Author: Anthony Stalter (Page 1252 of 1503)

Barstool Debate: An uncapped NFL – good or bad?

Granted, they’re not as important as the Lincoln-Douglas debates, but as long as there have been barstools, there have been men sitting on those stools arguing about sports. This week, John Paulsen and Anthony Stalter sit at a virtual bar and debate what life would be like if the NFL didn’t have a salary cap. Take a seat, order a beverage and feel free to give us your two cents.

Anthony: With the NFL threatening to have an uncapped year following the 2009 season, the first thing most fans want to do is panic. Who wants a situation in the NFL with haves and have-nots like they do in baseball? Well, the fact of the matter is that small market teams can still survive and MLB has proved that. Small market teams (i.e. teams that don’t spend big in order to win) like the 2007 Rockies and 2003 Marlins are prime examples that winning is accomplished on the field and not with a big budget.

John: I’m glad you brought up the Marlins. It’s true that a small-market/low-budget team can succeed for a year or two with a great farm system and good scouting, but what happens to those small market World Series teams the following year? Or the year after that? They either sell of their parts because they can’t afford to keep them or they are raided by the big market teams, who are looking to simply buy themselves a championship. In the four seasons since the Marlins’ 2003 World Series win, they haven’t finished higher than third in their division. It’s true that they can be competitive for a year or two, but they can’t sustain their excellence like the big market teams can. And that’s simply not fair.

Anthony: But at least these teams can still be competitive. Some fans assume that just because a team doesn’t spend a lot, it means that team is destined to finish in the cellar every year. And besides, it’s up to the owners whether or not to spend. We can assume that there’s going to be a huge gap in terms of budget between a team like the Cowboys (we know owner Jerry Jones will spend to win) and maybe a smaller market team like the Seahawks, but we simply don’t know what owners are going to be willing to spend. In other words, we don’t know if the NFL would turn into MLB if the league went without a cap. It sounds like a crazy thought now, but maybe not having a cap will drive the competition even more because owners in the lower market cities will still be willing to spend to win. (Unlike how it is in baseball, where clubs like the Marlins, Royals and Pirates simply don’t want to spend.)

John: It’s definitely possible for a small budget team to make a run here and there, but think what it must be like to be an American League team competing with the payrolls of the Yankees and Red Sox. Since MLB expanded its playoffs in 1995, the Yankees have made the postseason every single season, essentially gobbling up one of the four AL playoff spots each year. Now that the Red Sox started to catch up in payroll, they have made the postseason four of the last five years. So if you’re an AL team other than the Yankees or Red Sox, you’re basically competing for the two other division titles because the AL East and Wild Card berths are pretty much decided going into the season. Then imagine being a fan of the Devil Rays, Orioles or the Blue Jays, who are also in the AL East. Why even bother? In the NFL, the small market teams are already at a disadvantage when it comes to generating stadium revenue and attracting free agents. Removing the salary cap will only serve to eliminate the one thing keeping a competitive balance in the NFL. It’s parity that makes the league so popular, because most fans know that if their favorite team catches a few breaks, they’ve got a good shot to make the postseason. It’s no coincidence that the league exploded in popularity at the same time the salary cap was implemented.

Anthony: I actually agree 100%, John. I love how parity has made the NFL ultra competitive, but it’s interesting to play devil’s advocate regarding this topic. While I don’t think an uncapped year in the NFL would be a total disaster, I would much rather see things continue the way they are and preserve the balance in the league. How great is it that your favorite team has a shot to win every year if they can have a solid draft and make wise free agent pickups? It’s fun for fans.


Poll Answers

ESPN must be running out of topics

ESPN’s First Take posed this question recently: Could an NFL Player Score a Touchdown Against a Bear?

“If the bear was really trying, I’d take the bear. But in reality, I don’t see this ever happening.”

Really bear doctor? You don’t see this ever happening?

Is it wrong if I was kind of rooting for the bear to attack the good doctor on camera? Especially when he said, “I’ve been doing this for 40 years and a bear has never attacked me.” Great segment ESPN.

Instant replay coming to MLB?

According to ESPN.com, Major League Baseball is playing around with the idea of experimenting with instant replay in the Arizona Fall League.

