<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Scores Report - The National Sports Blog &#187; LSU Tigers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scoresreport.com/tag/lsu-tigers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scoresreport.com</link>
	<description>The National Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:48:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Celebration penalty dooms Georgia in loss to LSU</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/10/03/celebration-penalty-dooms-georgia-in-loss-to-lsu/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/10/03/celebration-penalty-dooms-georgia-in-loss-to-lsu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 23:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[College Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 College Football Week 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A.J. Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Football Week 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Football Week 5 scores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Bulldogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Cox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU Georgia score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU Georgia scoreboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU Tigers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=25766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
When did college football referees decide to hate the world and ruin everyone’s fun?
Down 12-7 with just over a minute remaining in their game against LSU on Saturday, Georgia quarterback Joe Cox found receiver A.J. Green for a 16-yard touchdown pass to give the Bulldogs a 13-12 lead. 
Following the play, Green foolishly decided to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/photos?photoId=2347066&#038;gameId=292760061" target="_blank"><img height="268" width="477" src="http://a.espncdn.com/media/apphoto/d3310c0e-ae33-4f6d-a684-3bf149b2e2ab.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>When did college football referees decide to hate the world and ruin everyone’s fun?</p>
<p>Down 12-7 with just over a minute remaining in their game against LSU on Saturday, Georgia quarterback Joe Cox found receiver A.J. Green for a 16-yard touchdown pass to give the Bulldogs a 13-12 lead. </p>
<p>Following the play, Green foolishly decided to act joyful about the touchdown pass and celebrate with his teammates, who mobbed him in the end zone. The refs flagged Green for excessive celebration (because you know, nobody should be allowed to show emotion about a touchdown), which is a 15-yard unsportsmanlike conduct penalty, added on to the ensuing kickoff.</p>
<p>After Georgia failed to convert the 2-point conversation, LSU set itself up at the Bulldog 38-yard line with much help from the penalty. Two players later, Charles Scott broke free for a 33-yard touchdown to put the Tigers up 18-13. A 2-point conversation later and <a href="http://www.ncaa.com/teams/m-footbl/scoreboards/sec/20091003_game_recap_geo.html" target="_blank">LSU hung on for a 20-13 victory</a>.</p>
<p>The celebration penalty was a freaking joke. It’s not like Green and his teammates choreographed a dance in the end zone that went on for five minutes, nor did Green mimic calling somebody on a cell phone he hid in the goal post. It was a crap call and at the very least, aided in LSU’s victory. (Scott was also called for excessive celebration after his TD run, which was just as bad as the call on Green.)</p>
<p>That said, Georgia played like crap in the first half, benefited from two costly LSU turnovers that probably would have generated points and allowed Scott to run basically untouched to the end zone on the game-winning touchdown. The Dawgs didn’t do enough offensively to earn the win and while the penalty certainly helped the Tigers, LSU outplayed UGA for most of the game.</p>
<p>As for the Tigers, they owe their 5-0 record and No. 4 ranking to the defense, because the LSU offense has been incredibly inconsistent so far this season. They moved the ball well in the first half and in the fourth quarter against Georgia, but once the Dawgs made adjustments at halftime, the Tigers didn’t have an answer. </p>
<p>Still, getting a win in Athens is tough and LSU deserves credit for the win, especially considering many pundits deemed the Tigers overrated coming into this game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/10/03/celebration-penalty-dooms-georgia-in-loss-to-lsu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 College Football Picks &amp; Predictions: Week 5</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/10/01/2009-college-football-picks-predictions-week-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/10/01/2009-college-football-picks-predictions-week-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[College Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 College Football Week 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football expert picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Football Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College football predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Football Week 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football week 5 free picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football week 5 picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football week 5 prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Bulldogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jahvid Best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Cox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU Georgia free pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU Tigers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lsu vs georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Barkley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Golden Gophers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notre Dame Fighting Irish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USC Cal Free Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Huskies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Notre Dame Free Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[week 5 college football picks predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Minnesota Free Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=25545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
No. 4 LSU at No. 18 Georgia, 3:30PM ET
Last year, Georgia rolled into Tiger Stadium and laid a 52-38 beat down on LSU as they forced three turnovers and running back Knowshon Moreno (now a Denver Bronco) racked up 163 yards on 21 carries. After an ugly 24-10 loss to Oklahoma State in the opening [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/joe-cox/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="268" width="477" src="http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2009/0612/ncf_u_jcox1_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><strong>No. 4 LSU at No. 18 Georgia, 3:30PM ET</strong><br />
Last year, Georgia rolled into Tiger Stadium and laid a 52-38 beat down on LSU as they forced three turnovers and running back Knowshon Moreno (now a Denver Bronco) racked up 163 yards on 21 carries. After an ugly 24-10 loss to Oklahoma State in the opening week of the season, the Bulldogs have rattled off three straight wins and will now face a Tiger team that struggled a bit offensively last week in a narrow 30-26 win over Mississippi State. LSU was outgained 374-263 and only rushed for 30 yards in the victory. The Tigers usually feast on pro-style offenses, so UGA quarterback Joe Cox can’t force throws in attempt to make something happen down field. That said, the Tigers haven’t been tested yet and needed a goal line stand to pull off the win last week. Georgia, on the other hand, has already faced a ranked OK State team and beaten competitive SEC foes South Carolina and Arkansas. The Bulldogs are more battle tested and will overcome a stiff Tiger defense.<br />
<strong>Odds:</strong> Georgia –3.<br />
<strong>Prediction:</strong> Georgia 24, LSU 20.</p>
<p><strong>No. 7 USC at No. 24 California, 8:00PM ET</strong><br />
