<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Scores Report - The National Sports Blog &#187; Nick Green</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scoresreport.com/tag/nick-green/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scoresreport.com</link>
	<description>The National Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:13:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ten infuriating MLB players to watch</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/07/06/ten-infuriating-mlb-players-to-watch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/07/06/ten-infuriating-mlb-players-to-watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albert Pujols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alfonso Soriano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Stalter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Howry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Duncan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edgar Renteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Damon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julio Lugo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kosuke Fukodome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magglio Orondez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melvin Mora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milton Bradley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Frustrating MLB Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most infuriating MLB Players to watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Kazmir]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=20989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether it’s that reliever that always seems to blow tight games in late innings, that batter that leaves runners on the bases, or that starter that walks seven batters an inning, every team has at least one player that as a fan, you’d rather set your eyelids on fire than watch trot onto the field [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/alfonso-soriano/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2009/0625/chicago_a_soriano_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Whether it’s that reliever that always seems to blow tight games in late innings, that batter that leaves runners on the bases, or that starter that walks seven batters an inning, every team has at least one player that as a fan, you’d rather set your eyelids on fire than watch trot onto the field for just one more inning.</p>
<p>I’ve compiled a list of 10 infuriating, punch-a-hole-through-your-wall MLB players to watch. Granted, this list is by no means all-inclusive (and I implore you the reader to list the guys that drive you nuts in the comments section). But these are the 10 that seem to make my blood boil on a consistent basis, whether they’re playing for my favorite team or not.</p>
<p><span id="more-20989"></span></p>
<p><strong>Julio Lugo, OF, Red Sox</strong><br />
I would lose the respect of all Boston fans if I didn’t have Lugo’s name on this list. It’s not only that Lugo can’t field and flails at pitches like a schoolgirl trying to swat away a bee on the playground, but also that he’s being paid $9 million a year to look so bad. He has zero range defensively and he also has a knack for turning double plays at a snail’s pace. Granted, he’s been delegated a backup behind Nick Green at short, but just the mere idea that Lugo is still on the roster must make BoSox fans want to toss their last meal. Whenever the BoSox do decide to get rid of him, Boston fans might try to make that day an official holiday.</p>
<p><strong>The Cubs’ outfield collection of Alfonso Soriano, Milton Bradley and Kosuke Fukudome</strong><br />
Nothing says overpaid and overrated like the Cubs’ outfield. Whether you love brutal defense, swing-at-everything offense, or just plain stupidity, the Cubs’ outfield collection of Soriano, Bradley and Fukudome have it all. Soriano can’t judge fly balls and even when he does, he’s always prone to making an error with his unnecessary hop, skip and a jump catch. Bradley has turned out to be <a href="http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/30/time-for-the-cubs-to-stop-playing-board-games/">one of the worst offseason signings</a> of the year while failing to produce at the dish, fighting with manager Lou Piniella and forgetting how many outs there are in an inning. Fukudome is fine defensively, but his mini-tornado batting approach is almost laughable to watch sometimes. Whenever the trio is in the outfield at the same time, you’d swear you’re at the circus instead of the “Friendly Confines.”</p>
<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/chris-duncan/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2009/0416/mlb_a_duncan1_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Chris Duncan, OF, Cardinals</strong><br />
Despite currently owning the best record in the NL Central, the Cardinals actually have a couple of players that fans wouldn’t mind taking on a tour of the Arch, only to leave them at the top with no way down. Reliever Dennys Reyes is one of those players, Joe Thurston is another, but Duncan takes the cake. Not only is he brutal both offensively and defensively, but he also continues to bat in front of superstar Albert Pujols and not produce. Pitchers give him hittable pitches on a nightly basis knowing that Pujols is behind him, yet the best Duncan can do is produce a sub-.250 batting average and a paltry five home runs. Couple that with his brutal defense and it’s amazing that he still has a starting job. (Although he can thank a rash of injuries for that.)</p>
