Month: June 2008 (Page 27 of 40)

Celtics + Game 4 = 4-Ever

If you happened to see my post about Game 3, where I compared the Celtics’ failure to steal a win to that person in everyone’s past that is the proverbial “one that got away,” you’ll understand why I’m now saying that Game 4 is the Celtics’ soul mate.

Generally, when a team makes a humongous comeback like the Celtics did tonight, they don’t have the energy to win the game down the stretch. Boston was down 70-50 after two Vladimir Radmanovic free throws with 6:03 to play in the third quarter. Over those final six minutes, the Celtics went on a 21-3 run to cut the lead to two heading into the final period.

It was chemistry that kept the Celtics alive. There was no poisonous body language or yelling at teammates when Boston was trailing. They just kept their heads down, chanted ubuntu and chipped away at the lead. Much has been written about Paul Pierce’s defense this season, and he was terrific in making life difficult for Kobe Bryant tonight. Pierce’s block on Kobe’s turnaround jumper when the Celtics were still down 15 might have been the turning point of the game (and the series). He bounced back from a horrid Game 3 to post a workman-like 20 points, seven assists and four rebounds.

In fact, the so-called “Big Three” all had their moments. Kevin Garnett owned the glass and hit a couple of big shots during the run and down the stretch. Ray Allen, now known more for his outside jumper than his ability to penetrate, made two huge drives to the hoop. The first was an impossible (for a 32 year-old, anyway) reverse, double-clutch layup and the other was a clear out where he schooled Sasha Vujacic into a sweet left-handed layup. (If my son ever questions my insistence that he develop his off-hand, I’m going to show him that play.)

In a way, I think it might have been to the Celtics advantage that they got down by such a big margin. On the surface, this doesn’t make much sense, but with the game completely out of hand, KG looked relaxed for the first time in the series. Since nobody was really expecting the Celtics to win the game at that point, the pressure was off and they were able to pull of the mother of all comebacks.

On the flip side, it was interesting to see the Lakers succumb to the mother of all meltdowns. Once things got really dire for L.A., Kobe looked like he wanted to bite all of his teammates in the throat. That’s the problem with his style of leadership; the guys around him are afraid to screw up and that only increases the chances that they will.

And I can’t discuss the Lakers without mentioning Vladimir Radmanovic’s awful defense. With 2:10 to play and the Lakers down five, Jeff Van Gundy was excited when they brought in the same unit that made the big comeback in Game 2, which included Radmanovic at power forward. After a couple of free throws and a driving layup by Kobe, L.A. trailed by two, 89-87, with 1:30 to play. Things were looking up.

Then Vladimir Radmanovic happened.

He was covering James Posey who is, as Mark Jackson is so fond of saying, a “knockdown shooter.” Posey is slow, so there’s no real reason to worry about the drive. So you crowd him and force him to put the ball on the court. Anyway, Radmanovic does that, and Posey is forced to give up the ball to Allen on the opposite elbow. Vujacic had defensive position, but when Allen dribbled the ball, Radmanovic inexplicably let Posey go to provide help that wasn’t needed. Posey spotted up on the wing, Allen made the extra pass, and Posey knocked down a three pointer that put the Celtics back up by five with 1:13 to play. Where was Radmanovic? He was up past the top of the key, completely out of position.

Game (pretty much) over.

Series (pretty much) over.

No team has come back from a 3-1 deficit to win the Finals, but it’s not an impossible task. The Lakers need to take it one game at a time, get a win on Sunday and then go from there. The Celtics have a history of getting in their own way psychologically, so if the Lakers can win Game 5 and somehow force a pressure-packed fourth quarter in Game 6, anything can happen.

Oh that crazy Milton Bradley

Rangers’ outfielder Milton Bradley didn’t take kindly to what Royals’ television announcer Ryan Lefebvre had to say about him during Texas’s 11-5 victory over Kansas City Wednesday night. So Bradley decided to pay Lefebvre a visit in the press box, that is, before Rangers’ manger Jon Daniels stopped him in the stairway and brought him back to the clubhouse.

“I came in to watch my at-bat on the video and all of a sudden I heard my name,” Bradley said Thursday. “It was a spiel like five minutes out of the blue about me. I didn’t think anything he was saying was anything positive.

“I never met him and I heard him talking about me on TV. I was upset and was going to introduce myself. … All I wanted to do was introduce myself and tell him the stuff you’re talking about is uncalled for.”

Bradley has a history of losing his temper.

He slammed a plastic bottle at the feet of a fan in the right-field seats at Dodger Stadium in 2004 after someone threw it on the field. With San Diego in the pennant chase last September, he tore the ACL in his right knee when he was spun to the ground by Padres manager Bud Black, who was trying to keep him from an umpire.

Bradley knows the perception of him by outsiders may not be good because of past incidents.

“I’ve done some things that have been construed as violent or temperamental,” Bradley said. “But I’ve never physically harmed anyone. You can talk to any teammates I’ve had and the most they’ll tell you about me is I’m moody. I love to laugh and have fun, but when I’m out on the field it’s strictly business. It’s my life. I take a lot or pride in what I do.”

It must be hard being a professional athlete and constantly under the microscope. A lot of people would get pissed off to hear themselves trashed by someone they didn’t even know. That said, Bradley is a professional athlete and hard as it may be, he’s got to let things like this roll off his back. He shows more character by not reacting the way he did, then trying to force the issue. I sympathize with him in a way, but unfortunately being ripped by the media is part of the job.

Master of the Obvious: Curt Schilling says that Kobe isn’t a good teammate

I’m probably one of the last bloggers to pick up on this, but call me old-fashioned… I don’t really care what professional baseball players think about the NBA, especially when they say up front that they don’t know anything about the game.

