Page 882 of 2956

Peter King outraged over blown call in U.S. draw vs. Slovenia

Peter King is hopping mad about the blown call during Friday’s draw between the United States and Slovenia at the World Cup.

Here’s King’s explanation of the play:’

With the score tied at 2 in the 86th minute, the United States had a direct kick on the Slovenian side of the field. There was much pushing and shoving in front of the goal, both before the ball was in the air and while it flew toward the net. Replays showed three American players being bearhugged by Slovenians — and Americans, in the case of at least two scrums, hugging back. But in the case of an earlier hero, midfielder Michael Bradley, Slovenian Aleksander Radosavljevic did his best Ray Lewis imitation, practically dragging Bradley down just feet from the goal. As the ball fell to earth, American sub Maurice Edu pounced on it, flicking it hard into the net for what appeared to be the winning goal. But in his first World Cup game, referee Koman Coulibaly, from the landlocked West African country of Mali, ran into the fray and blew off the goal.

King is mostly upset that Coulibaly didn’t explain why there was a penalty and which player it was on.

At least four Americans tried to find out what the call was. But Coulibaly, who, according to several U.S. players was all but mute during the game (a rarity in world-class games, they say), didn’t inform either side what call he made. We still do not know what the infraction was that Coulibaly called, and under the idiotic rules of FIFA, Coulibaly doesn’t have to say what the infraction was. He might go to his grave with it.

“Who knows what it was?” said the man of the match, Landon Donovan of the United States. “I am not sure how much English he spoke, or if he spoke English. But we asked him several times in a non-confrontational way. He just ignored us.”

The call was awful. But in all sports, when hugely controversial calls are made — the Tuck Rule call by Walt Coleman in the Raiders-Patriots playoff game nine years ago, the Jim Joyce ruination-of-the-perfect-game this month — at least we know what the call is. Here, millions of people staring at TVs around the world are still asking, “What’s the call?”

So I asked Bob Bradley in the American press conference: “Isn’t something like this a bit of an outrage in a game of this importance?”

I could see Bradley thinking about how to answer this question. When he did, he said, “In the midst of a game, it’s rare that a referee will give you an answer. When you’re involved in the game long enough, there are moments when you’re frustrated … That’s the way the game works. And you move on.”

I find it off-putting that Bradley can chalk this situation up to, “That’s the way the game works.” That’s not right and if that’s how soccer usually operates, then no wonder more Americans don’t get into the sport.

The U.S. deserves an explanation.

Was Kobe’s Game 7 performance worst-ever by game-winning superstar?

Kobe Bryant was brutal offensively last night, hitting just six of his 24 shots (25%) and turning the ball over four times. But he was great on the glass (15 rebounds) and found a way to get to the line in the fourth quarter, allowing him to score 10 points in the final period.

However, with a few exceptions, he took terrible shots all night long and had a couple of bad turnovers in the second half. It made me wonder — was Kobe’s performance last night the worst ever by a game-winning superstar in Game 7 of a Finals? Here’s a look at the last few comparables:

Kobe Bryant, 2010: 6-of-24, 23-15-2, 4 TOs
Tim Duncan, 2005: 10-of-27, 25-11-3, 5 TOs
Hakeem Olajuwon, 1994: 10-of-25, 25-10-7, 2 TOs

That’s it. There were just three Game 7s in the Finals in the last 22 years. Still, Kobe’s numbers don’t look too good. His shooting percentage was far worse than either Duncan or Olajuwon, but none of these guys had particularly good shooting nights.

Since box score data becomes more difficult to find the further back you go, I decided to look at all Game 7s (not just the Finals) from the ’00s to see how Kobe’s performance stacks up. (Note: I only included the conference semifinals and the conference finals. There isn’t as much pressure in Game 7s in the first round.)

Kobe Bryant, 2009 (WCS): 4-of-12, 14-7-5, 1 TO
Dwight Howard, 2009 (ECS): 5-of-9, 12-16, 3 TO
Tim Duncan, 2008 (WCS): 5-of-17, 16-14-3, 4 TO
Paul Pierce, 2008 (ECS): 13-of-23, 41-4-5, 4 TO
Dirk Nowitzki, 2006 (WCS): 11-of-20, 37-15-3, 0 TO
Steve Nash, 2006 (WCS): 11-of-16, 29-2-11, 4 TO
*Chauncey Billups, 2006 (ECS): 4-for-10, 12-8-3, 3 TO
*Chauncey Billups, 2005 (ECF): 5-of-15, 18-4-8, 1 TO
Kevin Garnett, 2004 (WCS): 12-of-23, 32-21-2, 2 TO (4 STL, 5 BLK)
*Chauncey BIllups, 2004 (ECS): 6-of-16, 22-2-7, 1 TO
Dirk Nowitzki, 2003 (WCS): 12-of-20, 30-19-2, 0 TO
**Shaquille O’Neal, 2002 (WCF): 12-of-25, 35-13-2, 3 TO
Ray Allen, 2001 (ECS): 10-of-18, 28-6-5, 4 TO
Allen Iverson, 2001 (ECS): 8-of-27, 21-4-16, 4 TO
Allen Iverson, 2001 (ECF): 17-of-33, 44-6-7, 2 TO
Patrick Ewing, 2000 (ECS): 5-of-10, 20-10-0, 1 TO
***Shaquille O’Neal, 2000 (WCF): 5-of-9, 18-9-5, 4 TO

I’ll stop there.

* It’s tough to pick the best player from the Pistons during this area, as they were probably the most balanced team in recent memory.
** Kobe shot 10-of-26, 30-10-7, 0 TO
*** Kobe shot 9-for-19, 25-11-7, 2 TO

There are some interesting lines in there. Look at Nowitzki’s lines (37-15-3 in 2006 and 30-19-2 in 2003)…wow. And Iverson’s 2001 line against the Bucks (44-6-7) was pretty epic.

