<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Scores Report - The National Sports Blog &#187; Trade Tom Brady</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scoresreport.com/tag/trade-tom-brady/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scoresreport.com</link>
	<description>The National Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:57:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Patriots franchise tag Matt Cassel</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/02/06/patriots-franchise-tag-matt-cassel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/02/06/patriots-franchise-tag-matt-cassel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cassel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cassel franchise tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cassel franchised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patriots franchise Matt Cassel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patriots should trade Matt Cassel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patriots should trade Tom Brady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Brady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Matt Cassel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Tom Brady]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=13225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Patriots didn’t waste any time regarding their decision whether or not to franchise quarterback Matt Cassel. On the first day the option become available, New England placed the non-exclusive franchise tag on Cassel, who will make $14.65 million once he signs the tender offer. In the event a trade market does not develop, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Patriots didn’t waste any time regarding their decision whether or not to franchise quarterback Matt Cassel. On the first day the option become available, New England placed the <a href="http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/articles/2009/02/06/patriots_move_fast_on_cassel/" target="_blank">non-exclusive franchise tag on Cassel</a>, who will make $14.65 million once he signs the tender offer.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/09/09/matt_cassel_3.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="photo_right" border="0" width="200" height="281" src="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/09/09/matt_cassel_3.jpg" alt="Matt Cassel" /></a>In the event a trade market does not develop, the Patriots would be tying up $29.2 million of their approximately $123 million salary cap on two players. That runs counter to the philosophy that has helped the Patriots thrive this decade, spreading the wealth to more players, and could handcuff other moves, such as signing nose tackle Vince Wilfork to an extension.</p>
<p>The Patriots chose the less restrictive of the two franchise tags.</p>
<p>The exclusive franchise tag would have prohibited other teams from negotiating with Cassel. A non-exclusive franchise player is free to negotiate with other teams, but if he signs an offer sheet, the original team has a right to match.</p>
<p>If the original team does not match, it receives two first-round draft picks. Because of that steep price, franchise-tagged players are seldom signed to offer sheets.</p></blockquote>
<p>This was a move that had to be done. Now the Patriots can see what the market (if any) is for Cassel and then they can plan their next step. If they trade Cassel, they’ll likely receive multiple draft picks in exchange and they won’t have to soak that much money into their quarterback position next year. If they can’t move him, then maybe they’ll contemplate trading Brady and working on a long-term deal for Cassel, who is six years younger and not coming off major knee surgery. The Pats could also hang onto Cassel in the event Brady has a set back in his recovery this offseason and use him as an expensive security blanket next season.</p>
<p>Regardless of what move they ultimately make, the first step was franchising Cassel and not letting him walk without getting anything in return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/02/06/patriots-franchise-tag-matt-cassel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten things to look forward to now that the Super Bowl is over</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/02/02/ten-things-to-look-forward-to-now-that-the-super-bowl-is-over/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/02/02/ten-things-to-look-forward-to-now-that-the-super-bowl-is-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[College Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 NFL Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A.J. Smith LaDainian Tomlinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anquan Boldin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anquan Boldin Cardinals trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Stalter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona Cardinals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltimore Ravens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltimore Ravens rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bart Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brett Favre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brett Favre retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt McCoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darren Sproles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Lions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Lions number one pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donovan McNabb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Matthew Stafford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Schwartz Detroit Lions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurt Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurt Warner free agent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurt Warner rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LaDainian Tomlinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Fitzgerald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Mayhew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cassel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Leinart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Stafford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Turner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia Eagles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rex Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Bradford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Chargers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Breaston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl XLIII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrell Suggs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Brady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 10 lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 10 sports lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 10 things to look forward to after the Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade LaDainian Tomlinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Tom Brady]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=13043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.emqb.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/anquan-boldin2_nc.jpg" target="_blank"><img height="298" width="477" src="http://www.emqb.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/anquan-boldin2_nc.jpg" alt="" /></a>

<em><a href="http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/02/01/six-pack-of-observations-super-bowl-xliii/">Click here for six observations on Super Bowl XLIII.</a></em>

Lucifer himself might as well have created the Monday after Super Bowl Sunday. 

