<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Scores Report - The National Sports Blog &#187; Mark DeRosa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scoresreport.com/tag/mark-derosa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scoresreport.com</link>
	<description>The National Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:39:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cards trade three prospects to A’s for Holliday</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/07/24/cardinals-trade-three-prospects-to-a%e2%80%99s-for-holliday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/07/24/cardinals-trade-three-prospects-to-a%e2%80%99s-for-holliday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A’s trade Matt Holliday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brett Wallace prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cardinals acquire Matt Holliday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Cubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clayton Mortensen prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark DeRosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Holliday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Holliday Cardinals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Holliday rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Holliday trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Holliday traded to Cardinals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milwaukee Brewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland A’s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Halladay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Halladay trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shane Peterson prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis Cardinals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=21730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The St. Louis Cardinals have finally found slugger Albert Pujols some protection in the lineup, as the Red Birds traded three minor league prospects to the A’s in exchange for outfielder Matt Holliday according to ESPN.com.
One of those three minor leaguers was Brett Wallace, who was Baseball America’s 40th-best prospect entering the season, while the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/matt-holliday/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2009/0601/mlb_g_mholliday1_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>The St. Louis Cardinals have finally found slugger Albert Pujols some protection in the lineup, as the Red Birds traded three minor league prospects to the A’s in exchange for outfielder Matt Holliday <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4353256" target="_blank">according to ESPN.com</a>.</p>
<p>One of those three minor leaguers was Brett Wallace, who was Baseball America’s 40th-best prospect entering the season, while the other two were 24-year old right-hander Clayton Mortensen and outfielder Shane Peterson, who was a second rounder in 2008. Apparently Oakland will also chip in $1.5 million to help pay for some of the $6 million still left on Holliday’s contract.</p>
<p>After a slow start, Holliday is now hitting .286 with 11 home runs and 54 RBI. He instantly makes the Cardinals the favorites to win the NL Central and challenge the Dodgers and Phillies for the NL Pennant by adding much-needed protection behind Pujols in the lineup. His presence in the order should also make players like Mark DeRosa and Ryan Ludwick better as well.</p>
<p>Billy Beane once again did well in a trade. The Oakland GM wanted to get Holliday’s contract off the books (or as much of it as he could), but he also didn’t want to just stick a for sale sign in Holliday&#8217;s forehead and give him away for free after trading multiple players to acquire him from Colorado last winter. With Holliday set to become a free agent at the end of the season, Beane did well to not only shed salary, but also get one of the Cards’ best prospects in Wallace.</p>
<p>What will be interesting to keep an eye on over the next two weeks as the trade deadline approaches, is whether or not the Cubs or Brewers will make a big move to counter this trade. Chicago doesn’t have much to offer in its farm system, but Milwaukee, as usual, is stacked and could look to add a pitcher. Although it would require giving up a haul, it’ll be interesting to see if the Brew Crew makes a run at Roy Halladay or the Tribe’s Cliff Lee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/07/24/cardinals-trade-three-prospects-to-a%e2%80%99s-for-holliday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time for the Cubs to stop playing Board Games</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/30/time-for-the-cubs-to-stop-playing-board-games/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/30/time-for-the-cubs-to-stop-playing-board-games/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Medsker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Cubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cubs should release Bradley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Hendry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Piniella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark DeRosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milton Bradley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raul Ibanez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[release Milton Bradley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suggestions for dealing with Bradley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspension]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=20818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's safe to say that this past offseason has been one of the worst for Jim Hendry during his tenure as General Manager of the Chicago Cubs. The Los Angeles Dodgers made a mockery of the Cubs' right-handed lineup in the playoffs by not throwing a single left-handed pitcher at them, and the Cubs responded to this glaring weakness by trading Mark DeRosa, the most versatile and well-liked player on the team – not to mention cheap, since he was in line to make an affordable $5.5 million in the final year of his contract – in order to free up some cash to sign a left-handed power hitter. For God knows what reason, Hendry doesn't even make an attempt to sign Raul Ibanez, a clubhouse prince who is good for 25 home runs and 100 RBIs year in and year out. Nope, Hendry set his sights on Milton Bradley, a talented but mercurial journeyman (the Cubs are the <i>eighth</i> team he's played for since his Major League debut in 2000) who just happened to put up career numbers in a contract year. The words "career numbers" sound good, but they come with one big-ass asterisk. Take a look at Bradley's career year numbers versus the 2008 stat lines of DeRosa and Ibanez:

Raul Ibanez: .292-85-23-110-2
Mark DeRosa: .285-104-21-87-6
Milton Bradley .321-78-22-77-5

It's a pretty average stat line as career numbers go, and don't forget that he put up those numbers primarily as a DH, and he still only played 126 games due to nagging injuries. Yep, this is the man that the Cubs hoped would save them, to the tune of three years and $30 million. To add insult to injury, DeRosa now plays for the rival Cardinals. 

