<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Scores Report - The National Sports Blog &#187; Brian Sabean</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scoresreport.com/tag/brian-sabean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scoresreport.com</link>
	<description>The National Sports Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ten Predictions for the MLB second half</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/07/20/ten-predictions-for-the-mlb-second-half/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/07/20/ten-predictions-for-the-mlb-second-half/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albert Pujols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alfonso Soriano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angel Villalona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aramis Ramirez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlanta Braves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Beane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Sabean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buster Posey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chad Billingsley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Cubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clayton Kershaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland Indians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cliff Lee trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Rockies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derrek Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geovany Soto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Millwod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kosuke Fukudome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Angels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Dodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madison Bumgarner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Holliday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Holliday Cardinals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Holliday trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milwaukee Brewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NL Wild Card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia Phillies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Halladay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Halladay Phillies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roy Halladay trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Ludwick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second half MLB predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis Cardinals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Rangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Alderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Blue Jays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victor Martinez trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Series Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=21545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The second half of the 2009 MLB season has kicked off and with that, I’m going to make some predictions that are sure to be proved wrong in a couple months. 
Feel free to whip out your crystal ball in the comments section but before you do, please do everyone a favor and take off [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/roy-halladay/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="340" width="477" src="http://a.espncdn.com/media/apphoto/33f82760-f401-440a-9b5c-4425d4f330e1.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
The second half of the 2009 MLB season has kicked off and with that, I’m going to make some predictions that are sure to be proved wrong in a couple months. </p>
<p>Feel free to whip out your crystal ball in the comments section but before you do, please do everyone a favor and take off your favorite team prescribed glasses and be objective for once in your life, will ya?</p>
<p><strong>1. The Blue Jays will trade Halladay…to the Phillies.</strong><br />
Toronto GM J.P. Ricciardi is reminding everyone who will listen that he doesn’t absolutely <em>need</em> to trade Roy Halladay – which he doesn’t. But the bottom line is that he’ll probably get more in return for the “Doc” this season than he would next when Halladay is set to become a free agent after the 2010 season. And despite Ricciardi stating that he’s open to trading Halladay within the division, he’s not stupid. He’s not going to trade Halladay to the Red Sox or Yankees and risk becoming public enemy No. 1 in the eyes of Jays fans for not only getting rid of their best and most popular player, but also trading him to a division rival in the process. In the end, I think Ricciardi will trade Halladay to an NL team and my guess is that it will be Philadelphia that will eventually puts a package together to acquire him. Although they might balk at the $7 million that’s remaining on Halladay’s contract, the Phillies are built to win now and need more starting pitching to make another run at a World Series. They also have enough appealing prospects to entice Ricciardi to make a deal.</p>
