<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Scores Report - The National Sports Blog &#187; Pat Williams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scoresreport.com/tag/pat-williams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scoresreport.com</link>
	<description>The National Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:57:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Court of Appeals sides with NFL – Williams Wall may yet be suspended</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2011/02/08/court-of-appeals-sides-with-nfl-%e2%80%93-williams-wall-may-yet-be-suspended/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2011/02/08/court-of-appeals-sides-with-nfl-%e2%80%93-williams-wall-may-yet-be-suspended/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Williams StarCaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Williams suspended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Vikings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StarCaps case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williams Wall suspension]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=52956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breaking news on the story that will never die: The Minnesota State Court of Appeals has sided with the NFL in the 2008 StarCaps case against Vikings’ defensive tackle Kevin Williams. The other players that were impacted by the ruling were Pat Williams, Will Smith, Charles Grant and Grady Jackson. The latter two players are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2009/1028/espn_a_kevin_pat_williams2_sw_576.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="photo_center" border="0" width="477" height="265" src="http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2009/1028/espn_a_kevin_pat_williams2_sw_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Breaking news on the story that will never die: The Minnesota State Court of Appeals <a href="http://twitter.com/gregaiello/status/35008076415369216" target="_blank">has sided with the NFL in the 2008 StarCaps</a> case against Vikings’ defensive tackle Kevin Williams.</p>
<p>The other players that were impacted by the ruling were Pat Williams, Will Smith, Charles Grant and Grady Jackson. The latter two players are out of football and Pat Williams is a free agent. This means Kevin Williams and Smith could be on the reserve/suspended list for the first four games in 2011 (assuming there even is a season, that is).</p>
<p>StarCaps was a dietary supplement the players took that is banned under the league’s substance abuse policy. The supplement can be used as a masking agent for steroid use, which is obviously what the NFL was most concerned with. Of course, cough drops are probably banned under the league’s substance abuse policy, so what isn’t the NFL concerned with? (Not that I’m complaining about the league wanting to be drug-free.)</p>
<p>This has to be one of the most annoying stories in sports and here’s hoping that it finally has an ending. It would be nice if the league were just as motivated and relentless in its efforts to sign a new CBA deal as it is trying to suspend these four players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2011/02/08/court-of-appeals-sides-with-nfl-%e2%80%93-williams-wall-may-yet-be-suspended/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Williams Wall likely to avoid suspension again?</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2010/05/21/williams-wall-likely-to-avoid-suspension-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2010/05/21/williams-wall-likely-to-avoid-suspension-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 22:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Williams suspension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Vikings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Williams suspension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vikings rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williams Wall rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williams Wall Starcaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williams Wall suspension]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=40016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in 1874, the NFL suspended Vikings’ defensive tackles Pat Williams and Kevin Williams four games each for violating the league’s substance abuse policy. But with the help of a Minnesota state judge who apparently loves himself some Minnesota Vikings, the Williamseseseses appear likely to once again avoid their suspensions. The Minnesota Star-Tribune shares new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.fotoglif.com/f/i2yejs4t5r7g/bmb8umemxrj6"><img id="fotoglif_bmb8umemxrj6" title="" alt="" style="width:468px" src="http://gallery.fotoglif.com/images/large/bmb8umemxrj6.jpg" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Back in 1874, the NFL suspended Vikings’ defensive tackles <a href="http://www.startribune.com/sports/vikings/blogs/94574994.html" target="_blank">Pat Williams and Kevin Williams</a> four games each for violating the league’s substance abuse policy. But with the help of a Minnesota state judge who apparently loves himself some Minnesota Vikings, the Williamseseseses appear likely to once again avoid their suspensions.</p>
