<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big 10 name change &#8211; The Scores Report &#8211; The National Sports Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.scoresreport.com/tag/big-10-name-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.scoresreport.com</link>
	<description>The National Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:52:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>New division names for Big Ten so awful, conference may change them</title>
		<link>https://www.scoresreport.com/2010/12/17/new-division-names-for-big-ten-so-awful-conference-may-change-them/</link>
					<comments>https://www.scoresreport.com/2010/12/17/new-division-names-for-big-ten-so-awful-conference-may-change-them/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Stalter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[College Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 10 name change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Delany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legions and Leaders Big 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new Big 10 division names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new Big 10 logo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.scoresreport.com/?p=50395</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not surprisingly, people outside of the unimaginative folks at the Big Ten don&#8217;t like the new division names that the conference will roll out in 2011. In fact, people hated the new names (Leaders and Legends) so much that Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany said the conference might change them. From ESPN.com: Delany said during [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://view.picapp.com/pictures.photo/sports/wisconsin-iowa/image/9975589?term=big+ten+football" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" src="http://view2.picapp.com/pictures.photo/image/9975589/wisconsin-iowa/wisconsin-iowa.jpg?size=500&#038;imageId=9975589" border="0" width="477" title="Wisconsin v Iowa" height="318" oncontextmenu="return false;" ondrag="return false;" onmousedown="return false;" alt="IOWA CITY, IA - OCTOBER 23: University of Iowa Hawkeyes fans cheer on their team as they take on the Wisconsin Badgers during the first half of play at Kinnick Stadium on October 23, 2010 in Iowa City, Iowa. Wisconsin won 31-30 over Iowa. (Photo by David Purdy/Getty Images)." /></a></div>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://view.picapp.com//JavaScripts/OTIjs.js"></script></p>
<p>Not surprisingly, people outside of the unimaginative folks at the Big Ten don&#8217;t like the new division names that the conference will roll out in 2011. In fact, people hated the new names (Leaders and Legends) so much that Big Ten commissioner <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5930029" target="_blank">Jim Delany said the conference might change them</a>.</p>
<p>From ESPN.com:</p>
<blockquote><p>Delany said during an interview with WGN AM-720 in Chicago on Thursday that the names Legends and Leaders were picked to highlight the conference&#8217;s rich history, and that &#8220;to a great extent it&#8217;s fallen on deaf ears.&#8221; Many fans have instead mocked the names and asked officials to reconsider, which Delany said could happen after the first of the year.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think we have enough experience with names, and expansion and development of divisions, to know that you never, rarely, get 90 percent approval rating,&#8221; Delany said during the interview. &#8220;But to get a 90 percent non-approval rating was, you know, really surprising.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Compounding the issue was the fact that the new Big Ten logo looks like it was done in MS Paint. Delany might want to reconsider doing something about that while he’s busy thinking about new division names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.scoresreport.com/2010/12/17/new-division-names-for-big-ten-so-awful-conference-may-change-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.scoresreport.com @ 2026-06-18 17:32:18 by W3 Total Cache
-->