<p class="photo_center"><img src="http://ftp.bullzeyerock.com/Photos/milton bradley.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"> <strong>"Let's see, if I strike out like that 100 more times this year...I still make $7 million! Ahhhh hahahahahahaha!"</strong></p>

And would you look at that; now that Bradley has his money, he can't hit water if he fell out of a boat. Well, let's qualify that -- he's actually hitting .333...<i>from the right side of the plate</i>. He's hitting .194 as a lefty, has been suspended for bumping an umpire, sent home by his manager after trashing yet another water cooler, and poisoned yet another clubhouse with his unpredictable temper. Bradley said before the season started that he had changed, that those days of flying off the handle (remember when he tore his ACL yelling at an umpire?) were long gone. How on earth did the Cubs believe him? Didn't they see the "South Park" movie? Bad people always say they'll change, but they never do. 

So what do the Cubs do with Bradley now? He's expected to take the next two days off to work on his approach from the left side of the plate with new hitting coach Von Joshua. A good start, but we have some other, admittedly extreme suggestions to the Bradley problem that we think the Cubs brass should consider. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s safe to say that this past offseason has been one of the worst for Jim Hendry during his tenure as General Manager of the Chicago Cubs. The Los Angeles Dodgers made a mockery of the Cubs&#8217; right-handed lineup in the playoffs by not throwing a single left-handed pitcher at them, and the Cubs responded to this glaring weakness by trading Mark DeRosa, the most versatile and well-liked player on the team – not to mention cheap, since he was in line to make an affordable $5.5 million in the final year of his contract – in order to free up some cash to sign a left-handed power hitter. For God knows what reason, Hendry doesn&#8217;t even make an attempt to sign Raul Ibanez, a clubhouse prince who is good for 25 home runs and 100 RBIs year in and year out. Nope, Hendry set his sights on Milton Bradley, a talented but mercurial journeyman (the Cubs are the <i>eighth</i> team he&#8217;s played for since his Major League debut in 2000) who just happened to put up career numbers in a contract year. The words &#8220;career numbers&#8221; sound good, but they come with one big-ass asterisk. Take a look at Bradley&#8217;s career year numbers versus the 2008 stat lines of DeRosa and Ibanez:</p>
<p>Raul Ibanez: .292-85-23-110-2<br />
Mark DeRosa: .285-104-21-87-6<br />
Milton Bradley .321-78-22-77-5</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a pretty average stat line as career numbers go, and don&#8217;t forget that he put up those numbers primarily as a DH, and he still only played 126 games due to nagging injuries. Yep, this is the man that the Cubs hoped would save them, to the tune of three years and $30 million. To add insult to injury, DeRosa now plays for the rival Cardinals. </p>
<p class="photo_center"><img src="http://ftp.bullzeyerock.com/Photos/milton bradley.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"> <strong>&#8220;Let&#8217;s see, if I strike out like that 100 more times this year&#8230;I still make $7 million! Ahhhh hahahahahahaha!&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>And would you look at that; now that Bradley has his money, he can&#8217;t hit water if he fell out of a boat. Well, let&#8217;s qualify that – he&#8217;s actually hitting .333&#8230;<i>from the right side of the plate</i>. He&#8217;s hitting .194 as a lefty, has been suspended for bumping an umpire, sent home by his manager after trashing yet another water cooler, and poisoned yet another clubhouse with his unpredictable temper. Bradley said before the season started that he had changed, that those days of flying off the handle (remember when he tore his ACL yelling at an umpire?) were long gone. How on earth did the Cubs believe him? Didn&#8217;t they see the &#8220;South Park&#8221; movie? Bad people always say they&#8217;ll change, but they never do. </p>
<p>So what do the Cubs do with Bradley now? He&#8217;s expected to take the next two days off to work on his approach from the left side of the plate with new hitting coach Von Joshua. A good start, but we have some other, admittedly extreme suggestions to the Bradley problem that we think the Cubs brass should consider. </p>
<p><b>Option #1: Release him</b><br />
<b>Pros:</b> The clubhouse is immediately free of his melodrama, and everyone can finally breathe again. The Cubs are sixth in team ERA, so the pitching is just fine. The hitters, however, are tight as a drum. Lose Bradley, and we&#8217;ll bet dollars to donuts that they start hitting again. The move would also send a strong message to both the team and the fans that management is in it to win it, and that they&#8217;re willing to put the team&#8217;s best interests ahead of everything else, even if it means Hendry wears egg on his face for the foreseeable future.<br />
