Tag: sports documentaries (Page 2 of 3)

A few random thoughts about “The Fab Five”

Jalen Rose The Fab Five Screenshot

ESPN is currently running a two-hour documentary about Michigan’s Fab Five (Chris Webber, Jalen Rose, Juwan Howard, Jimmy King and Ray Jackson, and if you haven’t seen it, I’d definitely recommend it. Webber didn’t agree to participate, but the interviews with the other four members along with members of the coaching staff were quite compelling.

Yesterday, the internet was abuzz with comments made by the former Michigan players about Duke and especially Christian Laettner, whom Rose thought was an “overrated pu**y,” until he actually played against him and saw that he had some serious game. I’ll leave those comments alone since Rose eventually gave Laettner credit, but there are a few other moments in the documentary that jumped out at me:

1. Rose hated Duke because they wouldn’t recruit someone like him; they only recruited “Uncle Tom”-type black players. He also admitted he hated Grant Hill because Hill grew up in a great home while Rose grew up poor with an absentee father. Rose probably hit the nail on the head with regard to why many inner city blacks resent/criticize suburban blacks; it’s out of envy. They see lives that are more comfortable than theirs, and they lash out in anger. The Fab Five translated this to a hatred of the Duke players, including guys like Grant Hill and Thomas Hill.

I suspect if Mike Krzyzewski were asked about his recruiting habits and answered honestly, he’d say that he had the luxury of recruiting players (of whatever race) that he thought would fit into his team-first concept. He already had a successful college program, so why recruit a ‘risky’ player like Rose who may or may not fit into what he’s trying to build? The last thing he wants is to have a to battle a player on a daily basis.

In the end, Duke was 3-0 against the Fab Five, so I’d say the Blue Devils got the last laugh.

2. Forget the shorts, shoes, socks or even the style of play. The thing that bothered me about the Fab Five was the in-your-face taunting. The film was great because it reminded me of what I didn’t like about the Fab Five. Their play was outstanding. Nobody hogged the ball and winning was paramount, so from a pure basketball respect, they were wonderful. It was all the antics that drove me nuts. There were several highlights that showed the players getting into the face of the opponent after the guy was just dunked on. It’s one thing to over-celebrate with your teammates, but to show up an opponent like that is just bad sportsmanship. This was explained away as being part of the inner city playground culture, but my guess is that if they would have gotten into someone’s face on the playground, they would have been punched in the nose (or worse). At the time, officials didn’t really call taunting technicals, so there were no consequences to those actions. Oh, and Juwan Howard was the worst. Webber or Rose would dunk and there comes Howard, getting into the grill of the guy who just got dunked on. It was no surprise that against Ohio St. in their first Final Four, Howard got headbutt to the nose at one point in the game.

Continue reading »

DVD Review: “Magic & Bird: A Courtship of Rivals”

For years, the passion they shared for winning made Earvin “Magic” Johnson and Larry Bird the most bitter of rivals. It also made theirs the most compelling rivalry in sports, driving the NBA to new heights of popularity in the 1980s. Narrated by Liev Schreiber, this all-new documentary tells the riveting story of two superstars who couldn’t have been more different — until they forged an unlikely friendship from the superheated rivalry that had always kept them apart.

And that’s how “Magic & Bird: A Courtship of Rivals” is described on its back cover. HBO Entertainment did a nice job outlining the duo’s relationship starting with their joint appearance as part of Team USA’s warmup to the 1976 Olympics and their clash in the 1979 NCAA championship game all the way through their respective retirements.

By now, most basketball fans are aware of the rivalry/friendship that Magic and Larry developed over the years, but this 90-minute documentary digs deeper into each man’s personality and puts their relationship into context based on what was going on in the country at that particular time. Bird was extremely introverted and for much of his career it wasn’t his style to be friends with an opponent. Meanwhile, Magic was an extrovert and loved being loved, so when Bird snubbed Magic before the NCAA title game, the relationship was purely adversarial for several years. That loss bothered Bird for years, and it wasn’t until Converse convinced the two players to shoot a commercial (in French Lick, Indiana, on Bird’s request) did the two men actually become friends.

The documentary also covers each player’s childhood, Larry’s first day with the Celtics, how their rivalry became fodder for racists in Boston and around the country, Larry’s reaction to Magic’s HIV revelation, and how their unselfish style of play effectively saved the NBA. The film relies heavily on interviews with the two players, and it’s refreshing to hear them describe the different milestones in their relationship in their own words. It’s funny, emotional and for those of us that grew up watching the two superstars battle in the Finals — plenty of nostalgia.

The only knock is the complete lack of bonus features on the DVD, so for viewers who have already seen the film on HBO, there isn’t any extra content to dig into. But that’s just a small gripe — on the whole, “Magic & Bird” is an outstanding production.

