Author: John Paulsen (Page 693 of 937)

Scoop Jackson said something stupid today

I’m not sure why, but I was watching ESPN’s “First Take” this morning and the subject of Elton Brand came up. Scoop Jackson and Skip Bayless debated what Brand should do now that he has two offers on the table, one from the Clippers and one from the Warriors.

Jackson said – and I’m paraphrasing here – that since the Warriors made Brand a max offer that it is “honorable” to consider it and go and talk to them about it because this might not be the last contract that Brand will sign and he might need the Warriors down the road. He went on to say that if the Clippers match the Warriors offer (which they can’t) then all bets are off.

What?

I don’t find myself agreeing with Bayless too often, but he was (as usual) acting incredulous that Jackson could call such actions “honorable” since it was Brand who told the Clippers to go after Baron Davis when he opted out and even said that Brand recruited Davis to come to L.A. to play with him.

The honorable thing to do is to forsake the extra $20 million and re-up with the Clippers.

Bayless knows this, I know this and I suspect even Jackson knows this. This was probably part of the manufactured conflict that is so prevalent on ESPN these days. It’s not enough to just discuss issues intelligently; there has to be an argument because that’s (apparently) what gets ratings.

What a sad world we live in that Jackson has to say something so stupid just to get people to watch.

Brand must re-sign with the Clippers

Okay, he doesn’t have to re-sign with the Clippers, but he needs to.

As more details come out about Brand’s situation, it has become clear that when Brand elected to opt out of the final year of his contract, he and the Clippers had an understanding about how the team would proceed in free agency.

From the LA Times

When reached by phone Monday shortly after choosing to become a free agent, [Brand] referred to the Clippers as “we” and said that he would like the Clippers to land a player “solid at the point guard spot,” before he would agree to re-sign with them.

At that time Falk said that Brand’s decision to opt out had partly been made to allow the Clippers breathing space under the salary cap to sign an impact free agent.

Were Brand and Falk just blowing smoke when they said that one of the purposes of Brand’s decision was to free up cap space so that the team could sign another star? Were they expecting the Clippers to get a player like Baron Davis for less than $13 million per season, leaving more money for Brand? What about all the talk about how Brand really appreciated what the Celtics did this season when their three stars came together and put their egos aside in the interest of one common goal?

From ESPN.com

One source said that Brand, during negotiations on a contract extension in June, specifically told Clippers management that Davis was the player he hoped they’d pursue if he became available in free agency.

Okay, Elton… Your plan worked. You opted out. The Clippers had the cap space to successfully sign Davis. Now they’ve offered you a five-year deal worth $70 million. That’s a lot of long-term security for a guy coming off a torn Achilles. The Clippers stepped up and acquired the guard you wanted to play with. Now put your money where your mouth is, set your ego aside, and take the Clippers’ offer. Sure, Golden State can offer you more money, but only because the Clippers went out and did what you asked them to do – sign Baron Davis.

If you jet for Golden State now, your clean image will be tainted forever. Reporters will keep digging to find out exactly what you told the Clippers before and after you opted out. The truth will be revealed and you will probably look like a Judas. Is the public relations hit you’ll take worth the extra dough?

Doubtful.

Jay Mariotti is a stone cold hypocrite

Chicago Sun-Times columnist Jay Mariotti has always been mildly irritating, but I haven’t been exposed to him enough to be truly bothered by his shenanigans.

Well, that changed today when Mariotti (and his oddly-coiffed eyebrows) invaded the “Pardon the Interruption” set to act as co-host with J.A. Adande. The duo discussed the news that Brett Favre may return to football and Mariotti went on this rant about how everyone is sick of Favre’s tease. He brought up his boy Michael Jordan and said that he never teased the public with his retirement.

I don’t know what’s worse, Mariotti’s inane comment or the fact that Adande didn’t call him on it. Michael Jordan retired… three times. How is that not a tease? Sure, when he said he was going to retire he did walk away from the game for a year or two, but he came back twice. How is that better than what Favre has done? At least Favre’s struggles with the thought of retirement are understandable. He didn’t walk away in the middle of his prime and waste a few of his best years trying to play another sport. This all started when Favre had a bad season or two and people started to question his ability. Then he comes back last season and has a MVP-caliber year.

Why can’t people understand that this is a difficult decision to make?

Did Favre ask the Packers to release him?

This story is getting stranger by the minute.

Just hours after news broke that Brett Favre might be getting the itch to play another season, the Wisconsin State Journal is reporting that Favre has already contacted the team about returning and the Packers rebuffed him. The conversation ended with Favre’s agent, Bus Cook, demanding that his client be released and the Packers refusing to do so.

However, an NFL source said Wednesday afternoon that Favre — or Cook on his behalf — actually contacted the Packers “within the past few weeks” about returning, and the conversation ended in him asking the club for his release. The Packers refused.

The source wouldn’t say why Favre would’ve asked to be released, but the logical reason he’d have made such a request would be because the team told him it had moved on with new starter Aaron Rodgers and did not want him back. The Packers also could’ve been testing Favre’s resolve to see how serious he really is about playing again.

The Packers placed Favre on the reserve/retired list on April 25 and continue to hold his rights, which they could trade to an interested team if Favre wants to come back and is willing to do so with another club.

If Favre is serious about reporting to training camp — the first practice is July 28 — and the Packers are committed to moving on, it would set up a potentially awkward parting of the ways between the franchise and its preeminent star. Favre could demand to be activated from the reserve/retired list, and that would give the Packers three options: Re-activate him, release him or trade him.

The thought of Favre playing for another team makes me sick to my stomach. The last thing I want to see would be for this relationship to get contentious. If Favre is serious about coming back and serious about the commitment it would take, I say let him come back. Apologize to Aaron Rodgers and ask him kindly to wait another year for his shot.

I do like the theory that the Packers are testing Favre to see how serious he is about returning, but this situation has the potential to get very ugly very quickly.

Warriors offer Brand max contract

It’s all fair in love and war… or in this case, love and basketball.

A day after the news broke that Baron Davis agreed to sign with the Clippers, his old team turned around and offered a max contract to the Clippers’ best player (and supposed Davis running-mate) Elton Brand.

Since the Clippers have agreed to terms with Davis, it was believed that the most they could offer Brand something in the neighborhood of a six-year deal worth $81 million. The LA Times is reporting that the Warriors offered a five-year deal worth $100 million.

So what will Brand do? Well, he recently implied that he liked what the Celtics did when a few stars checked their egos at the door and came together for a common purpose. But none of those guys had to take a major paycut or turn down an extra $6.5 million per season. My guess is that if Brand was lobbying Davis prior to the Clippers/Davis agreement, that he’ll take less money and stay in L.A. If not, all bets are off. If you put Brand on the Warriors, they’re certainly a playoff-caliber team. One could argue that Brand would have a better supporting cast in Oakland with the likes of Monta Ellis and Steven Jackson roaming the perimeter along with Andris Biedrins and Brandan Wright in the middle (assuming the team successfully re-signs both Biedrins and Ellis).

So will Brand put his money where is mouth is and take a pay cut to play with another star?

What was looking like a pretty boring free agency period has suddenly become quite interesting.

« Older posts Newer posts »