<p><span id="more-21545"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/chad-billingsley/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2009/0528/mlb_u_billingsley11_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><strong>2. The Dodgers won’t win the NL Pennant.</strong><br />
The Dodgers are the best team in baseball and I’m not afraid to put that in writing (which I did here). But something tells me that while they’re almost a shoe-in to in the NL West and probably go to the NLCS, they won’t be heading to the World Series. Chad Billingsley had a great first half, but he’s starting to look more human with every outing and while Clayton Kershaw is a phenomenal young pitcher, the back of L.A.’s starting rotation is very beatable. Of course, their lineup is outstanding and can certainly compete against anyone in the NL. But this team kind of reminds me of the 2008 Angels and Cubs. Neither team suffered any slumps throughout the season and essentially was on cruise control in the second half. When they got to the postseason and the games were all tight, neither team responded well. Will the same thing happen to the Dodgers? Again, this is more of a hunch than anything and I wouldn&#8217;t blame the Dodger faithful (or anyone for that matter) for eating my soul and preaching how wrong I&#8217;ll be. But I just think that this club could get overly content and even if they don&#8217;t, their pitching might still fail them in the end.</p>
<p><strong>3. The Cubs will make a run in the second half.</strong><br />
Two things led to the Cubs’ lackluster first half: Injuries and a lack of offense – and one may have had an effect on the other. Losing Aramis Ramirez for a huge chunk of the first half due to a shoulder injury took a significant bat out of Chicago’s lineup. But now that he’s back and guys like Kosuke Fukudome and Alfonso Soriano are starting to heat up again, the Cubs should see a rise in run production. Derrek Lee has also been solid and young players like Jake Fox have contributed as well. If Geovany Soto (DL) can get his act together, the Cubs could put pressure on the Cardinals in the NL Central. I’m not saying that Chicago will win their division and make the postseason, but considering that their starting pitching was a major strength in the first half, I wouldn’t count this club out. Of course, the back end of the bullpen is still a serious question mark and Fukudome and Soriano could start slumping again at a moment’s notice, but keep an eye on this team.</p>
<p><strong>4. Billy Beane will have to accept a lesser package to move Holliday.</strong><br />
Let’s call it like it is: Trading for Holliday last winter has proved to be a dud for the A’s. Not only has he not contributed much to Oakland’s offense, but the A’s are also currently 14 games back of the Angels in AL West and now GM Billy Beane has to find a trade suitor for the left fielder, who becomes a free agent at the end of the year. Holliday isn’t going to re-up with the A’s after the season and considering he’s hitting below .280 with only nine home runs, Beane probably won’t get the haul he normally does in trades. If Beane wants to move Holliday (and his contract) before the deadline, then he’s probably going to have to accept a deal that won’t net him a top prospect in return. Granted, the GM isn’t going to just give Holliday away, but if he thinks that he’s going to get two top prospects (and a couple of promising mid-round prospects) for the struggling left fielder, then he’s probably in for a wake up call.</p>
<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/ryan-ludwick/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2009/0712/mlb_a_ludwickgm2_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><strong>5. The Cardinals will find their protection for Pujols…in Ryan Ludwick.</strong><br />
Many pundits feel as though St. Louis will eventually make a move for Matt Holliday to ensure that Albert Pujols gets the protection he deserves in the lineup. But if they wind up standing pat around the trade deadline, don’t look too far for who could eventually fill the role batting behind the phenomenal Pujols. Ryan Ludwick is only hitting .265 as of this writing, but he’s starting to heat up after slumping since coming off the DL with a hamstring injury in mid May. He hit two home runs on the last day of the first half (he now has 15 dingers on the year) and is hitting .409 (18 for 44) in his last 44 at bats. Acquiring Holliday would be great, but don’t discount Ludwick’s potential to bat cleanup for the Cardinals either.</p>
<p><strong>6. Cliff Lee and Victor Martinez aren’t going anywhere.</strong><br />
The Indians have been one of the most disappointing teams in baseball this year, freefalling into last place in the AL Central despite many pundits predicting in spring training that they could win the division. But just because they’re 13.5 games back of the Tigers in the Central, it doesn’t mean that GM Mark Shapiro is going to have a fire sale as some have suggested. Ace Cliff Lee has a very manageable salary ($5.75 this season, $8 million club option with $1 mil buyout) through next season, as does catcher Victor Martinez ($5.7 million in ’09, $7 million club option with $250,000 buyout in 2010). So there’s no reason for Shapiro to feel as though he has to trade either player to acquire more talent. The fact is that Cleveland has talent, at least offensively. It’s their pitching that has been horrendous since trading CC Sabathia at the deadline last year. If Shapiro can get through this season and hang onto his core on offense, then maybe he can add an arm or two in the offseason in order to get the Tribe back into contention next year.</p>