<b>Cons:</b> The Cubs would be on the hook for the remainder of Bradley&#8217;s contract, which will hinder their ability to find a replacement on the free agent market. More importantly, pride always goeth before a fall when it comes to GMs taking responsibility for their bad contracts (see: Matthews, Gary Jr., and Rowand, Aaron), meaning Hendry is unlikely to say &#8220;My bad&#8221; anytime soon. From our standpoint, though, paying Bradley to disappear isn&#8217;t much different than the millions that the Reds are paying Ken Griffey Jr. in deferred money. Besides, who needs free agents when you have kids like Micah Hoffpauir and Jake Fox beating the snot out of the ball?</p>
<p><b>Option #2: Waive him</b><br />
<b>Pros:</b> This is the more financially sensible move, since anyone who claims Bradley would assume the remaining money left on his contract.<br />
<b>Cons:</b> No one is going to take on that contract. Bradley didn&#8217;t have a single multiyear deal on the table when the Cubs signed him, so there is no chance someone is going to suddenly want him for that many years when his value is at an all-time low. </p>
<p><b>Option #3: Send him to the minors</b><br />
<b>Pros:</b> It frees up a roster spot with the big league club while allowing Bradley to get out of the spotlight for a while and figure things out.<br />
<b>Cons:</b> He&#8217;s still a Cub. Plus, Bradley would surely have to approve such a move, and something tells us his ego is much too large to accept a demotion with anything resembling grace. </p>
<p><b>Option #4: Place him on the 15-day disabled list with social anxiety disorder</b><br />
<b>Pros:</b> This is our personal favorite. Much like a demotion to the minors, this would free up a spot on the major league roster, while sending a loud, clear message to Bradley that management will not tolerate his immaturity for another minute. It&#8217;s like a shock collar for a ball player. Punch the water cooler? Boom, you&#8217;re on the disabled list, no injury required. Want management to take off the shock collar? Then <i>quit being a jackass</i>. And while Bradley may not be &#8220;anxious,&#8221; one could definitely make an argument for the man having one social disorder or another. As an added bonus, Bradley would be incensed with the designation, which is sort of the point; it&#8217;s not about you, Milton. It&#8217;s about the team. If management has to completely destroy your ego in order for you to understand that, so be it.<br />
<b>Cons:</b> Again, he&#8217;s still a Cub. And even if the time away improves his attitude, there is no guarantee it will improve his hitting. </p>
<p>Sweet Lou Piniella apologized for sending Bradley home during last Friday&#8217;s game against the White Sox. To us, that was a mistake. There are far too many instances these days of management cowtowing to players that have not earned the respect they think they deserve, and few epitomize that better than Bradley. The man doesn&#8217;t just need to be humbled: he needs to be <i>broken</i>, like a wild horse. If the Cubs do not want to make the effort to break him, then they should cut him. Cubs fans have waited far too long for a title to be stuck with this clown for another two and a half years. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/30/time-for-the-cubs-to-stop-playing-board-games/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Cardinals to go after Holliday</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/29/report-cardinals-to-go-after-holliday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/29/report-cardinals-to-go-after-holliday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albert Pujols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cardinals trade for Mark DeRosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark DeRosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Holliday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Holliday Cardinals rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Holliday rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Holliday trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis Cardinals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis Cardinals rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=20724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
According to a report by the St. Louis Dispatch, the Cardinals are “redoubling efforts” to acquire A’s outfielder Matt Holliday, who is 29 and will be a free agent at the end of the season.