<p>The <em>Minnesota Star-Tribune</em> shares new details of this never-ending story:</p>
<blockquote><p>Judge Gary Larson recently ruled that the Williamses must serve their four-game suspensions after testing positive for a banned diuretic. But Larson granted the injunction Friday that will allow the Vikings to play during the appeals process.</p>
<p>This obviously is good news for the Vikings. Essentially, nothing has changed for the team because the Vikings will have their Pro Bowl defensive tackles while the legal process continues to play out.</p>
<p>The only question now is, how long will the appeals process take? Will it be resolved before the season or drag on for many more months?</p></blockquote>
<p>Here’s the deal, their case would have to pass through both the Minnesota Court of Appeals and Minnesota Supreme Court before the two players served their suspensions. Judge Gary “the Viking” Larson knows that the process would probably take quite a while, so the chances of the Williams Wall playing this year are very high.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve written before, this is a tricky situation. If the U.S. Supreme Court overrules Larson’s decision, then it looks as if the NFL has more power than state courts. But if the U.S. Supreme Court doesn’t overrule the decision, then maybe more players will look for loopholes when they fail drug tests.</p>
<p>When I do posts about this story, I feel like I’m writing an episode of “The Dukes of Hazzard.” All right, in this scene, we&#8217;ll have the Williams boys get away from Roger Goodell. Then in the next scene, we&#8217;ll have Goodell almost catch them, but then they get away again. We&#8217;ll do this over and over and over again until the end of the show. Cool?</p>
<p><em><br />Photo from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.fotoglif.com/f/i2yejs4t5r7g/bmb8umemxrj6">fOTOGLIF</a><br /></em><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.fotoglif.com/embed_login.js?hash=i2yejs4t5r7g&#038;size=medium&#038;imageuid=3808426&#038;layout=&#038;jpgembed=yes&#038;pubid=d47k0gcic8w9"></script></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2010/05/21/williams-wall-likely-to-avoid-suspension-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL not giving up on Williams Wall suspension</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2010/05/13/nfl-not-giving-up-on-williams-wall-suspension/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2010/05/13/nfl-not-giving-up-on-williams-wall-suspension/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 NFL Offseason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Williams suspension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Vikings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Williams suspension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StarCaps case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williams Wall suspension]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=39572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite Hennepin County District Judge Gary Larson’s ruling that the league failed to abide to state law in notifying Vikings’ defensive tackles Pat Williams and Kevin Williams of their positive drug test, the NFL is not giving in. According to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, the NFL is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Larson’s ruling [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a target="_blank" href="http://www.fotoglif.com/f/cney6z62ts1i/qh0mq7npgqq0"><img id="fotoglif_qh0mq7npgqq0" title="" alt="" style="width:468px" src="http://gallery.fotoglif.com/images/large/qh0mq7npgqq0.jpg" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Despite Hennepin County District Judge Gary Larson’s ruling that the league failed to abide to state law in notifying Vikings’ defensive tackles Pat Williams and Kevin Williams of their positive drug test, the NFL is not giving in.</p>
<p>According to the <em>Minneapolis Star-Tribune</em>, the <a href="http://www.startribune.com/sports/vikings/93700514.html?elr=KArksUUUycaEacyU" target="_blank">NFL is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Larson’s ruling</a> so that the league can suspend the two players four games for violating its anti-drug policy.</p>