Don’t everyone break your legs jumping off the Cal bandwagon after Oregon smacked the Golden Bears 42-3 last week. Heisman candidate Jahvid Best rushed for only 55 yards in the loss and will face another tough challenge this week against a USC defense that held him to only 30 yards last season. The Trojans have the sixth best defense in the nation and the fifth best scoring defense. They have limited opponents to only 59.5 rushing yards per game and only 95 YPC threw the air. That said, Cal has played USC close over the years and the Trojans have kept things rather conservative offensively with freshman Matt Barkley under center. I see this game being close, although I don’t know if Kevin Riley can beat USC through the air if the Trojans’ front seven takes away Best.<br />
<strong>Odds:</strong> USC –4.5.<br />
<strong>Prediction:</strong> USC 20, Cal 17.</p>
<p><span id="more-25545"></span></p>
<p><strong>Washington at Notre Dame, 3:30PM ET</strong><br />
A week after upsetting USC at home, Washington crashed back to earth last Saturday in a 34-14 loss at Stanford. The Huskies will have issues controlling the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball, but quarterback Jake Locker could have some success once he rolls out of the pocket and throws on the move. I don’t foresee Washington pulling off an upset, but considering ND quarterback Jimmy Clausen is dealing with a turf toe injury, running back Armando Allen’s ankle isn’t 100% and receiver Michael Floyd is out for the year, the Huskies should keep things close in South Bend.<br />
<strong>Odds:</strong> Notre Dame –13.<br />
<strong>Prediction:</strong> Notre Dame 27, Washington 20.</p>
<p><strong>Wisconsin at Minnesota, 12:00PM ET</strong><br />
The Golden Gophers are in a bit of a transition with new coordinators taking over on both sides of the ball, but they’ve steadily improved each week and I think this is the year they finally take back Paul Bunyan’s Axe. Wisconsin’s front four has struggled a bit this season and while Minnesota’s running game hasn’t been great, the Gophers did tally 166 yards on the ground last week in a win over Northwestern. This is the first time the Badgers will go on the road this year and they could struggle playing at the new digs of TCF Bank Stadium. I like the combination of quarterback Adam Weber and receiver Eric Decker to pull off a victory this week for the Gophers.<br />
<strong>Odds:</strong> Minnesota –3.<br />
<strong>Prediction:</strong> Minnesota 30, Wisconsin 24. </p>
<p><strong>Season Totals:</strong><br />
Straight up: 5-3<br />
Against the Spread: 2-6</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/10/01/2009-college-football-picks-predictions-week-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LSU narrowly defeats Mississippi State</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/09/26/lsu-narrowly-defeats-mississippi-state/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/09/26/lsu-narrowly-defeats-mississippi-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Glotfelty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[College Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 college football scores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 College Football Week 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football scores 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Football Week 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Football Week 4 recaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU at Mississippi State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU Tigers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU Tigers football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lsu vs Mississippi state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU-Mississippi State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU-Mississippi State recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU-Mississippi State score]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU-Mississippi State stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miss St.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miss St. football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi State Bulldogs football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC Game of the Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tigers-Bulldogs football]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=25140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
If one were to only watch this game&#8217;s first quarter, their views on both teams would be drastically shaken. No. 7 LSU went into this game 3-0 and had won nine straight against their opponents from Mississippi State. At the end of the first quarter, the Bulldogs somehow held a 14-13 lead. It seemed as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://walterfootball.com/forum/showthread.php?p=233134" target="_blank"><img width="477" height="318" src="http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/054ZadG89Aemq/610x.jpg" alt="LaFell" /></a></p>
<p>If one were to only watch this game&#8217;s first quarter, their views on both teams would be drastically shaken. No. 7 LSU went into this game 3-0 and had won nine straight against their opponents from Mississippi State. At the end of the first quarter, the Bulldogs somehow held a 14-13 lead. It seemed as though fans could sense an upset as they suddenly piled into the stadium well after the opening whistle. Quickly, however, that ornate offense helmed by Mississippi State quarterback Tyson Lee gradually dismantled. By the end of the first half, Lee had thrown three interceptions and his team had committed a total of four turnovers. Luckily for them, LSU didn&#8217;t look any sharper &#8212; on either end of the field. Their skimpy defense was obvious to anyone watching. We knew that could be a problem coming in, but what was up with their rushing? With a total of seven yards rushing at the half, LSU coach Les Miles was left dumbfounded. Both teams had multiple opportunities to score, but sloppy play prevented either from increasing a lead. At the end of the half, No. 7 LSU was on top 16-14.</p>
<p>In their first possession of the third quarter, LSU quarterback Jordan Jefferson connected with Brandon LaFell for a 58-yard touchdown pass. Despite their embarrassing first half performance, LSU suddenly looked like a real team. Still, Mississippi State would respond with a touchdown of their own. But Chad Johnson&#8217;s beautiful 93-yard punt return for a touchdown again rejuvenated the Tigers. Come the fourth quarter, Mississippi State completely depended on star running back Anthony Dixon to carry their team. This proved to be a wise decision, as he would finish the game with two touchdowns on 106 yards.</p>
<p>With 1:20 left in the game, Mississippi State came within four inches of scoring, thanks again to Anthony Dixon. However, they couldn&#8217;t convert their momentum into a touchdown as LSU&#8217;s defense finally made an impact when it mattered most. In what was a surprisingly close game, LSU defeated Mississippi State 30-26.</p>
<p>Lastly, hats off to Mississippi State&#8217;s new coach, Dan Mullen, who kept his team in the game against one of the strongest programs in college football.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/09/26/lsu-narrowly-defeats-mississippi-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 CFB Preview: LSU Tigers</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/08/26/2009-cfb-preview-lsu-tigers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/08/26/2009-cfb-preview-lsu-tigers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 04:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[College Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 College Football predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 College Football Preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 College Football rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ciron Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college football predictions 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Football Preview 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Coleman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jarrett Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU Tigers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU Tigers 2009 Season Preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU Tigers preview]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=23158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Check out our other 2009 college football previews.