<p><strong>Edgar Renteria, SS, Giants</strong><br />
At least twice this year I read that Renteria was a solid offseason signing for the Giants by two different media outlets. If by solid they meant that the Giants once again overpaid for a free agent, then yes, Renteria was a solid signing. Watching him trying to go to his left on a ball hit up the middle is like watching an insect trying to scramble to get out of water after you flushed it down your toilet. Unless the ball is hit right at him, he can’t move and God help the first baseman when he tries to rush a throw. He’s still okay with the bat at times, but Bruce Bochy refused to move him out of the two-hole for most of the first half despite Renteria’s willingness to suck. At No. 6 or No. 7 in the lineup, he’s serviceable. At No. 2, he’s maddening.</p>
<p><strong>Melvin Mora, 3B, Orioles</strong><br />
Whether it’s at the dish, in the field or on the base paths, Mora seemingly makes a bone-headed play at least once a game. He’s 37 years old, his production is almost non-existent and he doesn’t have much of a future in Baltimore past next year. Yet he continues to take up space in the middle of the O’s lineup because manager Dave Trembley refuses to play youngsters over the vets. It’s bad enough that Baltimore fans have to succumb to watching their team lose on a regular basis. But to also make them watch old, crusty vets lose is just downright cruel.</p>
<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/results?searchString=johnny%20damon&#038;start=0&#038;dims=8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2008/0819/mlb_a_damon_412.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Johnny Damon, OF, Yankees</strong><br />
Don’t get it twisted – Damon is a fine offensive player. I have no idea how he can still hit over 12 home runs almost every year despite his age, but he does and he’s been a very good offensive player for the Bombers. But his chicken wing has always been an issue and Yankee fans must cringe every time a ball his hit into left field. He used to be able to make up for his little league arm with his speed, but he’s definitely lost a step over the years and he has trouble making adjustments on balls hit over his head. The Yankees will take his offensive production, but they’d probably be better off with a scarecrow set up in left field.</p>
<p><strong>Scott Kazmir, SP, Rays</strong><br />
Granted, Kazmir is starting to slowly turn things around since coming off the DL a couple weeks ago. But he’s got to be one of the most frustrating supposed-aces in baseball and what’s maddening is that he has outstanding stuff. But he can’t stay healthy and he’s way too inconsistent to be counted on as a top-of-the-rotation pitcher. If he were a No. 3 or No. 4 starter being paid No. 3 or No. 4 money, fans could deal with his ups and downs. But he’s Tampa’s highest paid pitcher (fourth highest player behind Carl Crawford, Carlos Pena and the equally-frustrating Pat Burrell) and his ERA is almost 7.00 this season.</p>
<p><strong>Magglio Ordonez, OF, Tigers</strong><br />
This is obviously in correlation to this year, because Maggs has been outstanding for the Tigers since he was acquired from Chicago in 2005. He’s supposed to be a significant bat in Detroit’s lineup, yet he’s batting just .266 with four home runs and 28 RBI. Worse yet, he’s still collecting a massive paycheck (he’s the currently the Tigers’ highest paid player) and he’s frightening to watch in the outfield. Maybe he’ll bounce back and I’ll have to eat my words but until then, he has to be driving Detroit fans nuts right now, even with the Tigers in first place.</p>
<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/results?searchString=russell%20martin&#038;start=15&#038;dims=8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2008/1004/mlb_u_martin_725.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Russell Martin, C, Dodgers</strong><br />
What the frack happened to this kid? Once one of the most promising catchers in all of baseball, Martin is hitting just. 248 this season with one dinger. At 26, he still has a ton of potential and maybe with Manny Ramirez back in the Dodgers’ lineup he’ll turn it around in the second half. But once a promising player with a decent amount of pop, Martin now he hits like Chone Figgins without the high average.</p>
<p><strong>Bob Howry, RP, Giants</strong><br />
I went to a Giants-Cardinals game in St. Louis recently and wound up making small talk with a Red Bird’s fan next to me. The game eventually went into the tenth tied 1-1 and San Fran had two relievers warming up in the pen: Brian Wilson and Bob Howry. I turned to my new Cardinals friend and said, “If Bruce Bochy puts Wilson in we’re looking at more baseball. If he puts the black angel of death in, you’ll be sucking down a cold one enjoying a Cards’ victory in no time.” Lo and behold, Bochy put Howry in and against his first batter, he gave up a walk off to St. Louis centerfielder Colby Rasmus. Granted, Pablo Sandoval dropped a pop up in foul territory during the at bat and the umpire squeezed him on a pitch that would have struck Rasmus out, but nobody is better at blowing late inning games than Howry. Cub fans, you know what I’m talking about.</p>
