Author: John Paulsen (Page 707 of 937)

Michael Wilbon weighs in on Refgate

In light of Tim Donaghy’s recent accusations about the officiating in Game 6 of that 2002 Lakers/Kings series, “Refgate” is gaining some steam. Despite David Stern’s condescending attacks on the messenger, there is a growing perception around the league that there has, at least in the past, been something fishy going on with the officiating in the playoffs.

Michael Wilbon makes a couple of interesting points::

It needs to be addressed now. Stern needs to empower an independent panel to investigate referees and their relationship with the league in much the same way Major League Baseball conducted an independent investigation into steroid use. Stern told us the U.S. Attorney’s office and the FBI had thoroughly investigated all of Donaghy’s claims. Yet, Bob Delaney, one of the three officials who worked the infamous Lakers-Kings Game 6 in 2002, told ESPN he had not been questioned. So, how thorough could the investigation have been? Did somebody forget? Was it a whitewash? Was Dick Bavetta, who also worked that game, questioned? Was Ted Bernhardt, the third official, questioned?

I would generally trust Stern when he says that all of Donaghy’s accusations have been investigated, but how do you conduct an investigation when you don’t even question (at least) one of the referees (Bob Delaney) that worked that infamous game? This is really starting to smell like a cover up, and the league needs to do what Wilbon suggested and empower an independent, thorough investigation.

Oh, by the way… Game 4 of the Finals is tonight.

Ralph Nader looking for the conspiracy theorist vote

Ralph Nader is jumping on the-NBA-is-fixed bandwagon. Scratch that, he’s been driving the bandwagon since 2002, when he wrote David Stern a letter asking him to investigate the now-infamous Lakers/Kings Game 6, which Donaghy insists was fixed so that the Lakers would win.

The Lakers shot 40 free throws in that Game 6 – 27 in the fourth quarter – “won” the game 106-102, eliminated the Kings, and went on to beat the Nets for their third straight NBA Championship.

Ralph Nader saw injustice and on June 4, 2002, Ralph wrote to NBA Commissioner David Stern asking for an investigation.

Ralph personally spoke with Stern.

But Stern stiffed Ralph.

No action was taken.

Donaghy’s lawyer, John Lauro, says NBA executives directed referees “to manipulate games” in order to “boost ticket sales and television ratings.”

According to Lauro, in the crucial 2002 Lakers/Kings game that Ralph complained to Stern about – “Tim learned from Referee A that Referees A and F wanted to extend the series to seven games. Tim knew Referees A and F to be ‘company men,’ always acting in the interest of the NBA, and that night, it was in the NBA’s interest to add another game to the series.”

For his part, Stern says that this has been turned over to the investigators and nothing improper was found. So from his point of view, the conversation is over. Stern just wants Tim Donaghy to go away.

But Ralph Nader doesn’t want to let it happen.

Volleyball hottie Jenelle Koester strikes again!

A month ago, I pondered the success of beach volleyball by relating a story of my trip to the AVP Huntington Beach Open. In that post, I discussed Jenelle Koester (and her considerable… um… assets) and how sex plays such a big role in women’s (and men’s) beach volleyball.

Well, I thought I’d check up and see how Ms. Koester is doing, so I Google’d her and found this gem, courtesy of “rogets pics” on Flikr. Unfortunately, the picture is copyrighted, so I can’t post it here. But believe me, it’s worth a look.

Celtics + Game 3 = 4-Never

Everyone has their “one that got away.” You know, that person in your past who had all the tools to be a great match for you, but for one reason or another the two of you parted ways without ever really knowing what might have been. Maybe you’re in a great relationship now, maybe you’re not, but when times are tough, you sometimes think about that person and wonder, “What if?”

If the Boston Celtics go on to lose these Finals, Game 3 will be the one that got away.

She was gorgeous. (Pau Gasol: 3-9 from the field, nine points)

She was funny. (Lamar Odom: 2-9, five turnovers)

She was low-maintenance. (Derek Fisher: 1-6, six points)

She liked to pay her own way. (Kobe Bryant: 11-18 from the free throw line)

But she had this douchebag guy “friend” who was always hanging around, waiting to pounce. (Sasha Vujacic: 7-10, 20 points)

Still, at the very beginning, you were great together. (Ray Allen: 8-13, 25 points)

But something (was it fate?) stepped in and you just couldn’t make it work. (Paul Pierce + Kevin Garnett: 8-35 from the field, 19 points)

Just like that, you blew your chance. (Lakers 87, Celtics 81)

Boston had a golden opportunity to steal Game 3 and they let it slip away. Despite Ray Ray playing like he did with the Bucks, Pierce and Garnett looked all out of sorts, and could never really get it going. Pierce’s 2-14 shooting was absolutely brutal, and his play essentially cost his team the game and a commanding 3-0 lead in the series.

The Celtics can take solace in the fact that this is not the first time in these playoffs that a team squandered a chance to steal a game on the road. The Suns had a chance to win Game 1 in San Antonio. The Spurs had a chance to win Game 1 against the Lakers. What’s worrisome for Boston is that neither team recovered, and both teams went on to lose the series.

Ah, what could have been.

Lakers return home for a must-win game

One thing’s for sure – when you’re heading home, down 0-2 in a best of seven series, Game 3 is a must-win situation.

Kobe and Co. have their backs against the wall tonight, but the good news is that they’ll have the support of the Laker faithful in the friendly confines of the Staples Center. Laker fans aren’t the most knowledgeable, but they love their team and they’ll be out in force (once they all arrive by the end of the first quarter).

The Lakers are bound to attack the paint more, so expect the free throw shooting to even out. The bench usually plays better at home as well, so there is reason for optimism if you’re a Laker fan.

Conversely, the Celtics have a golden opportunity to take whatever wind remains out of the Laker sails. They’ll have to play the (almost) perfect game to overcome the Lakers’ home court advantage and an officiating crew that has heard Phil Jackson complain about the foul disparity for the last 48 hours. But if they can squeak out a win, you can put a fork in L.A.

« Older posts Newer posts »