Page 2419 of 2957

Carmelo Anthony pulled over for DUI

The Denver Post is reporting that Nuggets’ forward Carmelo Anthony was “pulled over Sunday night on suspicion of driving under the influence of alcohol.” He submitted to a blood test. The results won’t be known for two weeks.

(Sigh.)

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: HIRE A DRIVER!

Carmelo, you have made $28 million in five years and you are due to make another $66 million over the next four. Certainly, you have the cash flow to fork out $100K a year to a friend (or a stranger) to be your driver, right? He could drive you to the club, McDonald’s, wherever you want to go. That way, you won’t get pulled over for a DUI. Now your rep is tarnished and you’ll no doubt lose potential endorsement deals, however minor.

Not smart, ‘Melo. Not smart.

2007-08 NBA Year-End Awards

With the NBA season coming to a close, it’s a good time to hand out my year-end awards. I don’t get an actual vote in any of these races, but that’s not going to stop me from second-guessing those that do. Besides, I’ll probably put more thought into this than 90% of the sportswriters who do get to vote. Bastards.

Regular readers know that I like to use the league’s Efficiency number to look at a player’s complete statistical picture.

EFF = ((Points + Rebounds + Assists + Steals + Blocks) – ((Field Goals Att. – Field Goals Made) + (Free Throws Att. – Free Throws Made) + Turnovers))

It takes into account all of the positive and negative stats a player can accumulate and gives us a single number to use to compare players. There are times when it is necessary to determine player’s Efficiency Per Minute (EPM) by dividing a player’s efficiency by the number of minutes. This allows us to compare players who play a vastly different number of minutes.

With that in mind, let’s work through the awards, one by one.

MOST IMPROVED PLAYER

From Mark Stein’s year-end article last season, we know that this award “is designed to honor an up-and-coming player” and that it is “not intended to be given to a player who has made a ‘comeback.’” The “comeback” piece of that refers to a player who has missed a significant amount of time due to injury. He goes into more detail about the “up-and-coming” portion in a more recent piece, basically justifying 29 year-old Hedo Turkoglu’s name on this list.

After scouring the internets, here is a list of the most-mentioned names for MIP, along with their year-to-year improvement in EPG:

Andrew Bynum – 11.9 to 21.9 (+84%)
Rudy Gay – 10.3 to 18.5 (+80%)
LaMarcus Aldridge – 10.8 to 18.6 (+72%)
Chris Kaman – 13.5 to 23.1 (+71%)
Jose Calderon – 11.3 to 17.9 (+58%)
Hedo Turkoglu – 12.5 to 19.5 (+56%)
Rajon Rondo – 9.8 to 14.0 (+43%)
Mike Dunleavy – 13.9 to 18.5 (+33%)

Last season’s winner, Monta Ellis, was the first in eight years to have an EPG less than 17.1. (He had an EPG of 14.9). Seven of the last eight winners have seen an improvement of at least 44% in EPG. For those reasons, we can probably cross Rajon Rondo and Mike Dunleavy off this list. Both players had much improved seasons, but Rondo is overshadowed by the Big Three, while Dunleavy is playing for a team that is going to miss the playoffs in a conference that features the six-games-under-.500 Atlanta Hawks as its #8 seed.

The last eight MIP have also been durable, with each winner playing in at least 72 games. Andrew Bynum has played in just 35 games while Chris Kaman has played in just 56, so we can probably eliminate them from contention. Bynum has simply missed too many games. Meanwhile, Kaman has the No Elton Brand Effect working against him. Even if voters feel that Kaman has appeared in enough games, they’ll wonder if he would have made a similar jump had Elton Brand been healthy.

Another thing to consider is the hype surrounding the player when they entered the league. Just one of the last eight winners was a former lottery pick (Tracy McGrady, 2001). Expectations for lottery picks are inherently high, so when they make a big jump, the surprise factor isn’t as big. Bynum, Aldridge, Gay, Kaman and Dunleavy were all lottery picks, and that is probably having a conscious or subconscious effect on the voters.

Gay’s ascension has been remarkable, but the fact that Memphis is one of the league’s worst teams doesn’t bode well for him. Some voters will justify his big jump by pointing to Pau Gasol’s departure. Meanwhile, Aldridge’s chances would be better if the Trailblazers hadn’t faded after the All-Star break.

So that leaves Jose Calderon and Hedo Turkoglu. Calderon has had a wonderful year filling in for the injured T.J. Ford, but he has resumed his bench role, and that is probably making voters a little gun shy. His 8.2 assists are eye-popping, but he’s averaging a pedestrian 11.4 points per game. However, both his FG% (52.5%) and 3P% (43.3%) are outstanding.

Meanwhile, Turkoglu was probably the biggest surprise of the year. After four seasons of inconsistent play in Sacramento and San Antonio, he made a big jump in his fourth season with the Magic. Everyone expected Rashard Lewis to be Orlando’s second-best player, but it was Turkoglu who claimed that crown, setting career highs in points (19.6), rebounds (5.8) and assists (4.9). Given Orlando’s surprising ascension into the East’s elite, he’s my pick for Most Improved Player.

