Category: NBA (Page 455 of 595)

Jose Calderon and the restricted free agent quandary

I love reading blurbs like this one.

The Clippers — like many teams — have pinpointed Toronto Raptors point guard Jose Calderon as an attractive target this off-season.

Calderon is a restricted free agent but is also sharing point guard duties in Toronto with T.J. Ford. The Raptors can match any offer made to Calderon and have stated publicly that they intend to do so.

Let’s see… Calderon is 26 and averaged 8.3 assists in 30.5 minutes of playing time last season. He shot 52.5% from the field, 43.3% from long range and 90.8% from the free throw line. Calderon had the fifth-best Efficiency Per Minute of all the point guards in the league, trailing only Chris Paul, Steve Nash, Deron Williams and Chauncey Billups. (That means he’s ahead of guys like Baron Davis, Tony Parker, Jason Kidd and Allen Iverson.) Yeah, I’d say that he’s an “attractive target” this summer. That’s some crackerjack detective work there by the Clippers front office.

By the way, good luck wresting him away from the Raptors. My memory is a little fuzzy, but I don’t remember too many success stories of teams signing a medium- to big-name restricted free agent to an offer sheet that the player’s previous team didn’t match. The three that jump to mind are Denver’s offer to Manu Ginobili (which the Spurs wisely matched), Miami’s offer to Elton Brand (which the Clippers wisely matched) and Utah’s offer to Corey Maggette (which the Clippers wisely matched). You either have to overpay to get the other team to balk or hope that they’re completely inept and don’t match the fair offer sheet the player signed. That, or wait a year and hope that they become an unrestricted free agent.

If I’m running the Raptors, I’m locking Calderon up to a five-year deal in the $7 M-$9 M per year range. He’s still flying a bit under the radar, so his market value isn’t as high as it will be next summer.

Here are a few restricted agents that will likely play for their current team for at least another season: Josh Smith, Andre Iguodala, Emeka Okafor, Luol Deng, Monta Ellis, Ben Gordon, Daniel Gibson, Delonte West, Josh Childress, J.R. Smith, Andris Biedrins, Sasha Vujacic and Paul Millsap.

Welcome to the 21st century – TSN to roll out a daily digit to boost online readership

For decades, The Sporting News (the weekly magazine, not the website) used to be the pillar of sports information, from news and insights, to scores and stats. But TSN has slowly realized that what they provide weekly in a magazine is already available daily on hundreds of sports sites on the web.

That’s why TSN has decided to go with Sporting News Today, which is a digit daily (an e-mail basically) complete with news, scores, stats and more.

The new business model is a mix as well: the digital daily will be free while the magazine, which will be reintroduced in September with an emphasis on analysis and commentary, remains $3.99 an issue. The magazine circulation is about 700,000.

As the NYT explains, it’s a kind of “back to the future” move: take what the magazine was once known for—being the weekly sports Bible—and try to make it that kind of relevant in 2008 by providing a full morning briefing for “serious sports fans.” In today’s instant news world, can that work? Not in lieu of immediate gratification but as a way of providing a coherent picture the reader doesn’t have to piece together on his or her own, it just might.

This is a logical and smart business move. Obviously nobody wants to wait a week for information that they can get on a daily basis. So by sending a daily e-mail and making it free, TSN will get people to view their content instead going to ESPN.com or any other website to get their sports information. (Or at least, that’s what the idea is in theory.)

At least at the start, it’s a wise move for TSN to make this digit daily free. People have a short attention span as it is. If you want to charge for something that people can already get free elsewhere, their attention span gets even shorter.

Michael Wilbon weighs in on Refgate

In light of Tim Donaghy’s recent accusations about the officiating in Game 6 of that 2002 Lakers/Kings series, “Refgate” is gaining some steam. Despite David Stern’s condescending attacks on the messenger, there is a growing perception around the league that there has, at least in the past, been something fishy going on with the officiating in the playoffs.

