Before I wrote my Divisional Preview last week, I gave a jab to all the losing teams from Wild Card Weekend. So I think it’s only fair to the Falcons, Colts, Dolphins and Vikings that I do the same to the losers from the divisional round.
Tennessee Titans: Spend some time this offseason finding another offensive weapon besides Chris Johnson. I swear at one point during the game last week I actually saw Kerry Collins look to dump a pass to the Titan bench because he knew Johnson was sitting there nursing his injured ankle.
Carolina Panthers: Jake, black shirts, silver helmets, bro. Does anyone else wonder if one of the Panthers went up to Delhomme in the locker room after the game, stopped at his locker, looked him dead in the eye and said, “Happy f’ing birthday, Jake. Way to cost us the game”?
New York Giants: Eli, you’ve been playing in New York (New Jersey, actually) for four years now. You’re telling me you still haven’t figured out how to throw with that wind by now? Don’t blame yourself, though. Your coach should have deferred to the second half and put his defense (his strength) on the field first to start the game. Losing to the Eagles at home was a collective effort.
San Diego Chargers: I read that the general feeling out of Chargers’ camp was that Santonio Holmes’ punt return for a touchdown in the first quarter set off a chain of mistakes and miscues leading to San Diego’s loss in Pittsburgh. Yeah that, and the fact that Willie Parker did whatever he wanted, the Chargers only held the ball for 17 seconds in the third quarter and they couldn’t stop the big play. But that was it.
Philadelphia Eagles (9-6-1) at Arizona Cardinals (9-7)
Sunday, January 18, 3:00PM ET
Current Odds: Eagles –4
Over/Under: 47
Game Outlook:
What the hell do we make of the Cardinals now? They stumbled into the postseason, so everyone (myself included) thought, “Well, this team won’t make it past the first round.” Then they beat the Falcons by shutting down Michael Turner, which happened to be the one thing many pundits said that they would have trouble with. But then everyone (myself included) thought, “Well, now they have to go on the road. And there’s no way they’ll win on the road.” Then they go to Carolina and absolutely crush the Panthers 33-13. Now there seems to be two schools of thought with these Cardinals from Arizona. The first being that the Falcons and Panthers made their job a hell of a lot easier by collectively turning the ball over nine times in two games. The second being that the Cards are for real and that everyone has disrespected them the past two weeks. Personally, I think ‘Zona falls somewhere in between. Do I think they were handed some golden opportunities to win over the past two weeks? Yeah. Do I think that they’re better than what everyone (one more time: myself included) thought they were? Yeah. But the Eagles are playing some damn good football right now and probably won’t make the same glaring mistakes that the Falcons and Panthers did. Philly also measures up well with Arizona given that their secondary is outstanding and that they’re playing with a ton of confidence. This game will come down to three things for both teams: 1) don’t turn the ball over, 2) convert on third downs and 3) play good defense. Whichever team is successful in those three areas of the game will win. And if you think that’s too simple then look at all of the playoff games played so far this season. The losing team turned the ball over more, couldn’t convert on third downs and couldn’t stop their opponent from making the big play.
X-Factor: DeSean Jackson, WR, Eagles
Jackson has breathed life into Philly’s passing attack and he’s provided a spark in the return game. If Brian Westbrook isn’t 100%, Jackson will have to make plays to give the Eagles a shot at making their second Super Bowl appearance in four years. It’ll also help if Andy Reid can line Jackson up in the “Wildcat” formation and allow him to make plays running the ball, too. Because Donovan McNabb can’t win on his own, even though he’s playing outstanding football right now.
Prediction: Cardinals 24, Eagles 21
Why the Cardinals? Because I think they’re destined to win. Nobody thought that they would be here right now and nothing in the NFL has made sense all year (i.e. the Eagles are probably the better overall team, so why should they win, right?). The Cards are also at home (where they play remarkably better than they do on the road) and I can already see the Kurt Warner headlines in the paper Monday morning.