Preseason Ranking: No. 11 in AP Top 25; No. 9 in USA Today Poll.
Key Returning Players: Charles Scott (RB); Keiland Williams (RB); Jarrett Lee (QB); Brandon LaFell (WR); Richard Dickson (WR); Ciron Black (OT); Harry Coleman (S); Chad Jones (S); Danny McCray (S); Rahim Alem (DE); Charles Alexander [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/charles-scott/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="268" width="477" src="http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2009/0618/ncf_u_scott_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.scoresreport.com/tag/college-football-preview-2009/">Check out our other 2009 college football previews.</a></p>
<p><strong>Preseason Ranking:</strong> No. 11 in AP Top 25; No. 9 in USA Today Poll.</p>
<p><strong>Key Returning Players:</strong> Charles Scott (RB); Keiland Williams (RB); Jarrett Lee (QB); Brandon LaFell (WR); Richard Dickson (WR); Ciron Black (OT); Harry Coleman (S); Chad Jones (S); Danny McCray (S); Rahim Alem (DE); Charles Alexander (DT); Kelvin Sheppard (LB); Perry Riley (LB); Chris Hawkins (CB); Jai Eugene (CB).</p>
<p><strong>Key Losses:</strong> Tyson Jackson (DE); Ricky Jean-Francois (DT); Darry Beckwith (LB); Demetrius Byrd (WR); Colt David (K); Marlon Favorite (DT); Brett Helms (C); Herman Johnson (G); Curtis Taylor (S); Tremaine Johnson (DE); Quinn Johnson (FB); Kirston Pittman (DE).</p>
<p><strong>Player to Watch:</strong> <em>Charles Scott, RB</em>.<br />
After racking up 1,174 yards on 217 carries and 18 touchdowns last season, Scott proved to be a star in the making. The thundering back will once again be the backbone of the Tigers’ offense and is coming off a solid showing in the Tigers’ spring game in April. Head coach Les Miles also says that this year’s version of the offensive line will be the best blocking unit since he’s been at LSU, which is another reason to love Scott’s potential in ’09.</p>
<p><span id="more-23158"></span></p>
<p><strong>Team Strength:</strong> The defensive back seven will keep the Tigers in contention all season. Safety Harry Coleman (who is a star in the making) returns after amassing 71 tackles last season, as does defensive end Rahim Alem (eight sacks) and cornerback Chris Hawkins (three interceptions). The linebacker duo of Perry Riley and Kelvin Sheppard are set for productive seasons, while Hawkins’ partner in crime, Jai Eugene, is solid overall defender.</p>
<p><strong>Potential Weakness:</strong> In Scott, massive offensive tackle Ciron Black, and receiver Brandon LaFell, quarterback Jarrett Lee has more than enough talent around him to succeed. But the redshirt sophomore struggled to find consistency last year in a tough conference, throwing 16 interceptions. That’s not to say that he can’t develop into a quality quarterback, because he did show flashes of potential last year. But a lot of LSU’s success this season depends on whether or not Lee can limit the mistakes and be a more consistent passer.</p>
<p><strong>Outlook:</strong> As previously mentioned, the Tigers rest most of their hopes this season on Lee. The decisions by Scott and Black to return for their senior seasons was huge for LSU’s chances of competing in the SEC this year, although the Tigers won’t survive if Lee can’t cut down on the mistakes that haunted him last year. But the good news for LSU is that sophomore Jordan Jefferson completed 36 of 73 passes while tossing four touchdowns and just one interception last year. So if Lee struggles early in the season or can’t get it done against some of the conference’s stiffer competition, Miles has a viable backup plan in Jefferson. Defensively, the back seven will be stout, but the Tigers have a major challenge on their hands replacing defensive linemen Tyson Jackson, Ricky Jean-Francois, Marlon Favorite and Kirston Pittman. If the front four can’t generate consistent pressure on the opposing quarterback, it won’t matter how good the back seven is.</p>
<p>Overall, this is a good team that will certainly give Alabama and Ole’ Miss a run for their money in the SEC West. But an appearance in the SEC Championship could rest on the play of either Lee or Jefferson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/08/26/2009-cfb-preview-lsu-tigers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Heisman Hopefuls Version 1.0</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/08/20/top-10-heisman-hopefuls-version-10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/08/20/top-10-heisman-hopefuls-version-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[College Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 College Football rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Heisman Trophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Heisman Trophy candidates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Heisman Trophy rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Golden Bears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Football Preview 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College football top 10 lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt McCoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Royster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Gators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jahvid Best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jevan Snead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Clausen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Dwyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU Tigers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notre Dame Fighting Irish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio State Buckeyes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma Sooners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ole’ Miss Rebels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn State Nittany Lions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Bradford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrelle Pryor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Longhorns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Tebow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=22913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Every couple of weeks during the 2009 season, I’ll rank the top 10 Heisman Trophy candidates based on their chances of winning college football’s most prestigious award. Players will either rise or fall in the rankings based on their performances throughout the year.