<blockquote><p>The NFL cited the National Labor Relations Act in its filing on Thursday, saying its collective bargaining agreement with the players&#8217; union protects its drug policy from lawsuits in state courts.</p>
<p>The Williamses tested positive in 2008 for a banned diuretic, bumetanide, that was not listed as an ingredient on the label for the weight-loss supplement StarCaps. The diuretic is not a steroid, but the league said it can be used as a masking agent for performance-enhancing drugs and therefore is not allowed.</p>
<p>The players sued to block their suspensions, saying the NFL broke Minnesota labor law in applying its drug policy. The NFL wants the Supreme Court to overturn a federal judge&#8217;s decision last year that sent the case to state court.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a tricky situation. If the U.S. Supreme Court overrules Larson’s decision, then it looks as if the NFL has more power than state courts. But if the U.S. Supreme Court doesn’t overrule the decision, then maybe more players will look for loopholes when they fail drug tests.</p>
<p>Many feel as though the NFL’s drug policy is extreme, but it’s in place to ensure that players don’t cheat the game. While I would wholeheartedly agree that it’s a bit absurd for the league to force players to notify teams when they’re about to use over-the-counter cough medicine (which is actually on the NFL’s banned list), those rules are in place in effort to keep the playing field as level as possible.</p>
<p>In the end, I don’t think the Williams Wall will ever be suspended. I can’t imagine that the U.S. Supreme Court would side with the NFL, but then again, crazier things have happened.</p>
<p><em><br />Photo from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.fotoglif.com/f/cney6z62ts1i/qh0mq7npgqq0">fOTOGLIF</a><br /></em><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.fotoglif.com/embed_login.js?hash=cney6z62ts1i&#038;size=medium&#038;imageuid=5199698&#038;layout=&#038;jpgembed=yes&#038;pubid=d47k0gcic8w9"></script></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2010/05/13/nfl-not-giving-up-on-williams-wall-suspension/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vikings to have Williams Wall for entire season</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/09/11/vikings-to-have-williams-wall-for-entire-season/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/09/11/vikings-to-have-williams-wall-for-entire-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Williams and Pat Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Vikings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL Week 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vikings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williams Wall Vikings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=24039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that the case of Vikings’ defensive tackles Kevin Williams and Pat Williams will stay in Minnesota state court and thus, the two players will be allowed to play the entire season. From the Minneapolis Star-Tribune: Judge Bobby Shepherd wrote the highly detailed 34-page decision for the panel that also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/kevin-williams/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="268" width="477" src="http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2008/1203/fantasy_ap_kevin_pat_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that the case of Vikings’ defensive tackles Kevin Williams and Pat Williams will stay in Minnesota state court and thus, the two players will be allowed to play the entire season.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.startribune.com/59027052.html" target="_blank">From the <em>Minneapolis Star-Tribune</em></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Judge Bobby Shepherd wrote the highly detailed 34-page decision for the panel that also included Judges Duane Benton and Diana Murphy. The decision essentially allows the Williams to play while keeping the remains of the case in Hennepin County District Court where Judge Gary Larson already has said he likely wouldn&#8217;t force the Vikings defensive tackles into a civil trial during the coming season. He stayed action in his courtroom until the federal court determined whether it has jurisdiction over some of the claims.</p>
<p>While the parties could ask the U.S. Supreme Court to take the case, the court does not have to hear it. The Williamses were suspended for taking the banned substance bumetanide. They filed a lawsuit in state court contending that the NFL&#8217;s drug-testing procedures violate Minnesota workplace laws, and they asked that a judge void their suspensions. Then the NFL Players Association sued in U.S. District Court on their behalf.
