<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Scores Report - The National Sports Blog &#187; Stanford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scoresreport.com/tag/stanford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scoresreport.com</link>
	<description>The National Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:13:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oklahoma goes down at home against Texas Tech</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2011/10/23/oklahoma-goes-down-at-home-against-texas-tech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2011/10/23/oklahoma-goes-down-at-home-against-texas-tech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 12:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[College Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Luck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCS controversy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCS corrupt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCS corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCS defenders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCS flaws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCS mockery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCS money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCS scenarios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCS unfair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[busting the BCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football playoff system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idiotic BCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landry Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAA football playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=59424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No. 3 Oklahoma couldn&#8217;t overcome an early deficit as they lost to Texas Tech 41-38. The much-hyped Sooners&#8217; defense gave up 572 total yards to the Red Raiders along with the 41 points, pretty much destroying any notion that they belonged in the National Championship game. Meanwhile Landry Jones completed 30 of 55 passes in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. 3 Oklahoma couldn&#8217;t overcome an early deficit as they lost to Texas Tech 41-38. The much-hyped Sooners&#8217; defense gave up 572 total yards to the Red Raiders along with the 41 points, pretty much destroying any notion that they belonged in the National Championship game. Meanwhile Landry Jones completed 30 of 55 passes in the shootout for 412 yards and 5 touchdowns against one interception.</p>
<p>This result will shake up the BCS rankings, as No. 4 Wisconsin also <a href="http://www.scoresreport.com/2011/10/22/michigan-state-stuns-wisconsin/">lost a heart-breaker to Michigan State</a>. Few people have been talking about No. 8 Stanford, but with Andrew Luck at the helm, they might pose the most interesting challenge to the eventual SEC winner if that&#8217;s how things play out. Last night Luck barely had to break a sweat in Stanford&#8217;s 65-21 thrashing of No. 25 Washington, as the running game for Stanford exploded for 446 yards and 5 touchdowns.</p>
<p>Of course the entire BCS discussion is ridiculous. Oklahoma is still a very good team, and if we had a sensible 8-team playoff for example, the Sooners would have a chance to redeem themselves and learn from this loss. Unfortunately, that notion doesn&#8217;t exist often in college football unless everyone ends up losing a game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2011/10/23/oklahoma-goes-down-at-home-against-texas-tech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stanford&#8217;s Owen Marecic scores on offense and on defense [video]</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2010/09/27/stanfords-owen-marecic-scores-on-offense-and-on-defense-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2010/09/27/stanfords-owen-marecic-scores-on-offense-and-on-defense-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paulsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[College Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notre Dame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owen Marecic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=46582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="477" height="287"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZnzmNUcLG2M?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZnzmNUcLG2M?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="477" height="287"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2010/09/27/stanfords-owen-marecic-scores-on-offense-and-on-defense-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carroll says he won’t forget Harbaugh, Stanford’s 2-point attempt</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/20/carroll-says-he-won%e2%80%99t-forget-harbaugh-stanford%e2%80%99s-2-point-attempt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/20/carroll-says-he-won%e2%80%99t-forget-harbaugh-stanford%e2%80%99s-2-point-attempt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[College Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 College Football Week 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Harbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Harbaugh Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Carroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Carroll Jim Harbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Carroll Stanford two point conversation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Carroll