Author: Jamey Codding (Page 10 of 25)

Kobe’s 81 the best ever?

ESPN’s Marc Stein thinks so. In his column “Sorry Wilt: You’re no Kobe,” Stein says Bryant’s 81-point barrage against the Raptors Sunday night was more impressive than any other individual performance in NBA history, including Chamberlain’s 100-point effort nearly 45 years ago:

The folks who did see the 100-pointer and the game’s historians would be forced to tell you that the entire fourth quarter was a back-and-forth scramble between one team trying desperately to get Wilt the record and another trying to keep him from getting it. Wilt himself is quoted on the Basketball Hall of Fame’s Web site as calling that fourth quarter “a farce.”

In the forthcoming flood of Kobe replays, you’ll see that there’s nothing farcical about Bryant hauling the Lakers back from a 71-53 deficit. You’ll see a Raps team that kept the game sufficiently close in the final quarter to keep Kobe out there shooting, and nary an intentional foul by the Lakers to get the ball back (as Wilt needed).

That alone adds more legitimacy to Kobe’s performance. Wilt’s 100 points seem hollow after reading that, a number for the sake of being a number. Kobe’s 81, on the other hand, was legit, coming in a game where Bryant needed to score to win.

Stein goes even further, though, and this may be the most compelling part of his argument:

Don’t forget, furthermore, that no less an authority than Michael Jordan has been known to say that a perimeter player has it way harder when it comes to making a legitimate run at Wilt’s record, taking an array of longer and/or tougher shots. Factor in the ball-handling responsibilities and the energy required to play defense all over the floor and you can understand MJ’s theory. This might also help back it up: Jordan himself topped out at 69 points as his one-night best and needed overtime to get there.

When I first saw the article listed on the ESPN homepage saying that Kobe’s performance topped Wilt’s, I laughed. I’m not laughing anymore. Chamberlain’s 100-point effort is amazing, no doubt, but it’s not as authentic or as significant as Bryant’s 81, representing something a kid would try to pull off in a video game more than anything else. With that in mind, I’d say there’s no question we just saw the best single performance in NBA history.

ESPN took this argument one step further today, though, comparing the 81 to some of sports history’s greatest achievements: Gayle Sayers’ 6 TDs (in 14 touches), Jamal Lewis’ 295 rushing yards, 20 Ks by Roger Clemens (twice), Kerry Wood and Randy Johnson, and Mark Whitten’s 4 home runs and 12 RBI, among others. Personally, I’ve always found it difficult to compare individual accomplishments across sports: different circumstances, different games, different rules. Still, it’s an interesting comparison.

Let the Super Bowl coverage begin

So we’ve got two weeks to talk about this game. Might as well start now. Actually, I think ESPN may have even kicked off its Super Bowl coverage Saturday night.

I’ve been picking against the Steelers throughout the entire playoffs (click to see our complete Bullz-Eye staff predictions), and now it’s obvious that my loyalty to the Browns has blinded my judgment the last three weeks. Either that, or it’s all rotten luck, in which case I’ll now call a Steelers win in February and hope that the rotten luck continues.

One thing I do know: the Seahawks are my second-favorite team in football right now. Even though I think they’re going to lose, of course (wink-wink).

So who are you picking?

Benson to the Birds? Hmm….

A lot of people are wondering why the Orioles were so eager to get Kris Benson from the Mets. (Incidentally, even more may be wondering why the Mets were so eager to get failed closer Jorge Julio in return.) Benson’s not bad, but when he was selected first overall by the Pirates in 1996, it’s safe to assume they expected more than ‘not bad.’

Well, for those who haven’t noticed, the Orioles have a new pitching coach, a guy named Leo Mazzone. And if someobody can flip a switch with Benson and turn all that talent into consistent results, it’s Mazzone:

[Benson] throws in the low 90’s and works with both a slider and a curveball, an arsenal tailor-made for new pitching coach Leo Mazzone.

Give the Orioles credit: They’ve rejected every offer for potential stud SP Erik Bedard this winter and now they’ve added a dependable veteran to the front of the rotation. It’s up to Mazzone now. Don’t be surprised if Benson wins 17 games with a 3.40 ERA this year. Don’t be surprised if Bedard shows everyone why Baltimore refused to trade him. Don’t be surprised if Bruce Chen, who worked under Mazzone in Atlanta, and Rodrigo Lopez deliver career years.

With Mazzone guiding that pitching staff, the Orioles suddenly look like a sneaky dangerous team. B-12 Palmeiro is gone, Ramon Hernandez and Kevin Millar have been added, and Miguel Tejada is still around. And don’t underestimate the Corey Patterson addition. Despite the results with the Cubs, Patterson’s got a ton of talent and he’s still just 26. Hopefully Sam Perlozzo doesn’t make the same mistake Dusty Baker made and bat Patterson leadoff or second. Keep the pressure off by batting him sixth or seventh and see what happens.

But it all starts with the pitching. Kris Benson isn’t a superstar and this trade’s not going to profoundly affect the race in the AL East, but it’ll probably have more of an effect than most people think.

No love for Plummer

I’ve got to say, I’m stunned. When we put the poll up asking who the best remaining quarterback in the playoffs was, I assumed Jake Plummer would get the fewest votes. I just didn’t know how few he’d get.

One? Wow. In no way am I a big Plummer fan (I voted for Hasselbeck), but he’s coming off easily his best season, tallying a 90.2 QB rating (seventh in the NFL) while throwing just seven interceptions. Granted, he also threw just 18 touchdowns, and Roethlisberger and Hasselbeck each had higher QB ratings, but as crazy as it sounds, Jake Plummer was one of the most effective quarterbacks in football this year. And yet, no love.

Meanwhile, roughly half of the votes have gone to Roethlisberger, who threw two more interceptions than Plummer in four fewer games. Which suggests two things: 1. A lot of Steelers fans frequent our blog (check out last week’s smack thread for proof, as well as this Joey Porter post), and 2. Only one Broncos fan has visited the site since the poll went up. Either that, or not even Denver fans believe in Plummer.

Incidentally, ESPN does a pretty nice write-up of the four quarterbacks’ lack of star appeal. Worth the read.

Joey Porter doesn’t like to think

Now this is funny:

“[The Colts] don’t want to just sit there, line up and play football,” Porter told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. “They want to try to catch you off guard. They don’t want to play smash-mouth football, they want to trick you. … They want to catch you substituting. Know what I mean? They don’t want to just call a play, get up there and run a play. They want to make you think. They want it to be a thinking game instead of a football game.”

“They want to make you think.” Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Sorry. Dude, that’s funny. I get what Porter’s saying. Really, I do. Football is a Man’s Sport, and when you talk about it, you need to puff out your chest and act all tough and mean. But the only thing that matters after four quarters is, did you win the game? Joey Porter doesn’t understand this, apparently. The Colts win football games. Sure, they don’t play smashmouth, but why should they? Because football’s a Man’s Sport? No, it’s a competition, and the point of competition is to win.

Sounds to me like Porter’s suggesting the Steelers are bigger and meaner than the Colts, but the Colts are smarter. That’d be like the Peyton Manning telling reporters, “The Steelers hit too hard, and I don’t like it!” Stop whining and play football.

« Older posts Newer posts »