Even though the club acquired utility man Mark DeRosa from the Indians over the weekend, St. Louis manager Tony La Russa [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/matt-holliday/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2009/0414/mlb_g_mholliday1_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>According to a report by the <em>St. Louis Dispatch</em>, the Cardinals are “redoubling efforts” to <a href="http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/sports/stories.nsf/cardinals/story/1E3B3C89EA6C7E42862575E2000C428E?OpenDocument" target="_blank">acquire A’s outfielder Matt Holliday</a>, who is 29 and will be a free agent at the end of the season.</p>
<p>Even though the club acquired utility man Mark DeRosa from the Indians over the weekend, St. Louis manager Tony La Russa still wants to add a bat to serve as protection for Albert Pujols, who is essentially exposed in the Cards’ lineup with nobody hitting around him.</p>
<p>Holliday certainly isn’t setting the world on fire with his bat (he’s hitting just .274 with 8 HRs and 39 RBI) this season, but he could certainly get hot in the second half, especially if he winds up back in the NL were he’s used to the pitching.</p>
<p>The Cards actually tried to acquire Holliday last fall, but weren’t unwilling to part with the prospects that the Rockies wanted in order to complete the deal. The <em>St. Louis Post-Dispatch</em> speculates that the Red Birds would be willing to include Ryan Ludwick and either reliever Jason Motte or Kyle McClellan, plus a prospect.</p>
<p>St. Louis already has enough offense to battle the Brewers in the NL Central, but if they could acquire Holliday to go along with the addition of DeRosa, the Cards might be able to create some separation in the division.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/29/report-cardinals-to-go-after-holliday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cardinals acquire Mark DeRosa from Indians</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/28/cardinals-acquire-mark-derosa-from-indians/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/28/cardinals-acquire-mark-derosa-from-indians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 12:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cardinals rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Perez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Perez traded to Indians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland Indians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indians rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark DeRosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark DeRosa trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark DeRosa traded to Cardinals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB trades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis Cardinals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Who did the Indians get in exchange for Mark DeRosa?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=20680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
One of the more coveted veterans on the trade market has officially been snatched by the Cardinals, as the Red Birds acquired super utility man Mark DeRosa from the Indians in exchange for pitcher Chris Perez and a player to be named later.