Baltimore Ravens (11-5) at Pittsburgh Steelers (12-4)
Sunday, January 18, 6:30PM ET
Current Odds: Steelers -6
Over/Under: 34
Game Outlook:
Even though the divisional round essentially provided two duds (I know the Ravens-Titans game was close, but it really wasn’t that good of a game), I’m once again looking forward to what the AFC brings to the table this week. These are the two best defenses in the league (if not the NFL) and it’s going to be great to see how Rex Ryan and Dick LeBeau attack the opposing offense. The Ravens’ game plan has been simple the past two weeks in that they’ve relied on playing great defense and not turning the ball over offensively. Rookie Joe Flacco hasn’t thrown for over 200 yards in either of Baltimore’s two postseason wins, but the key is that he hasn’t turned the ball over. He has taken a couple of big shots down the field (mainly to Derrick Mason in the win last week) and converted, so that could once again play a factor this Sunday. The Ravens aren’t going to do anything different Sunday than they did the past two weeks – they’re going to play things conservative and win this game with defense. For the Steelers, Ben Roethlisberger isn’t the picture of perfect health right now, so it’ll be interesting to see what Ryan does to get pressure on Big Ben and force him to make mistakes like the Titans were able to in their Week 16 win over the Steelers. Of course, if Baltimore can’t stop Willie Parker than this game will be over before it starts. Parker had a great game in Pittsburgh’s win over San Diego last week and it forced the Chargers to be less aggressive. San Diego couldn’t get any pressure on Roethlisberger and he was able to hit them for big plays in the passing game. If the Ravens can effectively blitz him, he’s always likely to hold onto the ball too long, take sacks or turn the ball over. How effective Baltimore’s defense is will be what determines whether or not they’ll be playing for a Super Bowl title in two weeks. Pittsburgh’s defense is outstanding, but it’ll be the opportunities that the Ravens force via their defense that will be the determining factor in which team comes out victorious.
X-Factor: Terrell Suggs, LB/DE, Ravens
The Ravens need this guy to play. His status for Sunday is still uncertain as he continues to nurse an injured shoulder, but things don’t look promising. He’s been one of the best edge rushers in the league since he came into the NFL and he’ll be needed to drum up a pass rush against Big Ben. If he doesn’t play, that’s a huge blow to the Baltimore defense.
Prediction: Ravens 13, Steelers 10
It’s hard to beat a team three times in one season and with Big Ben’s injury a concern, I think Baltimore wins this with defense. Either way, this is going to be an outstanding game.
Follow the Scores Report editors on Twitter @clevelandteams and @bullzeyedotcom.
Posted in: NFL
Tags: AFC Championship, AFC Championship Preview, Andy Reid, Anquan Boldin, Anthony Stalter, Ben Roethlisberger, DeSean Jackson, Dick Lebeau, Donovan McNabb, Ed Reed, Joe Flacco, Kurt Warner, NFC Championship, NFC Championship Preview, NFL odds, Ray Lewis, Rex Ryan, Terrell Suggs, Willie Parker
Good points on the Titans.
I also think every once in a while
you need to PRESSURE the QB.
Ravens win, Eagles win…
Ravens SB Champs!..
Wait…wait…
I just don’t see the Eagles turing the ball over like you said. I also think they can get pressure on Warner. I think the Eagles roll.
As for the other game, I have no idea. Big Ben is the key. If the Ravens can hit him they have a good chance.
You think McNabb is playing great football!? Is 8 turnovers in 3 playoff games great football? In the first 2 playoff games McNabb only completed 2 passes over 10 yards. Is that great football? McNabb is personally seeing to it that David Akers has a great shot at the Hall of Fame. Have you ever seen such a poor performance in the redzone from a quarterback who’s playing great football? How may feild goals have the Eagles settled for this post season? I’m seriously asking. YOU do the research! You’re the idiot who wrote that McNabb is playing great football! I’m sorry but I don’t want a “franchise” quarterback who chokes in december and january. FACT: The Eagles would be nowhere without the play of the defense. FACT: You’re a moron. Donovan McNabb’s stats look great on paper… so does communism! He chokes under pressure. Nuf said!
Hey Dirk – sorry that your Eagles choked away another championship game, man. That’s got to be tough to take and I’m sure it’ll stay with you for a while.
Did I overstate that McNabb was playing “outstanding” football? Yes. You got me. But you can’t hang what he did today on me because I wrote this piece BEFORE the Cardinal game.