Is that extreme? No.

The Monday after the Super Bowl signals the end of another NFL season and that means there is no football on the horizon unless you’re one of the 10 people that watches the Pro Bowl. There are seven months between now and the start of preseason games, which makes me sick to think about. If I could freeze myself for the next seven months and thaw just in time for the 2009 season, I would.

Is that extreme? No.

But fear not my football friends because even though there isn’t any football this Sunday, it doesn’t mean there isn’t plenty to get excited about while looking ahead. Below are 10 things to look forward to now that the Super Bowl is over. (And so that you don’t have to freeze yourself for the next seven months.)

Before you read on, realize that I’m not going to copout and write about how free agency and the draft are things to look forward to. Of course they are, but let’s get more specific here, people.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.emqb.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/anquan-boldin2_nc.jpg" target="_blank"><img height="298" width="477" src="http://www.emqb.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/anquan-boldin2_nc.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/02/01/six-pack-of-observations-super-bowl-xliii/">Click here for six observations on Super Bowl XLIII.</a></em></p>
<p>Lucifer himself might as well have created the Monday after Super Bowl Sunday. </p>
<p>Is that extreme? No.</p>
<p>The Monday after the Super Bowl signals the end of another NFL season and that means there is no football on the horizon unless you’re one of the 10 people that watches the Pro Bowl. There are seven months between now and the start of preseason games, which makes me sick to think about. If I could freeze myself for the next seven months and thaw just in time for the 2009 season, I would.</p>
<p>Is that extreme? No.</p>
<p>But fear not my football friends because even though there isn’t any football this Sunday, it doesn’t mean there isn’t plenty to get excited about while looking ahead. Below are 10 things to look forward to now that the Super Bowl is over.</p>
<p>Before you read on, realize that I’m not going to cop out and write about how free agency and the draft are things to look forward to. Of course they are, but let’s get more specific here, people.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/14793597@N07/2232611533/" target="_blank"><img class="photo_right" border="0" width="200" height="333" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2123/2232611533_b8e2123d22.jpg?v=0" alt="Tom Brady" /></a><strong>1. The Patriots’ decision regarding Tom Brady and Matt Cassel.</strong><br />
The Patriots are faced with arguably the biggest decision of any team this offseason. Brady has won multiple Super Bowls for the organization, has been the face of the franchise for almost a decade and he’s one of the Pats’ most outspoken leaders. But he’s also coming off major knee surgery, is 32 years old and his backup (Cassel) is younger and had a productive season as a fill-in. Cassel is also an unrestricted free agent, which makes this situation even more intriguing. Rumor has it that the Pats will franchise Cassel, but that’s a risky move because they would have to pay him $14.65 million for one year. If New England went that route, they would have nearly $30 million tied up in the quarterback position next year and Cassel might not even take a snap if Brady recovers in time for the start of the season. Another option would be to re-sign Cassel to a long-term contract and then trade Brady, but that’s easier said than done. Even though Brady’s a multiple Super Bowl winner, the Pats would still have to find a suitor willing to take on his injury concerns and contract. Of course, New England could keep Brady and allow Cassel to walk, but then they would have to hope golden boy Tom is healthy, and have a backup option in place in case he does get hurt again. Either way, the Pats have one hell of a decision to make soon.</p>
<p><strong>2. Will the Cardinals trade Anquan Boldin?</strong><br />
On the surface, this situation isn’t too complicated. Boldin wants to be paid like a No. 1 receiver, but the Cardinals want him to honor the contact extension he signed in 2005, which won’t make him a free agent until 2011. If Boldin doesn’t get paid, he wants Arizona to trade him, but the Cardinals just got done playing in the Super Bowl and would love to keep their dynamic passing game intact for next season. Will the Cardinals pony up? They might not have to. Larry Fitzgerald once again proved this season that he is the team’s No. 1 and while Boldin remains highly underrated, Steve Breaston is more than capable of being the Cards’ No. 2. The team could find another wideout to play the slot either via the draft or free agency. Plus if they trade Boldin, they could acquire multiple draft picks to use to strengthen other areas on the team, including offensive line and defense. But if Fitz is willing to rework his contract in order to help keep Boldin, then obviously Arizona is a much better team with him than without him.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/13819939@N05/1468287791/" target="_blank"><img style="float:right;margin:6px 0 5px 5px;" src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1373/1468287791_16f2a2bc26.jpg?v=0" border="0" width="193" height="250" alt="" /></a><strong>3. Will the Lions draft a quarterback with the first overall pick?</strong><br />