The versatile DeRosa was a very sought-after player, especially by National League clubs. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/mark-derosa/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2009/0312/in_a_derosa_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>One of the more coveted veterans on the trade market has officially been snatched by the Cardinals, as the Red Birds <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/baseball/mlb/06/27/heyman.derosa/index.html" target="_blank">acquired super utility man Mark DeRosa</a> from the Indians in exchange for pitcher Chris Perez and a player to be named later.</p>
<blockquote><p>The versatile DeRosa was a very sought-after player, especially by National League clubs. He can fit as a third baseman for the Cardinals. The Giants, Mets, Braves and Cubs were other teams believed to have had some interest. The Indians have been shopping him for a couple weeks.</p>
<p>DeRosa, who the Indians acquired from the Chicago Cubs in a trade last offseason, was hitting .270 with 13 homers and 50 RBIs.</p>
<p>Perez has a 4.18 ERA in 29 appearances with a 1-1 record and one save.</p></blockquote>
<p>Both teams essentially get what they wanted with this trade. Cleveland coveted a young pitcher (Perez is only 24) in exchange for DeRosa (who becomes a free agent at the end of the year) and St. Louis wanted to add another bat to protect Albert Pujols in the lineup. They also needed help on the left side of the infield, which DeRosa can certainly offer.</p>
<p>Kind of rough market when Mark DeRosa is one of the more coveted players, although that’s not a dig at DeRosa, who can play almost every position and is a solid hitter. But one year ago CC Sabathia was the top name making its rounds on the rumor mill, while two years ago it was Mark Teixeira. DeRosa doesn&#8217;t really compare to those names now does he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/28/cardinals-acquire-mark-derosa-from-indians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MLB Trade Rumors: Beltre, DeRosa and Washburn</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/23/mlb-trade-rumors-beltre-derosa-and-washburn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/23/mlb-trade-rumors-beltre-derosa-and-washburn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Harang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Beltre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Beltre trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aubrey Huff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bronson Arroyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diamondbacks trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodgers trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erik Bedard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felipe Lopez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indians trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Peavy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jarrod Washburn trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Marquis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Garland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mariners trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark DeRosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark DeRosa trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mets trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Johnson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=20416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
- According to SI.com, the Mariners have yet to receive any interest for third baseman Adrian Beltre, who Seattle would love to move because he’s in the last year of his $64 million contract.
- One name that continues to be involved almost daily on the rumor mill is Indians utility man Mark DeRosa. According to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/adrian-beltre/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2009/0330/fantasy_u_beltre_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>- <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/jon_heyman/06/22/big.spenders/1.html" target="_blank">According to SI.com</a>, the Mariners have yet to receive any interest for third baseman Adrian Beltre, who Seattle would love to move because he’s in the last year of his $64 million contract.</p>
<p>- One name that continues to be involved almost daily on the rumor mill is Indians utility man Mark DeRosa. <a href="http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?name=olney_buster" target="_blank">According to ESPN’s Buster Olney</a>, the Cardinals and Yankees have expressed interest in DeRosa, but neither are willing to give up young pitching like Cleveland covets.</p>
<p>- The Mets are rumored to be interested in DeRosa, Nationals first baseman Nick Johnson and Orioles one-bagger Aubrey Huff, but <em>Newsday’s</em> Ken Davidoff writes that the club shouldn’t make <a href="http://www.newsday.com/sports/baseball/mets/ny-spmside2312908173jun22,0,6381199.story" target="_blank">any stupid trades</a> just to fill a spot while Carlos Beltran is on the DL.</p>
<p>- <a href="http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090622&#038;content_id=5471056&#038;vkey=news_ari&#038;fext=.jsp&#038;c_id=ari&#038;partnerId=rss_ari" target="_blank">MLB.com</a> reports that the Diamondbacks could become sellers soon and that pitchers Doug Davis and Jon Garland, as well as second baseman Felipe Lopez could all be on the trade block.</p>
<p>- The Phillies <a href="http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20090623/SPORTS01/906230321/1002/SPORTS" target="_blank">want to add an arm</a>, but the pitchers they’re looking at (Erik Bedard, Jake Peavy, Aaron Harang, Bronson Arroyo and Jason Marquis) are either hurt or playing for contending teams.</p>
<p>- The Dodgers have interest in Seattle pitcher Jarrod Washburn <a href="http://mlb.fanhouse.com/2009/06/22/jarrod-washburn-tied-to-dodgers-in-trade-rumors/" target="_blank">according to MLB Fanhouse</a> and Juan Pierre’s name has come up as a potential trade piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/23/mlb-trade-rumors-beltre-derosa-and-washburn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five MLB trades that don’t need to happen</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/15/five-mlb-trades-that-don%e2%80%99t-need-to-happen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/15/five-mlb-trades-that-don%e2%80%99t-need-to-happen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Gonzalez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Gonzalez trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Red Sox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Penny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Penny trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Uggla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Uggla Giants trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Uggla rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houston Astros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Wilson Red Sox trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Wilson trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Peavy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Peavy trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jed Lowrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Smoltz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Smoltz return]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julio Lugo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark DeRosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark DeRosa Cardinals trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miguel Tejada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miguel Tejada Cardinals rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miguel Tejada trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego Padres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis Cardinals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=20047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I get it – baseball trades are fun. They’re fun to speculate about, they’re fun to debate and they’re fun to analyze. But just because a club needs a bat, an arm or is just looking to shrink salary, doesn’t mean that a trade needs to happen.