Anyway, let the obligatory post continue… Curt Schilling got some sweet seats to Game 2 of the Finals and posted his thoughts about the experience on his blog. This is what he had to say about Kobe’s interaction with his teammates:

From the first tip until about 4 minutes left in the game I saw and heard this guy bitch at his teammates. Every TO he came to the bench pissed, and a few of them he went to other guys and yelled about something they weren’t doing, or something they did wrong. No dialog about “hey let’s go, let’s get after it” or whatever. He spent the better part of 3.5 quarters pissed off and ranting at the non-execution or lack of, of his team. Then when they made what almost was a historic run in the 4th, during a TO, he got down on the floor and basically said ‘Let’s f’ing go, right now, right here” or something to that affect. I am not making this observation in a good or bad way, I have no idea how the guys in the NBA play or do things like this, but I thought it was a fascinating bit of insight for me to watch someone in another sport who is in the position of a team leader and how he interacted with his team and teammates. Watching the other 11 guys, every time out it was high fives and “Hey nice work, let’s get after it” or something to that affect. He walked off the floor, obligatory skin contact on the high five, and sat on the bench stone faced or pissed off, the whole game. Just weird to see another sport and how it all works. I would assume that’s his style and how he plays and what works for him because when I saw the leader board for scoring in the post season his name sat up top at 31+ a game, can’t argue with that. But as a fan I was watching the whole thing, Kobe, his teammates and then the after effects of conversations. He’d yell at someone, make a point, or send a message, turn and walk away, and more than once the person on the other end would roll eyes or give a ‘whatever dude’ look.

In Kobe’s defense, the Lakers’ play was brutal for much of Game 2 and there is a ton of pressure (some of it self-applied) on Kobe to win a title without Shaq, so he can secure his legacy as one of the game’s greatest players. There has been a lot of talk about how great of a teammate he has been this season, but as the playoffs wear on and the pressure continues to mount, Kobe seems to be reverting to his old self. Watch his body language after a teammate makes a bad play – it isn’t pretty. He’s not good enough to win the series on his own, so only time will tell what kind of impact his “tough love” approach has on the rest of the Laker roster.

Jose Calderon and the restricted free agent quandary

I love reading blurbs like this one.

The Clippers — like many teams — have pinpointed Toronto Raptors point guard Jose Calderon as an attractive target this off-season.

Calderon is a restricted free agent but is also sharing point guard duties in Toronto with T.J. Ford. The Raptors can match any offer made to Calderon and have stated publicly that they intend to do so.

Let’s see… Calderon is 26 and averaged 8.3 assists in 30.5 minutes of playing time last season. He shot 52.5% from the field, 43.3% from long range and 90.8% from the free throw line. Calderon had the fifth-best Efficiency Per Minute of all the point guards in the league, trailing only Chris Paul, Steve Nash, Deron Williams and Chauncey Billups. (That means he’s ahead of guys like Baron Davis, Tony Parker, Jason Kidd and Allen Iverson.) Yeah, I’d say that he’s an “attractive target” this summer. That’s some crackerjack detective work there by the Clippers front office.

By the way, good luck wresting him away from the Raptors. My memory is a little fuzzy, but I don’t remember too many success stories of teams signing a medium- to big-name restricted free agent to an offer sheet that the player’s previous team didn’t match. The three that jump to mind are Denver’s offer to Manu Ginobili (which the Spurs wisely matched), Miami’s offer to Elton Brand (which the Clippers wisely matched) and Utah’s offer to Corey Maggette (which the Clippers wisely matched). You either have to overpay to get the other team to balk or hope that they’re completely inept and don’t match the fair offer sheet the player signed. That, or wait a year and hope that they become an unrestricted free agent.

If I’m running the Raptors, I’m locking Calderon up to a five-year deal in the $7 M-$9 M per year range. He’s still flying a bit under the radar, so his market value isn’t as high as it will be next summer.

Here are a few restricted agents that will likely play for their current team for at least another season: Josh Smith, Andre Iguodala, Emeka Okafor, Luol Deng, Monta Ellis, Ben Gordon, Daniel Gibson, Delonte West, Josh Childress, J.R. Smith, Andris Biedrins, Sasha Vujacic and Paul Millsap.

Welcome to the 21st century – TSN to roll out a daily digit to boost online readership

For decades, The Sporting News (the weekly magazine, not the website) used to be the pillar of sports information, from news and insights, to scores and stats. But TSN has slowly realized that what they provide weekly in a magazine is already available daily on hundreds of sports sites on the web.

That’s why TSN has decided to go with Sporting News Today, which is a digit daily (an e-mail basically) complete with news, scores, stats and more.

The new business model is a mix as well: the digital daily will be free while the magazine, which will be reintroduced in September with an emphasis on analysis and commentary, remains $3.99 an issue. The magazine circulation is about 700,000.

As the NYT explains, it’s a kind of “back to the future” move: take what the magazine was once known for—being the weekly sports Bible—and try to make it that kind of relevant in 2008 by providing a full morning briefing for “serious sports fans.” In today’s instant news world, can that work? Not in lieu of immediate gratification but as a way of providing a coherent picture the reader doesn’t have to piece together on his or her own, it just might.

This is a logical and smart business move. Obviously nobody wants to wait a week for information that they can get on a daily basis. So by sending a daily e-mail and making it free, TSN will get people to view their content instead going to ESPN.com or any other website to get their sports information. (Or at least, that’s what the idea is in theory.)

At least at the start, it’s a wise move for TSN to make this digit daily free. People have a short attention span as it is. If you want to charge for something that people can already get free elsewhere, their attention span gets even shorter.

« Older posts Newer posts »