<p><strong>7. Pitching will sink the Rangers in the end.</strong><br />
Look, I’m all about the Rangers’ postseason run this year. I think they’re a fun team to watch and they certainly have the lineup to contend. But their pitching staff overachieved a bit in the first half and I just don’t trust Scott Feldman, Vicente Padilla or any of the other arms after Kevin Millwood. I think this club will hang with the Halos for a little while, but at some point they’re going to start slowly sliding out of contention because they just don’t have the horses in the starting rotation to match what they bring to the field offensively.</p>
<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/buster-posey/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2009/0611/fantasy_u_posey_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><strong>8. The Giants will stand (somewhat) pat at the trade deadline.</strong><br />
The Giants have some of the best pitching in the NL, but it’s no secret that their offense is incredibly suspect. That said, don’t expect GM Brian Sabean to make a huge move at the trade deadline. San Fran has a couple of budding minor league stars in pitchers Madison Bumgarner and Tim Alderson, as well as position players like Buster Posey and Angel Villalona. They’re set up for the future so don’t assume that just because the Giants are in contention this season, that they’re going to cough up any of their top prospects in order to get a bat. That means no Matt Holliday, no Jermaine Dye and probably no Freddy Sanchez, either. If they make a move, think more Scott Rolen than a big name, because Sabean will be more inclined to trust that Randy Winn and Bengie Molina will heat up in the second half than he would be to giving up a significant piece (or two) for Holliday, Dye or Sanchez. If he can get a big bat and not give up Bumgarner, Alderson, Posey or Villalona, then all bets are off. But it’s doubtful that he would be able to make move without throwing in one of his top prospects.</p>
<p><strong>9. The NL Wild Card race will be the most exciting storyline of the second half.</strong><br />
The Giants, Rockies, Cubs, Brewers, Braves, Astros and Marlins are all within five games of each other in the NL Wild Card chase and each team brings a little something different to the party. San Fran has outstanding pitching, Colorado has played some of the best baseball in the league over the past two months, Chicago is getting healthy and Milwaukee has a potent lineup and will probably make a move at the trade deadline. I could see Atlanta, Houston and Florida eventually fading, but I also wouldn’t be surprised if they hung in there for the entire second half. The bottom line is that no team is going to run away with the NL Wild Card this season and I could see this race not being decided until the final couple days of the season.</p>
<p><strong>10. The Phillies will play the Angels in the World Series.</strong><br />
Hey, what would a prediction piece be without a projected World Series finish? Philadelphia is starting to have that World Series glow about them again and even though their starting pitching is suspect, don’t forget that I’m also predicting that they’ll acquire Roy Halladay. Nobody seems to be talking about the Halos this season, which is exactly why I like them to upset whomever they play in the postseason. Right now, their pitching isn’t that great, but it could certainly be one of the better rotations in all of baseball once healthy. I wouldn’t count them out for making a move at the deadline either.</p>
<p>Oh yeah: Halos in 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/07/20/ten-predictions-for-the-mlb-second-half/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Pirates pushing hard to deal Freddy Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/07/09/report-pirates-pushing-hard-to-deal-freddy-sanchez/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/07/09/report-pirates-pushing-hard-to-deal-freddy-sanchez/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors &#038; Gossip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Sabean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddy Sanchez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddy Sanchez Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddy Sanchez Rockies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddy Sanchez trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giants trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Sanchez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Pucetas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madison Bumgarner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rockies trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Alderson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=21101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
One of the more intriguing names on the trade market is Pirates second baseman Freddy Sanchez, who is currently batting .316 with six dingers and 33 RBI. And as the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette is reporting, the Bucs are pushing hard to deal him before the trade deadline.