<p>Those are my ten…which players infuriate you the most?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/07/06/ten-infuriating-mlb-players-to-watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five MLB trades that don’t need to happen</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/15/five-mlb-trades-that-don%e2%80%99t-need-to-happen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/15/five-mlb-trades-that-don%e2%80%99t-need-to-happen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Gonzalez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Gonzalez trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Red Sox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Penny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Penny trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Uggla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Uggla Giants trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Uggla rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houston Astros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Wilson Red Sox trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Wilson trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Peavy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Peavy trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jed Lowrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Smoltz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Smoltz return]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julio Lugo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark DeRosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark DeRosa Cardinals trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miguel Tejada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miguel Tejada Cardinals rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miguel Tejada trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Padres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis Cardinals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=20047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I get it – baseball trades are fun. They’re fun to speculate about, they’re fun to debate and they’re fun to analyze. But just because a club needs a bat, an arm or is just looking to shrink salary, doesn’t mean that a trade needs to happen. I’ve compiled a list of five trade rumors [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/results?searchString=miguel%20tejada&#038;start=15&#038;dims=8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2008/0522/mlb_a_tejada_412.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>I get it – baseball trades are fun. They’re fun to speculate about, they’re fun to debate and they’re fun to analyze. But just because a club needs a bat, an arm or is just looking to shrink salary, doesn’t mean that a trade needs to happen.</p>
<p>I’ve compiled a list of five trade rumors and where they originated. I then discuss why each of them makes sense, but why they also don’t necessarily need to happen.</p>
<p><strong>Rumor #1: The Red Sox will trade for Pirates shortstop Jack Wilson</strong> (<em><a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09166/977462-63.stm?cmpid=pirates.xml" target="_blank">Pittsburgh Post-Gazette</a></em>)<br />
<strong><em>Why it makes sense:</em></strong> Boston is growing impatient waiting for Jed Lowrie to recover from a wrist injury that has held him out since mid-April. They’re also tired of watching Julio Lugo (who is equally bad offensively as he is defensively) make a mockery of the game whenever he trots onto the field. While Nick Green has done well filling in for Lowrie while he’s been hurt and for Lugo while he continues to work on being the most overpaid player in professional sports, the Sox feel they could do better with Wilson. (There’s also a rumor making the rounds that Boston wouldn’t have to give up any top prospects in order to acquire Wilson – they just would need to take on the rest of his salary.)<br />
<strong><em>Why it doesn’t need to happen:</em></strong> Wilson is excellent defensively, but he brings very little to the table in terms of offense. He’s also overpaid himself, as he’ll make $7.25 million this year and $8.4 million in 2010 despite being limited at the dish. While waiting for Lowrie to return to the field has been a slow death for the Sox, he’s cheaper than Wilson and gives the team a better overall player at the position (when he’s healthy, of course). Plus, Green has played well and Boston might be better served holding onto prospects in order to make a more productive move around the trade deadline (i.e. adding another bat in case David Oritz plans on hitting south of .200 all season) than one involving Wilson.</p>
<p><span id="more-20047"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/dan-uggla/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2008/0529/mlb_a_uggla2_580.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Rumor #2: The Giants will trade for Marlins second baseman Dan Uggla</strong> (<em><a href="http://blogs.sun-sentinel.com/sports_baseball_marlins/2009/05/florida-marlins-should-they-engage-giants-in-uggla-trade-talks.html" target="_blank">Sun-Sentinel</a></em>)<br />