I’ve compiled a list of five trade rumors and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/results?searchString=miguel%20tejada&#038;start=15&#038;dims=8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2008/0522/mlb_a_tejada_412.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>I get it – baseball trades are fun. They’re fun to speculate about, they’re fun to debate and they’re fun to analyze. But just because a club needs a bat, an arm or is just looking to shrink salary, doesn’t mean that a trade needs to happen.</p>
<p>I’ve compiled a list of five trade rumors and where they originated. I then discuss why each of them makes sense, but why they also don’t necessarily need to happen.</p>
<p><strong>Rumor #1: The Red Sox will trade for Pirates shortstop Jack Wilson</strong> (<em><a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09166/977462-63.stm?cmpid=pirates.xml" target="_blank">Pittsburgh Post-Gazette</a></em>)<br />
<strong><em>Why it makes sense:</em></strong> Boston is growing impatient waiting for Jed Lowrie to recover from a wrist injury that has held him out since mid-April. They’re also tired of watching Julio Lugo (who is equally bad offensively as he is defensively) make a mockery of the game whenever he trots onto the field. While Nick Green has done well filling in for Lowrie while he’s been hurt and for Lugo while he continues to work on being the most overpaid player in professional sports, the Sox feel they could do better with Wilson. (There’s also a rumor making the rounds that Boston wouldn’t have to give up any top prospects in order to acquire Wilson – they just would need to take on the rest of his salary.)<br />
<strong><em>Why it doesn’t need to happen:</em></strong> Wilson is excellent defensively, but he brings very little to the table in terms of offense. He’s also overpaid himself, as he’ll make $7.25 million this year and $8.4 million in 2010 despite being limited at the dish. While waiting for Lowrie to return to the field has been a slow death for the Sox, he’s cheaper than Wilson and gives the team a better overall player at the position (when he’s healthy, of course). Plus, Green has played well and Boston might be better served holding onto prospects in order to make a more productive move around the trade deadline (i.e. adding another bat in case David Oritz plans on hitting south of .200 all season) than one involving Wilson.</p>
<p><span id="more-20047"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/dan-uggla/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2008/0529/mlb_a_uggla2_580.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Rumor #2: The Giants will trade for Marlins second baseman Dan Uggla</strong> (<em><a href="http://blogs.sun-sentinel.com/sports_baseball_marlins/2009/05/florida-marlins-should-they-engage-giants-in-uggla-trade-talks.html" target="_blank">Sun-Sentinel</a></em>)<br />
<strong><em>Why it makes sense:</em></strong> The Giants are playing better than most expected this season, but they’re doing it all with pitching. They’ve surrendered the fewest runs this year (233), but have scored the third fewest (248) themselves. San Fran might not be able to catch the streaking Dodgers in the NL West (as of this writing, the Giants are seven games back of L.A. in the division despite being six games above .500), but if they continue to play well, the Wild Card is certainly attainable. But they need offense – badly. While Uggla’s batting average has been atrocious all season, he does have 11 home runs and 40 RBI so the thought is that he could add much-needed pop to the Giants’ lineup.<br />
<em><strong>Why it doesn’t need to happen:</strong> </em>Yes, the Giants do need offense. But don’t forget that they play in a pitcher’s park so even if they did acquire Uggla, who knows how his power would translate to AT&#038;T Park. And his average is death so if he’s not going to hit home runs, he’s not worth acquiring (and don’t forget that his defense is brutal, too). The Giants’ current starting second baseman is Emmanuel Burriss, who has zero pop and has struggled at the plate despite tearing it up in the spring, but he has an outstanding glove and he’s young. It’s rumored that the Marlins would be looking for young pitching in exchange for Uggla, but it’s not worth it for the Giants to give up a young arm like Jonathan Sanchez (even though he’s struggling) to acquire Uggla while there are still options within the organization (and I don&#8217;t necessarily mean Burriss, who has been brutal, but Kevin Frandsen, who has been absolutely hosed by the organization this season). Plus, the Giants aren’t one bat away from making a deep postseason run – they’re two or three bats away. Acquiring Uggla isn’t going to change that. The Giants have also been linked to players like Adam Dunn and Paul Konerko and I would say the same thing about them as I do about Uggla – those players aren’t worth giving up young arms with the Giants still a year or two away from seriously competing. Unless they could get a young bat in a deal, San Fran GM Brian Sabean should stand pat and continue his rebuilding plan.</p>
