Author: Anthony Stalter (Page 165 of 1503)

La Russa: MLBPA forcing Pujols to ask for a record-setting contract

St. Louis Cardinals manager Tony La Russa speaks to reporters before a game against the Chicago Cubs at Busch Stadium in St. Louis on August 13, 2010. La Russa who was given a two game suspension for his part in a bench clearing brawl during a game against the Cincinnati Reds in Cincinnati last week, will not manage the next two games. UPI/Bill Greenblatt

Tony La Russa doesn’t believe that Albert Pujols is all about the money. He thinks it’s that damn Major League Baseball Players Association that is making Albert Pujols be all about the money.

From ESPN.com:

St. Louis Cardinals manager Tony La Russa said Tuesday that he believes the Major League Baseball Players Association is attempting to “beat up” Albert Pujols and his agent in an attempt to get Pujols to sign a record-setting contract.

And that, La Russa said emphatically, “is bull—-. That’s not the way it should be.”

“I’m not saying that if I was a union representative I would do it differently,” the manager said. “I’m just saying I think it diminishes the other factors that a player looks at. … I think each negotiation should be based on what’s the best decision — taking everything into account, not taking one thing into account.”

But because the union sees Pujols as a player who can raise the salary bar, he’s under more pressure than your average player, La Russa said.

This sort of pressure has gone on for years, with many high-profile players, La Russa went on. But in Pujols’ case, he said, this was “not just arm-twisting. It’s dropping an anvil on your back through the roof of your house.”

La Russa said he had no specific evidence that Pujols was being pressured by the players union. But he said his many years in the game have made that “a guaranteed assumption. It’s gone on since I started managing. And I don’t think they’d deny it.”

I think the first sentence in that last paragraph sums up this situation nicely: La Russa has no evidence that the players union is pressuring Pujols.

Who knows, maybe La Russa is right and the union is pressuring players to get the most they can. But it’s not a stretch to think that the players and agents want to soak every last penny out of teams. Why wouldn’t they? If they’re lucky, players are able to land one, maybe two big contracts throughout their playing career, so you better believe they’re going to stretch the dollar amount as big as possible.

Besides, I don’t really see a benefit for the union to demand that players ask for as much money as possible. There’s already a natural order to the way contracts are done now. Player A makes X amount in 2010, then Player B makes a little more than what Player A made in 2011. Player C then makes a little more than Player B and the cycle never stops.

The union already has what it wants, so there’s no real need to put pressure on players. I think La Russa has just grown frustrated that this Pujols contract situation hasn’t been resolved and the players are set to report to spring training.

Report: Panthers owner belittles Peyton Manning in recent CBA meeting

Indianapolis Colts quarterback Peyton Manning (18) drops back to pass against the Dallas Cowboys during the first quarter at Lucas Oil Field in Indianapolis on December 5, 2010. UPI /Mark Cowan

Details are starting to emerge about what Panthers owner Jerry Richardson said to Peyton Manning in a CBA meeting a day before the Super Bowl that got the Colts’ QB and NFLPA so riled up.

Michael Silver of Yahoo! Sports has the details:

Richardson treated the Colts’ quarterback like a dimwitted child. After Manning questioned the financial urgency of the owners’ request in the absence of documentation – a common union refrain – Richardson became agitated and dismissive while lecturing the player about the risks that their employers assume.

“He was condescending to Peyton,” said one player who was at the meeting. “He tried to talk about P&L [profit and loss] statements and all these other risks that the owners assume, as if Peyton didn’t know anything. Drew interrupted and said, ‘All we’re doing is just asking you to show us your books. We want to negotiate in good faith.’”

Said another player who was present: “We were so pissed. Peyton was breathing heavily, and some of us were about ready to jump across the table.”

As one perennial Pro Bowl player told me Monday morning, “When the owners want to get serious, they just need to get him out of the room – because we’ll never get a deal done with him in there. It’s not professional, and it’s not good business.”

The last paragraph that I pulled from Silver’s article (which was incredibly well-written and I encourage everyone to check out the full piece) disturbs me the most. If there’s one guy who is keeping the contract negotiations from even getting off the ground then Roger Goodell needs to step up ask Richardson to control himself. Or leave. Or go on vacation. Or go back into food sales and sell the Panthers to someone who cares about the league just as much as he does his yearly profits.

Guys like Richardson think that the NFL is about making money. He thinks it’s the owner’s league. But it’s not – it’s the fans’ league. It’s our league. It’s our money that lines the owners’ pockets so that they can pay the players and we want football next year. So if Richardson is not a part of the solution, then get him out.

Jerry Richardson is about to become public enemy No. 1 among football fans. And that’s not good for the rest of the owners.

Interest in Rogers is proof that Dan Snyder will never learn

Washington Redskins owner Dan Snyder watches warm ups before the game against the Baltimore Ravens at FedEx Field in Landover, Maryland on August 21, 2010. UPI/Alexis C. Glenn

When Shaun Rogers wants to play, he’s a fine player. He’s versatile in that he can play in either the 4-3 or 3-4 and in the right situation, the 31-year-old would be a good fit as a stopgap for one or two years.

The problem with Rogers is that he’s lazy and someone will be willing to overpay for his services. So naturally Dan Snyder is interested.

Two days after the Browns released him, Rogers was already at Redskins Park meeting with team officials. It makes sense that Snyder and Co. would be intrigued by a player like Rogers, who has a questionable attitude and is unwilling to practice. As the Cleveland Plain Dealer notes, because of the Browns’ inability to get him on the practice field during the week (in addition to other injuries along the defensive line), coaches had to devise schemes that used as few lineman as possible because that’s how they practiced during the week.

