Month: May 2008 (Page 3 of 28)

The Onion: Bulls Blow NBA Draft Lottery Win On More NBA Draft Lottery Tickets

Man, I love The Onion.

CHICAGO—Just days after beating long odds in the NBA Draft Lottery by winning the 2008 draft’s first pick, the Chicago Bulls shocked the basketball world by announcing that they would trade their prize in on yet more NBA lottery tickets.

“This is pretty good, this No. 1 pick, it’s true,” Bulls general manager John Paxson told reporters while watching pre-draft workouts at the United Center. “We could probably get a pretty good player. But you see, if we cash it in and play the NBA Draft Lottery some more, we have a chance to win, like, the whole draft. Our team can’t afford to pass up a chance like that.”

“I hear these people second-guessing our decision to re-invest the top pick,” team owner Jerry Reinsdorf said Monday, “and it reminds me of 1984, when everyone wanted Hakeem Olajuwon or Sam Bowie and we wound up with a player you might have heard of named Michael Jordan. Well, just think of the entire 2008 Draft as the second coming of Michael Jordan.”

The Bulls front office was immediately inundated with phone calls, letters, and e-mails from fans insisting that the entire 2008 class, though certainly good, was no Michael Jordan.

Barstool Debate: Does the NBA lottery need to be fixed?

As long as there have been barstools, there have been men on those barstools debating the most important topics in sports. In this week’s Barstool Debate, Anthony Stalter and John Paulsen discuss the pros and cons of the NBA’s current lottery system and what can be done to fix it.

John: The current NBA lottery system just isn’t working. It was designed to give the worst teams in the league the best draft picks while eliminating (or at least limiting) teams tanking in order to get a better pick. But every March, we start to see teams that are out of the playoff hunt shutting down their “injured” stars while “developing” their younger players. To be fair, these teams aren’t intentionally losing games, but they are intentionally not giving themselves the best chance to win. One way to eliminate this would be to give each lottery team an equal chance at the top (let’s say seven) picks, and go by record after that. Sure, decent teams will occasionally get the top pick (like in 1993, when the 41-41 Orlando Magic landed the #1 pick), but it will eliminate most of the tanking and put a better product on the floor later in the season.

Anthony: I agree that having a system in place that would give all lottery teams a fair shot at the No. 1 pick would eliminate tanking even more, but is it really fair that the fourth- or fifth-worst team gets a shot at the best player in the draft? Look the Spurs the year they drafted Tim Duncan. The only reason they were a lottery team that year was because David Robinson got hurt and missed most of the season. Now they’re a dynasty thanks to that draft. Isn’t there even a better way than giving all lottery teams a shot at the No. 1 pick? I understand that the NBA can’t adopt the NFL’s draft approach and pick just based on win-loss records, but it just doesn’t seem right that a decent team can become great just because they finished in the lottery one year.

John: I guess it depends on whether or not it’s right to reward failure. The idea is for the worst teams to have a shot at the best players so they can improve their teams and increase parity in the league. But look at the lottery this year. The Bulls overcame 1.7% odds to get the overall pick. Chicago was a playoff team two years ago and now it gets to add Derrick Rose or Michael Beasley to its talented roster. Meanwhile, the Heat are picking #2. Of all the teams in the lottery, Miami is the only one with a true superstar to build around and now they get to add whomever the Bulls pass on to a talented core that includes Wade and Shawn Marion. So even without an equal chance, decent teams are still getting the top picks, so why not make all the odds even so that we can at least eliminate tanking at the end of each season? I know that fans that fork out big money for seats want to see the stars play, but if they’re going to a game that features two non-playoff teams in March, chances are they will only get to see the scrubs in action. The most important thing is the product that is put out on the court, and tanking undermines that product.