Below is Version 1.0. Obviously with no games being played yet, I’m mostly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/tim-tebow/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="268" width="477" src="http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2009/0807/fantasy_g_ttebow1_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Every couple of weeks during the 2009 season, I’ll rank the top 10 Heisman Trophy candidates based on their chances of winning college football’s most prestigious award. Players will either rise or fall in the rankings based on their performances throughout the year.</p>
<p>Below is Version 1.0. Obviously with no games being played yet, I’m mostly projecting with this top 10. These types of rankings always stir up a lot of debate, so I encourage readers to tell me which players should be rated higher or lower. I’ll update the list after the first week or two of the season.</p>
<p>Without further ado…</p>
<p><strong>1. Tim Tebow, QB, Florida</strong><br />
After Sam Bradford edged Tebow out in last season’s Heisman race, some will argue that the Oklahoma QB deserves to be at the top of this ranking. But I’m giving the slight edge to Tebow right now after he absolutely destroyed the competition in the second half of last year. Florida will incorporate the no-huddle into their offense this season, which should only benefit Tebow’s style of play and give him even more scoring opportunities than he already had. Outside of Florida having to replace tackles Phil Trautwein and Jason Watkins, there’s little reason to believe that Tebow will take a step back in 2009 and considering the Gators are once again national title contenders, he should be the front-runner to win this year’s Heisman.</p>
<p><strong>2. Sam Bradford, QB, Oklahoma</strong><br />
After throwing for 4,720 yards and 50 touchdowns last season, I don’t doubt that the reigning Heisman winner could be even better in 2009. But the Sooners’ offensive line is a major question mark entering this season with the losses of Phil Loadholt, Duke Robinson, Jon Cooper and Brandon Walker. That’s a lot of change in one offseason and while OU should light up the scoreboard once again, I could see Bradford taking a backseat to Tebow when the final Heisman results are tallied.</p>
<p><span id="more-22913"></span></p>
<p><strong>3. Colt McCoy, QB, Texas</strong><br />
McCoy is one of the nation’s best and is truly exciting to watch each week. He could once again lead the Longhorns in both passing and rushing yards this season, which only helps his cause for winning the Heisman. But does he have enough pieces around him to get Texas to the national championship? Quan Cosby should emerge as a solid go-to receiver, but the Longhorns would benefit from having Vondrell McGee, Chris Ogbonnaya or Foswhitt Whitaker step up in the running game. Plus, the defense lost some talent with the departures of Marcus Griffin and Frank Okam, so with Tebow and Bradford also in the mix, McCoy’s numbers alone might not carry him in the eyes of voters. He may have to get UT into the title game, if not win it, to snatch this year’s Heisman.</p>
<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/terrelle-pryor/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="268" width="477" src="http://a.espncdn.com/i/mag/blog/2009MagBigTen2.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><strong>4. Terrelle Pryor, QB, Ohio State</strong><br />
With a year of seasoning under his belt, Pryor should take the next step in 2009. He reportedly has embraced a leadership role for the Buckeyes and given his athletic talent, he could become one of the nation’s best players as a sophomore. But the problem in his quest to win the Heisman is that he probably won’t post the kind of numbers Tebow, Bradford and McCoy will. So he’ll likely have to lead OSU to the national title to win the award. If the Buckeyes do reach the title game, Pryor will have played a huge role, so his chances of winning the Heisman might be tied to whether or not OSU can make a run. As long as he doesn’t experience the arm fatigue that hurt him down the stretch last season, Pryor and the Buckeyes have a shot at a tremendous season.</p>
<p><strong>5. Jahvid Best, RB, California</strong><br />
Following his 1,580-yard, 15-touchdown performance last season, Best could become a household name this year. The Cal running back rushed for 8.1 yards per carry last season and was also a factor in the passing game, totaling 27 receptions for 246 yards. He reminds some of the Titans’ Chris Johnson in that he’s small, but he’s got amazing speed and is incredibly dangerous in the open field. The only problem is that the Bears lost offensive linemen Alex Mack and Noris Malele this offseason and that could hinder how successful Best is. He’ll put up great numbers, but will they be enough to give him an edge over the other candidates?</p>
<p><strong>6. Jimmy Clausen, QB, Notre Dame</strong><br />
Most of the college football world is focused on whether or not Charlie Weis will hold onto his job this season, which takes away how good Clausen could be this year. Weis is now calling all of the offensive plays for the Irish, which could mean big things for Clausen, who threw for 401 yards and five scores in a 49-21 win over Hawaii in the Hawaii Bowl on Christmas Eve. Given Weis’ play calling, ND’s favorable schedule, as well as having weapons Golden Tate and Michael Floyd at his disposal in the passing game, Clausen is a sleeper candidate to win this year’s Heisman.</p>
<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/jonathan-dwyer/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="268" width="477" src="http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2009/0615/insider_g_dwyer01_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><strong>7. Jonathan Dwyer, RB, Georgia Tech</strong><br />
Dwyer was highly productive in Tech’s offense last year, rushing for 1,395 yards and 12 touchdowns on 200 carries. And unlike fellow Heisman candidate Evan Royster, he didn’t wear down at the end of the season as he rushed for 145, 157, 128 and 144 yards against Florida State, North Carolina, Miami and Georgia, respectively. Those numbers are pretty impressive considering the defenses he faced. It’s a long shot, but as long as an offseason hip injury doesn’t slow him down, Dwyer could come out of nowhere to claim this year’s Heisman.</p>
<p><strong>8. Evan Royster, RB, Penn State</strong><br />