The current (sad) state of card collecting

Thanks to Big League Stew, I stumbled upon this little eight-minute documentary about modern-day card collecting. Anthony Stalter watched it as well, so we’re going to discuss how card collecting has changed throughout the years.

John Paulsen: For me, card collecting started with basketball. I was never really into baseball as a kid (mostly because my dad preferred basketball and football, which he played in college), so my focus was on other sports. I had some old Topps football and basketball cards from the late ‘60s and ’70s, but I don’t really remember how I acquired them. Basketball cards were defunct for a while — Michael Jordan’s “real” rookie card could only be found in a regional set produced by Star — and once the mid-90’s hit, the NBA’s popularity blew up, so did the prices of those Star sets from the ’80s. I got into collecting for two reasons: 1) because I liked basketball (and to a lesser extent, football) and 2) I thought it was an investment that I could someday pass onto my son to teach him about the history of the sport (and about investing). Unfortunately, by the time I had some real money to spend on cards (when I was in college), the basketball card industry was so saturated with all the different brands and sets. Instead of going out and buying one or two rookie cards of your favorite player, now there’s 10 or 15 or more amongst all these different brands. The old rookie cards are iconic. I can still picture the first cards for Magic Johnson and Larry Bird, as well as Jordan’s Star rookie and his Fleer rookie, which came a few years later. With so many different brands/lines floating around, rookie cards have lost their appeal. The whole industry has lost its appeal for me, which is depressing because I probably have a few thousand cards stored under my bed that are worth a fraction of what they were 15-20 years ago. I was more of an individual card buyer than a pack or a box buyer. I bought a few packs and boxes in my day, but all those “commons” seemed like a waste. Anthony — how did you get into collecting and what do you think of the industry today?

Continue reading »

HBO presents the Thrilla in Manilla

Tomorrow night (April 11 at 8 pm ET/10pm PT), HBO will premiere the Thrilla in Manilla, a documentary covering the third and final fight between Muhammad Ali and Joe Frazier. The documentary “tells the story of two great fighters forever linked by three epic bouts, and looks at their final fight, considered the most brutal, from Frazier’s perspective for the first time.” Check out the trailer:

Martin Johnson reviews the film.

Thrilla in Manila tells the story with alarming detail and hilarious commentary. The film is much less observational than Leon Gast’s superb When We Were Kings which captured the scene in Kinshasa for the Ali-Foreman fight in 1974. Instead, Dower arrays a cast of talking heads between them so that a dialogue emerges from the commentary. Ali’s cornerman, Ferdie Pacheco, is almost as brash and outspoken as his fighter was. Imelda Marcos, former first lady of the Philippines, is a charming curiosity. Frazier’s son, Marvis, is calm and insightful. “I like to have a Robert Altmanesque ensemble,” said Dower of his motley crew of commentators.

The film will rub hard-core fans of Ali the wrong way, but Dower says it wasn’t his intent to tear down the great heavyweight. “I came to this with no agenda about Muhammad Ali at all,” he said at a post-screening press conference in New York this week. “It’s just that in telling this story you keep butting into the myth of Ali.”

Ali takes a few on the chin, but he has only himself to blame for some of it. Dower and his crew unearthed footage of Ali boasting about his agreements with the Ku Klux Klan on camera from the early ‘70s. And during his stay in Manila, he is caught womanizing.

However, Thrilla in Manila is far more effective as a portrait than a rebuttal or a diatribe. Frazier is the quiet focus of the film. He is shown in his gym, and he’s coaxed into watching the third fight for the first time. “I lost the fight. What would I have learned from watching it again?” he asked without the slightest hint of wistfulness.

Frazier, both in the movie and in person, seems like a man stuck in the wrong era. His humility and background were easily confused in the ‘70s for subservience, a time when outspokenness was the norm. He wasn’t media savvy in a moment when his opponent was charismatic and savagely sarcastic.

If you like boxing films and documentaries, this one is definitely worth checking out. Boxing isn’t as big now as it was in the glory days of the 20th century, but it’s still big business, particularly with sports betting becoming accepted in more states. Now you can at least find a no deposit bonus opportunity and enjoy betting on fights.

8 Questions for the Producers of “Muhammad Ali: Made in Miami”

Who needs another Muhammad Ali documentary? Creators of the new PBS documentary Muhammad Ali: Made in Miami succeeded by taking on a fresh approach – how did he become Muhammad Ali? And why is he and forever “the greatest”? We had a chance to chat with the producers, Gaspar Gonzalez and Alan Tomlinson.

Scores Report: Hello.

Gaspar Gonzalez: Yep, it’s Gaspar.

SR: Really enjoyed the documentary by the way.

GG: Thank you very much.

SR: So, is it okay if I just start the questions?

GG: Anytime you like.

SR: What is one thing that you guys learned about Ali that stood out when making the film?