If that experiment proves practical and successful, MLB then is likely to continue the experiment next March during the World Baseball Classic and spring-training games.

If no insurmountable problems arise, baseball could begin using replay — though only to decide home run calls — as soon as next season.

What is yet to be determined is whether calls would be reviewed by a “replay umpire” in each stadium, as the National Football League does, or in the MLB offices in New York, a system that would more resemble the National Hockey League.

It’s a good idea. Part of the concern with replay is slowing down the game, but getting the call right should be first priority. It’s got to be difficult for umpires down the foul lines to see if a ball hit the top of the fence or the yellow home run line in centerfield. With the amount of technology at our disposal, it would be a shame not to use it. In the case of judging home run calls, I think it’s worth taking the “human element” out of the game.

Hank gets his way: Chamberlain to start for Yankees

The time has come for Joba Chamberlain. Yankees’ part owner Hank Steinbrenner is getting his way, as the highly touted pitcher will move into the club’s starting rotation once he’s groomed for the role.

He won the debate about Joba Chamberlain, who officially is on his way to becoming a starter. Steinbrenner stopped all the speculation about Chamberlain remaining in the bullpen as a setup man, albeit the most dominating setup man in the business.

Manager Joe Girardi kept Chamberlain out there for two innings and 35 pitches at the end Wednesday night and revealed afterward that the lad wasn’t out there just to get some exercise. He is being stretched out to start games.

That’s what Hank always wanted and what he had, coincidentally, said in an interview with mlb.com yesterday afternoon.

“This was the plan all along,” Girardi said after the game, with the same straight face he had used when he had hinted on Saturday that Chamberlain could remain a reliever for the rest of the season.

Well, nobody should be surprised. It was only a matter of time before Chamberlain moved into the rotation anyway and once Hank made it public knowledge that he wanted the kid to start, an announcement was soon to follow. Girardi must love management telling him how to run his club.

10 Ways to Improve the NFL

It’s amazing how the NFL can’t get all 32 owners to collectively agree on whether or not instant replay should be allowed in the game, but they sure as hell come together when they feel they’re not making enough money.

Recently all 32 NFL owners unanimously decided to opt out of the league’s Collective Bargaining Agreement, which means a potential lockout looms on the horizon.

The biggest problem is that the owners thought the current labor agreement didn’t generate enough profit, so now they’ll go to battle over the next however many days, weeks, months or years to try and work out a deal that does.

One question: Instead of bitching about profit (these are millionaire owners by the way), why don’t the league and owners come together and work on ways to improve the game?

Football is by far the most popular sport in America, but it doesn’t come without its flaws. If the owners and league are going to squabble over money, they should also fight to improve the game, too.

Here are 10 ideas on how to improve the NFL, both on and off the field. There’s more that could be done, but let’s start with baby steps, because the owners need to get back to concentrating on how many more millions they’re not making. They can’t be bothered with too many ideas that could actually help improve the game.

This isn’t ranked in any particular order. All the ideas are worth discussing.

1. Have a rookie cap
The Falcons recently signed 2008 third overall pick Matt Ryan to a $72 million contract with $34.75 million in guarantees. The deal is the third largest in NFL history. Does anyone see a problem with this? The kid hasn’t taken one snap, yet he’ll make more than several quarterbacks who just led their teams to the postseason last year. The league needs to put a cap on rookie contracts so it can avoid holdouts fostered by money-grubbing agents. The NBA has employed a rookie cap and thus far, it has eliminated holdouts. There’s no way a rookie should waltz into his first training camp making more than his Pro Bowl teammate.

2. Cut the preseason down to two or three games and add a 17th regular season game
Coaches say they need all four preseason games so that they can completely evaluate their roster. It seems understandable at first, but when you consider the amount of film coaches can use from mini camps, training camps and preseason contests, do they really need four exhibition games to decide who the backup center is going to be? Instead of four preseason games, why doesn’t the league give fans an extra regular season game? This also helps the owners in that they’ll make much more profit from an additional regular season game than they would from a fourth preseason contest. (Do I have your attention now, Mr. Owner?)