Royster often took a backseat OSU’s Chris “Beanie” Wells and MSU’s Javon Ringer last year, but he was just as valuable to his team as his fellow Big Ten backs were to theirs. On 191 attempts, he rushed for 1,236 yards and 12 touchdowns, while also catching 17 passes for 155 yards. But after totaling over 100 yards in five of his first eight games, he failed to crack the century mark in any of PSU’s final five contests, including their Rose Bowl loss to USC. Was it a product of fatigue or does he struggle against tougher competition? It’ll be something to keep an eye on this season.</p>
<p><strong>9. Charles Scott, RB, LSU</strong><br />
The bruising Scott rushed for 1,174 yards and 18 touchdowns last year. Les Miles thinks his running back is set up for a huge season, although his success could be tied to how well Jarrett Lee performs at quarterback. Scott will once again be the backbone of LSU’s offense and will be aided by a solid offensive line. But if Lee can’t keep opposing defenses honest via the passing game, Scott could have trouble posting Heisman-worthy numbers.</p>
<p><strong>10. Jevan Snead, QB, Ole’ Miss</strong><br />
Snead is one of the more intriguing names on this list given that he’ll be the leader of what should be a dynamic offense this season. Ole’ Miss made some noise last year by beating Florida (on the road), Auburn, LSU and Texas Tech (Cotton Bowl). If the Rebels climb the rankings this season, Snead will be one of the main reasons why and he could certainly post passing numbers similar to Tebow’s this year, making him a viable Heisman candidate.</p>
<p><em><strong>Other players receiving consideration:</strong> Zac Robinson, QB, Oklahoma State; Daryll Clark, QB, Penn State; Dez Bryant, WR, Oklahoma State; Max Hall, QB, BYU; Kendall Hunter, RB, Oklahoma State; Stafon Johnson, RB, USC.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/08/20/top-10-heisman-hopefuls-version-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Championship Week Primer: Bubble teams and #1 seeds</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/09/championship-week-preview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/09/championship-week-preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paulsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[College Basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[March Madness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACC tournament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACC tournament preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACC tourney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACC tourney preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona Wildcats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 10 tournament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 10 tournament preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 10 tourney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 10 tourney preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 12 tournament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 12 tournament preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 12 tourney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 12 tourney preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big East tournament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big East tournament preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big East tourney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big East tourney preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bracketology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bubble Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Championship Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Championship Week preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Championship Week primer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Huskies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Blue Devils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gonzaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Sagarin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lunardi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paulsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas Jayhawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisville Cardinals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU Tigers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland Terrapins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami Hurricanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan Wolverines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina Tar Heels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma Sooners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pac-10 tournament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pac-10 tournament preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pac-10 tourney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pac-10 tourney preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Mills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn State Nittany Lions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Panthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Providence Friars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saint Mary's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC tournament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC tournament preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC tourney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC tourney preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Tech Hokies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=14846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://search.espn.go.com/north-carolina-tar-heels/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="268" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2009/0307/ncb_g_hansbrough_singler_576.jpg" alt="" /></a>

Strap ‘em up, kids. Championship Week is upon us!

Gonzaga and Saint Mary’s square off tonight in the final of the WCC tourney (9 PM ET, and why isn’t this game on national television?), and with the Gaels’ #45 RPI, they could really use a win to guarantee a NCAA tourney berth. The good news is that their leading scorer, Patrick Mills, is back, scoring 12 points in 35 minutes in yesterday’s win over Portland. If Saint Mary’s loses to the ‘Zags, it would put the Gaels squarely on the bubble. ESPN bracketologist Joe Lunardi has Saint Mary’s as a #10 seed, but I think that assumes that the committee will take Mills’ injury into account. After all, he was out of the lineup for three of the team’s five losses. Lunardi says that the Gaels are safe, but they don’t have a marquee win and are just 2-2 against the RPI top 50, so anything can happen.