<strong><em>Why it makes sense:</em></strong> The Giants are playing better than most expected this season, but they’re doing it all with pitching. They’ve surrendered the fewest runs this year (233), but have scored the third fewest (248) themselves. San Fran might not be able to catch the streaking Dodgers in the NL West (as of this writing, the Giants are seven games back of L.A. in the division despite being six games above .500), but if they continue to play well, the Wild Card is certainly attainable. But they need offense – badly. While Uggla’s batting average has been atrocious all season, he does have 11 home runs and 40 RBI so the thought is that he could add much-needed pop to the Giants’ lineup.<br />
<em><strong>Why it doesn’t need to happen:</strong> </em>Yes, the Giants do need offense. But don’t forget that they play in a pitcher’s park so even if they did acquire Uggla, who knows how his power would translate to AT&#038;T Park. And his average is death so if he’s not going to hit home runs, he’s not worth acquiring (and don’t forget that his defense is brutal, too). The Giants’ current starting second baseman is Emmanuel Burriss, who has zero pop and has struggled at the plate despite tearing it up in the spring, but he has an outstanding glove and he’s young. It’s rumored that the Marlins would be looking for young pitching in exchange for Uggla, but it’s not worth it for the Giants to give up a young arm like Jonathan Sanchez (even though he’s struggling) to acquire Uggla while there are still options within the organization (and I don&#8217;t necessarily mean Burriss, who has been brutal, but Kevin Frandsen, who has been absolutely hosed by the organization this season). Plus, the Giants aren’t one bat away from making a deep postseason run – they’re two or three bats away. Acquiring Uggla isn’t going to change that. The Giants have also been linked to players like Adam Dunn and Paul Konerko and I would say the same thing about them as I do about Uggla – those players aren’t worth giving up young arms with the Giants still a year or two away from seriously competing. Unless they could get a young bat in a deal, San Fran GM Brian Sabean should stand pat and continue his rebuilding plan.</p>
<p><strong>Rumor #3: The Cardinals will trade for Astros shortstop Miguel Tejada</strong> (<em><a href="http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/sports/stories.nsf/cardinals/story/207D8A0BFA2DDA3A862575D2000E047E?OpenDocument" target="_blank">St. Louis Post-Dispatch</a></em>)<br />
<strong><em>Why it makes sense:</em></strong> Manager Tony La Russa desperately wants to add another bat to the lineup to help protect Albert Pujols and upgrading the left side of the infield while Troy Glaus and Khalil Greene continue to miss time is a necessity as well. Tejada would cover both needs as he’s hitting .344 with six home runs and some feel as though he can play third base if needed, although he has never actually played there before.<br />
<strong><em>Why it doesn’t need to happen:</em></strong> First and foremost, there’s no guarantee that the Astros would want to trade within their own division. Plus, despite currently being three games under .500 and in last place, Houston is only four games back of the Brewers in the NL Central, so they’ll hang onto Tejada if they feel as though they have a shot at the playoffs (however slim those hopes may be). But looking at this from the Cardinals’ perspective, acquiring Tejada doesn’t make as much sense as going after someone like Cleveland’s Mark DeRosa, who is also rumored to be available. Tejada will earn $13 million in 2009 and is set to become a free agent in 2010. Chances are, St. Louis wouldn’t re-sign Tejada in the offseason and they’d probably have to pay Houston a premium because it would be a trade down within the division. Throw in the fact that Tejada isn’t that great of a defensive player and adding him makes little sense. A guy like DeRosa would still give the Cards a quality bat, a better defender who has actually spent time at third base, and cheaper player to boot.</p>
<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/adrian-gonzalez/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2009/0517/mlb_a_agonz_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Rumor #4: The Padres will trade Adrian Gonzalez</strong> (<a href="http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/06/olney-on-adrian-gonzalez.html" target="_blank">ESPN.com’s Buster Onley</a>)<br />
<strong><em>Why it makes sense:</em></strong> It doesn’t make sense unless you look at it from the view of the Padres’ front office, who wants to cut team salary significantly. (That’s why San Diego has been actively shopping Jake Peavy.)<br />
<strong><em>Why it doesn’t need to happen:</em></strong> This is more of a notion than a rumor. As previously noted, the Padres want to cut salary but they’ve been unable to move Peavy, so speculation has it that they could wind up dealing Gonzo if the right trade comes along. But while cutting salary is important to the front office, GM Kevin Towers can’t just give up a young slugger like Gonzalez in a cost-cutting move. Obviously Towers would get a couple of prospects in exchange for Gonzo, but would he be willing to take a lesser deal just to free up some money? If so, that would be incredibly disappointing for a Padre fan base that has embraced Gonzalez and hopes that he’ll still be around when San Diego eventually is competitive again (whenever that might be).</p>