My vote: Hedo Turkoglu, Magic
Prediction: Hedo Turkoglu, Magic

SIXTH MAN OF THE YEAR

To be eligible for this award, a player must come off the bench in more games than he starts. The race comes down to two players: Manu Ginobili and last year’s SMOY winner, Leandro Barbosa.

Truth be told, this isn’t much of a race. The knock against Ginobili last season was that he started too many of his team’s games, but that shouldn’t be a problem this season. He set career-highs in points (19.6), rebounds (4.8), assists (4.5) and 3P% (40.1%) and has the 17th highest EPM of all players averaging at least 30 minutes a game. Meanwhile, Barbosa’s numbers are down across the board.

My vote: Manu Ginobili, Spurs
Prediction: Manu Ginobili, Spurs

ROOKIE OF THE YEAR

ROY is a two-horse race between Kevin Durant and Al Horford. There’s no doubt in my mind that Durant is going to be a superstar, but Horford has the edge efficiency wise (16.5 to 15.2) and has done it in three fewer minutes a game. In the end, I think voters will gravitate towards Durant’s 20.1-point average (along with his unequaled potential), but Horford has a big edge in rebounds, FG% and PPS. Let’s not forget that the Hawks are playoff-bound while the Sonics have the second worst record in the league. There’s something to be said about the timing of Horford’s arrival in Atlanta and their sudden development into a playoff team, albeit a bad one.

I think Horford has the edge, but Durant will probably win it. Given the fact that KD has played his best ball in the second half of the season despite having virtually no help, it won’t be a huge travesty if he goes home with the trophy.

My vote: Al Horford, Hawks
Prediction: Kevin Durant, Sonics

ALL-NBA FIRST TEAM

PG: Chris Paul
SG: Kobe Bryant
SF: LeBron James
PF: Kevin Garnett
C: Dwight Howard

Honestly, the only pick here that isn’t a no-brainer is at center. I don’t think that Amare Stoudemire is worthy of back-to-back first team honors, especially with the Suns’ dropoff this year. I could go with Tim Duncan, who has been his usual steady self, but more and more San Antonio is becoming Manu Ginobili’s team, especially in the clutch. Besides, hasn’t Duncan asked time and time again to be treated as a forward? (He’s a center, by the way.)

The right pick here is Dwight Howard, whose averages of 20.9 points and (a league-high) 14.4 rebounds are eye-popping, to say the least. He’s the cornerstone of an Orlando franchise that has won 50 games for the first time since the 1995-96 season, when Shaq was still with the team. He has gone from a man-child to Superman in four short seasons, and will likely be the league’s best center for the next decade or so.

MOST VALUABLE PLAYER

There are four serious contenders for this year’s MVP: Kobe Bryant, Chris Paul, Kevin Garnett and LeBron James.

LeBron continues to grow. His gaudy averages – 30.0 points, 8.0 rebounds, 7.2 assists, 1.8 steals and 1.1 blocks – seem to get gaudier by the year. But the Cavs will finish below that important 50-win mark, which means that they simply aren’t an elite team. Throw in the fact that Cleveland is just 27-23 against the East and the record looks even worse. The MVP award hasn’t gone to a player on a team with fewer than 50 wins since the 1981-82 season, and the streak won’t be broken this year.

All due respect to Kevin Garnett, but his numbers just aren’t MVP-caliber. I don’t look solely at stats, but they play a pretty big factor and Garnett is one of eight players who average at least 19.0 points and 9.3 rebounds a game, so it’s not like he’s in exclusive company. If KG does defy the odds and win his second MVP, it will be due to the defensive mindset that he brought to the Celtics. The team’s transformation on that end of the court has been something to behold. This is why KG is all but a shoe-in to win the Defensive Player of the Year, which isn’t a bad consolation prize.

So it’s down to two. It’s tough to compare the stats of a point guard like Chris Paul to a scoring guard like Kobe Bryant, so I like to double the assist numbers and add that total to the average points to determine the total number of points that the player is directly responsible for. In this case, we’re looking at 44.3 for Paul and 39.3 for Bryant. Paul also averages almost a full steal more than Bryant, shoots more than two percent better from the field and a full percentage point better from the free throw line. Paul’s Points Per Shot (PPS) is 4% higher than Bryant’s. And he does this all with 1.6 fewer minutes per game, so he’s clearly more efficient than Kobe, which gives him an advantage in EPG (+1.0) and EPM (+0.055). Kobe is the better rebounder (6.4 to Paul’s 4.0), but other than points, that’s the only stat in which he’s superior to Paul.

And then you have the likeability factor. Paul has it and Kobe doesn’t. Bryant is no doubt a popular player, but he’s also the league’s most hated. Meanwhile, Paul seems to be universally loved. Like it or not, being the most valuable player to some degree requires a player to be a good teammate, both on and off the court. Kobe’s on-again/off-again trade demands last summer, along with his decision to throw Andrew Bynum and Mitch Kupchak under the bus, have destroyed any shred of “good teammate” rep that Kobe had left.