GG: We had researched the film and subject matter extensively before we ever started. I think the thing that surprised us, not that we didn’t know about it, but how kind of compelling the material turned out to be with his relationship with Malcolm X – and how that relationship kind of evolved and devolved. We came across that snippet of film where he is being interviewed obviously after the assassination and he says something to the effect of “anybody who speaks out against Elijah Muhammad will die” which is a very stark thing to hear. I think that aspect of the story turned out to be more compelling than we thought initially.

SR: What inspired you to make this film? Why did you want to make it?

GG: It was sort of my idea and I was not a filmmaker so I took the idea to Alan Tomlinson, so you know without Alan it wouldn’t have been made a film – let’s get that straight. But I grew up in Miami, and I’m forty years old, so I’m just old enough, obviously Ali was long gone by the time I was a young kid, but there were still plenty of people around who remembered Ali when he used to hang around Miami. They remembered running into him in Cuban restaurants and seeing him on South Beach and running to and from the gym – and so I always remembered that from the time I was a little boy. Then I ended up in grad school and did a PhD in American Studies and became a cultural historian. So I was able to appreciate as a cultural historian the significance of that story – the significance of this young kid named Cassius Clay coming to Miami and evolving into Muhammad Ali here, and in some ways these memories I had as a child, you know of people who still remembered and talked about Ali, kind of came together with my professional training as a historian. I thought it was a story that really had never gotten the attention it deserved – so I took the idea to Alan Tomlinson and he thought is was a great idea and so we made the film.

SR: How long did it take to make this film by the way?

GG: Well, that all depends on how you count it. From the time we pitched it to WLRN, which is the Miami PBS affiliate. They gave us the go ahead probably February of 2006 and we went into pre-production — we conducted the interviews beginning of the summer of 2006 and through early of 2007 and we premiered the film locally in November of 2007. So, if you want to count it from the very, very beginning – probably a year and a half. If you want to count from the time we actually started shooting it was probably a little more than a year.

SR: I think one of the greatest aspects of this film is probably some of the interviewees that you guys had and incorporated in the film. I was just curious how did you find some of these people that knew Ali so personally? Was it a difficult process in locating them?

GG: No, not really. Obviously people like Ferdie Pecheco and Angelo Dundee they’re famous in their own right. A few others like Nelson Adams who was the neighbor, as a young boy he was Ali’s neighbor who is actually a prominent doctor in Miami now – and Sonny Armbrister who is the barber, who was wonderful in the film. People like that, while they are not famous per se, they are very well known in the black community in Miami and are very well know in terms of their association with Ali. Everybody knows that Sonny Armbrister was Muhammad’s barber for a long time and that Nelson was his neighbor and so I don’t know that we necessarily uncovered anybody who…I don’t think that was one of the hard things in making this film. You know Flip Shulke is a reknown civil rights photographer and he had actually put out a book in the 1990’s of his Ali pictures in Miami so, that was just a matter of tracking Flip down. So you know again, I don’t think this story was unknown, I think the story was under-appreciated and had been given sort of short shrift in other films and books and what have you – and so I think that’s what we did. We just went back and told the story the way it deserved to be told and we went to the people who can best tell that story.

SR: Was there anything in particular that struck you about your interviewees?

GG: Yes. They were all great story tellers. It’s very unusual to turn the camera on people and have them be as smart and funny and insightful as our subjects were. Almost without exception that is very unusual. A lot of times you can go to somebody who is very knowledgeable and is the perfect interview subject for the film you’re making and you turn the camera on them, and it’s deadly – you know they are just not very good at it – they are not very good at talking on camera and not everybody is. We were really blessed, I guess would be the right word, that all of our subjects were just terrific that way – which incidentally is I think which made it very easy for us not to have a narrator.

SR: Those interviews were really great.

GG: Yeah. The entire film is narrated by our subjects.

SR: What was your favorite moment while making this film?

GG: There were lots. We had such a great time in making it. Making the film was a great excuse to talk to some really interesting people. One of my favorite moments is that when we actually interviewed Angelo Dundee, who is a great guy and a legendary boxing trainer, we thought on our way out the door, we thought of this idea, we said we should take this little T.V. set with a tape player, and play the tape of the Clay/Liston fight for Angelo. You know because we are gonna be asking about the fight. And so, we interviewed him at the gym, and we set up this little thirteen inch television set with a tape deck and we popped in the VHS tape, super low tech, and we set him up on a stool and he watched the fight. Then we had him comment on the fight as it played in front of him – and it was wonderful because he actually said he did not watch that fight all the way through since maybe the night of the actual fight. He’d seen little clips of it.

(Alan Tomlinson joins the call.)

Alan Tomlinson: I’m on board now. This is Alan Tomlinson. I was waiting for the opportunity to let you know I was here.