Two teams that covet the second baseman are the Giants [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/freddy-sanchez/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2006/0814/mlb_freddy_412.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>One of the more intriguing names on the trade market is Pirates second baseman Freddy Sanchez, who is currently batting .316 with six dingers and 33 RBI. And as the <em>Pittsburgh Post-Gazette</em> is reporting, the Bucs are <a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09190/982829-100.stm" target="_blank">pushing hard to deal him</a> before the trade deadline.</p>
<p>Two teams that covet the second baseman are the Giants and Rockies, each of whom are battling it out behind the Dodgers in the NL West and are in the thick of things for the NL Wild Card. Sanchez would be a nice catch for either team, although something for both clubs to consider is his salary. The All-Star makes $6.1 million this year and will make $8 million in 2010 if he picks up another 271 plate appearances before the end of the season.</p>
<p>Colorado might hold an edge over San Fran in the Sanchez sweepstakes because <a href="http://insidepittsburghsports.com/story/the-latest-pirates-buzz-rockies-looking-to-make-a-play-for-sanchez/14253/" target="_blank">Pittsburgh is reportedly gaga</a> over Rockies’ minor leaguer Eric Young. The 24-year-old has 23 extra base hits, 37 walks and a whopping 47 steals so far in the minors and if the Rox are willing to part with him, they could have Sanchez in uniform sooner rather than later.</p>
<p>That said, the Giants always have an abundance of pitching, but whether or not they’re willing to give any of it up remains to be scene. Madison Bumgarner and Tim Alderson are certainly out of the question, but GM Brian Sabean could still put a decent package together with the likes of Jonathan Sanchez or Kevin Pucetas, coupled with a couple of offensive prospects. (Sabean would probably be willing to throw Fred Lewis into the mix as well, although who knows if the Bucs would even want the struggling 28-year-old outfielder.)</p>
<p>It’ll be interesting to see which team eventually winds up making a move for Sanchez. Either way, it appears that his days in Pittsburgh are numbered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/07/09/report-pirates-pushing-hard-to-deal-freddy-sanchez/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Matt Holliday the answer to the Giants’ offensive woes?</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/24/is-matt-holliday-the-answer-to-the-giants%e2%80%99-offensive-woes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/24/is-matt-holliday-the-answer-to-the-giants%e2%80%99-offensive-woes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Dunn trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aubrey Huff Giants rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Sabean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edgar Renteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Sanchez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark DeRosa trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Holliday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Holliday trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Giants rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Giants trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sergio Romo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will the Giants trade for Matt Holliday?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=20453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It’s been five years since the San Francisco Giants have made a postseason appearance, so you’ll have to pardon their fans if they’re overly optimistic about the chances of their club possibly making the playoffs this year despite a lineup that often employs Edgar Renteria as its two-hole hitter.
The G-Men are currently 8.5 games back [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/matt-holliday/photo/8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2009/0601/mlb_g_mholliday1_576.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>It’s been five years since the San Francisco Giants have made a postseason appearance, so you’ll have to pardon their fans if they’re overly optimistic about the chances of their club possibly making the playoffs this year despite a lineup that often employs Edgar Renteria as its two-hole hitter.</p>
<p>The G-Men are currently 8.5 games back of the Dodgers in the NL West and with the PED Predator coming back from his suspension soon, L.A. is surely to stay well ahead of San Fran in the division. But the Giants are currently one game up on the Brewers for the NL Wild Card and if GM Brian Sabean could add a player or two before the July 31 trade deadline to help mask San Fran’s biggest flaw, then the five-year playoff drought could end.</p>
<p>What’s the Giants’ biggest flaw you ask? Well if anyone can look at their lineup without doubling over in side-splitting laughter, then some kind of award is deserved.</p>
<p><span id="more-20453"></span></p>
<p>The starting pitching is absolutely outstanding, with Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain headlining a rotation that also features 300-game winner Randy Johnson and the now-watchable Barry Zito. The bullpen has actually been a strength as well, with Sergio Romo and Jeremy Afeldt proving to be steady setup men for ’08 All-Star closer Brian Wilson.</p>