<p><strong>Rumor #3: The Cardinals will trade for Astros shortstop Miguel Tejada</strong> (<em><a href="http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/sports/stories.nsf/cardinals/story/207D8A0BFA2DDA3A862575D2000E047E?OpenDocument" target="_blank">St. Louis Post-Dispatch</a></em>)<br />
<strong><em>Why it makes sense:</em></strong> Manager Tony La Russa desperately wants to add another bat to the lineup to help protect Albert Pujols and upgrading the left side of the infield while Troy Glaus and Khalil Greene continue to miss time is a necessity as well. Tejada would cover both needs as he’s hitting .344 with six home runs and some feel as though he can play third base if needed, although he has never actually played there before.<br />
<strong><em>Why it doesn’t need to happen:</em></strong> First and foremost, there’s no guarantee that the Astros would want to trade within their own division. Plus, despite currently being three games under .500 and in last place, Houston is only four games back of the Brewers in the NL Central, so they’ll hang onto Tejada if they feel as though they have a shot at the playoffs (however slim those hopes may be). But looking at this from the Cardinals’ perspective, acquiring Tejada doesn’t make as much sense as going after someone like Cleveland’s Mark DeRosa, who is also rumored to be available. Tejada will earn $13 million in 2009 and is set to become a free agent in 2010. Chances are, St. Louis wouldn’t re-sign Tejada in the offseason and they’d probably have to pay Houston a premium because it would be a trade down within the division. Throw in the fact that Tejada isn’t that great of a defensive player and adding him makes little sense. A guy like DeRosa would still give the Cards a quality bat, a better defender who has actually spent time at third base, and cheaper player to boot.</p>
<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/adrian-gonzalez/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2009/0517/mlb_a_agonz_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Rumor #4: The Padres will trade Adrian Gonzalez</strong> (<a href="http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/06/olney-on-adrian-gonzalez.html" target="_blank">ESPN.com’s Buster Onley</a>)<br />
<strong><em>Why it makes sense:</em></strong> It doesn’t make sense unless you look at it from the view of the Padres’ front office, who wants to cut team salary significantly. (That’s why San Diego has been actively shopping Jake Peavy.)<br />
<strong><em>Why it doesn’t need to happen:</em></strong> This is more of a notion than a rumor. As previously noted, the Padres want to cut salary but they’ve been unable to move Peavy, so speculation has it that they could wind up dealing Gonzo if the right trade comes along. But while cutting salary is important to the front office, GM Kevin Towers can’t just give up a young slugger like Gonzalez in a cost-cutting move. Obviously Towers would get a couple of prospects in exchange for Gonzo, but would he be willing to take a lesser deal just to free up some money? If so, that would be incredibly disappointing for a Padre fan base that has embraced Gonzalez and hopes that he’ll still be around when San Diego eventually is competitive again (whenever that might be).</p>
<p><strong>Rumor #5: The Red Sox will trade Brad Penny</strong> (<em><a href="http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/extras/extra_bases/2009/06/penny_in_demand.html" target="_blank">Boston Globe</a></em>)<br />
<strong><em>Why it makes sense:</em></strong> With John Smoltz set to come back soon from a rehab assignment, Penny will be expandable to the Red Sox, who have discussed moving him to the pen (despite his unwillingness) when Smoltz returns to the mound. Boston seemingly has an abundance of starting pitching and if they could get a couple of prospects or a position player of worth in exchange for Penny, why not move him?<br />