But let’s move on to the “major” conference tournaments that will take place this week. I’m going to tackle these one-by-one in the order of <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/bkc0809.htm" target="_blank">Jeff Sagarin’s conference rankings</a>.

<font size="4"><strong>ACC</strong></font>

Lunardi projects six ACC teams – UNC, Wake Forest, Duke, Clemson, Florida State and Boston College – to make the Dance, and of those teams only BC really has anything to worry about. The Eagles (#57 RPI) are probably safe, but a first round loss on Thursday against Virginia might make BC squirm a bit on Selection Sunday.

Miami, Maryland and Virginia Tech are three teams that could play themselves into an NCAA berth with a nice ACC tourney run. What do I mean by “a nice run”? Well, Virginia Tech and Miami square off on Thursday, so if whomever wins gives North Carolina a great game on Friday, that might be enough. The Hurricanes are a bit closer than the Hokies, so VT would probably have to pull the upset against the Tar Heels to earn a bid. Miami could potentially get in with an 18-12 record and a #53 RPI (against the 26th-toughest schedule) if they were to lose to North Carolina.

Meanwhile, Maryland has to beat N.C. State on Thursday and then (at least) pull the upset against the seemingly vulnerable Demon Deacons on Friday.

As far as #1 seeds go, North Carolina pretty much sewed one up with their second win against Duke on Sunday. Neither the Blue Devils nor Demon Deacons would seem to have a shot at one of the other three #1 seeds. It’s conceivable that Duke would be able to make a case if they win the ACC Tournament (beating Wake and UNC in the process) and a few of the teams ranked ahead of them have poor conference showings. Despite the brutal schedule (#3) and stellar RPI (3), Duke is realistically shooting for a #2 or #3 seed.

<a href="http://www.theacc.com/championships/09-mbk-tournament.html" target="_blank">ACC Tournament bracket</a>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/north-carolina-tar-heels/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="268" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2009/0307/ncb_g_hansbrough_singler_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Strap ‘em up, kids. Championship Week is upon us!</p>
<p>Gonzaga and Saint Mary’s square off tonight in the final of the WCC tourney (9 PM ET, and why isn’t this game on national television?), and with the Gaels’ #45 RPI, they could really use a win to guarantee a NCAA tourney berth. The good news is that their leading scorer, Patrick Mills, is back, scoring 12 points in 35 minutes in yesterday’s win over Portland. If Saint Mary’s loses to the ‘Zags, it would put the Gaels squarely on the bubble. ESPN bracketologist Joe Lunardi has Saint Mary’s as a #10 seed, but I think that assumes that the committee will take Mills’ injury into account. After all, he was out of the lineup for three of the team’s five losses. Lunardi says that the Gaels are safe, but they don’t have a marquee win and are just 2-2 against the RPI top 50, so anything can happen.</p>
<p>But let’s move on to the “major” conference tournaments that will take place this week. I’m going to tackle these one-by-one in the order of <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/bkc0809.htm" target="_blank">Jeff Sagarin’s conference rankings</a>.</p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>ACC</strong></font></p>
<p>Lunardi projects six ACC teams – UNC, Wake Forest, Duke, Clemson, Florida State and Boston College – to make the Dance, and of those teams only BC really has anything to worry about. The Eagles (#57 RPI) are probably safe, but a first round loss on Thursday against Virginia might make BC squirm a bit on Selection Sunday.</p>
<p>Miami, Maryland and Virginia Tech are three teams that could play themselves into an NCAA berth with a nice ACC tourney run. What do I mean by “a nice run”? Well, Virginia Tech and Miami square off on Thursday, so if whomever wins gives North Carolina a great game on Friday, that might be enough. The Hurricanes are a bit closer than the Hokies, so VT would probably have to pull the upset against the Tar Heels to earn a bid. Miami could potentially get in with an 18-12 record and a #53 RPI (against the 26th-toughest schedule) if they were to lose to North Carolina.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Maryland has to beat N.C. State on Thursday and then (at least) pull the upset against the seemingly vulnerable Demon Deacons on Friday.</p>
<p>As far as #1 seeds go, North Carolina pretty much sewed one up with their second win against Duke on Sunday. Neither the Blue Devils nor Demon Deacons would seem to have a shot at one of the other three #1 seeds. It’s conceivable that Duke would be able to make a case if they win the ACC Tournament (beating Wake and UNC in the process) and a few of the teams ranked ahead of them have poor conference showings. Despite the brutal schedule (#3) and stellar RPI (3), Duke is realistically shooting for a #2 or #3 seed.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theacc.com/championships/09-mbk-tournament.html" target="_blank">ACC Tournament bracket</a></p>
<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/wisconsin-badgers/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="268" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2009/0305/ncb_3panel2_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>BIG TEN</strong></font></p>
<p>It’s funny, because the conventional wisdom is that the Big Ten is down this season, but it is 2nd in Jeff Sagarin’s rankings and Lunardi projects eight Big Ten teams to make the NCAA tournament, the most of any conference. The list includes Michigan State, Purdue, Illinois, Ohio State, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan and Penn State. Three of those teams – Penn St., Minnesota and Michigan – play in the first round on Thursday and they really need a win (against Indiana, Northwestern and Iowa, respectively) to keep their postseason hopes alive. </p>
