ECF Game 2: Celtics take 2-0 lead
Celtics 95, Magic 92
Well, we can pretty much stick a fork in the Magic. When a team loses the first two games of the series at home, they aren’t coming back. They’re just not. It doesn’t happen. Well, maybe it’s happened once or twice, I don’t know. (Update: Teams that win the first two games on the road have won the series 22 of 25 times, per John Hollinger.) It would take a miracle…or maybe an injury.
So barring that, the Magic have to be left wondering what happened. They cruised through the first two rounds of the playoffs, winning eight straight games, and ran into a brick wall in the form of the Boston Celtics. The difference in this series is that the C’s are simply a lot better than the Bobcats and Hawks. In fact, I think you could combine the rosters for the Bobcats and Hawks and Boston would still beat them in a seven-game series. That’s how good the Celtics are playing now.
Ray Allen lit it up in Game 1, but was quiet in Game 2. Paul Pierce picked up the slack, posting 28-5-5. Kevin Garnett (10-9) struggled shooting the ball once again, but there was Rajon Rondo with a timely 25-5-8. Quick — name five point guards that are better than Rondo right now. I bet you can’t.
Dwight Howard (30-8) played a lot better in Game 2, and even hit his free throws (12-of-17), but the rest of the Magic shot just 19-of-58 (33%) from the field for 62 points. Jameer Nelson (4-of-12), Vince Carter (5-of-15) and Rashard Lewis (2-of-6), who combined to make $42 million this season, shot a collective 11-of-33 from the field. At home.
I’ll wait until the Magic actually lose the series before I write their offseason piece, but at this point the entire region of Central Florida has to be regretting that Vince Carter move. In the final period, Carter went 2-of-5, turned the ball over once, and missed back-to-back free throws with 0:32 to play that would have cut Boston’s lead to one. Luckily for Otis Smith, Hedo Turkoglu’s play fell off a cliff in Toronto, so it’s not like Smith’s detractors can point to Turk as a no-brainer re-signing.
As for Boston, what has spearheaded this rejuvenation? To me, it’s a combination of several factors: 1) Rondo is now a Top 5 point guard, so it’s the Big 4 instead of the Big 3, and at least two are showing up every night, 2) Garnett’s knee looks a lot better, 3) they’re playing arguably the best defense in the league, and 4) someone on the bench — Tony Allen, Rasheed Wallace or Glen Davis — seems to show up every game with an unexpected 8-15 points.
The Celtics are also made up of consummate professionals, so even though they have their ring, they’re going out every night and laying it on the line.
With the way both teams are playing, there’s a good chance we’re going to see a matchup of the last two Finals winners (Lakers, Celtics) and a rematch of the 2008 Finals.
Photo from fOTOGLIF
Follow the Scores Report editors on Twitter @clevelandteams and @bullzeyedotcom.
Posted in: Fantasy Basketball, NBA, News
Tags: 2010 NBA Playoffs, Boston Celtics, Dwight Howard, Jameer Nelson, Orlando Magic, Otis Smith, Rajon Rondo, Rashard Lewis, Vince Carter
You hit it right on the nail. I agree that the difference in Games 1 and 2 (and the series as a whole) was the Celtics’ mental toughness and hard-nosed play without getting dirty. The Magic were probably more talented and fresh off a Finals appearance but the Celtics were hungry and came to play.
Carter, Lewis, and Nelson seemed to shy from the spotlight. It was especially disappointing for Lewis because he was so clutch in the 2009 Playoffs. I’m unsure if Garnett’s defense on Lewis was that good or if Lewis just aged that quickly. I’m not sure if Turkoglu would’ve enabled the Magic to beat the Celtics, especially, as you noted, considering that he was such a letdown with the Raptors and then in his return to the Magic in 2011, but maybe he would’ve been more motivated if he stayed with a championship contender like the Magic. Maybe the Magic as a whole would’ve played with more fire and resolve if they had both Carter and Turkoglu
I forgot to mention that the Celtics had the bigs to neutralize Howard like Perkins and Wallace unlike the Cavs; Howard could just run circles around Ilgauskas and is too strong for Varejao. Like you mentioned in another post, Perkins is strong enough to guard Howard one-on-one; Howard didn’t have the post moves or touch needed at the time to counter Perkins. Just like in 2009, Howard was exposed vs. Perkins.
Similar to how the Magic were a bad matchup for the Cavs, the Celtics were a bad matchup for the Magic. Not just Perkins vs. Howard. Barnes and Redick have to chase Ray Allen around all game, which means Carter has to guard Pierce. Carter cannot hide on defense and Pierce exposed him. Even without Garnett, the Celtics pushed the Magic to 7 games in 2009 and even took a 3-2 lead.
As I mentioned in another post, the other big edge the Celtics had was that they were just hungrier and tougher. I don’t know if it was Pierce having a chip on his shoulder for being drafted after Carter, Garnett’s knee injury being healed, or the team relishing the underdog role. They played with more fire, confidence, and swagger. I think that’s what was missing from the 2010 Magic compared to 2009, when they came back down 3-2 to beat the Celtics, blowing them out in Game 7 in Boston. I’m unsure if having both Turkoglu and Carter would’ve given them the fire to beat the Celtics in 2010 but I can’t help but think what if.