The Lions have a new general manager in Martin Mayhew and it’s unclear at this point what they’ll do with the first pick in the draft. Some mock drafts have Detroit selecting Georgia quarterback Matthew Stafford first overall, while others suggest Alabama offensive tackle Andre Smith should be the team’s first pick. With the success that rookie signal callers Matt Ryan and Joe Flacco had last year, many draft pundits will probably urge the Lions to take a franchise quarterback. But taking a quarterback in the first round (especially in the top 10) has proved to be a fatal move for teams in the past and the Lions’ offensive line is one of the worst in the league. Perhaps Mayhew’s plan for free agency will be a telltale sign of what the Lions do come draft day. If the GM decides to rebuild the offensive line, Stafford might be the pick. But considering new head coach Jim Schwartz’s background is in defense, Mayhew might spend the entire offseason rebuilding on that side of the ball and then target quarterbacks Sam Bradford or Colt McCoy next year.</p>
<p><strong>4. Donovan McNabb’s situation in Philadelphia.</strong><br />
McNabb is under contract with the Eagles until 2013, but according to several sources, he’s only signed through 2010, which is why he and the team are talking about a possible contract extension. Let the rumor mill start. Some media outlets claim that McNabb wants out of Philly, while others suggest that he wants to retire an Eagle. The fact that Andy Reid benched McNabb for former second-round pick Kevin Kolb in a game against the Ravens earlier this season adds intrigue. But I guess before anyone gets too wrapped up in the McNabb-Eagles offseason story, more information has to be released about his contract. If he’s under contract through 2012, there’s no sense in buying the rumors that he won’t be an Eagle next year. But if his contract is up, there are seemingly endless possibilities in this situation.</p>
<p><strong>5. Brett Favre…the saga continues.</strong><br />
If this were a list of “top 10 things not to look forward to now that the Super Bowl is over”, this same exact topic would be listed. Favre’s retirement dance is brutal, but it makes for good drama. Jets’ owner Woody Johnson recently said that if Favre isn’t in OTA’s this spring, he wouldn’t be with the team next year. Peter King thinks that Favre will retire. Methinks that unless Favre isn’t in uniform next year, then he won’t retire. He’ll never retire…ever.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nflravens/2890769999/" target="_blank"><img class="photo_right" border="0" width="250" height="192" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2059/2890769999_c12d767d66.jpg?v=0" alt="Ray Lewis" /></a><strong>6. What will the Ravens do about their linebacker corps?</strong><br />
Ray Lewis, Bart Scott and Terrell Suggs are all set to become free agents this offseason. The Cowboys are reportedly willing to spend upwards of $30 million to acquire Lewis, but that’s just a rumor at this point. If you’re Baltimore and another team wants to spend that kind of money on an aging linebacker, you might have to let him walk. Scott is highly underrated and Suggs is one of the premier pass-rushers in the league. Both players are also younger (Scott is 28, Suggs is 26) than Lewis and the Ravens can’t afford to lose all three players, especially considering their defensive coordinator (Rex Ryan) just became the new head coach of the Jets. Baltimore finally found a franchise quarterback in Joe Flacco and an offense that can score points and now their defense could be falling apart.</p>
<p><strong>7. Will Kurt Warner stick around?</strong><br />
Warner proved that he has plenty left in the tank after leading the Cardinals to the Super Bowl, but he’s no spring chicken at 37 years old and he’s set to become one of the more sought after free agent quarterbacks on the market. While Arizona might be the best fit for him, this will likely be his last opportunity to get a decent-sized contract and while the Cardinals would love to have him back, Matt Leinart is still waiting in the wings to take over the reins again (again). Warner’s agent recently said he’d test the market, but it’ll be interesting to see how many teams will pursue him given his age and decreasing arm strength.</p>
<p><strong>8. Scott Pioli’s first offseason in Kansas City.</strong><br />
It’s time to see what the mastermind behind the Patriots’ drafts this past decade can do outside of New England. The situation in Kansas City is a mess and it’ll be interesting to see whom Pioli hires to replace Herman Edwards at head coach. He has a plethora of candidates, but will he hire a veteran like Jon Gruden or go with an unknown? It’ll also be interesting to see what he does in his first draft, with the Chiefs in need at all positions. KC needs to rebuild the offensive line, has tons of holes on defense and unless Pioli thinks Tyler Thigpen is the answer, he’ll probably look at quarterback this offseason, too. Chiefs fans have one hell of a busy offseason to look forward to.</p>