<p>But the offense is at least one bat away from being beat-your-head-against-the-wall frustrating to, man-these-guys-aren’t-half-bad serviceable.</p>
<p>Enter Matt Holliday.</p>
<p>Even though the last place A’s would love to get something in return for Holliday before he walks at the end of the season, they’re not going to give him up for a warm hug and a bedtime story just to relieve themselves of his $13.5 million salary. They’ll likely want some young prospects and as long as their names aren’t Buster Posey, Madison Bumgarner or Tim Alderson, the Giants might be willing to part with a couple of their farm pieces.</p>
<p>What the Giants would love is if Oakland GM Billy Beane temporarily lost his mind and took a trade package with either Fred Lewis or Jonathan Sanchez as the headliners. But the stock has never been lower on Lewis and Sanchez, so it’s highly doubtful Sabean gets any kind of decent value for those players right now.</p>
<p>Granted, what the Giants really need is a solid bat in the infield. Their second base production this year has been a disaster (although recent call-up Matt Downs has showed signs of being a capable bottom-of-the-order player) and Renteria’s offense goes from nauseating to infuriating on a nightly basis. Unless Travis Ishikawa suddenly gets hot (which he could – he does have two home runs in the last four games), the Giants could stand to add a bat at first base, too. (Or allow Pablo Sandoval to play 1B and acquire a third baseman.) That said, Aubrey Huff, Nick Johnson, Mark DeRosa, Troy Glaus, Luke Scott, Adam Dunn, Felipe Lopez and Adam Kennedy are all possibilities.</p>
<p>Also, the Giants have a 25-year old in Nate Schierholtz who is finally getting a chance to play more regularly and is starting to heat up. So with Schierholtz producing and Randy Winn already holding down the other corner spot, is there room for Holliday? Andres Torres is already proving to be a fine fourth outfielder, so if the Giants didn&#8217;t move one of their existing outfielders, acquiring Holliday doesn&#8217;t make much sense.</p>
<p>But if they’re looking to make a splash, then you can&#8217;t get much better than Holliday in terms of what&#8217;s currently available. He knows the NL West, he’s the middle-of-the-order bat that the Giants covet and who knows, maybe he’ll go on an Alcatraz tour, fall in love with the city and decide to sign a long-term deal.</p>
<p>Last year the Dodgers took a risk and traded for Ramirez and wound up in the NCLS. Holliday hasn’t exactly been tearing it up in Oakland this season, but maybe a move back to the NL is exactly what he, not to mention the Giants, need. Either way, San Fran needs an offensive piece to help end their five-year postseason drought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/24/is-matt-holliday-the-answer-to-the-giants%e2%80%99-offensive-woes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could Lee be a trade option for Giants?</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/14/could-lee-be-a-trade-option-for-giants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/14/could-lee-be-a-trade-option-for-giants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors &#038; Gossip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Rowand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Dunn trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bengie Molina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Sabean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Cubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cubs rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Uggla trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derrek Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derrek Lee Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derrek Lee trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giants rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juan Uribe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB trade rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Sandoval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Giants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=19997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Chicago Tribune is speculating that the Giants could make a push to acquire Cubs first baseball Derrek Lee. The paper notes that San Fran’s pitching is good enough to keep them in contention, but the team desperately needs a big bat and Lee could be a viable option given that Chicago has a couple [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://search.espn.go.com/results?searchString=derrek%20lee&#038;start=15&#038;dims=8" target="_blank"><img height="265" width="477" src="http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2007/0520/mlb_g_lee_412.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>The <em>Chicago Tribune</em> is speculating that the Giants <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/chi-14-rogers-whispers-jun14,0,68060.story" target="_blank">could make a push to acquire Cubs first baseball Derrek Lee</a>. The paper notes that San Fran’s pitching is good enough to keep them in contention, but the team desperately needs a big bat and Lee could be a viable option given that Chicago has a couple of replacements for him in Micah Hoffpauir and Jake Fox.</p>