While there have been some pitiful shooting nights — Tim Duncan in 2008, Allen Iverson in 2001 — no game-winning superstar has shot as bad as Kobe did in last night’s Game 7. Not in the last 10 years anyway.

What can we glean from this? Well, Kobe is very, very lucky that his teammates played as well as they did. Pau Gasol and Ron Artest really carried Kobe on the offensive end, while Derek Fisher and even Sasha Vujacic hit key shots/free throws down the stretch to seal the win. Moreover, the Laker defense kept the Celtics at bay once L.A. took the lead.

But no matter how poorly he shot, the Lakers won, and that’s all that matters in the end.

One thing is for certain — if Kobe doesn’t get the concept of team play by now, he’s never going to get it.


Photo from fOTOGLIF

Bonds’ son reaches plea deal after spitting in mom’s face, threatening police officer

Remember the teenage boy that Barry Bonds usually bearhugged at home plate after hitting most of his record setting/breaking home runs earlier this decade?

Well that boy is a little older now. And judging by his criminal record, he’s become a fine, upstanding young man.

According to the San Jose Mercury News, Nikolai Bonds, 20, reached a plea agreement with San Mateo County prosecutors today, just days before he was scheduled to stand trial for five misdemeanor charges, which include: battery, false imprisonment, vandalism, making threats to an officer and obstructing an officer in the performance of duties.

Apparently young Nikolai has roid rage a temper problem.

Prosecutors said Bonds got into an argument with his mother, Sun Bonds, 45, the morning of Dec. 5 at her home on Valparaiso Avenue in Menlo Park over whether some of his friends had taken jewelry from the house.

During the argument, authorities said, Bonds spit in his mother’s face, broke two crystal bowls, threw a door handle across the room and prevented his mother from leaving through the front door. When police arrived, Bonds threatened a Menlo Park officer and his family, prosecutors said.

If convicted of the five original charges, Bonds could have faced up to two years in jail.

The story gets better. Sun moved to the East Coast because she wanted nothing to do with the situation and just wanted it “all to go away.” According to the report, without her testimony, prosecutors did not believe that they could get convictions on all the charges, hence the plea deal.

So basically, this kid will only have to serve four days in jail (the judge in his case granted him credit for time already served) and pay fines totaling $2,130 because his mother didn’t want to be bothered with the situation. Oh, and he’ll also have to undergo 32 hours of anger management counseling, as well. I’m thinking he’ll get a lot out of those classes.

Every family is a little nutty, but the Bonds’ clan may take the cake.

Bosh: “I can’t just sit around and wait [for LeBron].”

When free agency starts, Chris Bosh said he isn’t going to wait on LeBron to make a decision.

(Transcript from ESPN Rumors, interview by SNY.tv.)

“Anytime you have the opportunity to play with certain guys, you have to take that into consideration. When it all goes down, he’s gonna be one of the all-time greats,” Bosh told SNY.tv on Thursday. “At the same time, I can’t just sit around and wait. I have to be proactive with my choices and what’s gonna make me happy. I have to make sure I take my time and make the right decision.”

Bosh considers the Knicks to be an option for him.

“There are a lot of teams out there I’m considering including my home team, the Raptors,” Bosh said. “It’s gonna be crazy and confusing and I’m looking forward to it.”

What about the Nets?

“I think each team has its own advantages over the other,” Bosh said. “New Jersey has a young core, so does New York. The coaching styles are a bit different. A lot of people are excited about the new (Nets) owner. It’s interesting. Everybody is pretty much excited about the makeup of the team and the direction the Nets are headed. It might work out; it might not. You always have to consider a lot.”

While it appears that LeBron is going to milk this for all it’s worth, I doubt Bosh would have to wait too long to get a decision from LeBron’s camp if the two want to play with each other. However, if LeBron drags his feet, we could see the Heat sign Bosh quickly; the idea of playing in South Florida with Dwyane Wade has to be appealing and there are enough other quality big men out there that the Heat can use as leverage.


Photo from fOTOGLIF

2010 World Cup: Was U.S. robbed by refs in draw against Slovenia?

Thanks to a furious comeback in the second half, the United States was able to draw with Slovenia in Friday’s World Cup match in Johannesburg. Landon Donovan and Michael Bradley each had goals to help the U.S. erase a 2-0 Slovenia lead and help Americas’ chances of advancing in the World Cup.

The thrilling finish was tempered, however, when a late goal by the U.S. (one in which could have won the game) was waived off by a referee.

From ESPN.com:

Donovan scored in the 48th minute and Michael Bradley, son of U.S. coach Bob Bradley, tied the score in the 82nd.

Second-half sub Maurice Edu appeared to put the U.S. ahead in the 86th, poking in close-range shot after Jozy Altidore headed Donovan’s free kick to him. But the goal was disallowed by referee Koman Couilibaly of Mali, apparently for a foul before Edu got the ball.

“I’m a little gutted to be honest,” Donovan said. “I don’t know how they stole that last goal from us. I’m not sure what the call was. He (the referee) wouldn’t tell us what the call was.”

Slovenia (1-0-1) leads Group C with four points and would have qualified for the second round with a win.

The U.S. (0-0-2) is second with two points, followed by England (0-0-1) with one point, pending its match against Algeria (0-1) in Cape Town later Friday. The top two teams in the group advance.

I don’t know much about soccer (if anything), but it appears as though the U.S. was hosed by the call. An explanation of why the goal was not allowed would be nice.

Either way, the U.S. has put itself in position to advance if it can get a victory. (A loss by Slovenia wouldn’t hurt either.)


Photo from fOTOGLIF

« Older posts Newer posts »