</p></blockquote>
<p>This news is obviously huge for the Vikings, who are a completely different team when they don’t have their two run-stuffers in the middle of their defensive line. Minnesota can expect opponents trying to beat them through the air again this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/09/11/vikings-to-have-williams-wall-for-entire-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota judge says Williams Wall can play</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/08/05/minnesota-judge-says-williams-wall-can-play/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/08/05/minnesota-judge-says-williams-wall-can-play/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Grant suspension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin and Pat Williams suspensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saints rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Capps suspension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vikings rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vikings Williams Wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will Smith suspension]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=22228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Minnesota judge has ruled that Vikings defensive tackles Kevin Williams and Pat Williams, who were appealing four game suspensions for violating the NFL&#8217;s policy on anabolic steroids, can play the entire season according to a report by the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. Per the report, the only way this ruling won’t be upheld is if a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://a.espncdn.com/media/apphoto/163a2e29-d689-423b-9238-7808b9f55d66.jpg" target="_blank"><img height="340" width="477" src="http://a.espncdn.com/media/apphoto/163a2e29-d689-423b-9238-7808b9f55d66.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>A Minnesota judge has ruled that Vikings defensive tackles Kevin Williams and Pat Williams, who were appealing four game suspensions for violating the NFL&#8217;s policy on anabolic steroids, <a href="http://www.startribune.com/sports/vikings/52519642.html" target="_blank">can play the entire season</a> according to a report by the <em>Minneapolis Star-Tribune</em>.</p>
<p>Per the report, the only way this ruling won’t be upheld is if a federal court claims jurisdiction over the Williams Wall’s lawsuit, challenging the NFL’s drug-testing procedures.</p>
<blockquote><p>(District Court Judge Gary) Larson stayed action in his courtroom until the U.S. District Court determines whether it has jurisdiction on some of the players&#8217; claims. U.S. District Judge Paul Magnuson said the court does not, but a federal three-judge panel is hearing an appeal of his ruling in St. Paul on Aug. 18.</p>
<p>If the federal court determines the case should be conducted in state court, Larson wrote, &#8220;it is not likely that the [Hennepin County] court would, or could force [the players] into trial during the middle of a playing season, based on the court&#8217;s schedule.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This is obviously huge for the Vikings, who have the best run defense in the NFL with the Williams Wall intact. If Minnesota hopes to build upon the success it had last year, than it’ll need their stud defensive tackles manning the interior of its defensive line all season.</p>
<p>I wonder what this means for Saints defensive ends Will Smith and Charles Grant, who, like the Williams Wall, were given four-game suspensions as well. I’m assuming that since the Williams Wall will be able to play, so will Smith and Grant.</p>
<p>This is the never-ending saga.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/08/05/minnesota-judge-says-williams-wall-can-play/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 fantasy football is coming aoon—a look back at 2008 defenses</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/08/01/2009-fantasy-football-is-coming-aoon%e2%80%94a-look-back-at-2008-defenses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/08/01/2009-fantasy-football-is-coming-aoon%e2%80%94a-look-back-at-2008-defenses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Farley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bullz-Eye Sports Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happy Hour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 fantasy football preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Kampman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Rodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJ Hawk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albert Haynesworth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asante Samuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B.J. Raji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltimore Ravens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bart Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Urlacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cato June]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Bears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cortland Finnegan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas Cowboys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darelle Revis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derrick Brooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dom Capers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dwight Freeney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Reed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Mangini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fantasy defenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Brackett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Bay Packers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indianapolis