two point conversation comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford goes for two against USC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford USC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford USC two point conversation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=29420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[USC’s Pete Carroll says he’s over Stanford head coach John Harbaugh going for two when the Cardinal were already up 48-21 in the second half of their victory over the Trojans last Saturday. But Carroll also said that he wouldn’t forget about the play either. From SPORTSbyBROOKS.com: MASON: What do you think, now a couple [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.fotoglif.com/f/j3mmtmfrn0o1/5xoy039wyv1e"><img id="fotoglif_5xoy039wyv1e" title="" alt="" style="width:468px" src="http://gallery.fotoglif.com/images/large/5xoy039wyv1e.jpg" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>USC’s Pete Carroll says he’s over Stanford head coach John Harbaugh going for two when the Cardinal were already up 48-21 in the second half of their victory over the Trojans last Saturday. But Carroll also said that he wouldn’t forget about the play either.</p>
<p><a href="http://digg.com/d31AbVT" target="_blank">From SPORTSbyBROOKS.com</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>MASON:</strong> What do you think, now a couple of days removed, of Harbaugh going for the two-point conversion?</p>
<p><strong>CARROLL:</strong> Well, really, even since the time that it happened, you know, I haven’t bothered with it, and I know everybody else has and taken a lot of time to kinda discuss it and all. I think, you know, it is what you think it is, you know, it’s a statement that you can take away that maybe they were trying to accomplish something that seems out of the ordinary, you know, I don’t really care, to tell you the truth, it doesn’t matter.</p>
<p>And when you look at it like, uh, they’re ahead in the game and they’re in command of it, they really get to do whatever they want to do, and it doesn’t bother me to worry about it anymore, you know what I mean? Jim came out and said what he wanted to say, you know, a couple different times about it and, you know, to me it’s dropped, I don’t care.<br />
Will I forget it? No, I’m not forgetting it. But uh, you know, to me, it’s in the past.</p></blockquote>
<p>What’s funny is that everyone is concentrating on how Stanford went for two to make a statement to USC, but what Carroll and everyone needs to focus on is that the Cardinal whipped the Trojans’ ass for four quarters. It wasn’t just one play; Stanford owned USC on the Trojans’ home field for 60 minutes. That’s the bigger deal.</p>
<p>So Carroll truly does need to forget about the one play (albeit, an embarrassing play) and concentrate on what has happened this year to his program. To hell with the two-point conversation: How does that once stout USC defense allow 36 (Oregon State), 47 (Oregon) and 55 (Stanford) points over the course of a four game span?</p>
<p><em><br />Photo from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.fotoglif.com/f/j3mmtmfrn0o1/5xoy039wyv1e">fOTOGLIF</a><br /></em><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.fotoglif.com/embed_login.js?hash=j3mmtmfrn0o1&#038;size=medium&#038;imageuid=4740670&#038;layout=&#038;jpgembed=yes&#038;pubid=undefined"></script></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/20/carroll-says-he-won%e2%80%99t-forget-harbaugh-stanford%e2%80%99s-2-point-attempt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Heisman Barometer: Week 12</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/19/2009-heisman-barometer-week-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/19/2009-heisman-barometer-week-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[College Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Heisman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Heisman Trophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Ingram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Ingram Heisman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Tebow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Tebow Heisman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toby Gerhart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toby Gerhart Heisman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=29383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Draft Zoo.com writes that Stanford’s Toby Gerhart and Alabama’s Mark Ingram has seen their draft stock rise over the past couple weeks and now ranks them No. 1 and No. 2 on their Heisman Barometer. 1. Toby Gerhart, RB, Stanford Once again, a guy who might not have a real shot at winning the award. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.fotoglif.com/f/j3mmtmfrn0o1/p2bswhij607x"><img id="fotoglif_p2bswhij607x" title="" alt="" style="width:468px" src="http://gallery.fotoglif.com/images/large/p2bswhij607x.jpg" border="0" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://draftzoo.com/2009/11/professor-mikes-five-lessons-key-stats-and-heisman-barometer-2/" target="_blank">Draft Zoo.com</a> writes that Stanford’s Toby Gerhart and Alabama’s Mark Ingram has seen their draft stock rise over the past couple weeks and now ranks them No. 1 and No. 2 on their Heisman Barometer.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>1.  Toby Gerhart, RB, Stanford</strong><br />