Anthony: The overall goal in having a lottery is twofold. One, the NBA wants to encourage parity and two, it wants to avoid teams tanking at the end of the year. Unfortunately, it appears that there’s no way to accomplish both. If you want parity, you have to give teams with poor records a shot at the best prospects. But to avoid several teams “resting” their starters at the end of the year in order to get a better pick, you have to have a lottery. And in a lottery, you run the risk of decent teams like the Bulls and Heat coming away with some of the best talent. It seems like a no-win situation.

John: I say that the product that the league puts on the floor should be the priority. Therefore, it is most important to eliminate tanking, so the league should give each team even odds at winning the top seven picks. Then picks #8-#14 should be based on record. That, or devise a win-or-go-home playoff system that would keep some or all of the lottery teams involved until the very end. Maybe seed the top 14 teams in the playoffs and then take the other 16 teams and have a single-elimination tournament that would yield the final two playoff teams. Not only would that be exciting, but it would discourage tanking for most teams as they would still be playing their stars in an attempt to make the playoffs. Whatever the direction, the league should do something. Right now, tanking is running rampant and some good (or at least decent) teams are getting the top picks.


Poll Answers

The Top 10 Announcers In Sports Movies

Rumors and Rants ranked the top 10 announcers in sports movies. No surprise which announcer took the top spot.

1. Harry Doyle (Major League)
What more can be said of Harry Doyle? He’s easily the greatest sports movie broadcaster of all-time. The gap between his performance and any other is so wide that it’s almost not fair to include him on this list. Bob Uecker’s performance as the ultimate homer-announcer is simply fantastic. He’s off the cuff calls and condescending attitude towards his own team are perfect. He even drags his dead weight color guy Monty through the movie, which is both hilarious and true to life. Then when you throw in the insults he hurls at his Indians and their opponents, it makes for one of the best performances in the history of sports movies.

Memorable lines:
“In case you haven’t noticed, and judging by the attendance you haven’t, the Indians have managed to win a few ball games, and are threatening to climb out of the cellar.”

Harry Doyle: “That’s all we got, one goddamn hit?”
Assistant: “You can’t say goddamn on the air.”
Harry Doyle: “Don’t worry, nobody is listening.”

“The post-game show is brought to you by … (searches through his papers) … Christ, I can’t find it. To hell with it.”

“Remember fans, Tuesday night is Die Hard Night. Free admission for anyone who was actually alive the last time the Indians won the pennant.”

(Vaughn throws a pitch to the backstop) “Juuust a bit outside, tried the corner and missed. (Vaughn throws another wild pitch) Ball four. (Vaughn throws another wild pitch) Ball eight. (Vaughn throws another wild pitch) Low and he walks the bases loaded on 12 straight pitches. How can these guys lay off pitches that close?”

“Haywood swings and hits one towards South America. Hayes is gonna need a rocket up his ass to catch this one…”

Harry Doyle is announcing, folks.

Baseball’s best young guns, Vol. II

Clearly what Hank Steinbrenner wants, Hank Steinbrenner gets.

The Senior Vice President and part owner of the New York Yankees made it clear in late April that he wanted promising stud reliever Joba Chamberlain to be a starter. Not even a month later, Yankee manager Joe Girardi began prepping Chamberlain to join the rotation and with an injury to Ian Kennedy, it appears Joba will make his starting debut sooner rather than later.

On the left coast, the Los Angeles Dodgers had a similar situation with one of their young pitching prospects. Well, okay, so the two situations are actually quite different. The Dodgers don’t have an overbearing part-owner meddling in the team’s affairs. But they do have a top pitching prospect in Clayton Kershaw, who made his much-anticipated debut last Sunday against the Cardinals.

The 20-year old held St. Louis to two runs while striking out seven in six innings of work. He earned a no decision, but the outing proved he has loads of potential and his 96 mph fastball is nasty. What was even more promising was that he only gave up one walk since he had battled command issues in the minors.

Chamberlain and Kershaw are just two of baseball’s next generation of talented pitchers. Below is a look at 10 of baseball’s top young guns. To make the list, the pitchers could only be 24 years old or younger. For a look at baseball’s best young guns of 2007, click here.

