Month: May 2008 (Page 9 of 28)

10 Ways to Improve the NFL

It’s amazing how the NFL can’t get all 32 owners to collectively agree on whether or not instant replay should be allowed in the game, but they sure as hell come together when they feel they’re not making enough money.

Recently all 32 NFL owners unanimously decided to opt out of the league’s Collective Bargaining Agreement, which means a potential lockout looms on the horizon.

The biggest problem is that the owners thought the current labor agreement didn’t generate enough profit, so now they’ll go to battle over the next however many days, weeks, months or years to try and work out a deal that does.

One question: Instead of bitching about profit (these are millionaire owners by the way), why don’t the league and owners come together and work on ways to improve the game?

Football is by far the most popular sport in America, but it doesn’t come without its flaws. If the owners and league are going to squabble over money, they should also fight to improve the game, too.

Here are 10 ideas on how to improve the NFL, both on and off the field. There’s more that could be done, but let’s start with baby steps, because the owners need to get back to concentrating on how many more millions they’re not making. They can’t be bothered with too many ideas that could actually help improve the game.

This isn’t ranked in any particular order. All the ideas are worth discussing.

1. Have a rookie cap
The Falcons recently signed 2008 third overall pick Matt Ryan to a $72 million contract with $34.75 million in guarantees. The deal is the third largest in NFL history. Does anyone see a problem with this? The kid hasn’t taken one snap, yet he’ll make more than several quarterbacks who just led their teams to the postseason last year. The league needs to put a cap on rookie contracts so it can avoid holdouts fostered by money-grubbing agents. The NBA has employed a rookie cap and thus far, it has eliminated holdouts. There’s no way a rookie should waltz into his first training camp making more than his Pro Bowl teammate.

2. Cut the preseason down to two or three games and add a 17th regular season game
Coaches say they need all four preseason games so that they can completely evaluate their roster. It seems understandable at first, but when you consider the amount of film coaches can use from mini camps, training camps and preseason contests, do they really need four exhibition games to decide who the backup center is going to be? Instead of four preseason games, why doesn’t the league give fans an extra regular season game? This also helps the owners in that they’ll make much more profit from an additional regular season game than they would from a fourth preseason contest. (Do I have your attention now, Mr. Owner?)

3. Change overtime rules
I’ve fought this idea for a while because I thought it was unique that the NFL had a do-or-die mentality to overtime and college football didn’t. But when you really think about it, how ridiculous is it that a coin flip could essentially determine the end of a football game? A team could battle for 60 minutes, only to eventually lose the game because a coin came up heads instead of tails. Overtime is exciting in college football because each team gets an opportunity to win. The same idea should be applied to the NFL, although instead of having each team start at the opponents’ 25-yard line (which is instant field goal range in the NFL), how about having the starting position at the 35 or 40-yard line? Make an offense drive a little.

4. Have all BYE weeks Week 8
How fair is it that some teams get BYE weeks in Week 3 and others in Week 8? Sure, a team might have injuries and could use the rest after only two games, but then that team has to play 14 straight games to finish out the season. Some teams automatically get an advantage over their opponents just based on when their bye week occurs, so why not make one universal BYE week at the midway point of the season? Yes, it would undoubtedly be lame to not have NFL football for one whole week, but we’re only talking about one weekend. Think of it as an All-Star break for the NFL.

5. Make pass interference a 15-yard penalty
I’m tired of watching teams chuck the ball downfield, hoping to get pass interference called so that they can immediately move into scoring position. It completely takes away from the strategy of the game – something that makes football so great. Given that the rules are currently designed to give wide receivers an advantage, why help the offense even more by giving them loads of field position just because they were lucky enough to get a call? A 15-yard penalty should be the max a team is awarded for pass interference.

6. Teams forfeit any game if caught cheating
Remember what would happen if you were ever caught cheating in school? In most cases, the teacher would rip up your test and give you a zero. No mercy, baby. The NFL should adopt the same policy and cut the bullshit. Caught videotaping your opponents’ signals? You forfeit the game. You lose. You get a zero. Both teams caught cheating? They both get a loss. The only potential problem is coming up with evidence to prove that a team cheated (especially coming up with evidence quick enough on a week to week basis). Plus, what if a team goes an entire year cheating and doesn’t get caught? (I’m looking at you, Belicheat.) Do they forfeit all of their wins once the season is over with? There’s one problem – if win-loss record determines draft position, and the Patriots cheat in all 16 games during a season, they would technically get the first pick. Obviously, details would have to be ironed out and it’s going to be hard to regulate, but the point is that there has to be a more severe punishment for cheating.

7. Leave the replay system alone
Don’t change the replay system because you’re worried about slowing down the game. This isn’t baseball – the tempo of the game is fine. If the league is worried about picking up the pace, then it should limit all of the commercials in between damn near every play (more on this below). Referees are human and if they need a little help from the vast technology at their disposal, then they should be able to use it. While I don’t advocate having replay for every single play, getting the call right should be the only thing that matters. The current replay system is fine.