<p>While rumors are definitely fun to discuss, this one looks like it has no teeth. The Cubs haven’t given any indication that they want to deal Lee and even if they have considered it, he’d still have to waive his no-trade clause. (And why would he waive it to go to a team like the Giants?)</p>
<p>The Giants make an easy target in all of this because yes, they do need a bat. Aaron Rowand, Pablo Sandoval, Bengie Molina, Randy Winn and Juan Uribe don’t exactly strike the fear of God into opposing pitchers. But GM Brian Sabean has to be smart here and even though San Fran is playing well, it’s probably not worth it for the Giants to trade young arms (which they’ve got plenty of) so that they can put a band-aid on a deep gash.</p>
<p>Now, if a situation comes up and a club is willing to part with a young bat in order to get a couple of arms, then all bets are off. If the Giants can get a young, productive bat this season that could also add to their rebuilding process, then Sabean would be a fool not to jump on the opportunity. But how often do clubs make young bats available?</p>
<p>The Giants have already been linked to the Marlins’ Dan Uggla and the Nats’ Adam Dunn. Now Lee’s name has been throw into the mix and while it would be tempting for Sabean to add a bat to his weak lineup, none of the aforementioned names are going to help the Giants win a World Series this year so why bother? Why sacrifice the future for half a season?</p>
<p>We’ll see if this rumor grows any legs, but I hardly doubt it will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/06/14/could-lee-be-a-trade-option-for-giants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manny Ramirez, Dodgers have deal in place</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/04/manny-ramirez-dodgers-have-deal-in-place/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/04/manny-ramirez-dodgers-have-deal-in-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Sabean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodgers sign Manny Ramirez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Dodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Ramirez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Ramirez Los Angeles Dodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Ramirez new contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Ramirez rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Ramirez signs with Dodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Sandoval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Giants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=14569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://saltymilk.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/manny_ramirez_dodger.jpg" target="_blank"><img height="318" width="477" src="http://saltymilk.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/manny_ramirez_dodger.jpg" alt="" /></a>

My God, it may be finally over.

According to the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>, free agent Manny Ramirez and the Dodgers <a href="http://www.insidesocal.com/dodgers/2009/03/the-agreement-i.html" target="_blank">have a deal in place on a two-year, $45 million contract</a> and that the outfielder could report to spring training as early as Thursday.

For those that still have a shred of interest in this story after months of speculation, the Dodgers only upped their offer another $3 mil. Manny and Boras just rejected a two-year, $42 million offer last week, but apparently a two-year, $45 million deal was good enough.

Awesome.

There are Americans all over the country losing their jobs hand over fist and these ass clowns (i.e. Boras and Ramirez) put the Dodgers through the ringer for another $3 million? I thought this whole stance by Boras was so that Manny could get at least a three or four year deal? But they eventually broke down and compromised on an extra $3 million? What a joke.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://saltymilk.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/manny_ramirez_dodger.jpg" target="_blank"><img height="318" width="477" src="http://saltymilk.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/manny_ramirez_dodger.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>My God, it may be finally over.</p>
<p>According to the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>, free agent Manny Ramirez and the Dodgers <a href="http://www.insidesocal.com/dodgers/2009/03/the-agreement-i.html" target="_blank">have a deal in place on a two-year, $45 million contract</a> and that the outfielder could report to spring training as early as Thursday.</p>
<p>For those that still have a shred of interest in this story after months of speculation, the Dodgers only upped their offer another $3 mil. Manny and Boras just rejected a two-year, $42 million offer last week, but apparently a two-year, $45 million deal was good enough.</p>
<p>Awesome.</p>
<p>There are Americans all over the country losing their jobs hand over fist and these ass clowns (i.e. Boras and Ramirez) put the Dodgers through the ringer for another $3 million? I thought this whole stance by Boras was so that Manny could get at least a three or four year deal? But they eventually broke down and compromised on an extra $3 million? What a joke.</p>