Once again, a guy who might not have a real shot at winning the award.  Mark Ingram looks poised to become Alabama’s first Heisman recipient ever, and I’m not trying to take anything away from him, but I don’t think the Tide would struggle without him.  Stanford, on the other hand, doesn’t beat USC without their junior tailback.  He’s a deceptively quick bulldozer who has the Cardinal on the right track to getting back to the Rose Bowl.  One loss from Oregon, and a Pac 10 title could be just enough help to give Gerhart the hardware.  At the very least, he’s my number one.</p>
<p>Last Week’s Stats:  178 Rushing Yards, 3 TDs</p>
<p><strong>2.  Mark Ingram, RB, Alabama</strong><br />
He’s probably the realistic frontrunner right now, and it’s not like he doesn’t deserve it.  1297 rushing yards, 13 total TDs, and a 6.7 ypc average.  Not bad at all, especially through only 10 games.  But the biggest reason that Ingram’s looking like a lock to become the second sophomore to win the Heisman is the fact that his team is undefeated.  One big test left against Florida in the SEC championship.  Win that one and head to Pasadena for the big game and Mark can vote for himself next year.</p></blockquote>
<p>As Draft Zoo points out, Gerhart is unlikely to win the award but the way he has come on as of late, it’s hard to argue that he doesn’t at least deserve some mention.</p>
<p>If you haven’t see Gerhart play, you’re really missing out. He’s a load to bring down and looked damn near unstoppable against Oregon and USC the past two weeks. He’s one of those guys that can put his entire team on his back and carry them and it’s no wonder that more pundits are starting to talk about him as a legit NFL prospect.</p>
<p>People keep talking about how Tim Tebow is the front-runner to win this year’s Heisman, but I just don’t see it. Can anyone objectively say that Tebow has done enough to merit the award? Considering how much talent he has around him (and I’m not just talking about offense), I’m not sure you can.</p>
<p>Unless he comes out and puts on a show against Alabama and whomever Florida plays in the national championship if the Gators can beat the Tide in the SEC title game, then I don’t see Tebow taking home the hardware this season.</p>
<p><em><br />Photo from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.fotoglif.com/f/j3mmtmfrn0o1/p2bswhij607x">fOTOGLIF</a><br /></em><script type="text/javascript" src="http://fotoglif.com/embed_login.js?hash=j3mmtmfrn0o1&#038;size=medium&#038;imageuid=4740606&#038;layout=&#038;jpgembed=yes&#038;pubid=undefined"></script></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/19/2009-heisman-barometer-week-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim Harbaugh squashes Michigan rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/18/jim-harbaugh-squashes-michigan-rumors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/18/jim-harbaugh-squashes-michigan-rumors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[College Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 College Football Week 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cal vs. Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Harbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Harbaugh Michigan head coach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Harbaugh Michigan rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michgian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan head coaching rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Rodriguez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=29323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stanford head coach Jim Harbaugh recently was asked on Sirius XM’s “Mad Dog Radio” if he would be interested in coaching at Michigan if things didn’t work out with current Wolverine coach Rich Rodriguez. His response (via the Detroit Free Press): Host Bruce Murray: “You are a hot prospect now in college football. You are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.fotoglif.com/f/8rog6od2gkje/ebdkmruaqoie"><img id="fotoglif_ebdkmruaqoie" title="" alt="" style="width:468px" src="http://gallery.fotoglif.com/images/large/ebdkmruaqoie.jpg" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Stanford head coach Jim Harbaugh recently was asked on Sirius XM’s “Mad Dog Radio” if he would be interested in coaching at Michigan if things didn’t work out with current Wolverine coach Rich Rodriguez.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20091117/SPORTS06/91117057/1356/SPORTS/Harbaugh-refuses-to-get-into-U-M-speculation" target="_blank">His response (via the <em>Detroit Free Press</em>)</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Host Bruce Murray:</strong> “You are a hot prospect now in college football. You are going to be sought after. Do you have outs to go to other jobs should they present themselves in your contract?”</p>
<p><strong>Jim Harbaugh:</strong> “Well, I love Stanford and I love the football players here and the coaches here. I’m not going to specifically discuss my contract but I hope to have the honor of coaching here, Bruce, for a very long time.”</p>
<p><strong>Murray:</strong> “But you’ve heard the rumors and I’m not saying that you would entertain it. You know if something doesn’t work out with Rich Rodriguez at Michigan, as an alum you’re going to be called by them … ”</p>
