Category: NFL (Page 336 of 1282)

Kevin Kolb has Andy Reid’s backing now, but he better win

Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Michael Vick runs with the ball against the Detroit Lions during the first half of their NFL home opening football game in Detroit, Michigan September 19, 2010. REUTERS/Rebecca Cook (UNITED STATES - Tags: SPORT FOOTBALL)

After leading the Eagles to victory over the Lions on Sunday, this is what Michael Vick told Peter King in reference to his role as Kevin Kolb’s backup:

“I know Kevin can do it,” Vick said. “I saw him do it all summer. For me, I’ve had a taste of it now, and now, finally, I know it’s going to be there for me. If I have to wait another year, I can. I can be patient.”

Those are the types of comments that show how far Vick has come in his maturity. Although, what else is he going to say? In the last two weeks, he’s completed 37 of his 58 pass attempts for 459 yards and three touchdowns with zero interceptions.

He doesn’t have to say anything – his play speaks for itself.

Vick has put up Pro Bowl-type numbers in his two outings this year, but he knows Andy Reid makes the decisions. And Reid has already made it clear that Kolb is his starter for Week 3 and beyond.

But if I were Kolb, I wouldn’t get too comfortable. Sure, he has the backing of Reid and as long as he plays well, he’ll continue to receive his coach’s support. Reid went to bat for Kolb after he shipped Donovan McNabb to Washington on Easter Sunday and isn’t going to abandon him now for Vick. Reid also drafted Kolb and doesn’t want to be made the fool after choosing him over Vick earlier this offseason.

But again, Kolb better produce. Reid knows that in benching a nearly flawless Vick, he’s running the risk of not only having this situation blow up in his face, but losing games, too. Looking like a fool is definitely the lesser of two evils here.

The Eagles are at Jacksonville this week and host the Redskins next Sunday. Those are two winnable games and if Kolb can’t get the job done, I wouldn’t be surprised if Vick gets the starting nod again in Week 5 when the Eagles play the 49ers in San Francisco.

Or better yet, when they host the Falcons (Vick’s old team) in Week 6.

The Jimmy Clausen era set to begin Carolina

EAST RUTHERFORD, NJ - SEPTEMBER 12: Jimmy Clausen  of the Carolina Panthers looks to make a pass against the New York Giants on September 12, 2010 at the New Meadowlands Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey. The Giants defeated the Panthers 31-18. (Photo by Jim McIsaac/Getty Images)

Telephone conversations with my satellite company last longer than Matt Moore’s tenure as starting quarterback with the Panthers. After another brutal performance on Sunday in a loss to the Bucs, John Fox has decided to bench Moore and insert rookie Jimmy Clausen into the starting lineup.

Clausen replaced Moore during the fourth quarter yesterday and he went on to complete 7-of-13 passes for 59 yards and one interception. Outside of a nice first down throw to receiver Steve Smith, the rookie struggled in the passing game, which tells you something if Fox is willing to go with him over Moore against the Bengals this week. Clearly the coaching staff doesn’t believe that Moore gives the Panthers the best chance to win.

With a rookie starting, Carolina will lean even heavier on running backs DeAngelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart to win games. The duo combined to rush for 97 yards on 25 carries against Tampa, although without the threat of the pass the Bucs loaded up the box to take away the run. The Panthers can expect more opponents to do the same thing unless Clausen can make immediate strides in the passing game.

The knock on Clausen coming out of Notre Dame was that he lacked leadership skills and that’s why he dropped out of the first round of April’s draft. It’ll be interesting to see how things play out now that he’s a starter and whether or not Fox will stick with him if he struggles early on.

Brandon Jacobs wants Giants to trade him

August 16, 2010: New York Giants running back Brandon Jacobs (27) colliding with New York Giants quarterback Eli Manning (10) during the NFL preseason game between the New York Giants and the New York Jets at the New Meadowlands Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey.

Brandon Jacobs is following the handbook for disgruntled athletes to a “T” right now, as he’s already openly complained about his role in the Giants’ offense, made a public scene and will now ask the Giants to trade him.

With the way Jacobs has handled his demotion over the last couple of weeks, which includes a recent run-in with the media during a locker room interview session and throwing his helmet into the stands during last night’s loss to the Colts, the Giants probably wouldn’t mind if the two sides parted ways as well.

The problem is that Jacobs is only in the second year of a four-year, $25 million contract that the Giants gave him in February of 2009. He’s owed $3.65 million this year, $4.65 million next year and $4.9 million in 2012. He’s only 28, but it’s not like he’s a bargain right now – at least not how he’s a) acting and b) playing.

And that’s the bigger problem: his on-field play has been brutal over the past year and two weeks. He gained only 3.7 yards per carry last season and is gaining just 3.3 YPC in two games this year. Granted, he’s only had 16 carries, but he’s done little to nothing with those 16 carries that would convince a team to make a deal for him.

