip on his shoulder and that he’s very sensitive to criticism. He needs to leave this alone and move on.

Garbage dump in Boston

The Boston Celtics were a mess, and Bill Simmons does a great job of explaining how Danny Ainge was able to dump four players who had to go. He doesn’t pull any punches when decribing Mark Blount:

Blount duped the Celtics into signing him to a 6-year, $40 million deal during the last three months of the 2004 season, when he averaged 20 points and 10 rebounds and resembled a poor man’s Robert Parish. That summer, when they re-signed him, I wrote a column defending the decision (after all, it was market value for a starting center) while leaving the door open that he had hoodwinked the team with his contract push. Of course, my father was horrified and thought they made a terrible mistake, screaming, “It’s Mark Blount! He’s got bad hands! He’ll always have bad hands!”

As it turned out, that was the least of our worries. Blount simply checked out after the contract — indifferent on the court, indifferent off it, the kind of guy who watched the Jumbotron during timeouts and walked on the court for a noon practice at 11:59:59. This season he averaged an astonishing 4.2 rebounds a game — to put this in perspective, Nate Robinson averages more rebounds per minute. Throw in his contract (four excruciating years after this one), youngster Kendrick Perkins (who needs to play) and the immortal Doc Rivers (who kept throwing Blount in there even after his bosses agreed, “Hey, Perkins needs to play!”), and getting Blount off the team was Danny Ainge’s number-one goal before the deadline. Mission accomplished. Minnesota should be perfect for Blount — it’s cold and depressing, and so is he.

He also delivers a perfect explaination of Ricky Davis’ game:

As for Ricky Davis (the key for Minnesota), he matured over the last three seasons from “selfish me-first gunner who partied like a madman off the court” to “team-oriented guy who worked his butt off and wanted to get better.” But there’s a ceiling with him — some habits just can’t be broken, especially for guys who came into the league when they were 19 and bounced around for the next few years. For instance, he’s an atrocious defensive player. Just atrocious. He TRIES hard, and he’ll get to a couple loose balls every game, and he rebounds and stuff, and maybe he’ll pick off an occasional cross-court pass … but if there’s anyone in the league who could have used a few more trips to basketball camp as a kid, it’s Ricky. You know the whole concept of “move your feet, keep your body in front of your guy and the basket?” Totally foreign to Ricky. He’ll help you out on defense, but he’s always a second late. You can pick-and-roll him to death because he’ll invariably make the wrong choice. If you’re a good shooter, he’ll forget this five-six times per game and give you a wide-open shot. And so on and so on. Again, because he’s trying hard, it seems like he’s a good defender. He’s not.

Offensively? He’s explosive in the open floor (it’s a shame that he spent his whole career playing without a real point guard) and someone who can wake up a dead crowd in three seconds. In a halfcourt offense, if you’re running him off screens, nobody’s better at curling around to the top of the key and making open 18-footers. Against poor defenders, he can beat them off the dribble and create his own shot. But that’s about it. If you’re not specifically running plays for him, he stands around and watches everyone else. Any good defensive team could shut him down — just look at what happened in the Indiana series, or some of the Detroit games this season.

Then he gives us this hilarious line:

With Blount’s contract off the books, and Olowokandi’s contract done after the season, the Celtics will be under the cap this summer. Now Danny can sign another white guy to go with Wally, Raef, Scalabrine and Dan Dickau for an official Whitewash. Bring back the tight shorts from the ’80s, Danny! Let’s take this thing all the way!

I can laugh and also learn something every time I read one of Simmons’ columns. That’s pretty rare, and that’s why he’s one of the best.

Law of averages catches up to the Patriots

Until yesterday, Tom Brady had never lost a playoff game. The streak had to end at some point, and yestderday the Patriots lost to the Broncos in a mistake-filled game. Surprisingly, Tom Brady made one of the biggest mistakes, with an errant throw near the goal line that was intercepted and returned 99 yards to the New England one-yard line. That play changed the entire game.

New England out-gained Denver, but they couldn’t overcome the turnovers and mistakes. Not what you would expect from a three-time champion, but the streak had to end at some point.

Hasselbeck serves notice

Matt Hasselbeck had his coming out party yesterday against the tough Redskins defense. He demonstrated why Seattle has a real shot to win it all this year, as he led Seattle to an impressive 20-10 victory over Washington. ESPN’s John Clayton sums it up well:

Nationally, Hasselbeck isn’t a household name. Not yet, anyway, but games such as this NFC divisional playoff are starting to show what a lot of players and coaches already realize. Hasselbeck is more than just a leader of the offense. He, along with Holmgren’s play-calling, is one of the main reasons Seattle has been to the playoffs three consecutive seasons and now is within one game of the franchise’s first Super Bowl.

Shawn Alexander should be back next week, so Seattle fans have to be excited about their chances.

« Older posts Newer posts »