Colts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Harrison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Caldwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Leonhard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Gruden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kris Jenkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Vanden Bosch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LaMarr Woodley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Vikings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia Eagles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Steelers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raheem Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rex Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronde Barber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Chargers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheldon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Bay Bucs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee Titans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrell Suggs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Dungy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Redskins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=22063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month we started looking at last season’s statistics for position players in fantasy football land, and today we’ll look at a position many often overlook. That’s fantasy defenses, which can sometimes put up just enough points to earn your team a victory once in a while. It’s always smart to try and grab one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/results?searchString=ray%20lewis&#038;start=15&#038;dims=8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2008/1228/nfl_g_rlewists_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Last month we started looking at last season’s statistics for position players in fantasy football land, and today we’ll look at a position many often overlook.  That’s fantasy defenses, which can sometimes put up just enough points to earn your team a victory once in a while.  It’s always smart to try and grab one of the top units, although as we’ve seen before, things change, sometimes drastically, from year to year with fantasy D’s.  Me?  I like to grab my defense before my kicker.  This list is based on point totals from one of my leagues, so keep in mind that stats vary from year to year.  </p>
<p><strong>1.  Baltimore Ravens</strong>—The Ravens’ defense is perennially awesome, and we’ll find out for sure how much of that was due to former coordinator Rex Ryan, who is now the head honcho for the Jets.  Ryan took plenty of players with him too, like LB Bart Scott and S Jim Leonhard, but the Ravens still have Ray Lewis, Ed Reed and Terrell Suggs.  Reed just keeps getting better every year, and his sick nose for the ball is one reason the Ravens had a league high 26 picks.  They will keep scoring low as always, but their 34 sacks last season isn’t much to get excited about.  <strong>Bottom line: The Ravens won’t be a number one this year, but are still top 10.</strong></p>
<p><span id="more-22063"></span></p>
<p><strong>2.  Philadelphia Eagles</strong>—Sadly, coordinator Jim Johnson passed away this week, though he was on leave from the team anyway.  Look for the Eagles to continue Johnson’s schemes however, which means blitz, blitz and more blitz.  What that means to you is sack points, and while Brian Dawkins is now in Denver, the secondary is still strong with corners Sheldon Brown and Asante Samuel and safeties Quintin Mikell and Quintin Demps.  <strong>Bottom line: 48 sacks is a lot, and the Eagles may not match that in ’09, but they aren’t going to suck by any means.</strong></p>
<p><strong>3. Pittsburgh Steelers</strong>—You don’t win the Super Bowl without a stout unit, and this won finished second in the league with 51 sacks, led by two awesome linebackers, NFL Defensive Player of the Year James Harrison, and LaMarr Woodley.  The Steelers also ranked #1 in points allowed and yard allowed, with 20 picks and three defensive scores.  <strong>Bottom line: With the front seven intact, this unit may be the top defense taken in many FF drafts.</strong></p>
<p><strong>4.  Tennessee Titans</strong>—If you live in Nashville like I do, you saw this team play a lot, and let me tell you….their games are pretty boring to watch.  Well, unless you like 13-10 scores every week.  Punishing DT Albert Haynesworth is now in Washington, but Tony Brown and Kyle Vanden Bosch are no slouches, and CB Cortland Finnegan is a ball hawk like Ed Reed.  <strong>Bottom line: More boring games for me, more fantasy points for you.</strong></p>
<p><strong>5.  Chicago Bears</strong>—Their 22 interceptions probably had a lot to do with the Bears finishing as high as they did in 2008, but the Monsters of the Midway with just 28 sacks?  To put that in perspective, the Saints also tallied 28 sacks.  And besides Brian Urlacher, go ahead try to name five players on this defense.  The Bears gave up 350 points in ’08, which is over 100 more than the Titans, Steelers and Ravens.  Still, it’s the Bears.  <strong>Bottom line: You can pick them, but I’m only picking them as a bye week backup.  </strong></p>
<p><strong>6.  Tampa Bay Bucs</strong>—This is not the same unit that ranked in the top 10 in points allowed and yards allowed in 2008, with Jon Gruden gone and Raheem Morris at the helm.  Derrick Brooks is gone as are Cato June and Jovan Haye, but the likes of DE Gaines Adams and the ageless CB Ronde Barber remain.  How much of Gruden’s mark will be missed?  <strong>Bottom line: With so much turnover in the front office and on the field, I’m not taking my chances with these guys.</strong></p>