<p>Good for the Dodgers for never giving in on their two-year offer. They were steadfast all along in that they wouldn’t up the years of their contract offer and they never did.</p>
<p>Anyway, so the one place Manny was always expected to go was the exact place he wound up. The Dodgers are now the clear favorites to win the weak NL West and as long as their pitching holds up and some of the youngsters produce, they’ll have a great shot at battling the Phillies, Mets and Cubs for a pennant.</p>
<p>As for the Giants, one has to wonder if they were ever interested in Manny in the first place or if they just feigned interest in order to mess with the Dodgers. They could have pretended to be interested this entire time in order to delay L.A.’s signing of Ramirez just long enough to piss everybody off. After all, it doesn’t appear that they ever made an official offer to Manny.</p>
<p>But the thing is, GM Brian Sabean isn’t that smart. Chances are, Sabean was interested in Manny the entire time, but just wasn’t willing to pull the trigger with the ghost of Barry Zito’s contract still calling out to him in the dead of the night. Either way, the Giants can continue their rebuilding plan and pray that youngsters Fred Lewis and Pablo Sandoval overachieve this year offensively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/03/04/manny-ramirez-dodgers-have-deal-in-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dodgers vs. Giants: The Manny Ramirez standoff</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/12/dodgers-vs-giants-the-manny-ramirez-standoff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/12/dodgers-vs-giants-the-manny-ramirez-standoff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Rowand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bengie Molina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Sabean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Dodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Ramirez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Ramirez Dodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Ramirez Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Ramirez rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randy Winn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Boras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Who will sign Manny Ramirez?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=12042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
One of the more underrated and overlooked stories in sports right now is the battle going on with the Los Angeles Dodgers and Manny Ramirez. Manny and his agent Scott Boras want at least a five year contract, while the Dodgers want Manny and his agent Scott Boras to look up “realistic” in the dictionary [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/M8BFA46yr6v/Colorado+Rockies+v+Los+Angeles+Dodgers/L6Xn-OSra23/Manny+Ramirez" target="_blank"><img height="318" width="477" src="http://www3.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/Colorado+Rockies+v+Los+Angeles+Dodgers+L6Xn-OSra23l.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>One of the more underrated and overlooked stories in sports right now is the battle going on with the Los Angeles Dodgers and Manny Ramirez. Manny and his agent Scott Boras want at least a five year contract, while the Dodgers want Manny and his agent Scott Boras to look up “realistic” in the dictionary and get back to them.</p>
<p>The Dodgers’ standoff is admirable; finally a club is willing to stand up to a player that probably won’t be worth what he’s asking for in the long run. Manny is a weakness in the outfield, is known for quitting on plays and even worse, quitting on his team. But the guy is still one of the best hitters in the game and given how weak the NL West should be again, the Dodgers would be instant favorites to win the division if they can re-up with Ramirez.</p>
<p>But another battle brewing under the surface is the one between the Dodgers and Giants. San Fran has shown interest in Ramirez, but has balked at his asking price and reports state that <a href="http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/07/report-manny%e2%80%99s-too-expensive-for-giants/">they’re no longer a potential suitor</a>. But does anyone truly believe that the G-Men are taking themselves out of the running and just handing Manny over to their rivals (the frontrunners for Ramirez) at a discounted price? Not a chance.</p>
<p>The Giants are several bats away from competing for a World Series title or even an NLCS berth. But they’re seemingly one big bat away from at least competing in the NL West and the postseason. Their pitching staff is solid and they have enough decent hitters in Bengie Molina, Aaron Rowand, Randy Winn and Edgar Renteria (assuming his bat returns to form now that he’s back in the NL) to be a contender if they can sign Ramirez.</p>
