Category: Soccer (Page 15 of 29)

To axe or not to axe? FIFA’s referee dilemma.

Koman Coulibaly is a name which most of us aren’t familiar. In fact, we probably won’t remember it even after the 2010 World Cup has finished. Simply put, for the next couple of days, Coulibaly will be known as the referee who called a phantom penalty against the United States when the team scored on a direct kick in their match versus Slovenia. Down 2-nil at the beginning of the second half, the U.S. squad unfathomably rebounded with goals by Landon Donovan and Michael Bradley. In the 86th minute, the team suddenly struck the dagger into Slovenia with Maurice Edu’s goal off Donovan’s free kick. But it was not to be, as Coulibaly called a foul…not on Slovenia — whose team member was giving Bradley a FIFA-endorsed Heimlich during the play — but on the U.S. Video evidence proves the call was bogus — so much so, in fact, that FIFA is mulling suspending Coulibaly from officiating for the rest of the tournament.

From ESPN.com:

After the match, Donovan said he asked the referee what the call was but did not get an answer.

“We asked the ref many times what it was or who it was on and he wouldn’t or couldn’t explain it,” Donovan said. “I don’t know what to think of the call because I didn’t see any foul, just a normal free kick and a goal.”

Referees must submit a written report to FIFA after each match, but it is not specified in the rule that he must fully explain a ruling such as this.

FIFA refereeing rules state: “The referee shall hand over to the FIFA general coordinator a match report at the stadium immediately after the match. On the report form the referee shall note all occurrences such as misconduct of players leading to caution or expulsion, unsporting behavior by supporters and/or by officials or any other person acting on behalf of an association at the match and any other incident happening before, during and after the match in as much detail as possible.”

The U.S. team has been besieged with questions why soccer referees don’t publicly explain controversial decisions, as umpires and referees do in U.S. sports.

I take a rather harsh stance when evaluating referees. You know, it is all they do. They attend the seminars and classes to get better, but at the end of their 5-hour work day, their job description is still defined as being a fan with a whistle. While we shouldn’t crucify one to represent the whole, calls such as this are simply inexcusable.

The part that confuses me is that there’s no accountability in FIFA. If the U.S. ends up missing the knockout round, fans may never get an explanation, per FIFA’s outdated protocol. That’s just the way it is. Well, the way is infantile.

Coulibaly needs to go, and take some time to fully understand what’s expected of him as a World Cup official. And yes, I’ll say this as fair-weather soccer fan. Because it matters now.

Weezer unveils U.S. national soccer team theme song

Watching the U.S./England game yesterday, I was struck by the fact that the U.S. team doesn’t have any creative chants. The England fans in attendance repeatedly drowned the bar with well-orchestrated cheers, all the while swaying back and forth with mugs in their hands. Our response was the dreadfully mediocre “U.S.A., U.S.A, U.S.A.,” yelped ad nauseam until the crowd ran out of gas. Even more embarrassing was when one section tried to substitute “U.S.A.” for “Ole” in the song of the same name. You can imagine the disappointing results.

Now we have Weezer, helmed by soccer fanatic Rivers Cuomo, contributing their own offering to the U.S. national team’s musical canon. The song is called “Represent” and…

it’s not very good. False hope.

Ghana makes history with recent win

In defeating Serbia 1-0 earlier today Ghana became the first African team to win a World Cup match on the continent.

Though the first half failed to produce any goals, there were chances at either end. Despite early intent from Serbia, it was the Black Stars who looked the more likely team to open the scoring. After the interval, the pattern of the game remained the same until Aleksandar Lukovic was dismissed for a second booking, inviting Ghana to really go for the jugular late on. And the Africans aimed the decisive blow from the penalty spot in the closing stages of the game when Asamoah Gyan thumped high into the net.

This is a huge victory for Ghana, and to think they achieved it without star midfielder Michael Essien. Serbia and Germany were expected to advance, but now the Ghanaians are sitting pretty with three points in their pool. Better yet, they get to play a weak Australia squad next game, and it won’t be until Game 3 that they face the challenging Germans.

With a little (mis)fortune, United States and England draw

I’ve been reading a bunch of recaps on this game, and everyone is describing the U.S. team as a “force” or some other obligatory hyperbole.

Are you kidding me? Look through your afternoon buzz and realize that, aside from goalie Tim Howard, we looked capable at best.