Some sportswriters will weigh the likeability factor more heavily than others, but I think most voters are just looking for an excuse not to reward Kobe’s offseason antics by giving him his first MVP. And in Chris Paul they have the perfect alternative. No one thought the Hornets would be this good and CP3 is one of those guys that simply makes everyone around him better. If you only consider the on-court performance, an argument could be made that Kobe’s season is more deserving, but the NBA is not played in a vacuum, and Kobe’s wild summer will seep into voters’ minds, as it should.

My vote: Chris Paul, Hornets
Prediction: Chris Paul, Hornets

Photos courtesy of Flickr.

Has baseball lost the meaning behind Jackie Robinson Day?

Angels’ outfielder Torii Hunter recently had this to say about so many teams sporting No. 42 jerseys for baseball’s annual Jackie Robinson Day:

This is what Los Angeles Angels outfield Torii Hunter said, to USA Today: “This is supposed to be an honor, and just a handful of guys wearing the number. Now you’ve got entire teams doing it. I think we’re killing the meaning. It should be special wearing Jackie’s number, not just because it looks cool.”

What upset Hunter, he says now, was this: The Houston Astros had no black players on their team last April, and yet the entire team wore No. 42. Said Hunter: “That got it away from, ‘OK, we don’t have any blacks,’ ” he said. To Hunter, a roster with no black players did not represent the progress for which Robinson stood, and baseball celebrated according to a report in the Los Angeles Times.

I obviously can’t speak for everyone, but I’d like to assume that any player that wears No. 42 on that day is doing so in tribute to Robinson and not because “it looks cool.” I could be naïve here, but I’d like to think that baseball players understand the importance of what Robinson did for the game and donning his number on your back should be done with the utmost respect.

What do you think? Does Hunter have a point?

Photo Courtesy of Flickr

San Francisco Tabs Walters

Moves from East Coast to West Coast continue with the hiring of Rex Walters (Florida Atlantic) at San Francisco. On the surface this hire looks as bizarre as the hiring of Craig Robinson at Oregon State. Walters, who is coming off a losing season at Florida Atlantic, is 31-33 as a head coach. That means that this AD forced out Jessie Evans for a guy with a losing record. Let me say that again. The AD at San Francisco fired a coach with an overall winning record to replace him with a guy with a losing record. Oh, and by the way, this same AD spent money on hiring a search firm to find this gem. When will she lose her job?

Marist Update: There are two left standing at Marist. Memphis assistant Chuckie Martin and Tom Herrion (Pitt) are the final two candidates. My money is on Martin.

Getting back to Florida Atlantic
. This job is a sleeping giant. Not only have they boosted budgets, but they have spent millions on renovating the arena and locker rooms. More importantly, they have a power forward by the name of Carlos Monroe who has NBA potential.

Look for a slew of former coaches to be all over this job. Mike Jarvis (St. John’s), Eddie Sutton (OSU) and Jim O’Brien (Ohio State) will all be involved. Odds are the AD will try to make a splash like when he hired Matt Doherty a couple of years ago. Hiring Eddie Sutton would be a perfect match with football coach Howard Schnellenberger. Then they would have two of the oldest coahes in college sports today.

Mariotti calls out Tiger

Chicago Sun Times columnist and everyone’s favorite bigmouth Jay Mariotti called out Tiger Woods for not backing up his words at this year’s Masters, won by Trevor Immelman on Sunday.

In one disjointed sense, this truly was a piece of history we should tell the grandkids about. Never before has Tiger Woods been so fantastically presumptuous — and so gloriously wrong. Without prompting from any source but his own inner voices, he had the temerity to suggest that a calendar-year Grand Slam was “easily within reason” for him.

While we applaud him for manufacturing drama that otherwise wouldn’t have existed in April, do note that unkept promises usually aren’t part of a sports legend’s resume. What does it say when Plaxico Burress nails a Super Bowl prediction but the extraordinary Woods, never known for outlandish boasts of any sort, instantly blows the forecast and loses the Masters by three strokes to the worthy but previously obscure Trevor Immelman?

It tells us that Tiger, who made the comments on his personal Web site as the season began, might want to withhold such bold opinions if he can’t take the heat. As dusk fell over Augusta National, he clearly wasn’t happy that his self-fueled Slam talk had become such a hot-button topic — and a major letdown Sunday. What, when Eldrick Woods interjects “Grand Slam” into the discussion, people aren’t going to listen and react? Um, aren’t we talking about the world’s biggest sportsman, the first billion-dollar athlete?

Tiger can’t take the heat? After one bold comment on his personal website that wasn’t even that bad to begin with? Stop stirring the pot Mariotti – Tiger has nothing to prove and he’s always been a class act. And the comparison to Plaxico Burress was a reach to say the least.

Photo Courtesy of Flickr

« Older posts Newer posts »