8. A fumble is a fumble
How can the ground not cause a fumble? If a player is on the field of play and he loses control of the ball, that’s a fumble. The whole idea behind the game is hanging onto the ball and moving it down field to score. So why does the league reward a fumbling player by giving him the ball back just because the ground caused the gaff? This isn’t golf – there are no mulligans. It doesn’t matter how the ball comes out – it came out. And if the opposing team recovers, then it’s their ball. This would limit some of the guesswork for referees too, something that they could definitely use.

9. No more TV timeouts directly following kickoffs
This is more of an annoyance than anything. As a fan, you’re all jacked up for the start of another week of NFL action and the kickoff just occurred. What happens next? Well, a commercial, of course. You just waded through 27 commercials through all the pregame coverage, now you have to make your way through five more until the actual game gets going? It’s a crap I tell you! Crap!

10. Offer Sunday Ticket to ALL your fans, not just DirecTV subscribers.
We all know that DirecTV would have never earned its current market share if not for exclusive rights to offer Sunday Ticket to subscribers, but now that they have a strong foothold in the satellite TV market, isn’t it time to offer Sunday Ticket to all NFL fans? There are a lot of people who can’t subscribe to DirecTV for various reasons, and they’re stuck with whatever games their local networks decide to cover. DirecTV pays the NFL a big fee for the exclusive rights, which is why the league is willing to keep things the way they are, but sometimes it’s not all about money. Besides, if they offered Sunday Ticket on cable networks, wouldn’t the additional subscribers offset the loss in upfront revenue?

Hunter the Humanitarian

Every day you read about this college athlete getting into trouble and that coach with the big contract, but today I would like to give you a story that needs to be told. Ron Hunter at IUPUI has made putting shoes on the feet of the children of Africa his humanitarian cause. Take a look at the attached article and you will see a coach who understands that is not just about wins and losses. Now if we can get some college administrators and the money people to understand the same thing.

Redd to Cleveland?

The Racine Journal-Times is reporting that the Bucks have been “gauging the interest” that other teams have in Michael Redd. There’s a new sheriff in town (GM John Hammond) and he’ll want to reshape the team. The Bucks have some talent, but clearly there wasn’t much chemistry there and changes have to be made. Keep in mind that Hammond comes from Detroit, where they built a consistent winner without a single bona fide superstar. The Pistons’ strategy is to find solid star- and starter-level guys that represent good value. Chauncey Billups, Rip Hamilton, Rasheed Wallace… these are all players who play beyond their respective contracts.

Dan Labbe of Cleveland.com wrote a blog post campaigning to bring Michael Redd to the Cavaliers. Here are a couple of his key points…

Dan, why Michael Redd?

Great question. First reason, the Cavs biggest asset is expiring contracts. Their next biggest asset is a first round draft pick. Who likes expiring deals and draft picks? Teams going nowhere. Especially teams going nowhere with one particular player that is grossly overpaid. Milwaukee, I’m looking in your direction.

Wait a minute, Dan. You just said Michael Redd was grossly overpaid, yet you want the Cavs to go get him? Sounds like crazy talk to me.

Ahhh, excellent point you make there. But Milwaukee and Cleveland are in two very different situations. That $47 million due Redd over the next three years (not to mention a player option for $18 million that fourth year) is an albatross to the Bucks. That’s franchise player money and Redd’s not a franchise player. Not to mention the Bucks aren’t a contender. But for the Cavs, a team trying to win a title ASAP, who cares how much money it costs? A good shooter like Redd that can create a bit on the wing could be the difference playing next to LeBron. Besides, the Cavaliers have no contracts that currently run past ’09-’10 (assuming LeBron James opts out), so Redd’s deal wouldn’t hamper them too excessively down the road.

So how do the Cavs get him?

It can be done. It starts with Wally Szczerbiak’s expiring deal. That alone would get Redd by league rules. But Milwaukee will want more. So you throw in some talent. Maybe you have to part with Daniel Gibson (though you’d have to sign him first). Or maybe you do them a favor and take Bobby Simmons’ not-so-good contract in exchange for the expiring deals of Damon Jones and Anderson Varejao (he’s got a player option after next season). Maybe you toss in a draft pick. Find a combination they’d want and do it. Look, that’s not my job. I just think it can be done.

Labbe is right on a couple of points. First, Michael Redd is getting paid franchise money but is not a franchise player. One of the problems with the NBA is that there are only 10-15 so-called “franchise” players. Here’s a list of guys that I’d give max contracts to retain: LeBron, Kobe, Amare Stoudemire, Chris Paul, Dwight Howard, Kevin Garnett, Tim Duncan, Deron Williams and Dwyane Wade. Those eight players don’t really have any serious flaws in their games. Then there are guys like Dirk Nowitzki, Carlos Boozer, Yao Ming, Chris Bosh, Elton Brand and Steve Nash, who are almost on that level. There might be a player or two I’m forgetting, but the point is that just because you’re the best player on your team doesn’t mean you deserve a max contract. But the Bucks, who are already at a disadvantage since they play in a small market, had to overpay Redd almost three years ago so that he wouldn’t bolt to Cleveland. Now, after seven seasons of consistent improvement and one season of questionable shot selection that brought about charges of selfishness, the Bucks are thinking about moving on.