3. Change overtime rules
I’ve fought this idea for a while because I thought it was unique that the NFL had a do-or-die mentality to overtime and college football didn’t. But when you really think about it, how ridiculous is it that a coin flip could essentially determine the end of a football game? A team could battle for 60 minutes, only to eventually lose the game because a coin came up heads instead of tails. Overtime is exciting in college football because each team gets an opportunity to win. The same idea should be applied to the NFL, although instead of having each team start at the opponents’ 25-yard line (which is instant field goal range in the NFL), how about having the starting position at the 35 or 40-yard line? Make an offense drive a little.

4. Have all BYE weeks Week 8
How fair is it that some teams get BYE weeks in Week 3 and others in Week 8? Sure, a team might have injuries and could use the rest after only two games, but then that team has to play 14 straight games to finish out the season. Some teams automatically get an advantage over their opponents just based on when their bye week occurs, so why not make one universal BYE week at the midway point of the season? Yes, it would undoubtedly be lame to not have NFL football for one whole week, but we’re only talking about one weekend. Think of it as an All-Star break for the NFL.

5. Make pass interference a 15-yard penalty
I’m tired of watching teams chuck the ball downfield, hoping to get pass interference called so that they can immediately move into scoring position. It completely takes away from the strategy of the game – something that makes football so great. Given that the rules are currently designed to give wide receivers an advantage, why help the offense even more by giving them loads of field position just because they were lucky enough to get a call? A 15-yard penalty should be the max a team is awarded for pass interference.

6. Teams forfeit any game if caught cheating
Remember what would happen if you were ever caught cheating in school? In most cases, the teacher would rip up your test and give you a zero. No mercy, baby. The NFL should adopt the same policy and cut the bullshit. Caught videotaping your opponents’ signals? You forfeit the game. You lose. You get a zero. Both teams caught cheating? They both get a loss. The only potential problem is coming up with evidence to prove that a team cheated (especially coming up with evidence quick enough on a week to week basis). Plus, what if a team goes an entire year cheating and doesn’t get caught? (I’m looking at you, Belicheat.) Do they forfeit all of their wins once the season is over with? There’s one problem – if win-loss record determines draft position, and the Patriots cheat in all 16 games during a season, they would technically get the first pick. Obviously, details would have to be ironed out and it’s going to be hard to regulate, but the point is that there has to be a more severe punishment for cheating.

7. Leave the replay system alone
Don’t change the replay system because you’re worried about slowing down the game. This isn’t baseball – the tempo of the game is fine. If the league is worried about picking up the pace, then it should limit all of the commercials in between damn near every play (more on this below). Referees are human and if they need a little help from the vast technology at their disposal, then they should be able to use it. While I don’t advocate having replay for every single play, getting the call right should be the only thing that matters. The current replay system is fine.

8. A fumble is a fumble
How can the ground not cause a fumble? If a player is on the field of play and he loses control of the ball, that’s a fumble. The whole idea behind the game is hanging onto the ball and moving it down field to score. So why does the league reward a fumbling player by giving him the ball back just because the ground caused the gaff? This isn’t golf – there are no mulligans. It doesn’t matter how the ball comes out – it came out. And if the opposing team recovers, then it’s their ball. This would limit some of the guesswork for referees too, something that they could definitely use.

9. No more TV timeouts directly following kickoffs
This is more of an annoyance than anything. As a fan, you’re all jacked up for the start of another week of NFL action and the kickoff just occurred. What happens next? Well, a commercial, of course. You just waded through 27 commercials through all the pregame coverage, now you have to make your way through five more until the actual game gets going? It’s a crap I tell you! Crap!

10. Offer Sunday Ticket to ALL your fans, not just DirecTV subscribers.
We all know that DirecTV would have never earned its current market share if not for exclusive rights to offer Sunday Ticket to subscribers, but now that they have a strong foothold in the satellite TV market, isn’t it time to offer Sunday Ticket to all NFL fans? There are a lot of people who can’t subscribe to DirecTV for various reasons, and they’re stuck with whatever games their local networks decide to cover. DirecTV pays the NFL a big fee for the exclusive rights, which is why the league is willing to keep things the way they are, but sometimes it’s not all about money. Besides, if they offered Sunday Ticket on cable networks, wouldn’t the additional subscribers offset the loss in upfront revenue?

« Older posts Newer posts »