Michael Wilbon makes a couple of interesting points::

It needs to be addressed now. Stern needs to empower an independent panel to investigate referees and their relationship with the league in much the same way Major League Baseball conducted an independent investigation into steroid use. Stern told us the U.S. Attorney’s office and the FBI had thoroughly investigated all of Donaghy’s claims. Yet, Bob Delaney, one of the three officials who worked the infamous Lakers-Kings Game 6 in 2002, told ESPN he had not been questioned. So, how thorough could the investigation have been? Did somebody forget? Was it a whitewash? Was Dick Bavetta, who also worked that game, questioned? Was Ted Bernhardt, the third official, questioned?

I would generally trust Stern when he says that all of Donaghy’s accusations have been investigated, but how do you conduct an investigation when you don’t even question (at least) one of the referees (Bob Delaney) that worked that infamous game? This is really starting to smell like a cover up, and the league needs to do what Wilbon suggested and empower an independent, thorough investigation.

Oh, by the way… Game 4 of the Finals is tonight.

Ralph Nader looking for the conspiracy theorist vote

Ralph Nader is jumping on the-NBA-is-fixed bandwagon. Scratch that, he’s been driving the bandwagon since 2002, when he wrote David Stern a letter asking him to investigate the now-infamous Lakers/Kings Game 6, which Donaghy insists was fixed so that the Lakers would win.

The Lakers shot 40 free throws in that Game 6 – 27 in the fourth quarter – “won” the game 106-102, eliminated the Kings, and went on to beat the Nets for their third straight NBA Championship.

Ralph Nader saw injustice and on June 4, 2002, Ralph wrote to NBA Commissioner David Stern asking for an investigation.

Ralph personally spoke with Stern.

But Stern stiffed Ralph.

No action was taken.

Donaghy’s lawyer, John Lauro, says NBA executives directed referees “to manipulate games” in order to “boost ticket sales and television ratings.”

According to Lauro, in the crucial 2002 Lakers/Kings game that Ralph complained to Stern about – “Tim learned from Referee A that Referees A and F wanted to extend the series to seven games. Tim knew Referees A and F to be ‘company men,’ always acting in the interest of the NBA, and that night, it was in the NBA’s interest to add another game to the series.”

For his part, Stern says that this has been turned over to the investigators and nothing improper was found. So from his point of view, the conversation is over. Stern just wants Tim Donaghy to go away.

But Ralph Nader doesn’t want to let it happen.

Celtics + Game 3 = 4-Never

Everyone has their “one that got away.” You know, that person in your past who had all the tools to be a great match for you, but for one reason or another the two of you parted ways without ever really knowing what might have been. Maybe you’re in a great relationship now, maybe you’re not, but when times are tough, you sometimes think about that person and wonder, “What if?”

If the Boston Celtics go on to lose these Finals, Game 3 will be the one that got away.

She was gorgeous. (Pau Gasol: 3-9 from the field, nine points)

She was funny. (Lamar Odom: 2-9, five turnovers)

She was low-maintenance. (Derek Fisher: 1-6, six points)

She liked to pay her own way. (Kobe Bryant: 11-18 from the free throw line)

But she had this douchebag guy “friend” who was always hanging around, waiting to pounce. (Sasha Vujacic: 7-10, 20 points)

Still, at the very beginning, you were great together. (Ray Allen: 8-13, 25 points)

But something (was it fate?) stepped in and you just couldn’t make it work. (Paul Pierce + Kevin Garnett: 8-35 from the field, 19 points)

Just like that, you blew your chance. (Lakers 87, Celtics 81)

Boston had a golden opportunity to steal Game 3 and they let it slip away. Despite Ray Ray playing like he did with the Bucks, Pierce and Garnett looked all out of sorts, and could never really get it going. Pierce’s 2-14 shooting was absolutely brutal, and his play essentially cost his team the game and a commanding 3-0 lead in the series.

The Celtics can take solace in the fact that this is not the first time in these playoffs that a team squandered a chance to steal a game on the road. The Suns had a chance to win Game 1 in San Antonio. The Spurs had a chance to win Game 1 against the Lakers. What’s worrisome for Boston is that neither team recovered, and both teams went on to lose the series.

Ah, what could have been.

« Older posts Newer posts »