<p><strong>Rumor #5: The Red Sox will trade Brad Penny</strong> (<em><a href="http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/extras/extra_bases/2009/06/penny_in_demand.html" target="_blank">Boston Globe</a></em>)<br />
<strong><em>Why it makes sense:</em></strong> With John Smoltz set to come back soon from a rehab assignment, Penny will be expandable to the Red Sox, who have discussed moving him to the pen (despite his unwillingness) when Smoltz returns to the mound. Boston seemingly has an abundance of starting pitching and if they could get a couple of prospects or a position player of worth in exchange for Penny, why not move him?<br />
<strong><em>Why it doesn’t need to happen:</em></strong> A lot has been made about Boston’s pitching depth, but things could go from good to ugly at the drop of a dime. Dice-K has been brutal and has already made one trip to the DL. Josh Beckett started off slow, recovered to pitch incredibly well over the last month but then was shelled yesterday in Philadelphia. Smoltz is set to return from his rehab assignment, but who knows how he’ll pitch once he faces major league batters again. So essentially yes, the Red Sox do have a ton of depth. But that could vanish in a heartbeat and while Penny has looked good in his last three starts, teams aren’t going to be willing to overpay for the 31-year old’s services – especially knowing that Boston has an abundance of arms. In the end, holding on to Penny for depth and in case of injuries to other starters might be worth it in the end. Of course, if some club offers a top prospect in exchange for Penny (which is doubtful), then all bets are off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/15/five-mlb-trades-that-don%e2%80%99t-need-to-happen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Sox interested in Jack Wilson, but do they need him?</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/15/red-sox-interested-in-jack-wilson-but-do-they-need-him/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/15/red-sox-interested-in-jack-wilson-but-do-they-need-him/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Red Sox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Wilson Red Sox rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Wilson rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jed Lowrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jed Lowrie return]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julio Lugo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Sox rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=20034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a report by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, trade rumors between the Red Sox and Pirates involving shortstop Jack Wilson are starting to heat up. There is some hesitation, however, on the Pittsburgh’s behalf because the club doesn’t want to alienate its fan base by trading away another popular player as it did last week [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/jack-wilson/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2009/0524/mlb_a_jwilson_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>According to a report by the <em>Pittsburgh Post-Gazette</em>, trade rumors between the Red Sox and Pirates involving shortstop Jack Wilson <a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09166/977462-63.stm" target="_blank">are starting to heat up</a>. There is some hesitation, however, on the Pittsburgh’s behalf because the club doesn’t want to alienate its fan base by trading away another popular player as it did last week when they dealt Nate McLouth to the Braves.</p>
<p>While Boston would love to add a shortstop while Jed Lowrie continues to recover from a wrist injury, I don’t know if Wilson would be the right fit. While he’s excellent defensively, Wilson brings little to the table offensively and he’s grossly overpaid (he’s set to make $7.25 million this year and $8.4 million in 2010 with a club option buyout of $600,000).</p>
<p>Even though Lowrie is hurt, he should return at some point this year and he gives the Sox a better overall player at the position than Wilson does. Not to mention, Lowrie is also cheaper.</p>
<p>The problem is waiting for Lowrie to return. He’s been out since mid April and while Nick Green has filled in admirably, he doesn’t offer much long-term upside. The other issue is that with Lowrie out, there’s a possibility that Julio Lugo may continue to see the field and as all Sox fans know, that’s a tragedy.</p>
<p>Personally, I think Boston would be better off not making a move for Wilson. Lowrie offers the Sox the most upside at the position and while it may be painful waiting for him to return, they might be better off in the long run if they hold off on making any moves (at least at shortstop).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/15/red-sox-interested-in-jack-wilson-but-do-they-need-him/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