I watched the game at a crowded pub in Agoura Hills, Calif., surrounded by seasoned English soccer enthusiasts and fledgling converts of the U.S. squad. Any budding energy on the U.S. side was instantly deflated in the fourth minute when England captain Steven Gerrard netted a goal inside the box. Things did not look good, but at least a goal early on is much easier to mitigate than one late into the game.

As the game drudged toward the half, I didn’t see anything that resembled a promising U.S. effort. England must of had control of the ball at least 80 percent of the time, continuing to make short passes and well-structured runs that kept the U.S. defense scrambling and Howard on his toes. When the U.S. finally snagged the ball it was all about sending it downfield for an ill-advised breakaway or improbable cross.

Our team looked directionless. Where was that touted counterattack that was supposedly our ace in the hole? If I were an England fan I would have felt fairly comfortable heading into halftime. The British squad had a stranglehold on the game, what with the dismal U.S. offense and its patchy defense.

But. But! Aha! Despite boasting an organized offense, England fans were already worried about the most important factor of a team’s defense: its goalie. Robert Green plays in the English Premier League but is known for having some of the most unfortunate hands; U.S. goalie Howard also plays in the EPL, but thankfully he’s with the Yanks and exudes leadership qualities that Green might never hold. In the 40th minute Green’s weaknesses shined as U.S. midfielder Clint Dempsey lined a shot toward the opposing goalkeeper. Green knelt down for the manageable save, but fumbled the ball. As the sphere stumbled into the goal, Green collapsed mournfully along with Three Lions fans everywhere. Pikey’s Pub in Agoura Hills, however, came alive, and it was clear more U.S. fans had showed up to rally their team on their own soil.

By the second half, the idea of an “underdog” had left my mind. The U.S. goal was a gift from above (or a curse from below, depending on who you’re rooting for), but now we had two evenly-matched teams on the pitch. Both England and the U.S. created runs and pounded the net. Neither controlled the tempo, but fought for it. It was the finest half so far in the World Cup, and fans of both teams should be proud.

Yet, England will come out the curmudgeon as they were heavily favored. As for the U.S., this team at times played like 11 bashful opportunists, and that won’t fly at this level. If they expect to go deep into this tournament they need to replicate the play-making they exhibited in the second half.


Photo from fOTOGLIF

World Cup Reminder: United States vs. England, 2:30 PM ET on ABC

At this point, I shouldn’t need to remind any of you. In addition to the ubiquitous FIFA ads over the past couple of months (you saw them, even if they hadn’t registered), our country’s most powerful sports resource, ESPN, is judiciously handling the 2010 World Cup coverage (with the help of ABC). It’s the one time (every four years) that the Worldwide Leader has the opportunity to reach mass markets that don’t care for Yankee/Red Sox games. And although the lucrative task isn’t quite as burdensome as the heft of the Olympics, I’m glad the World Cup is out of the clumsy grasp of NBC.

Of course, their soccer-centric coverage has to do with what is on as much as what isn’t. With the Stanley Cup decided, the achingly-long NBA Finals on an off-day and baseball offering underwhelming rivalries (Cubs/White Sox, Dodgers/Angels), today is all about an American second-tier sport. Do you remember anything about the 2006 World Cup? Maybe so, but what about our national team’s showing? Who scored? Who did we beat? Right.

I love supporting our national teams. I was pumped up when the U.S. hockey team made it to the gold-medal game at the recent Olympics. And although I’m not a soccer or hockey aficionado, I look forward to getting together with groups of people around a television and sharing in the joy, sorrow, surprise and dismay. And really, the Olympics and the World Cup are the prime times we do this as Americans — it’s all so rare.

No, we aren’t going to win the World Cup. (At this point, considering soccer’s popularity in America, it would be sin.) But what our team can do is advance into the knockout stage. We’ve landed in Group C, likely the easiest overall selection of teams. As two teams advance from each group, our chances look great. From then on, it only gets hard or harder. That’s what make today’s outcome against England so important. If the U.S. defeats Wayne Rooney and company they could face Austria/Serbia en route to France. But if England comes out on top the U.S. could be at the mercy of Germany.

That last paragraph may have been more than you wanted to know about the World Cup. I can’t apologize, because the rewards far exceed the effort.

Watch the game. Watch all of them.


Photo from fOTOGLIF

« Older posts Newer posts »