Month: July 2010 (Page 23 of 62)

Is Arum to blame for the holdup between Mayweather and Pacquiao?

Boxing fans want to see it.

Manny Pacquiao wants to see it.

Promoter Bob Arum definitely wants to see it.

So what’s stopping Floyd Mayweather Jr. from putting his John Hancock down on a contract in order to sign off on the superfight between him and Pacquiao later this year?

Over the weekend, Mayweather let Arum’s deadline to sign a contract that would ensure a fight with Pacquiao pass without saying a word. One day later, Mayweather said he was in no rush to sign off on a deal.

“I’m not really thinking about boxing right now,” Mayweather said. “I’m just relaxing. I fought about 60 days ago, so I’m just enjoying myself, enjoying life, enjoying my family and enjoying my vacation.”

One would think that someone with the nickname “Money Mayweather” would sign a contract that guaranteed him over $50 million to fight. And seeing as how his current record is a perfect 41-0, I highly doubt Mayweather is scared to get in the ring against anyone.

So then what’s the snag?

Continue reading »

Putting all of this ‘MJ would never have done that’ talk into context

For at least a year now, we’ve been hearing people criticize LeBron for potentially (and now actually) leaving the Cavs to play with another superstar. One of the arguments they often bring up is how Michael Jordan, Larry Bird, or Magic Johnson would never have left Chicago, Boston or L.A. to form a dynasty elsewhere.

Now, even Jordan has said that he wouldn’t have called those guys up and tried to join forces.

“There’s no way, with hindsight, I would’ve ever called up Larry, called up Magic and said, ‘Hey, look, let’s get together and play on one team,’ ” Jordan said after playing in a celebrity golf tournament in Nevada. “But that’s … things are different. I can’t say that’s a bad thing. It’s an opportunity these kids have today. In all honesty, I was trying to beat those guys.”

Skip Bayless, in his infinite wisdom, has been saying this for months, and took this moment to gloat a bit about what MJ said.

“Michael said, ‘I’m going to stay in Chicago.'”

In September of 1988, coming off his first MVP, Jordan signed an eight-year deal worth $25 million. (Soak those numbers in for a moment…the greatest player ever to play the game made about $3 million a season in his prime. Amazing.) The Bulls were 50-32 the previous season (Scottie Pippen’s first year in the league) and were eliminated in the Eastern Conference Semifinals. So his playing situation was not unlike LeBron’s, though I don’t think too many NBA stars would choose the city of Cleveland over Chicago.

Continue reading »

Browns appear ready to head into camp with Delhomme as their starter

CHARLOTTE, NC - JANUARY 03:  Jake Delhomme #17 of the Carolina Panthers reacts on the sidelines against the New Orleans Saints during their game at Bank of America Stadium on January 3, 2010 in Charlotte, North Carolina.  (Photo by Streeter Lecka/Getty Images)

Eric Mangini said Monday that the Browns’ starting quarterback job is Jake Delhomme’s to lose. Some Cleveland fans may want to throw their Jim Brown bobblehead through their office window after reading that news, while others probably shrugged and muttered, “Well, at least it’s not Derek Anderson.”

Thus far, all of the reports on Delhomme this summer have been positive. Mike Holmgren was looking to add a veteran quarterback who could help provide leadership in the locker room and he found one in Delhomme. Perhaps more importantly, the former Panther has developed a good report with young receivers Mohamed Massaquoi and Brian Robiskie.

Of course, Delhomme has been around long enough to know how to make an impression in OTAs. While his veteran presence has probably been a welcoming sight around Cleveland this summer, the real work is still ahead. This is a player that hasn’t played with confidence in the recent past and his decision-making has been downright brutal over the last year and a change. If the Browns were looking for a savior at the quarterback position, Delhomme isn’t it.

Continue reading »

Is the East the better conference?

Mar. 04, 2010 - Miami, FLORIDA, UNITED STATES - epa02065582 Los Angeles Lakers guard Kobe Bryant (L) drives the ball past Miami Heat guard Dwyane Wade (R) during their game at the American Airlines arena in Miami, Florida, USA 04 March 2010. The Heat defeated the Lakers in overtime 114-111.