<p>The problem is that after they chose not to re-sign Barry Bonds, Brian Sabean and company pledged to rebuild. Of course Sabean then went out and signed Molina, Dave Roberts and Rich Aurilia – all players well into their 30s – so the Giants can’t use the rebuilding excuse as the only reason not to sign Manny. Still, the team finally has chemistry again and tossing a personality like Ramirez into the mix could ruin an otherwise drama-less atmosphere in the clubhouse. And for what? A shot to maybe contend in the West and then lose in the postseason?</p>
<p>The Manny Ramirez battles have only begun and it’ll be interesting to see who cracks first. Ramirez could get tired of waiting for the Dodgers to offer him a long-term contract and take one of their initial proposals for 2 or 3 years. Worried about the Giants making a move, the Dodgers could also start to get antsy and cave to Boras’s demands. Or the Giants, in fear of wasting good pitching for another year, could seize the moment and put the power hitter smack dab in the middle of their lineup.</p>
<p>I’m sticking with my prediction of a few months ago: Manny will return to the Dodgers. The Giants are too freaked out about another Barry Zito-deal and will stick to their rebuilding plan. I imagine L.A. retains Ramirez with a 3-year contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/12/dodgers-vs-giants-the-manny-ramirez-standoff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Manny’s too expensive for Giants</title>
		<link>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/07/report-manny%e2%80%99s-too-expensive-for-giants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/07/report-manny%e2%80%99s-too-expensive-for-giants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Stalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Zito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Zito contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Sabean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fire Brian Sabean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Dodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Ramirez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Ramirez rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Ramirez San Francisco Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Aurilia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Giants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scoresreport.com/?p=11789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently Manny Ramirez-to-the-Giants was all just one big c*ock tease for San Fran fans that were hoping the club would add some offense.
According to one source familiar with the Giants&#8217; thinking, just about every recent rumor connecting the Giants with Manny is &#8220;unfounded&#8221; or &#8220;baloney.&#8221; 
&#8220;If a million things came together over the next few [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3814396" target="_blank">Manny Ramirez-to-the-Giants</a> was all just one big c*ock tease for San Fran fans that were hoping the club would add some offense.</p>
<blockquote><p>According to one source familiar with the Giants&#8217; thinking, just about every recent rumor connecting the Giants with Manny is &#8220;unfounded&#8221; or &#8220;baloney.&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;If a million things came together over the next few weeks, would it be possible? Maybe,&#8221; the source told ESPN.com. &#8220;But for where [Boras] is right now and where the team is right now, it doesn&#8217;t make sense economically and it doesn&#8217;t make sense for how the team fits together.&#8221;</p>
<p>And the Giants, according to multiple sources, have no interest in pursuing Ramirez or any other free agent looking for large dollars and multiple years. Even reports connecting them with free-agent third baseman Joe Crede, another Boras client, have been exaggerated, sources say.</p>
<p>Industry sources estimate that the Giants&#8217; payroll, with no other additions or subtractions, is already likely to be north of $85 million &#8212; and would be more than $90 million if you include deferred money owed to Barry Bonds. That&#8217;s already significantly higher than last year&#8217;s payroll (about $77 million) and close to the highest in team history.<br />
So signing Ramirez would push them well beyond $100 million. And multiple sources indicate there is virtually no scenario that would allow them to maintain a payroll in that range. </p>
<p>&#8220;They fit because they need the bat,&#8221; one NL executive said. &#8220;They&#8217;re one hitter away from being a real good team. But how do they go to $100 million to add that bat? I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any way that happens.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: how does Brian Sabean still have a job? The guy developed some of the best young pitching talent in the ML, yet successfully combined it with the worst offense known to mankind. And the reason why the Giants’ payroll is so high is because the goofball (I’m referring to Sabean here) gave ridiculous contracts to Barry Zito, Dave Roberts ($18 mil, Sabean? Really?) and Rich Aurilia two years ago.</p>
<p>The guy must have dirt on every person in the Giants’ front office because he should have been gone years ago. And Manny&#8217;s going back to L.A. It&#8217;s the only logical fit at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scoresreport.com/2009/01/07/report-manny%e2%80%99s-too-expensive-for-giants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