<strong><em>Why it doesn’t need to happen:</em></strong> A lot has been made about Boston’s pitching depth, but things could go from good to ugly at the drop of a dime. Dice-K has been brutal and has already made one trip to the DL. Josh Beckett started off slow, recovered to pitch incredibly well over the last month but then was shelled yesterday in Philadelphia. Smoltz is set to return from his rehab assignment, but who knows how he’ll pitch once he faces major league batters again. So essentially yes, the Red Sox do have a ton of depth. But that could vanish in a heartbeat and while Penny has looked good in his last three starts, teams aren’t going to be willing to overpay for the 31-year old’s services – especially knowing that Boston has an abundance of arms. In the end, holding on to Penny for depth and in case of injuries to other starters might be worth it in the end. Of course, if some club offers a top prospect in exchange for Penny (which is doubtful), then all bets are off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/15/five-mlb-trades-that-don%e2%80%99t-need-to-happen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tribe come from 10 runs down to beat Rays</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/05/26/tribe-come-from-10-runs-down-to-beat-rays/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/05/26/tribe-come-from-10-runs-down-to-beat-rays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asdrubal Cabrera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fausto Carmona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indians beat Rays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indians come from 10 runs down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indians come from behind win over Rays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indians rally to beat Rays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indians rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indians’ rally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamey Carroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Isringhausen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jhonny Peralta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark DeRosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid Brignac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shin-Soo Choo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victor Martinez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=18962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
With their 11-10 win over the Rays on Monday night, the Indians became the first team to win a game after trailing by 10 runs since the Rangers rallied to beat the Tigers in 2004.
Thanks to another brutal performance by Fausto Carmona in which he walked the first four men he faced in the second [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/victor-martinez/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="298" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/media/apphoto/d8838ae6-32e0-4950-a72b-6658899712ca.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>With their 11-10 win over the Rays on Monday night, the Indians became the first team to win a game after trailing by 10 runs since the Rangers rallied to beat the Tigers in 2004.</p>
<p>Thanks to another brutal performance by Fausto Carmona in which he walked the first four men he faced in the second inning on 20 pitches and gave up five runs while getting only one out, the Tribe fell behind 5-0 after only two innings. Cleveland then surrendered five more runs to fall behind 10-0 after three and a half innings before scratching across two runs in the fourth and two more in the eighth to make it 10-4 Rays.</p>
<p>The massive rally in the ninth started when Grady Sizemore walked, Victor Martinez popped out to third, Jhonny Peralta singled to left and then a throwing error on a ground ball by Shin-Soo Choo allowed Sizemore to score and Peralta to get to third. Mark DeRosa then lined out for the second out of the inning, but Ryan Garko belted a three-run dinger to cut Tampa’s lead down to 10-8. After Asdrubal Cabrera, Ben Francisco and Jamey Carroll all walked, Rays’ reliever Jason Isringhausen then walked Sizemore to force a run home to make the game 10-9. The final dagger for Tampa came when Martinez singled home Francisco and Carroll to give the Indians an improbable 11-10 win.</p>
<p>It’s amazing how games can turn in the blink of an eye. Had Rays’ shortstop Reid Brignac not made a throwing error on Choo’s grounder, Tampa probably would have turned a double play and the game would have been over. But one thing leads to the next and before you know it, your team loses. (Of course, the 67 walks in the ninth didn&#8217;t help the Rays either.)</p>
<p>Despite the win, Carmona once again had major control issues. It’s amazing to think that he was viewed as one of the better young arms in baseball just two years ago and now he’s on a crash course to baseball purgatory. Also, top pitching prospect David Price failed to get out of the fourth inning in his debut, although he did strike out six. Like Carmona, Price had major issues with his control and threw 100 pitches to record just 10 outs. He walked five in total.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/05/26/tribe-come-from-10-runs-down-to-beat-rays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