Does this sound like a player that most teams would want to add? Again, if a team was able to sign him to a reasonable contract, then you could do worse than having Shaun Rogers in a defensive line rotation. A team like the Patriots could handle him because he’d shut up and play for the opportunity to win a ring (just like Corey Dillon did in ’04).

But when has Snyder ever signed a free agent to a reasonable contract? In case anyone needs a reminder, the Skins still employ Albert Haynesworth – the same Albert Haynesworth who stole $100 million and who has been a total malcontent since arriving in D.C. Why would Washington want to replace one headache with another?

Redskin fans will argue that Snyder doesn’t run the team anymore – Bruce Allen and Mike Shanahan do. But Snyder clearly still sets the tone. A mere hours before the Skins got the beating of a lifetime by the Eagles on national television, the front office signed Donovan McNabb to a five-year extension worth $70 million. Are we to believe that Shanahan was at the forefront of that deal? The same Shanahan who benched McNabb for Rex Grossman late in the year? No? It was GM Bruce Allen? So the GM signed a quarterback to a new deal even though his head coach was unsure whether or not he could run his offense? That…doesn’t…sound…

I know, I know – if they cut McNabb then they only owe him $3.75 million. The bottom line is that the timing of it all reeked of Snyder. There are many problems with the Redskins owner but the biggest issue holding the team back is his unwillingness to rebuild. He says he’s allowing the football minds in his front office to run the show and yet the team is still making questionable decisions. The Packers and Steelers reached the Super Bowl because they’re two teams that draft incredibly well. When was the last time the Redskins had a great draft? Try never under Snyder. His belief is that if you throw enough money at free agents, eventually you’ll buy a Super Bowl. The NFL is a copycat league but instead of trying to copy the success that the Packers, Steelers and Patriots have had, Snyder refuses to do things the right way.

What the Skins need to do is shed their overpriced, past-their-prime talent and rebuild through the draft for the next three years. But they won’t because Snyder has no concept of long-term plans. Maybe things will be different now that Shanahan is in charge and I’ll eat crow in a couple of years. But even having interest in a player like Rogers is like adding a new verse to a very old, familiar tune when it comes to this team.

Eagles franchise Vick, Kolb still unlikely to be traded

Philadelphia Eagles Michael Vick throws a pass in the fourth quarter against the New York Giants at New Meadowlands Stadium in week 15 of the NFL in East Rutherford, New Jersey on December 19, 2010. The Eagles defeated the Giants 38-31. UPI /John Angelillo

Now that the Eagles have assigned their franchise tag to Michael Vick, one would think that they could begin working on a long-term contract with the quarterback. And once they sign him to a long-term contract, they can trade backup Kevin Kolb for a draft pick or two.

Or none.

The Kolb situation is a sticky one in Philadelphia. Even if the Eagles work out a deal to keep Vick long-term, it might not be enough for coach Andy Reid to leave himself exposed at the most important position on the field. Vick’s playing style leaves him open for injury and if the Eagles didn’t have a decent backup to step in, they would likely suffer the consequences.

The other problem is that even if the Eagles wanted to move him, once the current CBA expires they won’t be able to trade for 2011 draft picks. Instead they would be acquiring picks for the 2012 draft and therefore, selections that wouldn’t be able to help them this year. Would the Eagles be willing to do that?

The saving grace for Kolb is that time is on his side. He becomes a free agent in 2012 and unless the Eagles plan to franchise him (which is highly doubtful – especially if they sign Vick to a long-term deal), he’ll be able to walk. His hope should be that Vick signs a contract extension and the Eagles find a suitable backup either via free agency or the draft. Then Reid and Co. would feel safe trading him away and acquiring draft picks that won’t make an impact until at least next season.

Either way, Kolb won’t be an Eagle in 2012. As for 2011, well that’s a different story.

Albert Haynesworth accused of sexual assault

Washington Redskins’ Albert Haynesworth is seen on the sidelines as the Redskins play a pre-season game against the Buffalo Bills at FedEx Field in Washington on August 13, 2010. UPI/Kevin Dietsch

Less than two weeks after being charged with simple assault for an incident involving road rage in Virginia, Albert Haynesworth has been accused of sexually assaulting a waitress at the W Hotel in D.C. over the weekend.

From NBC Washington:

According to a police report obtained by NBC Washington, the waitress stated that her hands were full carrying glasses as she was clearing the table at about 1:30 a.m. Sunday.

She said that “Subject 1” tried to pay his bill by giving her his credit card, but he asked if it was OK to stick the card in her blouse near her breast area. She nodded her head yes and, according to the report, she said he then placed the card into her blouse gently, sliding the card further into her left side of the blouse and then started to caress her breast.

Haynesworth’s name is not mentioned in the report, which was filed at 5:15 a.m. Sunday, but sources say that “Subject 1” is indeed referring to Haynesworth.

Assuming the report is true, there’s simply no excuse for Haynesworth to be caressing a waitress’s breast. But why on earth would the waitress tell him that it was okay for him to stick his credit card in her blouse? A simple, “No, I’d rather you leave your dirty credit card on the table and I’ll come back for it,” would have made more sense.

Either way, Haynesworth has now made it incredibly difficult for the Redskins to trade him. He’s not going to net much back in a trade – if anything. The Skins should have dealt him last year when they still presumably had a chance to acquire a second round pick. Now they’ll be lucky to get even a late round selection for the groper.

« Older posts Newer posts »