The West has dominated the East since the Bulls finished their second three-peat in 1998, winning nine of 12 NBA titles (Lakers 5, Spurs 4) and finishing with a better overall record in 11 of 12 seasons. (The East won the regular season matchup in 2008-09.)

Is this dominance about to end? With the Super Friends joining forces in Miami, the Heat go from playoff also-ran to bona fide contender. However, the Cavs and Raptors will both be lucky to win 30 games this year, so regular season wins-wise it may be a wash. Amare Stoudemire joined the Knicks, which is somewhat offset by the loss of David Lee to the Warriors. Carlos Boozer signed with the Bulls, which gives Chicago a legit shot at a Top 4 seed in the East.

The top three picks in the draft — John Wall, Evan Turner and Derrick Favors — all went to Eastern Conference teams, so the Wizards, Sixers and Nets should be better.

Charlotte lost Raymond Felton, but they should still be decent under Larry Brown. Atlanta retained Joe Johnson which means the Hawks should be good for 45-50 wins. The Bucks aren’t going to sneak up on anyone this year, but they added some talent and the continued maturation of Brandon Jennings and Andrew Bogut should put Milwaukee in that 45-50 win range as well.

In the West, the Lakers will continue to be excellent, while the Spurs’ addition of Tiago Splitter might put them back into contention. After that, who has a legit shot representing the West in the Finals? Dallas and Denver will be good, but both teams seem to be treading water. The Thunder should continue to improve, but they still seem to be a year or two away. The Rockets should be a lot better if Yao Ming can stay healthy. Same goes for the Frail Blazers, but the Suns and Jazz both figure to be a little worse.

On paper, it looks as if there could be a sea change in terms of conference power this season, but one thing’s for sure — proud teams in the West like the Lakers and Spurs aren’t going to go down without a fight.

And that’s why they play the games.

Padres’ Bud Black well deserving of a contract extension

May 19, 2010; Los Angeles, CA, USA; San Diego Padres manager Bud Black (20) before the game against the Los Angeles Dodgers at Dodger Stadium. Photo via Newscom

MLB.com is reporting that the Padres are on the verge of giving manager Bud Black a three-year contract extension. If that’s the case, then yahoo for Bud Black, yahoo for the Padres and most importantly, yahoo for school.

In case you haven’t seen many San Diego games this year (and if you rely on ESPN for games or highlights, then you haven’t), then you may not fully grasp how important Black has become to the first place Padres. This isn’t a club that puts a lot of runs on the board on a nightly basis (they’re 21st in the league in that category), nor can they wait for one of their big poppers to save them with a home run (they’re 23rd in MLB in dingers) late in games.

But this is a club that relies on pitching, defense and fundamentals. They grasp the idea of the hit and run and more importantly, they know how to execute it. They know how to steal to put themselves in position to score and unlike so many teams in Major League Baseball these days, they’re not afraid to play their younger prospects. (As opposed to signing past-their-prime veterans, watching them hit .220, keeping them in the lineup for three-fourths of the season anyway and then allowing youngsters to play when there’s only a month left in the year.)

And because of Black, they do all of the things mentioned above well and that’s the main reason they find themselves up four games above the Rockies in the NL West. Is that to say that another manager wouldn’t be having the same success? No, but no matter how the young Padres finish this season, Black has put them in the best position to win not only now, but also in the future.

Also, don’t forget that many people thought the Padres would be gearing up to hold a fire sale at this point in the season. But thanks to the Padres’ strong play so far, it’s almost assured that players like Adrian Gonzalez will have the opportunity to make a postseason run in San Diego this season. Thus, in some ways, Black has played a role in keeping Gonzo in San Diego and that alone should have Padre fans elated that the club is keeping the skipper around for next few years. (Even if Gonzo is dealt this offseason after the Padres make a postseason run this year.)

« Older posts Newer posts »