<p>In the next round, Minnesota would need to compete with Michigan State, Michigan with Illinois and Penn State with Purdue to clinch a spot. If any of these teams are blown out in the next round, they’ll be right back on the bubble. With an RPI of 38, the Badgers look to be safe, but a win against Ohio State would seal a bid (and vice versa, if the Buckeyes were to win). </p>
<p>The only team with a legitimate shot at a #1 seed is Michigan State. The Spartans have the #6 RPI and the 8th-toughest schedule, so if they win the Big Ten tourney, they have a great shot to move up to the top line.</p>
<p><a href="http://bigten.cstv.com/sports/m-baskbl/spec-rel/m-bracket-09.html" target="_blank">Big Ten Tournament bracket</a></p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>BIG EAST</strong></font></p>
<p>The Big East Championship serves as the actual championship for the conference –they don’t recognize a “regular season” champion. It kicks off on Tuesday with the #9-#16 seeds (on BIGEAST.tv) and then on Wednesday the #5-#8 seeds – Marquette, Syracuse, West Virigina and Providence – start play. At 8-10 in conference, Cincinnati is out barring an unlikely four wins in four days scenario. Lunardi currently projects West Virginia as a #7 seed, so they are safe. Likewise, Syracuse (#6 seed) and Marquette (#7 seed) are both safely in.</p>
<p>So the Big East team that can help itself the most is Providence. Lunardi projects the Friars to miss the cut, and with an 18-12 record and a #70 RPI, it’s easy to see why. However, if Providence can beat the winner of the Cincinnati/DePaul game in convincing fashion and then give Louisville a great game, it might be enough to earn them a bid. After all, the Friars did beat #1 Pitt just two weeks ago. But a near win against Louisville probably won’t be enough; realistically, Providence needs to beat Louisville to secure a berth. That would give the Friars 20 wins and a couple of marquee victories over two of the top teams in the nation.</p>
<p>On the other end of the spectrum, there are three Big East teams  &#8212; Louisville, Pitt and UConn &#8212; that have a legitimate shot at a #1 seed. In fact, Lunardi projects all three as #1 seeds right now, but it is likely that one or more will fall off as the Big East Championship progresses. The Huskies seem to be on the most tenuous footing, given their two head-to-head losses against Pitt in the last three weeks. If both teams survive, Pitt and UConn are projected to meet on Friday, with the winner having a golden opportunity to clinch a #1 seed by winning the next night as well.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&#038;source=web&#038;ct=res&#038;cd=2&#038;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bigeast.org%2Fpdf5%2F385560.pdf%3FATCLID%3D1322952%26SPSID%3D99617%26SPID%3D11228%26DB_OEM_ID%3D19400&#038;ei=qJa1SbHTL4nYsAODjbz2CA&#038;usg=AFQjCNHVPZfqthLKE311C_eCUjcdkGg-VA&#038;sig2=ux66u3SKl-H6I_6aKyIPYw" target="_blank">Big East Championship bracket</a></p>
<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/arizona-wildcats/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="268" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2009/0215/ncb_i_arizona_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>PAC-10</strong></font></p>
<p>Lunardi says that four Pac-10 teams – Washington, UCLA, Cal and Arizona St. – are already in, while Arizona is holding on for dear life. In fact, he says that they are the very last team in. The Wildcats don’t have a great RPI (52), but their SOS (#32) works in their favor. </p>
<p>Arizona is in a tough spot as the #5 seed in the conference tourney because they play a good team (ASU) right off the bat. A win would probably secure a berth, but a loss would probably knock them out. (And you can bet that after living in Arizona’s considerable hoops shadow for years, that the Sun Devils would like nothing more than to be the ones to knock their arch-rival out of the postseason.)</p>
<p>On the flip side, it’s conceivable that a tournament win would push Washington up to the next line. The Huskies have a strong RPI (13) and have played a tough schedule (#14), so if they can beat UCLA or Cal in the Pac-10 final, they may be rewarded with a #2 seed.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&#038;source=web&#038;ct=res&#038;cd=9&#038;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.madduxsports.com%2Fpac-10-tournament-bracket.pdf&#038;ei=1pa1SeeDJonOsAOx9NHjCA&#038;usg=AFQjCNGtkp9HI3TTGR8Vnd8pbxCIatFq2Q&#038;sig2=_iaYUipNrgKhWNiBaw9wFQ" target="_blank">Pac-10 Tournament bracket</a></p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>BIG 12</strong></font></p>
<p>Joe Lunardi currently projects six Big 12 teams – Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, Texas A&#038;M, Texas and Oklahoma St. – to make the NCAA tournament. Those teams are seeded #9 or above, so all six would seem to be safely in. The team that can play its way into the tournament is Kansas State. The Wildcats have a 21-10 record, but their RPI (#76) and schedule (#111) are lacking. After a string of victories that included wins against Missouri, Texas and Texas A&#038;M in late January/early February, the Wildcats have gone 4-3 over their last seven, including losses to Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma St. What’s worse, there isn’t a good win amongst the four in that stretch. They are likely to play Texas on Thursday, and that’s absolutely a must-win game. </p>
<p>If things break the right way, both Kansas and Oklahoma could play themselves into a #1 seed. It would help if they faced each other in the tourney final, and if they beat good competition on the way there (Oklahoma St., Missouri for OU and Texas for the Jayhawks). With a Big 12 tourney win, I think the Sooners have a great shot at a #1 seed if the committee takes into account their 0-2 record without POY candidate Blake Griffin, who was out with a concussion.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.big12sports.com/fls/10410/championships/pdfs/2009_mbasketball_bracket.pdf?DB_OEM_ID=10410" target="_blank">Big 12 Championship bracket</a></p>