Still, I deeply apologize for any inconvenience I might have caused you by writing that McNabb was playing outstanding football. He was playing marginal at best and his defense carried him to the NFC Championship Game. You’ll be much better off with Kevin Kolb next year, I’m sure.
I’m also sorry that you take everything in life so literally (I hope you get this angry at stuff that really matters in life) and that you have to resort to calling people an “idiot” and a “moron” to get your point across.
FACT: This idiot called a Cardinals win.
God Bless.
Hey Antny,
Beleive me, I don’t blame you for the Eagles loss. And sure it will stay with me for a while. That’s just life as an Eagles fan.
The reason guys like you agrivate me is because none of you have the guts to actually take a stance on something contraversial. Instead of writing that McNabb is playing mediocre football in your article, you took the safe road and included one line about “outstanding” football. Are you afraid that if you actually call it like it is Al Sharpton going to show up at your door and shut down your web site?
Do me a favor Antny. Before you get suited up for battle with one guy, why don’t you have the courage to print something contraversial in an article. If you knew McNabb was playing mediocre football, why not say it. I’ll tell you why. Because just like every other sports reporter out there you have no marbles. You are content to take the safe road and live to write another day.
I know you wrote this article before the game. However, I figure if no one out there has the guts to call McNabb out, I’ll just start calling you out! Your article happened to pop up first in my google search.
Stay safe,
Dirk
Antny? Oh I get it, you’re playing with my name – cute. Hey, at least I’ve graduated past “idiot and moron.” Not much I could do with Dirk, but I’ll go with “Chuckles McGee” just so I can play along.
What’s great about you Chuckles, is that you come by the site all hopped up on piss and vinegar because the Eagles lost and you start making generalizations about me and my writing off of ONE STATEMENT. Did you take the time to even read through my other stuff before blasting me about playing it safe? If not – where’s your research?
I would post some articles where I’ve taken shots at players and coaches when they deserved it, but if you’re too lazy not to spend a little time reading the site and just want to make generalizations about people you don’t know, then I can’t help you.
And your McNabb argument is bunk. While I might have overstated that he was playing “outstanding”, he was certainly playing better than what you perceived. In the last seven games prior to the loss to the Cardinals, McNabb passed for 11 touchdowns and four interceptions. He also ran for two TDs, averaged 238 passing yards per game and I would hardly call 375 yards and 3 touchdowns a bad outing yesterday. (Not too mention he got the Eagles back into the game when THE DEFENSE allowed Larry Fitzgerald to abuse them and had given up a 24-6 lead.)
Are stats everything? No. And I’m sure your comeback is going to revolve around saying how Brian Westbrook, Kevin Curtis, DeSean Jackson and Celek made him look better than he really is. But to rip me for saying McNabb was playing well is freaking ridiculous. You make it sound like he was playing like Ryan Leaf all hopped up on sugar and cocaine. What was his rating in the fourth quarter in the postseason before yesterday? I don’t have the actual number but I know it was nothing to scoff at.
The main thing here is that you hate Donovan McNabb. Cool. He won’t be there next year and then you can slip into your Kevin Kolb jersey and rub peanut butter all of yourself or whatever you do for fun. In the meantime, stop calling this a “battle.” I hardly consider having irrational arguments over the internet “a battle.”
Stay angry Chuckles,
Antny
Anthony…a few suggestions.
1. As he did with your name, eliminate a consonant and just refer to him as “Dik”.
2. He’s an Eagles fan so use small words.
3. Comment on something “Dik” would be familiar with like urinating and defecating on cars of the opposing team’s fans in the parking lot. You know…those things that make Eagles fans “special”.
Hahahahaha…………….”rub peanut butter all over yourself or whatever it is you do for fun.” Anthony, you’ve got marbles. Mind marbles. Way to cut “Dork” down to size.
Ah D-Nab didnt allow the cardinals
to pass all day. He didnt drop easy basket catches
that would have been huge gains, and he didnt miss
the obvious pass interference call for philly at
the end.. Anthony did.
I saw him out there, dropping passes, then in a ref jersey.
Seriously though,
D-Nab isnt what he used to be, and he has no #1
wide out and an average line. Plus with westbrook
hurt, overused, and not running well what do you want. Maybe your eagles will hold an open try out again and you can play QB