<p><strong>9. Is LaDainian Tomlinson done in San Diego?</strong><br />
By now, most people understand the situation in San Diego. Tomlinson is coming off his worst season as a pro, isn’t getting any younger and his backup is a free agent. All of this has spurned the idea that GM A.J. Smith will trade or release LT this offseason, re-sign Darren Sproles and then concentrate on landing another back either in free agency or the draft. But when you stop and think about it, the Chargers obviously didn’t think LT was on his last legs last offseason when they didn’t try and persuade Michael Turner to stick around. Had they known Tomlinson was done, they would have taken preemptive measures in trying to keep Turner and pair him with Sproles. Tomlinson is still under contract and Sproles is likely to test the free agent market. So maybe Smith’s decision isn’t as tough as everyone thinks and LT will remain a Charger for at least the 2009 season. Or Smith could part ways with the most productive back in team history and then the fun really begins.</p>
<p><strong>10. Mock Drafts &#8211; in all of their glory.</strong><br />
All right, I had to do one less specified thing to look forward to this offseason. Mock drafts &#8211; are they pointless? Yeah. But you know damn well that you’ve already Googled over hundreds of them. Don’t lie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/02/02/ten-things-to-look-forward-to-now-that-the-super-bowl-is-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Tom Brady throwing passes</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/28/report-tom-brady-throwing-passes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/28/report-tom-brady-throwing-passes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors & Gossip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franchise tag Matt Cassel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cassel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Brady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Brady 2009 season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Brady knee surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Brady recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Brady to play 2009 season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Matt Cassel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Tom Brady]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=12764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the Boston Globe, Tom Brady’s recovery from ACL and MCL surgery is on track for the 2009 season opener and he’s even started to throw passes. While the Patriots obviously want Brady, the 2007 NFL MVP, back for the start of the 2009 season, the greater concern is how strong the knee will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the <em>Boston Globe</em>, Tom Brady’s recovery from ACL and MCL surgery is on track for the 2009 season opener and <a href="http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/articles/2009/01/27/source_brady_on_track_for_opener/" target="_blank">he’s even started to throw passes</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/14793597@N07/2232611533/" target="_blank"><img class="photo_right" border="0" width="200" height="333" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2123/2232611533_b8e2123d22.jpg?v=0" alt="Tom Brady" /></a>While the Patriots obviously want Brady, the 2007 NFL MVP, back for the start of the 2009 season, the greater concern is how strong the knee will be when he returns, how long the knee will hold up, and how it will affect his play.</p>
<p>Brady, who turns 32 in August, and the Patriots likely will not have definitive answers to those questions until this summer, when the quarterback can test himself in game-like situations at training camp.</p>
<p>All the more reason for the Patriots to place the franchise tag on backup quarterback Matt Cassel, who proved a more than capable starter while filling in for Brady. The Patriots can&#8217;t franchise Cassel, preventing the QB from becoming an unrestricted free agent, until Feb. 5.</p>
<p>Still, the latest reports on Brady&#8217;s knee seem more encouraging than a month ago, when an NBCSports.com report said both the ACL and MCL were loose and a second reconstructive surgery would be required to repair the problem.</p>
<p>The report said the second surgery could cost Brady the 2009 season.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Pats must franchise Cassel to protect themselves if Brady doesn’t recover. Sure, a lot of cap space will be eaten up at the quarterback position next year if they do tag Cassel, but it’s better to have him as a security blanket so if Brady goes down again, their entire season doesn&#8217;t go down the drain because they don’t have an experienced backup.</p>