<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/marcus-thornton/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="268" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2009/0228/ncb_u_thornton1_sw_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>SEC</strong></font></p>
<p>According to Jeff Sagarin, the Southeastern Conference is a good bit weaker than any of the other five majors, and this makes sense when Lunardi only picks three SEC teams to make the tourney. (That’s one fewer than the Mountain West!) The fact of the matter is that the SEC is much more of a football conference than it is a basketball conference right now.</p>
<p>LSU and Tennessee are safely in, and Lunardi projects South Carolina to be a #12 seed so the Gamecocks (along with the Gators) are very much on the bubble. South Carolina needs to win its game on Friday (vs. the winner of the Georgia/Miss. St. game) and could seal a bid with a win (or at least a good showing) in a potential matchup with LSU on Saturday. Regardless of whom they play, the Gamecocks would probably get a berth with two wins in the SEC tourney. Likewise, Florida can play themselves into strong consideration with wins against Arkansas and a pretty good Auburn team. Clearly, a third win (over Tennessee?) would put the Gators back in the Big Dance.</p>
<p>Both LSU and Tennessee are currently projected to be #6 seeds, but a tourney championship for either team could bump the winner up a line or two, especially if the two teams square off in the final.</p>
<p><a href="http://secsports.com/doc_lib/bkc_2009_bracket.pdf" target="_blank">SEC Tournament bracket</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/09/championship-week-preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VA Tech saves ACC from more bowl embarrassment</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/02/va-tech-saves-acc-from-more-bowl-embarrassment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/02/va-tech-saves-acc-from-more-bowl-embarrassment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[College Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Orange Bowl Virginia Tech-Cincinnati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACC Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACC vs. BCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cincinnati Bearcats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Da'Rel Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darren Evans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darren Evans performance in Orange Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSU Tigers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orange Bowl recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyrod Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Tech beats Cincinnati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Tech Hokies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=11538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Entering the Virginia Tech-Cincinnati Orange Bowl matchup Thursday night, the ACC hadn’t earned a BCS victory since 1999 and some media outlets were even suggesting that the conference champion should lose its automatic BCS bid. Making matters worse, the conference was just 3-6 in non-BCS bowl games this year, further adding to the embarrassment.
But Frank [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/gallery#photoViewer=urn%3Anewsml%3Asports.yahoo%2Cgetty%3A20050301%3Ancaaf%2Cphoto%2C178af56f51fc3896e9aa475ccf4e2979-getty-83540732mh082_fedex_orange_%3A1" target="_blank"><img class="photo_right" border="0" width="200" height="298" src="http://d.yimg.com/a/p/sp/getty/20/fullj.178af56f51fc3896e9aa475ccf4e2979/178af56f51fc3896e9aa475ccf4e2979-getty-83540732mh082_fedex_orange_.jpg" alt="Darren Evans" /></a>Entering the Virginia Tech-Cincinnati Orange Bowl matchup Thursday night, the ACC hadn’t earned a BCS victory since 1999 and some media outlets were even suggesting that the conference champion should lose its automatic BCS bid. Making matters worse, the conference was just 3-6 in non-BCS bowl games this year, further adding to the embarrassment.</p>
<p>But Frank Beamer’s Hokies put an end to the ACC’s drought with <a href="http://collegefootball.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=895713" target="_blank">their convincing 20-7 win over the Big East Champion Bearcats</a>. Tech held Brian Kelly’s dynamic offense to just 239 passing yards and picked off Cincy quarterback Tony Pike four times. </p>
<p>Offensively, Hokie frosh running back Darren Evans did most of the damage, rushing for 153 yards and a touchdown, while sophomore quarterback Tyrod Taylor added 47 rushing yards and a score. As a team, Tech rushed for 259 yards, which was their third 250-yard rushing game of the year.</p>
<p>Maybe this win will breathe some life into the ACC, which certainly has some talented programs, but inconsistency seems to be the conference’s major drawback. </p>
<p>VA Tech always has one of the more talented defenses, but poor quarterback play doomed them for most of the year. Georgia Tech’s triple option was impossible to stop at times, but LSU’s 38-3 rout in the Chick-fil-A Bowl proved that the Jackets still have a long way to go to compete for a national title. Boston College, NC State and Maryland have some great young talent, but once again, inconsistency doomed those three programs throughout the year.</p>
<p>With players like Evans, Taylor, Da’Rel Scott and Russell Wilson, the ACC will feature some of the best young talent in college football heading into 2009. So hopefully the ACC can turn their BCS misfortunes around and produce a legit title contender next year, instead of being the conference that’s best known for its underachieving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/02/va-tech-saves-acc-from-more-bowl-embarrassment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