1. Joba Chamberlain, 22, New York Yankees
Everyone is waiting on pins and needles to see what Chamberlain can do in a starting role. His 0.38 ERA last year as a setup man was ridiculously good and his four-pitch repertoire is filthy. An 83-87 mph slider, an 11 to 5 curve and a solid changeup complement his 94-98 mph fastball. Even though he’s battled some weight issues in the past, at 6-foot-2 and 230 pounds, he has great size and is durable. Now that the “Baby Boss” has demanded him to be in the rotation, it’s only a matter of time before manager Joe Girardi stretches out Chamberlain’s arm so that he’s ready to start. While ranking Chamberlain No. 1 might be a reach since he has zero starting experience, his work in the bullpen has been proof enough of his vast potential.

2. Cole Hamels, 24, Philadelphia Phillies
Hamels hasn’t looked as dominate this year as he did last season, but he’s been solid nonetheless. He’s currently 5-3 with a 3.18 ERA and a fantastic 1.07 WHIP. More importantly, the Phils are 6-0 in his last six starts and he’s made quality outings, averaging almost 7.0 innings per game. The only issue has been inconsistency and he’s had problems staying healthy over the course of an entire season. Hopefully his last outing (4.0 IP, 6 ER, 0 K) isn’t an indication that he’s suffering from some kind of aliment.

3. Tim Lincecum, 23, San Francisco Giants
“The Franchise” has been absolutely dominating in his first full season in the bigs. (He started 24 games last year after being called up from Triple-A Fresno.) Thus far in 2008, he’s 7-1 with a 2.33 ERA and 1.28 WHIP. At only 5-foot-11 and 170 pounds, scouts have always worried that he’ll eventually breakdown. But his unique throwing motion (designed by his father) doesn’t put a ton of strain on his arm and creates less torque when he pushes off the mound. His devastating 93-98 mph fastball has given batters fits this year, but even more damaging has been his changeup – a pitch he worked on during spring training and is starting to perfect.

4. Scott Kazmir, 24, Tampa Bay Rays
If Kazmir could ever stay healthy, he could be one of the more dominant pitchers in the league – especially now that the Rays are winning and scoring runs. After missing all of April with an elbow injury and struggling against the Red Sox in his first outing off the DL, Kaz has been lights out. In his past four starts, he’s 4-0, has only given up two earned runs and has struck out 27 in 26 innings pitched. He’s truly one of the more underrated ace pitchers in the league and once again, if he can stay healthy he’ll win 12-plus games.

5. Fausto Carmona, 24, Cleveland Indians
Carmona recently suffered a left hip strain that landed him on the 15-day DL, but apparently it’s nothing major and he’ll return in a couple weeks. Some were concerned that his 19-8 record in 2007 was a bit of a fluke, but thus far in 2008, Carmona is 4-2 with a 3.10 ERA and 1.59 WHIP. In his last start before the injury, Carmona was dominant through seven innings, but took the no decision after the Tribe lost to the Reds on a walk off dinger. If he bounces back from the injury, he should have no problem totaling 10-plus wins again.

6. Felix Hernandez, 22, Seattle Mariners
“King” Felix is another young pitcher that just can’t stay healthy. While he’s pitched better than his 2-5 record indicates, it’s clear that the soreness in his calf has bothered him of late. Hernandez has one of the best arms in all of baseball and his power curve is outstanding. But if he can’t stay healthy, then he’ll never reach his full potential. Still, at only 22, he’s got plenty of time to mature and hopefully he’ll be more durable with a refined in-season conditioning program.

7. Clayton Kershaw, 20, Los Angeles Dodgers
Kershaw has only one major league start, but it’s easy to get excited about the youngster’s potential. He has a great fastball that tops off at 96 mph and an outstanding curve. He’ll need to work on his changeup, but once that develops, he’ll have an evil three-pitch repertoire. The Dodgers can’t rush the 20-year old, but he has a good, live arm and there’s always a high demand for lefties so they’ll be tempting to keep him in the majors.

