Michigan’s Denard Robinson dilemma
Michigan’s new head coach, Brady Hoke, is facing a difficult dilemma. On the one hand, he needs to bring Michigan back to playing Michigan football after the disastrous RichRod experiment. That means moving back to a pro style offense and moving from the absurd 3-3-5 defense that stopped nobody in the Big Ten back to a traditional 4-3. Michigan needs to get bigger, and Hoke has started that process with his 2011 recruiting class.
Yet with respect to the offense, Hoke also has Denard Robinson, one of the most explosive college football players we’ve seen in years. He was perfect for RichRod’s offense, even though that offense and Robinson sputtered against better defenses. It was an all-or-nothing proposition, and naturally Hoke is anxious to move on.
So how does he use Denard Robinson going forward? Hoke says “We’re smart enough to have elements he does well from what he did in the past in our offense.” But he plans on using Robinson as the quarterback in his pro style offense, which will have Robinson taking snaps under center instead of the shotgun and relying on play action.
I’m skeptical this can work. Sure, he’ll still unleash Robinson at times, and I suspect they might use the option play, but Robinson’s effectiveness will likely suffer dramatically under this system.
Robinson made big plays in the passing game last year, but that was because he found wide-open receivers when defenses tried in vain to slow down his running game. This year he won’t have that luxury. I don’t see Robinson consistently making the tough throws demanded in a pro style offense. He’s also very short and that will limit him as well.
We’ll see how this experiment plays out, but I suspect that Hoke will regret taking Robinson out of his element.
A better option might be to have a traditional quarterback run Hoke’s new offense, and keep a version of RichRod’s system around for Robinson to run as a Wildcat formation. He could also use Robinson as a Slash-type weapon in the traditional offense.
Right now their odds of winning the Big Ten are set at 15/1, so few are expecting a breakout year.
With this transition and the drama surrounding the Big Ten this year with the addition of Nebraska and the troubles at Ohio State, Michigan should be one of the more intriguing stories of 2011.
Follow the Scores Report editors on Twitter @clevelandteams and @bullzeyedotcom.
Honestly, Denard Robinson was not all that impressive against any decent school . . . he racked up all the yardage and hype against sub-par opponents. Once he faced Wisconsin, Penn State, Michigan State, OSU or my Hawkeyes, he got stuffed.
Even Mississippi State held him down . . .
Yea Iowa really “stuffed” the guy who had over 200 yards of total offense in the 1st two qaurters. Penn State (380 yds) and Illinois (370 yds in 3 quarters) really stuffed him too. He ran half as many times as he did all season against MSU and still put up over 300 yds of offense. And you probably don’t have a clue as to why he didn’t run as much or why he wouldn’t take a hit that game.
I get it. He struggled mightily at times especially against MSU, wisky and OSU, but anyone that puts 2500 yds passing and 1500 yds rushing in thier first year as a starter can’t be stuffed by half of the opponents.
As for the OP, I have no idea how well Denard Robinson will perform in this new offense, but there is absolutely no way Hoke and Co. can put anyone else behind center this fall. What do they do with Denard if they give the nod to Devin Gardner? Leave the most dynamic player on the bench? No chance. Put him in the slot? Can’t do it with only two scholarship qbs behind him. One of which is a true freshman.