<p><strong>Harbaugh:</strong> “Let me just stop you right there, Bruce. This is big game week. This is Cal week, and as you would understand, all my focus and our focus has to be on that. So if we’re going to keep going into this I’ve got other things that are more pressing. … This week is just one of those weeks where the focus really has to be on the game we’ve got coming up.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Good for Harbaugh for not getting roped into saying something that he would probably regret later. He didn’t come out and say that he wouldn’t coach at Michigan; instead he kept the focus on Stanford and its upcoming battle with Cal this Saturday. It wouldn’t be fair to his players or his fellow coaches if he stoked the Michigan-head coaching flames three days before a big game against a key rival. Furthermore, it would be disrespectful to Rodriguez for Harbaugh to talk about a job that isn’t his.</p>
<p>I know he has ties to Michigan because he played there, but I hope the powers at be put together a fair extension so that he can stay at Stanford. They were the ones to give him his first shot and it would be nice to see a college football head coach show some loyalty once in awhile (although one could argue that he has loyalties to Michigan, too).</p>
<p><em><br />Photo from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.fotoglif.com/f/8rog6od2gkje/ebdkmruaqoie">fOTOGLIF</a><br /></em><script type="text/javascript" src="http://fotoglif.com/embed_login.js?hash=8rog6od2gkje&#038;size=medium&#038;imageuid=4174126&#038;layout=&#038;jpgembed=yes&#038;pubid=d47k0gcic8w9"></script></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/18/jim-harbaugh-squashes-michigan-rumors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 College Football Week 12 Picks &amp; Predictions</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/18/2009-college-football-week-12-picks-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/18/2009-college-football-week-12-picks-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[College Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 College Football Week 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 college football week 12 picks predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cal vs. Stanford free pick prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football week 12 free picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football week 12 predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dexter McCluster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Les Miles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU vs. Ole Miss free pick prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio State vs. Michigan prediction free pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ole Miss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCU vs. Wyoming free pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toby Gerhart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=29290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week was bitter sweet as I went 4-0 straight up but just 1-3 against the spread. Keep in mind that I try to only pick top 25 games, so they’re much, much harder to predict. Like, much harder. (Or at least that’s my excuse anyway.) No. 8 LSU at Mississippi, 3:30PM ET Both of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.fotoglif.com/f/svuehzom9eh5/n1q86fxjw202"><img id="fotoglif_n1q86fxjw202" title="" alt="" style="width:468px" src="http://gallery.fotoglif.com/images/large/n1q86fxjw202.jpg" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Last week was bitter sweet as I went 4-0 straight up but just 1-3 against the spread. Keep in mind that I try to only pick top 25 games, so they’re much, much harder to predict. Like, much harder. (Or at least that’s my excuse anyway.)</p>
<p><strong>No. 8 LSU at Mississippi, 3:30PM ET</strong><br />
Both of these SEC teams will be looking to finish the 2009 season strong when they square off this Saturday in Oxford. The Rebels snapped a six-game losing streak to the Tigers last season but they haven’t won at home in his series since 1998. The public seems high on Ole Miss after the Rebs hammered Tennessee last Saturday, but keep in mind that the Vols were in the midst of some turmoil after three of their players were arrested for attempted armed robbery last week. Dexter McCluster went off on Tennessee for 282 yards and four touchdowns, but he’ll have a hard time repeating that effort against a stout LSU front seven. Something tells me that Les Miles’ team is still pissed off about what happened two weeks again in Tuscaloosa and will play this week with passion. I see a small upset for the Tigers and an outright win.<br />
<em>Odds:</em> Ole Miss –4.5.<br />
<strong>Prediction: LSU 20, Ole Miss 17.</strong></p>
<p><strong>No. 25 California at No. 17 Stanford, 7:30PM ET</strong><br />
Stanford is playing as well as anyone in the nation right now. The Cardinal have scored 106 points combined against Oregon and USC the past two weeks and senior running back Toby Gerhart has almost been unstoppable. Without running back Jahvid Best, Cal squeaked by Arizona last week, 24-16. With Best sidelined again this Saturday, many expect Stanford to roll but don’t forget that Cal has the 19th best run defense in the nation and is capable of containing Gerhart and keeping things close. Quarterback Kevin Riley might be able to take advantage of a Stanford secondary that has been inconsistent this season, although without the threat of a running game the Bears’ offense might become too one-dimensional in the second half. I think Stanford will pull out the victory but this game will be closer than people think.<br />
<em>Odds:</em> Stanford –7.5.<br />
<strong>Prediction: Stanford 35, Cal 31.</strong></p>
<p><span id="more-29290"></span></p>
<p><strong>No. 10 Ohio State at Michigan, 12:00PM ET</strong><br />