GG: I was just telling the story of when we took the T.V. over to Angie.

AT: Yes, absolutely.

GG: And it was a great moment. He immediately fell almost into this trance and he started referring Ali as “my kid.” As “My fighter my kid” and it was like he was right back in that moment – and that made it into a terrific interview. So that was one of the things that really stands out for me and I assume that for Alan as well, but I don’t know.

AT: Well, I think it kind of really set the tone for the way we went about telling the story. Angelo Dundee is a guy who, whatever he talks about, he’s right back there in the moment – he’s just that sort of guy who lives and breathes this boxing world and with the twinkle in his eye, he is right back in the moment. He seems to have an incredible memory; although, no doubt watching the fight was a good aid to his memory – but the sort of immediacy of it was so powerful, the rest of the interviews kind of took their cue from that and the whole way we built the film.

SR: Was there a main point you wanted to make by the end of this film?

AT: This is sort of a round-about way in answering your question. But, who needs another Muhammad Ali documentary? Google or Amazon, you will find there are plenty out there. We thought this was one little story, one little window, that his Miami is, which goes a long way in explaining how this guy from Louisville, Cassius Clay, this “Louisville Lip” with predicting rounds and the gibberish and the rhyming became this enormous figure who totally transcends sport – and who resonates with people all over the world: white, black, green, orange – I mean he captures everybody’s imagination; most people positively. But how did he become Muhammad Ali? The fact of the matter is, he became Muhammad Ali during his Miami years. Most times when you make films they kind of take on a life of their own and this rapidly went beyond evoking the time and the place of Miami Beach and the boxing world, which were very important to us in the outset of the film. The heart of what the film is about is how this guy became Muhammad Ali — its one of those things when you start out by doing one thing and you wind up achieving something else. Your way of looking at Muhammad Ali is a little different – it takes you into a world and a time. You know I’m sixty, so I remember the Liston fight, Cassius Clay, and all that stuff – but my kids who are in their early twenties, love Muhammad Ali, and they never knew he was ever called Cassius Clay or that he spent any time in Miami Beach – and they have absolutely no idea how he became Muhammad Ali, his involvement with Malcolm X, and the background of the Civil Rights Movement of the time. So, why do we need another Muhammad Ali film? I mean this was an aspect of it that it just reminds you – Muhammad Ali has now become something almost mythical, he’s almost been sanctified by this point. But he’s just this kid that wanted to be this fighter for Christ sake. I’m always reminded of John Lennon who said, “I wanted to be Tom Jones and look what happened.” This guy wanted to be heavyweight champion of the world and look what happened – and that’s our story.

SR: This is sort of a rhetorical question, but in your opinion, will Muhammad Ali always be known as “the greatest?”

GG: I think that Ali as a figure of his moment and as a figure of the 1960’s – I mean the 1960’s are this era that is remembered as an age of revolt and revolution and transformation – and I think Ali will always be identified with that historical moment.

SR: So, it had a lot to do with the time period in which he came?

GG: Absolutely, to the degree that it was a significant era with the Civil Rights, anti-war movement, and all of that which I think what makes Ali’s place secure. But, you know as Alan sort of points out, that time sort of moves on and there are twenty year old kids who aren’t quite sure why he’s famous. They don’t have a memory of him as a fighter – he was a great fighter. Was he the greatest heavyweight fighter ever? He’s certainly the top three or four. You can argue that he was.

AT: There was another film out there that was made years ago. In fact it was filmed live at the time of the Liston fight, I saw a bit of it on the Independent Film Channel the other night, and someone asks Ali a provocative question and he says, “Listen, you’re the greatest if you think you are, let somebody prove you wrong.” I think there are a lot of boxing experts and analyst who would argue that Muhammad Ali isn’t their number one or two – I think it is Jack Dempsey or Joe Louis. But, there will never be another one like him. I don’t think there will never be a heavyweight as fast as he was and we’ve yet to see in any division a showman like him. In fact, a showman in boxing that we see these days is pretty much taking a leaf from Muhammad Ali’s book. A bit like Tiger Woods today, he certainly increased the size of the purses because people started watching boxing who never watched it before. Of course, that’s all gone now – nobody watches heavyweight boxing. I don’t watch heavyweight boxing. Who is the heavyweight champion of the world?

GG: Who, all six of them?

AT: Yeah, who cares? But back then everybody knew who the heavyweight champion of the world was. If you asked anybody in Ali’s time who was the heavyweight champion of the world, everybody would know. With that point, I don’t think there was anybody as greatly recognized – I mean what other boxer in any division, what other sportsman in any other sport could argue that he became the most famous face on the planet.

SR: Well, thank you guys once again for this opportunity.

GG: Sure, no problem, thank you.

(Be sure to check out Jeff’s review of the documentary.)

« Older posts Newer posts »