And really, is Redd “grossly overpaid”? I don’t think so. Larry Hughes is grossly overpaid. Ben Wallace is grossly overpaid. Wally Szczerbiak is grossly overpaid. But Redd, who just two seasons ago averaged almost 27 points a game on 46.5% shooting, has a fair market value of $12-$13 million.

Even at the risk of pissing off Redd (who might need a little kick in the butt anyway), a possible trade is worth exploring, but the kind of deal that Labbe is talking about – Daniel Gibson, a first round pick and the expiring contracts of Wally Szczerbiak, Damon Jones and Anderson Varejao – is like the Grizzlies’ decision to send Pau Gasol to the Lakers for Javaris Crittenton and bag of peanuts. It isn’t going to happen. That deal is ridiculous.

The only way that a small market team can become a consistent winner is if they hire a good coach, draft well, retain the talent they have (by overspending) and have an owner willing to pay the price (i.e. luxury tax). Nobody wants to play in Milwaukee, but they will if they have to, or if the money is right, or if the Bucks are a winner. (Just look at San Antonio.)

Redd’s ideal role would be as a sidekick that can make teams pay when they double-team the star. The Bucks do have an emerging big man, Andrew Bogut, but the two are rarely on the same page and seem to be in a constant tug-of-war over the direction of the team. Bogut came into his own after the All-Star break, averaging 16.3 points and 11.6 rebounds, while shooting 51% from the field. He’s never going to be Dwight Howard, but he could be a semi-affordable cog in the wheel like Rasheed Wallace is in Detroit. That’s where the good coaching comes in.

But back to Labbe… If Hammond hates Redd’s game, the Bucks could conceivably take his deal. It would allow Milwaukee to cut a ton of salary heading into the 2009 season, but at what cost? They’d be trading one of the best scorers in the league to a division rival for cap flexibility, a late first round pick, and Daniel Gibson. How is that any different than the Gasol trade? Since no one really wants to play in Milwaukee, they won’t be able to use that flexibility to attract a superstar, so what’s the point? If Hammond were to take that deal I’d say fire him on the spot and re-hire Larry Harris. At least he didn’t give his players away.

But for Cleveland, that deal would be a no-brainer.

Lakers/Spurs Preview: Kobe vs. Manu, Duncan vs. Gasol, Parker vs. Fish

Like most NBA fans, I was rooting for the Hornets in their series against the Spurs. It’s not because I hate San Antonio; I’m just sick and tired of watching them play. But the Spurs prevailed and now they face my least favorite team, the Lakers. As much as I like to root against both of these franchises, this is an excellent matchup.

Kobe has the unenviable task of having to guard Manu Ginobili on one end and while being guarded by Bruce Bowen on the other. But he’s the MVP, right? Everyone keeps telling me that he’s the hardest working player in the NBA, so he should be able to handle those responsibilities.

Down low, Pau Gasol will have to defend Tim Duncan in the post. Gasol has trouble defensively, but his long arms could bother Duncan if the Big Fundamental’s face up game isn’t flowing. Duncan is a lot stronger, so he’d be wise to mix some power moves in to keep Gasol on his heels. Gasol also has trouble scoring on Duncan, but if he can come close to holding his own in the post, the Lakers have a good shot.

Back on the perimeter, it’s speed versus strength in the Tony Parker/Derek Fisher matchup. If Fisher can’t keep Parker out of the paint, it’s going to be a long series for the Lakers. Parker’s jumper is improving, but it’s still inconsistent. If he gets on a roll from the outside, there will be no way for Fisher to guard him.

Lamar Odom is quick for a power forward and I don’t think Fabricio Oberto or Kurt Thomas can hold him on the perimeter. Neither player is good enough offensively to demand a lot of playing time, so I expect Robert Horry will see significant minutes in this series. It’ll be his responsibility to keep Odom out of the paint and off the glass.

This series might come down to bench play. The Lakers have a young, up-and-coming group of reserves, while the Spurs are grizzled and experienced. The Lakers’ bench wasn’t very good in the Utah series, so it will be interesting to see how they play now that a trip to the Finals is on the line. Phil Jackson seems to go with the hot hand when choosing the fifth guy to finish games. One game it’s Luke Walton, the next it’s Sasha Vujacic. Whoever it is, they will have to play mistake-free ball, because no one on the Spurs is going to fold under pressure. They’ve all been there (too) many times before.

The Lakers have home court advantage, which makes them a pretty solid favorite in the series. But I think the Spurs match up well, so I’m going to go out on a little bit of a limb and say that San Antonio wins this series in six games.

10 Best Sports Anthems

Somebody tell the closer to start warming up, because The Love of Sports has ranked the top 10 Best Sports Anthems (with YouTube clips).

1. Welcome To The Jungle – Guns ‘N’ Roses
This song became the anthem for the Cincinnati Bengals in the late ‘80s, since their home stadium (Riverfront Stadium) is actually nicknamed “The Jungle.” Since then, the song as become a staple of stadiums around the country and a truest anthem of them all.

Oh, I know where I am, Axl. And I’m loving every damn second of it.

« Older posts Newer posts »