8. Matt Cain, 23, San Francisco Giants
Don’t look at his overall record, because it’s not pretty. If the Giants could ever give him some run support, Cain could easily be a 15-win pitcher every season. He has one of the best live fastballs in the league and he’s incredibly durable. He’s been more inconsistent this year than in his two previous seasons, but his strikeouts are always high and at only 23, he hasn’t even sniffed his potential. It would be interesting to see what he could do on a team that averaged more than three runs per game.

9. Edinson Volquez, 24, Cincinnati Reds
Where did this guy come from? In three seasons with the Rangers, Volquez was 3-11 with an ERA just south of 10.0. Now in his first season with the Reds, he has a major-league best 1.31 ERA and a 7-2 record. He also has 76 strikeouts this year and has only walked 33 batters. Is he a one-year (or even half-season) fluke? Maybe. But the same could have been said about Fausto Carmona this time last year and he looks like the real deal. Maybe a change of scenery and a chance to be a full-time starter has inspired the youngster, either way, Volquez has been one of the best surprises in 2008.

10. Clay Buchholz, 23, Boston Red Sox
Buchholz is off to a rocky start in his first full season as a starter, recording a 2-3 record with a 5.53 ERA, but as evidence from his no-hitter in his major league debut last year, he has excellent stuff. And he arguably has a higher ceiling than teammate Jon Lester, as well as other top prospects Franklin Morales (Rockies) and Homer Bailey (Reds). He’ll go through growing pains, but Buchholz is in a great situation in Boston and will have plenty of opportunity to succeed.

Crazy Coaching Moves

Florida Atlantic announced this week that Mike Jarvis will be their new basketball coach. This is the same Mike Jarvis whose St. John’s program deteriorated to the bottom of the Big East. The same Coach Jarvis whose program was put on NCAA probation for paying players. The same Coach Jarvis whose George Washington program detriorated in his last copuple of years to the bottom of the Atlantic 10.

Not that I don’t believe in second chances, but give me a break. Once again college administrators have proven that if you have a successful record on the court (Jarvis did have good seasons early in his tenure at both schools) then what happens off the court doesn’t matter. After a two-year stint working with Athletes in Action (Christian organization), his image has been rehabilitated. But come on! Isn’t it time that college presidents walk the walk?

Until these college presidents stop hiring coaches who have broken serious NCAA rules, the whole system will remain a sham. Remember the president of Georgia when he hired Jim Harrick after his rules violations at UCLA? He extolled how Harrick had learned his lessons. Obviously, he didn’t learn them well enough because he was part of the biggest scandal in Georgia basketball history.

Now I am not saying that Jarvis has not learned his lessons or doesn’t deserve another chance, but there are too many coaches out there with proven integrity who should be given the same chance. However, there is one thing that Jarvis has proven and that is he can win games. And that is all that matters to most college administrators!

Crazy Coaching Move, Part 2: Kansas State announced today that they have signed Associate Head coach Dalonte Hill to a five-year contract worth $420,000 per year. Are you kidding me? That’s more money than what 90% of the head coaches make in Division I. And for what? He delivered Michael Beasley. The one-year wonder who helped Kansas State make the NCAA tournament, where they won a single game.

His salary is more than the the combined salary of the entire assistant staff at Kansas. And they won a National Championship. And they have reloaded with NBA talent. Meanwhile, K-State is left without a single potential NBA player on their roster or incoming recruit with any buzz of a NBA future. Couple that with an irresponsible DUI charge during the season and it makes you wonder what the new Athletic Director at K-State was thinking. That type of money should be left for proven coaches who are the whole package. For a great cost comparison check out the article by Jason Whitlock of the Kansas City Star.

« Older posts Newer posts »