<p>Tagging Cassel buys the Pats one year to figure out what they want to do long-term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/28/report-tom-brady-throwing-passes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brady to start next year on PUP list?</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/07/brady-to-start-next-year-on-pup-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/07/brady-to-start-next-year-on-pup-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cassel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cassel franchise tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cassel vs. Tom Brady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Brady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Brady PUP list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Matt Cassel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Tom Brady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What will the Patriots do with Matt Cassel and Tom Brad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=11791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Tom Curran of NBC Sports, Tom Brady could start the 2009 NFL Season on the Pats’ PUP list. But the timing just doesn’t work for the Patriots to allow Cassel to leave. Even though Brady went the aggressive route by having his reconstructive surgery relatively early (many doctors recommend waiting for the MCL [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Tom Curran of <a href="http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/28527539/" target="_blank">NBC Sports</a>, Tom Brady could start the 2009 NFL Season on the Pats’ PUP list.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/27611217@N05/2858056202/" target="_blank"><img class="photo_right" border="0" width="200" height="246" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3039/2858056202_cdd7573849.jpg?v=0" alt="Matt Cassel" /></a>But the timing just doesn’t work for the Patriots to allow Cassel to leave. Even though Brady went the aggressive route by having his reconstructive surgery relatively early (many doctors recommend waiting for the MCL to heal on its own before going in to repair the ACL), the infection that began near the repaired MCL required six weeks of antibiotics and irrigation. The significant scar tissue that built up during that period still had not been removed as of last week, leaving Brady with limited range of motion. Until the scar tissue comes out (and a two-to-three week period of recovery from that process is observed) and range of motion improves, a productive rehab can’t begin. With the start of training camp seven months away and the season opener nine months out, Brady may wind up beginning the 2009 season on the Physically Unable to Perform (PUP) list. Players placed on that list are eligible to begin playing in Week 6.</p></blockquote>
<p>There’s really no decision to be made – the Patriots have to pony up and tag Cassel. If they don’t, they could wind up forcing Brady (or Tom could force himself) back onto the field too soon and then disaster could strike again. But if they tag and pay Cassel, the team can go into next season with more security at quarterback.</p>
<p>The Pats’ decision on what to do with Tom Brady won’t be made over the next few months. The decision will be made over the course of the next year. If Brady is placed on the PUP list, the team can watch Cassel play for another six weeks. If he progresses, then maybe it’s time to move into the Cassel era. If he digresses or is sub par, then Brady can step him – fully healthy – and resume his starting quarterback duties.</p>
<p>I think both quarterbacks will be on New England’s roster next season. And this is exactly why the Pats never spend big on free agents – so that they have the cap room when they need it (i.e. like right now).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/07/brady-to-start-next-year-on-pup-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patriots to use franchise tag on Matt Cassel?</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/02/patriots-to-use-franchise-tag-on-matt-cassel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/02/patriots-to-use-franchise-tag-on-matt-cassel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cassel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cassel franchise tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cassel vs. Tom Brady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Brady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Matt Cassel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Tom Brady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What will the Patriots do with Matt Cassel and Tom Brad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=11540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New England Patriots have quite the decision to make regarding quarterback Matt Cassel, who becomes an unrestricted free agent at the end of the year. They could allow the young signal caller to walk, franchise tag him and keep him, franchise tag him and trade him or re-sign him and ship multiple Super Bowl [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/27611217@N05/2858056202/" target="_blank"><img class="photo_right" border="0" width="200" height="246" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3039/2858056202_cdd7573849.jpg?v=0" alt="Matt Cassel" /></a>The New England Patriots have quite the decision to make regarding quarterback Matt Cassel, who becomes an unrestricted free agent at the end of the year. They could allow the young signal caller to walk, franchise tag him and keep him, franchise tag him and trade him or re-sign him and ship multiple Super Bowl winner Tom Brady elsewhere. (The last option I discussed <a href="http://www.scoresreport.com/2008/12/19/could-the-patriots-trade-tom-brady-in-the-offseason/">in more detail a couple weeks ago</a>.)</p>