<p><strong>7.  Green Bay Packers</strong>—Everyone expected big things from the Pack in 2008, but it was their offense, led by QB Aaron Brooks and WR Greg Jennings that were the bright spots on a mediocre team.  So now with new D-coordinator Dom Capers and his 3-4 in place, things will look different at Lambeau.  Aaron Kampman is now an outside linebacker, and BJ Raji and AJ Hawk are left to clog up the middle.  Kampman will likely have more sacks, but how will the 3-4 affect overall fantasy points?  <strong>Bottom line: I’m going out on a limb—the Pack will be much better defensively, and could be a fantasy sleeper.</strong></p>
<p><strong>8.  New York Jets</strong>—DT Kris Jenkins is a monster, and Rex Ryan brought along a few toys, like Bart Scott and Jim Leonhard, as we mentioned earlier.  Eric Mangini also took some players with him to Cleveland, but the Jets will still keep scores low, rack up sacks, and score on defense (5 defensive TDs in 2008).  CB Darrelle Revis had 5 picks and keeps getting better.  <strong>Bottom line: Proceed with caution, but still a Top 10 D.  </strong></p>
<p><strong>9.  Indianapolis Colts</strong>—Even with Tony Dungy gone and Jim Caldwell running the team, the Colts still give up way too much ground on the ground.  Thing is, they are opportunistic, and they have Dwight Freeney attacking the QB and a bunch of under the radar players (like LB Gary Brackett) wreaking havoc (30 forced fumbles and 5 defensive scores in 2008).  <strong>Bottom line: The Colts’ D will keep them in games, meaning these guys will continue to play hard and put up decent fantasy points.  </strong></p>
<p><strong>10.  Minnesota Vikings</strong>—These guys are damn near as good as the Ravens, led on the line by Jared Allen and DT’s Pat and Kevin Williams (45 team sacks in 2008).  12 picks from this unit is baffling, as is allowing 333 points, but they can be better.  <strong>Bottom line: The Vikes may not be a true top 10 this season, so I’d take my chances with the revamped Giants or the sack-happy Cowboys before them. </strong></p>
<p>Teams that aren’t on this list you’ll want to draft: New York Giants, San Diego Chargers, Dallas Cowboys, Washington Redskins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/08/01/2009-fantasy-football-is-coming-aoon%e2%80%94a-look-back-at-2008-defenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge blocks Williams Wall suspension, but will it hurt Vikings in the end?</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/07/09/judge-blocks-williams-wall-suspension-but-will-it-hurt-vikings-in-the-end/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/07/09/judge-blocks-williams-wall-suspension-but-will-it-hurt-vikings-in-the-end/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge blocks Williams Wall suspension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Vikings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Williams Kevin Williams suspension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will Pat and Kevin Williams play Week 1?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williams Wall suspension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williams Wall Vikings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=21096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The AP is reporting that a district judge has granted Vikings’ defensive tackles Pat and Kevin Williams a block against their four-game suspensions for using a banned substance. The “Williams Wall” now has a temporary restraining order against the NFL and the judge has also scheduled a July 22 hearing to consider whether or not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/kevin-williams/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2008/1203/fantasy_ap_kevin_pat_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>The AP is reporting that a district judge has granted Vikings’ defensive tackles Pat and Kevin Williams <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/football/nfl/07/09/williams-suspensions.ap/index.html?eref=si_nfl" target="_blank">a block against their four-game suspensions</a> for using a banned substance. The “Williams Wall” now has a temporary restraining order against the NFL and the judge has also scheduled a July 22 hearing to consider whether or not he’ll put a hold on state court proceedings.</p>
<p>This could be construed as either good or a bad for the Vikings. Sure, Minnesota could have the Williams Wall for Week 1 against the Browns, but what happens if the NFL wins this battle and suspends the pair during a critical point during the season?</p>
<p>If the Williams Wall is truly innocent or victims are victims in some way, then nobody should blame them for fighting their suspensions. But the NFL isn’t going to give up here, especially considering it doesn’t want to take on an image that its players are using banned substances to help them compete on the field (a la Major League Baseball).</p>
<p>Last year, the Williams Wall avoided a four-game suspension during a critical stretch in the season and they helped the Vikings make the playoffs. If they serve their four game suspension over the course of the first four weeks of this season, they’ll miss games against the Browns, 49ers, Lions and Packers. Granted, no win is guaranteed in the NFL, but the Vikings certainly have a much easier schedule at the start of the year than the middle and end.</p>
<p>Again, if the Williams Wall is innocent, then they shouldn’t back down. But if the two think that they’re going to sneak one past the NFL with this judge’s help, then they probably have another thing coming and could wind up missing crucial games during the middle or end of the season. Everybody (i.e. the Williams Wall and the Vikings) seems to be playing with fire here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/07/09/judge-blocks-williams-wall-suspension-but-will-it-hurt-vikings-in-the-end/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