Michigan has the offense to contend with most teams in the Big Ten, but the Wolverine defense has been horrid this year while giving up over 400 yards a game. Michigan has been fine against the pass, but that’s only because opponents have been able to run the ball with success and don’t need to put it in the air. Unfortunately for them, Ohio State’s strength is its ground attack, which means Brandon Saine should find plenty of running room against a soft Wolverine front seven. Given how this game is in Ann Arbor and is the final regular season outing for both teams, Michigan may keep things close in the first half. But after a while, mistakes will start to add up and Ohio State should cruise after halftime.<br />
<em>Odds:</em> Ohio State –12.<br />
<strong>Prediction: Ohio State 34, Michigan 20.</strong></p>
<p><strong>No. 4 TCU at Wyoming, 2:00PM ET</strong><br />
This will likely wind up being a free win for my straight up plays, but I’m really adding this game for my ATS plays. TCU is coming off an emotional win over Utah last week at home and now has to go on the road to face an improved Wyoming team. The last time these two teams faced off in Laramie, the Cowboys beat the Frogs 24-21 in 2007. TCU is a juggernaut and looks unstoppable at this point, but can anyone say letdown?<br />
<em>Odds:</em> TCU –31.<br />
<strong>Prediction: TCU 30, Wyoming 21.</strong></p>
<p><em><br />Photo from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.fotoglif.com/f/svuehzom9eh5/n1q86fxjw202">fOTOGLIF</a><br /></em><script type="text/javascript" src="http://fotoglif.com/embed_login.js?hash=svuehzom9eh5&#038;size=medium&#038;imageuid=3812048&#038;layout=&#038;jpgembed=yes&#038;pubid=d47k0gcic8w9"></script></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/18/2009-college-football-week-12-picks-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gerhart goes off as Stanford shocks Oregon</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/07/gerhart-goes-off-as-stanford-shocks-oregon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/07/gerhart-goes-off-as-stanford-shocks-oregon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[College Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 College Football Week 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Luck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Football scores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football week 10 scoreboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon Ducks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon vs. Stanford recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford Cardinal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toby Gerhart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toby Gerhart Heisman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=28511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stanford running back Toby Gerhart rushed for 223 yards and three touchdowns as the Cardinal shocked No. 8 Oregon 51-42 on Saturday. From ESPN.com: Andrew Luck completed 12 of 20 for 251 yards with two touchdowns and no interceptions to lead Stanford past Oregon, 51-42. Toby Gerhart rushed for 223 yards and three touchdowns. Stanford [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/photos?photoId=2379473&#038;gameId=293110024" target="_blank"><img width="477" height="318" src="http://a.espncdn.com/media/apphoto/9f535d9c-8ebd-43ba-bae1-198f72293516.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Stanford running back Toby Gerhart rushed for 223 yards and three touchdowns as the Cardinal shocked No. 8 Oregon 51-42 on Saturday.</p>
<p><a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/pac10/post/_/id/4967/final-stanford-x-oregon-x" target="_blank">From ESPN.com</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Andrew Luck completed 12 of 20 for 251 yards with two touchdowns and no interceptions to lead Stanford past Oregon, 51-42. Toby Gerhart rushed for 223 yards and three touchdowns. </p>
<p>Stanford finished with 505 total yards. Oregon had been giving up only 301 yards per game. </p>
<p>Sure, Oregon seemed to suffer a hangover from its 47-20 win over USC last weekend. But this was about Stanford&#8217;s offense dominating the Ducks defense, and the Ducks offense not being able to keep up. </p>
<p>What does it mean? </p>
<p>It means the Pac-10 is now wide-open. Arizona controls its own fate, but there is so much football left that it&#8217;s almost meaningless to speculate. </p>
<p>It means the Pac-10 is out of the national title hunt. </p>
<p>It means the Oregon vs. Boise State rankings debate ends. </p>
<p>And it means Stanford, at 6-3, is bowl eligible. The Cardinal haven&#8217;t gone to a bowl since 2001.</p></blockquote>
<p>This had trap written all over it, although I still thought Oregon would prevail. The Ducks just couldn’t match the intensity it had from last week’s huge win over USC. They were emotionally spent and Stanford took full advantage of it but taking it to them for four quarters. Gerhart was amazing today and his performance may have catapulted him back into the Heisman race.</p>
<p>Boise State stands to benefit the most from Oregon’s loss. Some had started to question whether or not the Ducks deserved to be ranked higher than the Broncos, even though Boise routed Oregon in the opening week of the season. With the Ducks now out of the way, the Broncos can start working on that whole style points thing that they continue to struggle with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/11/07/gerhart-goes-off-as-stanford-shocks-oregon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