<p>NationalFootballPost.com writer Mike Lombardi <a href="http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/playerbreakingnews.asp?sport=NFL&#038;id=3237&#038;line=137073&#038;spln=1" target="_blank">recently provided some insight</a> on which way the Pats are leaning:</p>
<blockquote><p>NationalFootballPost.com writer Mike Lombardi, speaking on Inside the NFL, said the Patriots will place the franchise tag on Matt Cassel.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Patriots are way too smart, and I’ve talked to people in the organization,&#8221; Lombardi said. The former Raiders GM worked under Bill Belichick in Cleveland. While this may just be informed speculation, it&#8217;s the likely move. Cassel is a huge asset and the Patriots can either work out a short-term contract or trade him after using the tag.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree with Rotoworld.com – the Patriots will likely tag Cassel and then figure out what their next move is. Maybe the team will know more about Brady’s recovery and whether or not he’s going to be ready next season. If Brady continues to recover slowly (which seems to be the current notion), than maybe the Pats will eventually make Cassel their long-term answer and deal Brady in the offseason.</p>
<p>This will be one the best storylines this offseason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/02/patriots-to-use-franchise-tag-on-matt-cassel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could the Patriots trade Tom Brady in the offseason?</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2008/12/19/could-the-patriots-trade-tom-brady-in-the-offseason/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2008/12/19/could-the-patriots-trade-tom-brady-in-the-offseason/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cassel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Cassel vs. Tom Brady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England Patriots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL Week 16]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Brady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Tom Brady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What will the Patriots do with Matt Cassel and Tom Brad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=11024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The majority of people who read the title of this post probably uttered one of two things to themselves: 1) “What? Stop trying to stir the pot by throwing crap against the wall in efforts to see if it sticks. Moron…” OR… 2) “You don’t part ways with a three-time Super Bowl champion just because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/24084631@N06/2775700568/" target="_blank"><img class="photo_right" border="0" width="200" height="333" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3229/2775700568_fcfef51a89.jpg?v=0" alt="Matt Cassel" /></a>The majority of people who read the title of this post probably uttered one of two things to themselves:</p>
<p>1) “What? Stop trying to stir the pot by throwing crap against the wall in efforts to see if it sticks. Moron…”</p>
<p>OR…</p>
<p>2) “You don’t part ways with a three-time Super Bowl champion just because Matt Cassel has had one decent season. Moron…”</p>
<p>For those of you that fit into one of the above categories, I don’t blame you for having those thoughts – or calling me a moron. But just take a moment and think about the situation for a second, because the idea isn’t that far-fetched.</p>
<p>There currently is no timetable set for Brady’s return after having season-ending knee surgery earlier this year. He might not even be ready to play at the start of next season, which leaves the Patriots in a tough predicament. Do they allow Cassel to leave via free agency next offseason and risk going into 2009 with hopes Brady is ready to play? Or do they allow Cassel to walk, sign a veteran who’ll play for the minimum and hold Brady’s spot until he’s ready to start again?</p>
<p>Or do they sign a much younger (and now experienced) Matt Cassel, trade Brady for multiple draft picks (which could be used to get younger on defense) and head into a new era with a new quarterback? Brady is 32 and while guys like Kurt Warner and Jeff Garcia have proven that quarterbacks can still be highly efficient past their 35th birthday, there’s no guarantee that Tom will ever be as effective as he was before the knee surgery. </p>
<p>Whether the Patriots or their fan base want to admit it, the team faces major questions this offseason. And while it might be ludicrous to think about parting ways with a Super Bowl MVP quarterback, Cassel has proven that he can step into Bill Belichick’s offensive system and succeed.</p>
<p>Comment fodder: You’re in charge of the Patriots next offseason. Do you allow Cassel to walk and remain loyal to the man that got you multiple titles this decade? Or in the wake of Brady’s season-ending injury, would you start preparing for the future with Cassel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2008/12/19/could-the-patriots-trade-tom-brady-in-the-offseason/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