The Bills haven’t made it public, but they would probably be willing to trade Marshawn Lynch for a mid-round pick. Even with all of his baggage, why wouldn’t a team want to acquire him over a disgruntled Jacobs, who-oh-by-the-way is four years older than Lynch?

It appears as though Jacobs is stuck in his current situation for the foreseeable future.

Controversy already brewing in Oakland regarding quarterback position

Oakland Raiders Head Coach Tom Cable adjusts his headset during play against the St. Louis Rams in the fourth quarter at the Oakland Coliseum in Oakland, California on September 19, 2010. The Raiders defeated the Rams 16-14.  UPI/Terry Schmitt Photo via Newscom

Following the Raiders’ 16-14 win over the Rams on Sunday, a game in which Bruce Gradkowski gave Oakland a lift after Jason Campbell was benched in the second half, head coach Tom Cable wouldn’t commit to any quarterback for Week 3.

Here’s what he said in his post-game presser (from the Oakland Tribune):

“(I) made the switch at halftime at quarterback, basically to just give the team a lift, felt like we needed to change up a little bit and my job is to win games and do whatever it takes to do that.’’

He said the Raiders “weren’t in rhythm, weren’t in synch,’’ and when asked what it meant for the rest of the season said, “ I’ll worry about all that tomorrow, really. I want to go look at it. But today was about winning this game, what did it take to do that, that was the right choice, obviously, and it worked out, and Bruce came in and gave us a lift.’’

But here’s what the team said he said:

Included in the quote sheet distributed by the team was this sentence from Cable: “Today was about winning the game, it does not necessarily mean Campbell is replaced as the quarterback for the rest of the season.”

That’s not what he said, so why would the team try to pull a fast one on the media and attempt to put out a fire that hasn’t even started yet? What Cable said was fine – he didn’t want to make any decisions regarding the quarterback position for next week. And why would he? His backup just earned him a victory when his starting quarterback failed him. Why commit to anything?

Al Davis loved JaMarcus Russell, but Cable didn’t. Russell wasn’t cut sooner than he should have because Davis was protecting his investment. Now Campbell is Al’s investment (he was the one that orchestrated the trade with Washington) and once again there appears to be a conflict of interest.

It’ll be interesting to see how Cable handles the situation this week and whether or not Campbell lines up under center next Sunday in Arizona, or if it’ll be Gradkowski. Something tells me Al would prefer it to be Campbell.

Fantasy Fallout, Week 2: Where Jahvid Best becomes a must-start

Detroit Lions running back Jahvid Best runs for a touchdown against the Philadelphia Eagles during the first half of their NFL home opening football game in Detroit, Michigan September 19, 2010. REUTERS/Rebecca Cook (UNITED STATES - Tags: SPORT FOOTBALL)

I actually had Jahvid Best (232 total yards, 3 TD) on my bench (behind Maurice Jones-Drew and Pierre Thomas, in my defense), figuring that the Eagles DT is generally pretty tough and even though the rookie scored twice in Week 1, the Lions running game struggled against Chicago. Well, I think the kid will be in my starting lineup next week. Not only did he average 4.6 ypc en route to 78 rushing yards, he posted 9-154-1 in the passing game. Let’s just hope he can hold up for the entire season. Brandon Pettigrew (7-108) had eight targets to Tony Scheffler‘s (1-5) four. The other lesson we can take from this game is to always start our key guys against the Lions. Michael Vick (284 yards, 2 TD), LeSean McCoy (16 carries, 120 yards, 3 TD), DeSean Jackson (4-135-1) and Jeremy Maclin (3-26-1) all had nice games.

Michael Turner owners were expecting a big week against a suspect Arizona rush defense, but all they got was 75 yards on nine carries and a groin injury. Jason Snelling picked up where Turner left off and racked up 186 yards and three TD on 29 touches. If Turner’s injury is serious (and it doesn’t sound like it is), Snelling becomes a great waiver wire pickup, but there’s a good chance that Turner’s injury is minor and the Falcons elected to shut him down since the blowout was on. Meanwhile, Matt Ryan bounced back from a rough performance in Week 1 to post 225 passing yards and three TDs. On the other side of the ball, Larry Fitzgerald (7-83) put up decent numbers despite dreadful play from Derek Anderson (161 yards, 2 INT), and Tim Hightower (124 total yards, TD) took advantage of another injury scratch by Chris Wells.

Fantasy-wise, the only truly surprising thing to come out of that Ravens/Bengals tilt was the poor game by Joe Flacco (154 yards, TD, 4 INT). The Patriots shredded the Bengals in Week 1 and Flacco looked pretty solid against a tough Jets’ defense, so everything lined up for a good game. At this point, Flacco is not an every-week starter and is better used as part of a QBBC.

Continue reading »

« Older posts Newer posts »